8/22/05 - NPR: NATO Forces Needed in Darfur

General Wesley K. Clark discussed the need for NATO intervention in Darfur on the National Public Radio's (NPR) Morning Edition.
Transcript reprinted with permission.

We encourage you to listen to the program.
Windows Media
Real Player


By Gen. (ret.) Wesley Clark
NPR "Morning Edition"
August 22, 2005
The transcript is available below:


After a series of UN Security Council resolutions on Darfur and a donors conference to boost the African Union Mission there, you could be forgiven for thinking the international community has responded adequately to the crisis. Sadly, this is far from the case. The international community urgently needs to take bold new action.


The truth is, civilians are still targeted in Darfur. The pro-government Janjaweed militias still remain unchecked. Humanitarian access is still restricted along key transit routes and in areas where millions of displaced Sudanese have gathered. Women and girls are still being raped as they leave their camps to collect firewood and forage for food. It's a tragedy.


The African Union's priority must be to protect civilians. It must be able to take all necessary measures -- including offensive action -- against any attacks or threats against civilians and humanitarian operations.


But the AU Mission's force numbers and mandate are simply not sufficient to cope with the reality on the ground in Darfur. The AU current plan is to deploy 7,700 troops next month, and possibly 12,000 troops next year. But this is far too slow. A minimum of 12,000 troops are needed on the ground right now, not six months from now.


The African Union should deploy a battalion task force of around 1,000 troops to each of Darfur's eight sectors and maintain another battalion task force in reserve. Each sector would then have close to 1,000 troops, twice as many civilian police, and 1,000 headquarters and other support staff.


Even if the African Union can overcome the political obstacles to strengthening its mandate in Darfur -- and that's a very big "if" -- it's in no position to get such large numbers of troops on the ground in such a short time. Despite the European Union and NATO assistance, the African Union mission looks set to fall short of its target of 7,700 troops by September.


The UN Security Council, in consultation with the AU, should request and authorize NATO to deploy a multinational "bridging force" to bring the combined force level in Darfur immediately up to 12,000 to 15,000 troops while the African Union prepares and deploys its own forces.


This is not an easy recommendation to make for Darfur, where all multinational organizations have been at pains to keep non-African troops out of Sudan. But the notion that the atrocities in Darfur are solely African problems requiring exclusively African solutions has to be reconsidered. These ongoing offenses are crimes against all humanity. They demand an international response that gives human life priority over diplomatic sensitivities.


Working together, NATO and the AU can save the lives of tens of thousands of innocent civilians. They can demonstrate to outlaw regimes like the government of Sudan that the international community will not tolerate crimes against humanity.


And we must do this now.

Click
images to enlarge and read this child's story
Abd
al-Rahman, Age 13
Taha,
Age 13 or 14
Drawings
and links courtesy of Human
Rights Watch
Submitted by Bruce Holder (not verified) on August 31, 2005 - 1:20am.

Thank you General Clark for your ear.

When I first heard about the Navy men trapped on the Russian Mini-sub, I like many others, was very impressed by the immediate international support. But as I reflected, I wondered why such an international outpouring over a few white Russains while thousands of black Africans were being ignored. The mainstream media played right into it, the dramatic rescue of a few European sailors while ignoring the massacre of thousands of Africans.

Please continue to pay attention to the injustices around the world. Our armed services can be best used for good deeds after this current debacle has been resolved. God help us and God bless you

Formerly -
E5 Lloyd Holder, Combat Medic
B Co, 1st Bn, 12th Inf, 4th Inf Division
Viet Nam, 1969-1970

Currently -
Vice General Chairman
United Transportation Union
UPRR Western Lines Trainmen and Switchmen

Submitted by Nova Hall (not verified) on August 26, 2005 - 10:54am.

The true tragedy is that one of the few men that seemed to have realized the need for public attention to this genocide, was kicked out of this Administration. Or should I say, "not invited back".

I have a green arm-band that I have on all the time to remind me of the situation. The news rarely covers it in any detail. It says "Do not Stand Idly by - Save Darfur" The sad part? When someone asks me what it stands for, I tell them about the situation. They don't know or they think it’s already "better". I'm guessing that the only way anyone will care is if photographs are able to be taken and broadcast around the world.

That, or after a movie is made about it.

Yes...that is highly skeptical of me. This administration has no desire or interest to take solid action. They are just trying to do damage control on Iraq.

Submitted by Carlyn (not verified) on September 13, 2005 - 12:23pm.

You can get a dark green bracelet like the yellow ones for cancer that say "Not On Our Watch-Save Darfur"from the Holocaust Museum in DC. I'm sure you can get them online somewhere.

Submitted by James (not verified) on August 25, 2005 - 11:06am.

Your leadership on issues of preventing and responding to acts of genocide have been truly amazing. The crisis in Darfur far from over, nor will it be over until the thousands of civilians can return to their homes in peace and security.

In the meantime, that even now, over a year after you first spoke of this tragedy that the Janjaweed militias remain unchecked is proof that we need to do more, now. We have delayed too long and it has cost precious time and lives.

It is my hope that world leaders will have your wisdom and foresight in appraoching the Darfur crisis and not shrink from the challenge as was done tragically in Rwanda.

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on August 25, 2005 - 10:14am.

in Darfur.

President Bush and NATO should embrace this Plan at once!!!!!!!

Submitted by armchairanalyst (not verified) on August 24, 2005 - 2:08pm.

Wes seems to be taking a stand on an issue that can win few political points. Thats not politics; thats leadership.

Submitted by dphi (not verified) on August 23, 2005 - 10:17am.

Presuming NATO, as a whole, will do nothing, this would seem to me a perfect opportunity for Germany and France to further distinguish their own positions from that of the U.S. and U.K., by making a direct (non-NATO) offer to supply troops to the AU. I would hope the new administration in Spain would also be happy to join such a coalition. And I think Putin would also be very happy to very publicly participate in a joint mission with these defiant NATO members.

Submitted by Dem4life (not verified) on August 22, 2005 - 10:48pm.

I completely agree with General Clark, but I would like to do more than that. Please let me and all the others receiving your emails know what we can do. Is there a petition we can sign? Is there an organization we should donate to? How can we let our voices be heard on this matter?

Submitted by ian gamache (not verified) on August 22, 2005 - 9:06pm.

I am glad that the general has come fourth with his views on Darfur. It is what needs to be done. And it is important coming from someone with Military knowledge, someone who knows how to handle difficult situations and succeed. This shows that the general is perhaps one of the most compassionate people, as well as someone with a plan and the awareness to carry it out. I hope that Wes Clark will decied to run for office in 2008. But wheather he does or not. He is important, he is great, and he deserves to be listened too.
Thank you. From Canada.

Submitted by RegNYC (not verified) on August 22, 2005 - 6:43pm.

The drawings are heartbreaking.

Submitted by John on August 22, 2005 - 9:16pm.

Yes they are. The old adage of a picture is worth a thousand words holds very true on how these children see their world.

Hiam, one of the General's activists, sent this link to an excellent Flash movie contrasting what we have to be so thankful for in this country and what families and the children face in Africa.

Submitted by Judy from NJ (not verified) on August 22, 2005 - 2:21pm.

Thanks for a very specific plan to help in Darfur. It is a real human tragedy, and I don't understand why the world isn't helping out. I think your idea of having NATO troops serve as a bridge is a good one. I hope others will pick up on your plan.

Submitted by RegNYC (not verified) on August 22, 2005 - 1:30pm.

It's such a tragedy. We've got so many of our troops in this waste of an Iraq war that we don't have any to send in response to a genuine humanitarian crisis.
How long must this go on before someone does something?

Submitted by Carlyn (not verified) on August 22, 2005 - 2:28pm.

I have been saying the same things that General Clark said, and I am so glad that someone as important as him is saying them. 400,000 people have died, 6,000 die a month, 2 million people are displaced in Darfur, and 200,000 are living in Chad. There is so much more that we should be doing. FYI: if anyone is interested in learning more about the crisis and ways to help, a great website is wwww.Africa Action.org

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.