Concerns have been expressed today about General Clark's Wiki page. A blog went up at Daily Kos titled: "Today's Wikipedia Featured Article" (this was General Clark):

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/3/24/182455/858

The author of the Wiki page was the first commenter and also posted the following:

* [new] I am the primary author (2+ / 0-)

The prosecution for The Hague Tribunal have requested General Wesley Clark to appear as a witness in the trial of the Kosovo Six.

"Prosecution wraps up Kosovo Six case
23 March 2007

THE HAGUE -- The prosecution formally rested at the Kosovo Six trial after calling its 111th witness.
However, the prosecutor asked for permission to call three more witnesses: Wesley Clark, Zoran Lilić, and Shaun Burns.

Remarks on Restoring America's Alliances

By Wesley K. Clark

November 20, 2003
COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS
NEW YORK, NY

AS PREPARED FOR DELIVERY

I've been watching

Tavis Smiley’s - “State of Black America”

which has been on C-Span all day today, both prior to, and after Obama’s speech. I was struck before Obama's speech, and have always been impressed with the enormous number of great orators the Black community have. They speak without written speeches, just off the cuff, and Obama pales in comparison to the majority of them.

I'm not dissing Obama, just rather bemused at the fuss over him.

I Remember it Well - from my personal archives relating to General Clark.
This is an OpEd General Clark wrote for the Washington Post - notice the date.
Sorry no links, I only learned to ad links once I started blogging.

"A Long, Tough Job

By Wesley K. Clark

Friday, September 14, 2001

America is indeed at war. The attacks in New York and Washington have raised the dangers posed by international terrorism to a new level. But despite the awful familiarity of the devastation in New York and Washington, an effective U.S. response is likely to be something new and unfamiliar.

From the diaries -- Larry

Reid: President Bush Must Disclose Role in Leak of Intelligence Information

4/12/2006 11:06:00 AM

To: National Desk, Political Reporter

Contact: Jim Manley or Rebecca Kirszner, 202-224-2939, both of Office of U.S. Sen. Harry Reid

WASHINGTON, April 12 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Today, Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid sent the following letter urging the President to fully disclose his role in the selective leak of intelligence information to the American people.

--

The text of the letter follows below.

April 12, 2006

The Honorable George W. Bush

(It seems, as usual, that Bush and Cheney don't care what anyone in the world says, or what they think about these warmongers, they are determined to start another war.)

”Bush’s salon revolutionaries plot an Iran coup
Michael Pinto-Duschinsky
Washington think tanks are pushing for the toppling of another regime

For me the alarm bells began to ring in the unlikely surroundings of the ancient Trout Inn near Oxford. A senior Republican party foreign affairs insider, as hawkish as they come and a staunch backer of the Iraq war, made a bitter complaint about the incompetence of George W Bush’s international policy. If my Republican friend is so critical, I thought, the US president must be in real trouble.

From FDL

"Bush Authorized Libby NIE Release to Press
By Christy Hardin Smith

The latest filing in the Libby case is a doozy, according to the NYSun this morning. If Libby was being truthful in his testimony about this, and if Cheney wasn’t misleading him in his assertion that President Bush authorized Libby to leak selected portions of the NIE to the press (specifically Judy Miller), then I think we’ve discovered a very good reason for Fitz to have met with the President’s attorney just prior to Libby’s indictment.

But that’s the least of the revelation’s implications:

The Republican Party is now branded "Bush" or framed "W"

whichever way you want to call it. They don’t like it and are wishing to re-brand or re-frame

Great post on the front page of Kos by Georgia10; http://tinyurl.com/hkemb

snip...............

"Poor attack puppy Ken Mehlman. Come November, his party may lose control of the House, and if things go really, really well, they might lose the Senate too (a girl can dream, can't she?) A recent RNC memo details how Republicans think they can retain their majority status: by clinging to Bush and the "W" brand. The memo, written by pollster Jan van Lohuizen for RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman, demonstrates the internal debate about whether to embrace Bush or avoid him. There's a lot of good stuff in there, but I'd like to focus on aspect of the memo: