My Diary for sportybabe
Submitted by Tom Rinaldo on March 7, 2007 - 3:52am.
CCN
Something very good happened for all of us these last couple of days. I can see that now and we have you to thank for it sportybabe. Some of that appreciation is for how you have carried yourself over this short emotional span, and some of it is appreciation for who you have been for us over a much longer and more significant span. I know that from first appearances it seems like we all have been in some kind of damage control mode for a day or two, but now I see that there never was any damage to begin with, and there certainly isn't any now.
We just passed through a moment of virtual chaos together. The only possible negative that could have happened didn't, and that would have been if confusion led to any rifts among ourselves, and it did not. The internet is a remarkably "live" medium, so it highlights an immediate jumble of mixed emotions whenever anything significant seems to "happen". It can be kind of like our inside emotions get turned inside out and become visible to others immediately, before we really even have a chance to recognize what they really are ourselves. Usually within a day or so things settle down and we all get to figure out what is real and what is not, what is lasting and what was just an adrenaline reaction.
People here were highly appreciative to read your initial blog on the house meeting you attended, and a lot of old timers, those who immediately knew who you were, were thrilled to see you posting here. I guess I was in the first rather than second category, because though I knew of you from Clarkie lore, I never had a chance to personally interact with you before. So let me say this now. I am thrilled to have you here posting with us now on CNN. I feel like I've been reunited with a sister who I somehow got separated from and never got the chance to know before.
I don't mean to sound clicheist about this, but the fact that we all just had to weather a little emotional storm together, one that pushed our emotional boundaries in different ways, IS an important bonding experience, one that we are emerging out of together now.
What harm was done? None. The matter of the missing three month question, the seeming fire storm it created, was in hind sight really just a fire cracker exploding, momentarily startling but of no lasting significance. And the reason why it even was a fire cracker at all is because tensions have naturally been building, given the uncertainty of if and when Wes Clark will announce for the Presidency.
Those tensions have been building among us here, and they have been building elsewhere in the blogosphere, and in Democratic Party circles in general, so there was an explosive build up, including a lot of frustration with the uncertainty, waiting to be released. The semi-professional political junkies that many major bloggers have become "feel" jerked around by it, which is really their own issue to deal with, certainly not Wes Clark's, or even his core supporters. We know and trust our guy, and we will be there for him no matter what he decides and when he decides it.
So this all was just a story looking for an excuse to be written, by kos and Chris Bowers and others. One way or another they and those others would have found an excuse to "notice" that in their opinion General Clark is not meeting their expectations of how someone who has an interest in running for President should be behaving right now. That seems to be the root of it to me, not even a thoughtful discussion of what it might take for another candidate to now emerge to seriously compete with the two or three currently major media anointed ones. They've bought into the conventional wisdom, and we'll see how well it serves them, as self risen voices of the netroots, to have done so.
A storm cloud was gathering and it broke and the waters it released needed some place where they could flood, and your little personal Diary report ended up being the channel used for that emotional flood. If not that, it would have been something else, water may always take the path of least resistance, but it always finds a path, resistance or not. If we ourselves emerge from this particular flood unscathed, if in fact we emerge from it stronger than we went into it, then there was a blessing within this inevitable storm. I think we are emerging stronger and I think this is our blessing.
Let’s make use of the emotional deluge we all just went through to wash away our frustrations over timelines and horse races and starting gates and posted race times. Oh of course we'll still chatter about all of it, it is after all more interesting than discussing the weather, but we need not be consumed by it any longer. That storm cloud broke, and for Clark's true believers at least, it washed accumulated frustrations away. We are left here stronger among ourselves, focused on what really matters, our community and the mission we still have that binds us together, our mission to support Wes Clark's leadership in preventing a widening war in particular. If that mission expands into a Wes Clark quest for the Presidency, as I think we all hope that it still will, we must be ready for that also, but not driven by it obsessively now.
For me the tension is broken. I still have my opinions of course. If asked I will say that General Clark "should" enter the race in time to participate in the first New Hampshire candidate debate. I know some of you all agree with that and others do not. It doesn't matter. It doesn't change any thing. It is not our decision to make, and the timing of that decision by Wes Clark does not effect my decision to support Wes Clark in whatever he does decide to do.
sportybabe, please don't feel frustrated by what kos or anyone else did or does with what you wrote here. They all have their own agendas, and I don't think it petty to point out that their agendas may not always line up perfectly with our own, and their agendas exist independent of anything you have ever said or ever done, and it will stay that way no matter what you now say or now do. But collectively we can work to make our agenda change their agenda in what we believe are positive ways. That involves our work here together, and that revolves around Wes Clark's work to serve our nation. So if you, if I, if any of us or if all of us want to effect what kos or what anyone else puts on the front page of their blogs, we will do so through our own efforts. We will create that imperative.
In truth I look to you for leadership, but not solely to you. We all need to provide leadership each in our own ways. But I honor you for all the leadership you gave to Draft Clark 04, and of course I know you weren't alone then either. So I take strength from reading you posting here now among us, sincerely, I do. I know that you know what can be achieved when a dedicated group of people set their minds to achieve it. We are stronger for your presence. May the circle be unbroken.
Very eloquently spoken. As Wes always says, "It's good to be with you" as well.
Like I initially said, I've never blogged much before so this whole experience is new to me. I am used to mailing lists where we interact to closed groups.
Thanks again for your diary. I hope to have a chance to meet you and the others I didn't meet in 04 on a possible 08 campaign.
We will DEFINITELY have a chance to meet. New Hampshire is less than 5 hours away for me. In the grand scheme of things that's nothing! I have a similar future rendezvous awaiting with your fellow New Hampshirite Bernie Quigley also. There are many dedicated Clark supporters who still look forward to meeting other committed Clark supporters in person, and we all know that will happen if Wes runs again. The 2008 campaign will be less of a sprint, there's plenty of time remaining for personal face to face networking.
But the amazing thing about the Clark Activist Network (I'm coining the term; "We C.A.N. Do") is that is has been woven continually over the course of almost four years now. So many strands already are personally interconnected. It gives us a strength and resiluency that those politically outside of it can't begin to grasp by looking at us from afar. Were Howard Dean still a free agent possible candidate for President, I have no doubt he would have support like this also, but as it stands what we have collectively achieved, though it may on the surface look easy to copy, can not be duplicated by any other Democrat this year.
We've already been through a lot together, and that gives us a veterans edge that will serve us well doing the work that the coming months will bring. This long learning curve is something that Wes Clark and "C.A.N." didn't have the advantage of in 2004, which is much of the reason why what was achieved back then still is so amazing. But this time we have so much under our belts already. Hey, you even just got a intense crash course in the hidden secondary dynamics of blogging, now during the sleepy mostly out of the spotlight month of March. Now is the time for us all to be tuning up our game in anticipation of the coming hot months of summer.

I've been pretty busy so I didn't really come across this whole controversy, until it had already started to wind down.
Tom is on point and I'll explain.
Of all the accounts we Clarkies write on various blogs etc., your particular post was zeroed in upon. It seemed rather odd. Why pick your post? Why not pick the many other posts. I believe it was because it was a message someone wanted to get out there.
I still believe Wes poses the biggest threat to the Republicans and to his fellow Democrats. Who can argue with a general who has successfully waged war, brought a dictator down without loss of a single American soldier and who is on the speed dials of Ambassadors, heads of state across the world as well as the party's leadership.
I'm guessing he was singled out because his resume makes all the other candidates in BOTH parties pale in comparison and to see him in is going to make their lives MISERABLE. Let the misery begin!

That's why universally everyone in another candidates camp wants him on their administration.
If you need someone to fill gaps in your resume, then perhaps you aren't suitable for POTUS.
Even with Kerry, who wasn't on my short list (cause I viscerally, for no good reason, just don't like him.), I didn't consider him in need of resume filling.
chances in NH and, in your opinion, what are the things to be done to secure a top finish in the state? I believe that Clark left a lot of goodwill and lasting impression the last time. It is a matter of momentum, as many of us believe, and winning or doing well in those early states like NH will be crucial.
Wesley K. Clark... best hope for my grandchildren!
Many of the people in NH who worked on the Clark campaign are now working with Hillary. Many were on loan from Bill's last campaign and were transplanted here from LR and DC.
But the bulk of the activists are still neutral. They are still attending events and sizing up the field.
I would suggest Wes begin communicating with his NH supporters as soon as possible, as often as possible and through a separate NH newsletter. Developing a dialogue with them separate from national mailings is important, talking about the issues that matter to them, highlighting interviews in local newspapers, etc. I don't know where most of his supporters are now, but during the last campaign, we developed regular email NH newsletters which kept everybody updated on his stance on local and state issues. He should meet former supporters as soon as he announces to begin engaging them to keep them from aligning with others.
I also suggest he hire more NH people for the campaign and surround himself with locals. Last time, he was surrounded by the posse from LR and most of the workers were not local and did not know the state. Also suggest HQ let NH control his NH schedule. Don't send him to out of the way places to meet with 10 people instead of scheduling bigger events for 500 to use his time and energy more wisely. Stay on topic as well. If the papers are talking about education, he needs to talk about it. If it's environmental issues, he should be talking about what's relevant to voters at that time.
As Carol Shea-Porter found out, it's retail politics in NH that counts. You don't fundraise. She also conducted viral politics where she did much virtually with a small core of dedicated individuals. Wes could find out more from Carol, as it worked well.
I like how one other campaign sends out invitations electronically for upcoming events well in advance, and asks for RSVP's either yes, no or maybe and # of people who will be attending. Helps determine the size of the venue.
So to answer your question, there's much to do but time to do it.
I am glad as hell you were not pissed off enough to disengage. This is a treasure trove of practical and ground level view of what works. I hope SOMEONE, SOME PEOPLE, are listening. I hope you are fully engage in NH when the time comes.
A while back, there were discussions on what one person could do while waitng for the word. Some of us have taken the position that Clark will run. That much faith we have.
Your post will probably make for an excellent blog here.
Wesley K. Clark... your support befits you!

And that is what I have maintained all along....that "they'll" "find" what "they want" if it "suits them", yet they will ignore contributing to the public good and avoid writing about important issues as they stares them in the face. Instead of being a counterforce to the media, they follow close behind and unwittingly act as their foot soldiers (something that the media welcomes).
So it is unfortunate that some of our Internet hopes of "what could be" have morphed into media accomplice Internet Kingmakers "wannabees". Tragic, no doubt....but expected as it appears that a little power in the wrong hands is dangerous no matter who's the hands belong to.
And to Sportybabe who has, for years, provided much enthusiasm and great perspective on the closed mailing lists......yo go girl! Supporting Wes Clark oftentime equates combating those with ulterior motives. In this instance, those with the agenda will not be so big as to acknowledge their own misdoing, but will prefer to point at this community in hopes of dividing it as a side benefit. They know who they are; and you and the majority here are not amongs them.
I think that is silly.
We don't like Kos's "political opinion" (this time) so you want to throw away a very good and valuable book for political activism... hm.
Kevin
-

So say we all, Tom; although far less eloquently.
Thank you.
Nick Kelly
Wes Clark will be the national security candidate.
'[Y]ou also have a very vibrant online community on your blog. Did that happen organically, or was that by design?
General Clark (chuckles) It wasn't my design.'
Imagine that! We JUST HAPPENED!
I would like to have gotten into more depth, but didn't want to post much on a public blog.
Is there a password protected area within the CCN for Clark activists who can exchange ideas through the website rather than through the mailing lists that got very cumbersome last time around???
But something that only Clark supporters can see and read??
Please advise.
but I'm sure you already knew that. And when you have suggestions to offer that are best not shared in public, it is never a bad idea to contact WesPAC directly, it can be done via email from this site among other ways.
By the way I am answering this question as much for other visitors to this site as I am for you.

That's the difference between Wes and others. Wes's community is a community. This wasn't our first crisis together and although we'd all like it to be our last, it probably won't be. We come together and huddle up when it happens.
I can't speak from experience in the other camps, but I really don't think they are that way. Wes doesn't have individual supporters. He has a community.
Free unofficial stopIranWar.com Buttons