Michael Ware calls McCain's comments about Iraq "beyond ludicrous" & "Neverland"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 28, 2007 - 6:02pm.
Iraq
Hello Everyone:
Below are the link and transcript of John McCain being interviewed by Wolf Blitzer on CNN from Tuesday, March 27 along with Michael Ware's "fact checking" on McCain's comments right after the interview.
Here are 3 points where John McCain was very mistaken in the comments that he made in the interview below:
1) McCain quoted Joe Lieberman's 2006 Senate race to try and deny that most Americans want us out of Iraq:
MCCAIN: "And Joe Lieberman could never have been reelected in Connecticut if it was as clear cut as some describe it that Americans just want us out. Because his opponent, clearly that was his position."
McCain is mistaken about this assumption because Lieberman won that race with MANY REPUBLICAN VOTES that he would not have normally received if he was not endorsed by Sean Hannity and if he was not up against a very weak Republican opponent in Alan Schlesinger who was not even being supported by Bush and by the Republican Party establishment:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connecticut_United_States_Senate_election,_2006
Connecticut United States Senate election, 2006
"From the results as compared to their change in support from the 2000 election, where Lieberman overwhelmingly won alongside a weak Republican challenger, the support from Republicans and Democrats for Lieberman can be gathered. The Democratic vote for Lieberman in 2000 was 63.2%, and fell to 39.7% for Lamont...
It can then be stated that Lieberman received about half his support from people that voted for the Democrat (him) in 2000, and about half his support from people that voted for the Republican in 2000."
2) McCain says about Iraq that "we are achieving success" and that "I'm confident we can succeed if we stay with this strategy:"
MCCAIN: "What I'm saying is we are achieving success...
BLITZER: If the situation a year from now, Senator, is what it is basically today, what will that say to you?
MCCAIN: It won't be. It won't be. It will be better or worse. No military person...
BLITZER: Well, what if it is worse?
MCCAIN: Then obviously we are going to have to examine a set of bad options. But I'm confident it won't be. I'm confident hell won't freeze over. I'm confident we can succeed if we stay with this strategy. And if I'm wrong, we have got a lot more problems than anything it does to my political reputation..."
McCain thinks that we can win this militarily by following Bush's strategy when there has been no political or diplomatic solution yet!
3) McCain is totally disconnected from reality when he admits to this quote and then tries to defend it: "There are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods today. The U.S. is beginning to succeed in Iraq:"
BLITZER: "Here's what you told Bill Bennett on his radio show on Monday. "There are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods today. The U.S. is beginning to succeed in Iraq."
Everything we hear, that if you leave the so-called Green Zone, the international zone, and you go outside of that secure area, relatively speaking, you're in trouble if you're an American.
MCCAIN: You know, that's where you ought to catch up on things, Wolf. General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in a non-armed Humvee. I think you ought to catch up. You see, you are giving the old line of three months ago. I understand it. You certainly don't get it through the filter of some of the media.
But I know for a fact that much of the success we're experiencing, including the ability of Americans in many parts. Not all. We have got a long, long way to go. We have only got two of the five brigades there to go into some neighbors in Baghdad in a secure fashion..."
Michael Ware of CNN, who reports on the ground from Baghdad, has these very blunt comments to say in response to McCain's assertions:
BLITZER: "So is Baghdad really getting safer? A very different view of the reality there from our own reporter on the ground who says Senator McCain couldn't be more wrong. Let's go back to CNN's Michael Ware.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
BLITZER: Michael, you've been there, what, for four years. You're walking around Baghdad on a daily basis. Has there been this improvement that Senator McCain is speaking about?
MICHAEL WARE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, I'd certainly like to bring Senator McCain up to speed, if he ever gives me the opportunity. And if I have any difficulty hearing you right now, Wolf, that's because of the helicopter circling overhead and the gun battle that is blazing just a few blocks down the road.
Is Baghdad any safer? Sectarian violence, one particular type of violence, is down. But none of the American generals here on the ground have anything like Senator McCain's confidence.
I mean, Senator McCain's credibility now on Iraq, which has been so solid to this point, has now been left out hanging to dry. To suggest that there's any neighborhood in this city where an American can walk freely is beyond ludicrous. I'd love Senator McCain to tell me where that neighborhood is and he and I can go for a stroll.
And to think that General David Petraeus travels this city in an unarmed Humvee? I mean, in the hour since Senator McCain has said this, I've spoken to some military sources and there was laughter down the line. I mean, certainly, the general travels in a Humvee. There are multiple Humvees around it, heavily armed. There are attack helicopters, Predator drones, sniper teams, all sorts of layers of protection.
So, no, Senator McCain is way off base on this one -- Wolf...
No way on Earth can a Westerner, particularly an American, stroll any street of this capital of more than 5 million people.
I mean, if al Qaeda doesn't get wind of you, or if one of the Sunni insurgent groups don't descend upon you, or if someone doesn't tip off a Shia militia, then the nearest criminal gang is just going to see dollar signs and scoop you up. Honestly, Wolf, you'd barely last 20 minutes out there.
I don't know what part of Neverland Senator McCain is talking about when he says we can go strolling in Baghdad."
I said last year that John McCain "has virtually no chance to become President in 2008" and I fully stand behind that right now:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/5563
ANALYSIS: John McCain has virtually no chance to become President in 2008!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 17, 2006 - 12:09am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11165
ANALYSIS: Why I think John McCain's Presidential campaign is in big trouble now!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 23, 2007 - 5:34pm.
John McCain is hated by the vast majority of the Neocon GOP activist base so he will not get the 2008 GOP nomination short of a huge miracle happening in his favor!
He has also lost a lot of support among Independents and Democrats for his strong support of Bush's Iraq war policies so there are not many people left in the country who will vote for him where he would have any serious chances of winning even if he ran as an Independent!
If McCain wanted to go to the White House so badly, he probably should have accepted Kerry's VP offer back in 2004! I wonder if he regrets not accepting that offer right now?
Mitch Dworkin
http://www.securingamerica.com/
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10756
StopIranWar.com: "War is not the answer"
Submitted by Wes Clark on February 21, 2007 - 11:40am.
http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!
--------------------
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0703/27/sitroom.03.html
THE SITUATION ROOM
Aired March 27, 2007 - 19:00 ET
BLITZER: Tonight, Democrats say they're taking a new step toward bringing U.S. troops home from Iraq. The Senate voted 50-48 in support of a timetable for withdrawal of the U.S. forces in defiance of a presidential veto threat, but some Republicans calling it a surrender date. The debate is weighing very heavily on the race for the White House and Republican Senator John McCain. I pressed the Arizona Republican about his support for the president's troop buildup and Democrats demands to begin a pullout.
But the Democrats, or at least some of them are saying, you know what, let's say you're right. Maybe you give them another year, the Iraqis -- it's now year five of this war -- give them another year to get their act together, strengthen their military, strengthen their police force, strengthen their whole political environment there and then you begin to leave. Do you think they can get their act together over the next year?
MCCAIN: I'm sure. I'm confident that they can to a large degree, but that's like saying after the Korean War, after we had a cease-fire that we would immediately pull out. We kept our troops there and we keep them there as a stabilizing force. I think that there's no doubt that we may require troops there for a long period of time, a long period of time, but at the same time we can achieve success and American troops withdraw from the front battle lines...
BLITZER: How much time do you think, Senator, the Iraqis need to be really in charge of their own security?
MCCAIN: I don't know the answer to that. And when I venture a guess, then we have a date for withdrawal. What I'm saying is we are achieving success. The key to it is not U.S. presence. It's U.S. casualties and if we can keep U.S. casualties down as we did after the Korean War, obviously, Americans won't mind that and Americans have got to understand the consequences of failure.
Failure is catastrophe. Failure is genocide. Failure means we come back. Failure means they follow us home. The consequences of failure that one of the most disingenuous -- two disingenuous aspects about the Democrats' position -- one is what do you do if we leave? What do you do if Iraq deteriorates into chaos? And second of all, if you really feel this way, if you really feel it, then bring them home tomorrow. That's the intellectually honorable thing to do.
BLITZER: Here's the latest poll in the "USA Today"/Gallop poll asked about setting a timetable for withdrawal by fall of 2008. Sixty percent say they favor such a timetable. Thirty-eight percent say they oppose it. You would be in the 38 percent. Why is the American public or at least the majority of the American public disagreeing with you?
MCCAIN: Because the American public is frustrated and angry and saddened by our failure and mismanagement of the war for nearly four years. And they would like to see us be out of there, but they also want us to succeed. You know better than I do, it's how you ask the questions in a poll. If I ask the question, if I can show you a path to success that involves maintaining a U.S. presence there for an extended period of time, you have 80 percent of the American people say yes, if we can show them path for success. And Joe Lieberman could never have been reelected in Connecticut if it was as clear cut as some describe it that Americans just want us out. Because his opponent, clearly that was his position.
BLITZER: If the situation a year from now, Senator, is what it is basically today, what will that say to you?
MCCAIN: It won't be. It won't be. It will be better or worse. No military person...
BLITZER: Well, what if it is worse?
MCCAIN: Then obviously we are going to have to examine a set of bad options. But I'm confident it won't be. I'm confident hell won't freeze over. I'm confident we can succeed if we stay with this strategy. And if I'm wrong, we have got a lot more problems than anything it does to my political reputation.
BLITZER: Here's what you told Bill Bennett on his radio show on Monday. "There are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods today. The U.S. is beginning to succeed in Iraq."
Everything we hear, that if you leave the so-called Green Zone, the international zone, and you go outside of that secure area, relatively speaking, you're in trouble if you're an American.
MCCAIN: You know, that's where you ought to catch up on things, Wolf. General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in a non-armed Humvee. I think you ought to catch up. You see, you are giving the old line of three months ago. I understand it. You certainly don't get it through the filter of some of the media.
But I know for a fact that much of the success we're experiencing, including the ability of Americans in many parts. Not all. We have got a long, long way to go. We have only got two of the five brigades there to go into some neighbors in Baghdad in a secure fashion.
BLITZER: Let me refer to a few of your colleagues in the Senate and the House. Chuck Hagel, John Murtha, former Senator Max Cleland, the current Senator Jim Webb, they're all like you, Vietnam War veterans. You say this is potentially a worse situation if the U.S. were to withdraw from Iraq as opposed to when the U.S. withdrew from Vietnam.
Why are -- because they're saying, just get out, basically, and you're saying you have got to say. Why do you think these Vietnam War veterans, decorated just as you are, disagree?
MCCAIN: Well, because I hope that all of our experience, knowledge, background and decision-making is not driven by the experience of the Vietnam War. I hope it's an accumulation of all the training, experience and knowledge I had, including 22 years in the military and 24 years in the Congress and the Senate. But, look, don't take my word for it that they'll follow us home. Look at what they say. Look what bin Laden says. Look what Zarqawi says. Look at what Khalid Sheikh Mohammed said at his tribunal down in Guantanamo. They all say the same things. Go on their Web sites. They'll tell you. They want to follow us home. We're their enemy. They're the ones we want to destroy.
They win in Iraq the way they won in Beirut and the way that they won in Somalia, then they will be following us home.
Again, it's not my stated -- not from anything I've written or said. It's what they're saying and writing.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
BLITZER: So is Baghdad really getting safer? A very different view of the reality there from our own reporter on the ground who says Senator McCain couldn't be more wrong. Let's go back to CNN's Michael Ware.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
BLITZER: Michael, you've been there, what, for four years. You're walking around Baghdad on a daily basis. Has there been this improvement that Senator McCain is speaking about?
MICHAEL WARE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, I'd certainly like to bring Senator McCain up to speed, if he ever gives me the opportunity. And if I have any difficulty hearing you right now, Wolf, that's because of the helicopter circling overhead and the gun battle that is blazing just a few blocks down the road.
Is Baghdad any safer? Sectarian violence, one particular type of violence, is down. But none of the American generals here on the ground have anything like Senator McCain's confidence.
I mean, Senator McCain's credibility now on Iraq, which has been so solid to this point, has now been left out hanging to dry. To suggest that there's any neighborhood in this city where an American can walk freely is beyond ludicrous. I'd love Senator McCain to tell me where that neighborhood is and he and I can go for a stroll.
And to think that General David Petraeus travels this city in an unarmed Humvee? I mean, in the hour since Senator McCain has said this, I've spoken to some military sources and there was laughter down the line. I mean, certainly, the general travels in a Humvee. There are multiple Humvees around it, heavily armed. There are attack helicopters, Predator drones, sniper teams, all sorts of layers of protection.
So, no, Senator McCain is way off base on this one -- Wolf.
BLITZER: Michael, when Senator McCain says that there are at least some areas of Baghdad where people can walk around and whether it's General Petraeus, the U.S. military commander, or others, are there at least some areas where you could emerge outside of the Green Zone, the international zone, where people can go out, go to a coffee shop, go to a restaurant, and simply take a stroll?
WARE: I can answer this very quickly, Wolf. No. No way on Earth can a Westerner, particularly an American, stroll any street of this capital of more than 5 million people.
I mean, if al Qaeda doesn't get wind of you, or if one of the Sunni insurgent groups don't descend upon you, or if someone doesn't tip off a Shia militia, then the nearest criminal gang is just going to see dollar signs and scoop you up. Honestly, Wolf, you'd barely last 20 minutes out there.
I don't know what part of Neverland Senator McCain is talking about when he says we can go strolling in Baghdad.
(END VIDEOTAPE)
BLITZER: And we have just learned that two Americans were killed tonight in the heavily fortified Green Zone in Baghdad...
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=4F6EC1A8-3C3D-46DA-81D0-CD5C3C42CC0C&f=00&fg=email (07:45)
McCain losing credibility?
March 28: John McCain has said that things in Iraq are going well. "Countdown" host Keith Olbermann analyzes his claims with Rajiv Chandrasakeran, author of "Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq's Green Zone."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17856294/
'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for March 28
Read the transcript to the Wednesday show
Guests: Rajiv Chandrasekaran, Dana Milbank, John Dean, Tom O‘Neil
OLBERMANN: Progress in Iraq has often been marked by President Bush, especially when he needed most to prop up public support. Further strain is showing, now that the president is citing reports from Iraqi bloggers.
In our fourth story on the COUNTDOWN, Senator John McCain is not only mirroring the president‘s statements about the early success of the surge, he is often going well beyond them, even if he has to then back away from some of the claims almost immediately.
The senator made his pitch on the Senate floor yesterday, completely with a color-coded map.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
MCCAIN: The Baghdad security plan, the surge is working far better than even the most optimistic supporter had predicted. The progress is tangible in many key areas, despite the fact that only 40 percent of the planned forces are in Iraq.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
OLBERMANN: McCain‘s aides say it is the first time he has systematically addressed recent events in Iraq, and off the Senate floor, Mr. McCain went even further, saying in an interview, quote, “General Petraeus goes out there almost every day in an unarmed Humvee.” When challenged on that statement today, the senator notably omitted any claims about unarmed Humvees, saying that he meant that there are neighborhoods that are safe, and that General Petraeus does go out into Baghdad.
Senator McCain also said that, quote, “There are neighborhoods in Baghdad where you and I could walk through those neighborhoods today.”
More on the reality of that in a moment.
Meantime, President Bush today eager to cite an unimpeachable source.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
BUSH: I want to share with you how two Iraqi bloggers—they have bloggers are in Baghdad, just like we got here. (INAUDIBLE). “Displaced families are returning home. Marketplaces are seeing more activity. Stores that were long shuttered are now reopening. We feel safer about moving in the city now. Our people want to see this effort succeed. We hope the governments in Baghdad and America do not lose their resolve.”
(END VIDEO CLIP)
OLBERMANN: Joining us now, the associate editor of “The Washington Post,” former Baghdad bureau chief for the publication, also author of “Imperial Life in the Emerald City: Inside Iraq‘s Green Zone,” Rajiv Chandrasekaran.
Thank you for your time again tonight, sir.
RAJIV CHANDRASEKARAN, ASSOCIATE EDITOR, “THE WASHINGTON POST”: Good to be on with you, Keith.
OLBERMANN: Senator McCain also said on the Senate floor yesterday that, quote, “Markets subject to horrific car bombings have been turned into pedestrian malls.” Obviously, you can‘t gauge progress by only one measure, but there could be pockets of safety without overall security, as you well know. But can we just start with this? Conditions in (INAUDIBLE) Baghdad today are what?
CHANDRASEKARAN: Conditions are Baghdad today are still pretty grim. There are certain places where things have improved. I will hand McCain and the administration that point. But by and large, the city is still incredibly dangerous, incredibly dangerous to foreigners and dangerous to Iraqis.
I‘m in touch with Iraqis all the time. They‘re still living under an incredible climate of fear. They‘re still afraid to go out and about. They don‘t know whether the trip they‘re making to the market or the mosque or to work is going to be the last trip they ever make. So there‘s still a climate of fear. I don‘t think that the Iraqis would take the same sanguine view that Senator McCain has.
OLBERMANN: He also, Senator McCain, that is, made this comment that we cited earlier about the neighborhoods where you or I could walk today. He‘s backed away from that one too. He also said, if we fail in Iraq, bin Laden and Zarqawi are going to follow us, which was a neat trick, because Zarqawi is dead.
But I want to ask you about this assessment, Dana Milbank referenced it, from retired general Barry McCaffrey, who was recently in there with General Petraeus and 16 other senior U.S. commanders, and the general wrote- -- let me read this in full—“No Iraqi government official, coalition soldier, diplomat, reporter, foreign NGO,” nongovernmental organization individual, “nor contractor can walk the streets of Baghdad, nor Mosul, nor Kirkuk, nor Basra, nor Tikrit, nor Najaf, nor Ramadi without (INAUDIBLE) heavily armed protection.”
Is the distance between the kind of thing Senator McCain is saying and the reality on the ground, as General McCaffrey sees it, as great as it sounds, or are these just two people looking at two different parts of the same picture?
CHANDRASEKARAN: No, I think that there is a vast gulf there. And I -
you know, I think it‘s worth noting that General McCaffrey, a respected military leader, was just in Iraq. He‘s been there much more recently than Senator McCain has.
It‘s also worth noting, Keith, that just today, the U.S. embassy put out an all-hands bulletin to its personnel inside the green zone. The green zone‘s that fortified part of central Baghdad, guarded by hundreds of U.S. troops, surrounded by 17-foot-high concrete blast walls. The new directive, all embassy personnel must wear flak jackets and helmets any time they‘re leaving any building inside the green zone.
They‘re also not allowed to congregate by that palace pool, the site of some fairly raucous parties in recent years. And nonessential personnel are not even allowed inside the embassy compound. Why? Because insurgents have been pelting the green zone with literally dozens of rockets and mortars in recent days, and two Americans have been killed in the past week in these attacks.
So people inside the green zone, inside supposedly the most secure part of Baghdad, don‘t feel much safer this week than they did last week.
OLBERMANN: Anybody who‘s dealt with anything ranging from recipes to wars knows the danger of outdated information. Senator McCain has said repeatedly over the last couple of days, people are stuck in a time warp about Iraq, with information from three months ago. He suggests that critics are not looking at what‘s happening now. Is there validity to that point? And on the other side of the same point, can the trees and forests cliche apply to looking at a specific lull in a civil war like this one?
CHANDRASEKARAN: Yes, well, look, you know, you want to compare headlines today to headlines three months ago, I mean, today up in Tal Afar, a place in northern Iraq that President Bush a few months ago hailed as a great success story, well, what did you have? You know, yesterday you had twin car bombings, killing a lot of Shiites, and then apparently early today, you had Iraqi security forces marauding through the town, killing a lot of innocent Sunni civilians, this sort of sectarian tit for tat that has defined much of the conflict there.
Yes, I think it‘s dangerous to sort of say, Well, look, you know, today is much better than it was three months ago. Yes, they have improved here and there. I mean, we have to admit that in Baghdad, there have been some parts of the city that have improved. I think part of it is also not because the U.S. forces are there, it‘s because Shiite militia leaders have decided to rein in their forces.
It‘s a very complicated situation, but I think it‘s still too early to say that this surge is a unqualified success. Even administration officials say, More time is needed before we can judge the efficacy of it.
OLBERMANN: Lastly, I must ask you about the blog that the president cited today. It‘s now been identified. It‘s IraqTheModel.com. There‘s a pair of dentists who‘ve generally been sympathetic to the American mission. They met with the president in the Oval Office three years ago. But as late as last Friday, on the same blog, they said (INAUDIBLE) the administration, quote, “needs to revise the way it‘s been handling and planning for this critical war.” We‘re down to the president quoting a couple of dentists to prove that the surge is working?
CHANDRASEKARAN: Well, you know, there are dozens of Iraqi bloggers. And I dare say IraqTheModel is one of very, very few to be as rosy as it is, just notwithstanding some of their own skepticism about things and some of their own critical comments. I mean, those guys aren‘t idiots.
But, you know, if we do a more representative sample of what Iraqis are writing in their blogs, and I read a lot of them, you won‘t find as optimistic of a portrait as IraqTheModel portrays.
OLBERMANN: Rajiv Chandrasekaran, the former Baghdad bureau chief for “The Washington Post.” Great thanks, again, for your time, sir.
CHANDRASEKARAN: Good to be on with you.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0703/28/ltm.01.html
AMERICAN MORNING
Aired March 28, 2007 - 08:00 ET
JOHN ROBERTS, CNN ANCHOR: Senator McCain grabbing headlines this morning, telling us in the past half hour that the surge in Iraq is working and that neighborhoods are becoming safer.
CNN's Michael Ware joins us now to do a little reality check on what the senator is saying. Michael, you've watched and you've monitored what the senator has been saying over the past few days. Generally, what is your take on it?
MICHAEL WARE, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Well, look, overall, in the broad thrust, the senator is correct to say that the current strategy being employed, headed by the new American commander of the war, General David Petraeus, is, indeed, having an impact on the levels of violence in Baghdad, the capita of Iraq, particularly in terms of sectarian violence. Basically, the civil war. And in many ways, Senator McCain's Iraq policies have been amongst the strongest in a political sphere in D.C.
Nonetheless, the senator went deep overboard when he suggested fantastically that Americans could now dare to stroll the streets of certain parts of Baghdad and, indeed, that the top American commander, General Petraeus, drives about the capital in a Humvee that does not have weapons. So, he really put his credibility on the line there. And we see this morning with you, John, the senator backing away with that, putting his campaign vehicle into high gear reverse.
ROBERTS: Yes. I mean, he definitely said that, well, what I meant to say was that General Petraeus goes out there in the neighborhoods of Baghdad, and he also clarified his earlier comments on the Bill Bennett radio show to say that, I'm not saying people could walk around these neighborhoods without protection.
But he did certainly insist that things are getting better, and he blamed the media, in part, for not portraying that picture.
Let me play a little bit of what he said to me this morning and get you to response to it, Michael.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
SEN. JOHN MCCAIN (R), ARIZONA: The fact is that the neighborhoods are safer, and every indicator of that, the number of bodies found, the number of deaths, the fact is we are making progress. It's still dangerous, it's still a long way to go, but the fact is that things have improved. And much of that you do not get to the American people, and that's just a fact.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
ROBERTS: What do you think about that, Michael, that we're not passing along to the American people the fact that there is some progress in terms of the number of deaths on the streets of Baghdad?
WARE: Well, in terms of the number of deaths from a particularly kind of violence in Baghdad, that's true. But even American commanders on the ground distance themselves from what Senator McCain has said about the broad-term implications of this.
Everybody knows that the insurgents and militias are lying low. Yes, the military is putting stress on them right now. But time and time again, they bounce back. They displace, they move their violence everywhere.
At the end of the day, nothing has really changed. The fundamental dynamics of the war aren't being addressed.
And we see today, with the release of a report for West Point by retired General Barry McCaffrey, where he spells out that Iraq is ripped by a low-grade civil war. Three million Iraqis are displaced, they don't trust their own prime minister. The government isn't functioning.
The police are feared. The army, the Iraqi army, is too small and underequipped.
U.S. support for the war has evaporated and will not return. Current deployment of U.S. forces is not sustainable.
He says, however, that the current strategy could work, that it's still possible to achieve a stable Iraq that doesn't have weapons of mass destruction and doesn't harbor terrorists. But there's nothing about democracy.
And correct me if I'm wrong. Wasn't that the central strategy of the Bush administration plan for this country, to be a shining beacon for the rest of the Middle East?
ROBERTS: And Michael, McCaffrey backs you up as well, saying you can't go out in the neighborhood in Baghdad without an armed escort, as well.
Michael Ware, as always, from Baghdad, thanks. Good to see you, buddy -- Soledad.
WARE: Thank you.
These crazy people mock McCain, have nothing but sheer hatred toward McCain, and they would never let him win the 2008 GOP nomination!
They attack McCain just like how they would any Democrat who they do not like:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html
• Parody: NSA Wiretap Catches McCain: ![]()
• Parody: McCain Explains
• McCain Sings: You're Our Guest Worker Now!
Where Have All the Conservatives Gone? ![]()
It's Open Line Friday!
Dittoheads Have McCain on Their Minds
Why McCain Wins in Arizona:
(1:20)
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-say-mccain-nearly-abandoned-gop-2007-03-28.html
Democrats say McCain nearly abandoned GOP
By Bob Cusack
March 29, 2007
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) was close to leaving the Republican Party in 2001, weeks before then-Sen. Jim Jeffords (Vt.) famously announced his decision to become an Independent, according to former Democratic lawmakers who say they were involved in the discussions.
In interviews with The Hill this month, former Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.) and ex-Rep. Tom Downey (D-N.Y.) said there were nearly two months of talks with the maverick lawmaker following an approach by John Weaver, McCain’s chief political strategist.
Democrats had contacted Jeffords and then-Sen. Lincoln Chafee (R-R.I.) in the early months of 2001 about switching parties, but in McCain’s case, they said, it was McCain’s top strategist who came to them.
At the end of their March 31, 2001 lunch at a Chinese restaurant in Bethesda, Md., Downey said Weaver asked why Democrats hadn’t asked McCain to switch parties.
Downey, a well-connected lobbyist, said he was stunned.
“You’re really wondering?” Downey said he told Weaver. “What do you mean you’re wondering?”
“Well, if the right people asked him,” Weaver said, according to Downey, adding that he responded, “The calls will be made. Who do you want?” Weaver this week said he did have lunch with Downey that spring, pointing out that he and Downey “are very good friends.”
He claims, however, that Downey is grossly mischaracterizing their exchange: “We certainly didn’t discuss in any detail about the senator’s political plans and any discussion about party-switchers, generically, would have been limited to the idle gossip which was all around the city about the [Democrats’] aggressive approach about getting any GOP senator to switch in order to gain the majority. Nothing more or less than that.”
Downey said Weaver is well aware that their discussion was much more than typical Washington chit-chat.
“Within seconds” of arriving home from his lunch with Weaver, Downey said he was on the phone to the most powerful Democrats in town. One of the first calls he made was to then-Senate Minority Leader Daschle.
“I did take the call from Tom [Downey],” Daschle said in an interview. “It was Weaver’s comment” to Downey that started the McCain talks, he added.
Daschle noted that McCain at that time was frustrated with the Bush administration as a result of his loss to George W. Bush in the 2000 Republican primary.
Daschle said that throughout April and May of 2001, he and McCain “had meetings and conversations on the floor and in his office, I think in mine as well, about how we would do it, what the conditions would be. We talked about committees and his seniority … [A lot of issues] were on the table.”
Absolutely not so, according to McCain. In a statement released by his campaign, McCain said, “As I said in 2001, I never considered leaving the Republican Party, period.”
Some of the meetings Daschle referred to are detailed in the former senator’s 2003 book.
Other senators who played major roles in the intense recruiting effort, according to Democrats, were then-Sen. John Edwards (D-N.C.) as well as Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Harry Reid (D-Nev.)...
MCCAIN MEMORY:
'I was approached by Kerry to run as his running mate and I rejected it out of hand'...
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/mccain-no-truth-in-claims-he-was-close-to-bolt-from-the-gop-2007-03-30.html
McCain Said VP Slot 'Was Never Offered' By Kerry...
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,124970,00.html
McCain Said 'Obviously, I Would Entertain' Running With Kerry...
http://www.theoaklandpress.com/stories/040704/nat_20040407053.shtml

I believe whatever he says. He is the best in country reporter we have in Iraq.
This is the definitive statement on where we are in Baghdad.
WARE: I can answer this very quickly, Wolf. No. No way on Earth can a Westerner, particularly an American, stroll any street of this capital of more than 5 million people.
I mean, if al Qaeda doesn't get wind of you, or if one of the Sunni insurgent groups don't descend upon you, or if someone doesn't tip off a Shia militia, then the nearest criminal gang is just going to see dollar signs and scoop you up. Honestly, Wolf, you'd barely last 20 minutes out there. (End)
Imagine: We destroyed the mighty German War machine and were walking the streets of Berlin in less time than we have been in Iraq!!