ANALYSIS: Why Rush Limbaugh is especially vulnerable to attack right now!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on October 2, 2007 - 10:44am.
Media
Hello Everyone:
It is definitely my opinion that Rush Limbaugh is especially vulnerable to attack right now because of the MoveOn.org "Betray Us" ad and also because of his extremely hypocritical behavior!
I was really glad to see Gen. Clark and Jon Soltz take the lead in going after Rush Limbaugh for his "Phony Soldiers" comment:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12727
Phony Soldier?
Submitted by Wes Clark on September 28, 2007 - 11:11am.
Jon Soltz in my opinion did an excellent job in this Hardball debate against Neocon Buzz Patterson on Friday, September 28. He also put out an open challenge to Rush Limbaugh in this video:
http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-us&brand=msnbc&tab=m5&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/&fg=&from=00&vid=f0aaafa6-f5bb-4c13-ae7b-ef0567e97352&playlist=videoByTag:mk:us:vs:0:tag:Source_Hardball:ns:MSNVideo_Top_Cat:ps:10:sd:-1:ind:1:ff:8A (7:15)

Are anti-war troops “phony soliders?”
Sept. 28: Rush Limbaugh used his nationally syndicated radio show to say troops who support withdrawal from Iraq are “phony soldiers.” Are they? A “Hardball” panel debates. Watch video
http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-us&brand=msnbc&tab=m5&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036697/&fg=&from=00&vid=f0aaafa6-f5bb-4c13-ae7b-ef0567e97352&playlist=videoByTag:mk:us:vs:0:tag:Source_Hardball:ns:MSNVideo_Top_Cat:ps:10:sd:-1:ind:1:ff:8A (7:15)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21083689/
'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for Sept. 28
Read the transcript to the Friday show
Guests: Jon Soltz, Buzz Patterson, Mario Cuomo, Peter Berg, Craig Crawford, Michelle Bernard
JON SOLTZ, CO-FOUNDER, VOTEVETS.ORG: "And, for Rush to say that, I mean, hey, I just want to know—invite me on the show, brother, because I want to have a one-on-one discussion about how our service is—is phony, when this is a guy that, you know, didn‘t go to Vietnam because he had a bump on his butt.
So, I mean, this guy is a draft dodger. We need to have this debate, so let‘s have it..."
Give Keith Olbermann credit for also going after Rush Limbaugh in this Countdown video from Friday, September 28 where he discusses Limbaugh with Howard Fineman and has an excellent interview with Gen. John Batiste of VoteVets.org:
http://video.msn.com/?mkt=en-us&brand=msnbc&tab=m5&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/&fg=&from=00&vid=400c98e8-7092-4a13-a8d8-c70674b593e8&playlist=videoByTag:mk:us:vs:0:tag:Source_Countdown:ns:MSNVideo_Top_Cat:ps:10:sd:-1:ind:1:ff:8A (10:24)
Sept. 28: Newsweek’s Howard Fineman discusses Rush Limbaugh’s “phony soldiers” comment as well as American Conservative magazine calling Gen. Petraeus a “Sycophant savior.”
I would definitely disagree with these comments made by Howard Fineman in this video where he does not think that going after Rush Limbaugh should be a top priority now:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21083685/
'Countdown with Keith Olbermann' for Sept. 28
Read the transcript to the Friday Show
Guests: General Batiste, Elizabeth Edwards, President William Jefferson Clinton, John Ridley
HOWARD FINEMAN, SENIOR WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT, “NEWSWEEK”: "The Democrats really have the upper hand on the issue here. If they want to try to score points on Limbaugh, I think they can. If they want to try to score points on the “American Conservative” my point would be, who really cares? They can do that, too..."
Democrats and Non-Neocon Republicans have another big opportunity to legitimately go after Rush Limbaugh and the extreme right wing media right now which is what I think that they need to do in order to expose his slanderous comments as well as to weaken the huge amount of influence that he will have in the 2008 election among any impressionable people who listen to him!
Democrats and some media pundits in my opinion have made the mistake of going after Rush Limbaugh for a particular incident on a one time basis, they have let him reply back (which he always does and very hard), and then they just let the issue go with nothing more said about it. This kind of behavior only empowers Limbaugh!
A) John Kerry was guilty of doing this:
http://securing.advomatic.com/ccn/node/7662
DOCUMENTATION: John Kerry finally takes a public stand against Rush Limbaugh!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 27, 2006 - 6:40am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9351#comment-147279
John Kerry has no concept about how to deal with media attacks:
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on October 31, 2006 - 3:27pm.
B) There was also another great opportunity that was missed by Democrats and by the media pundits in going after Limbaugh when the Imus controversy was in the news:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11762
Keith Olbermann asks good questions about Imus leading to the Fairness Doctrine!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 13, 2007 - 4:35pm.
Here is how Democrats, media pundits, and Non-Neocon Republicans can credibly go after Rush Limbaugh over his extremely slanderous statements and his very blatant hypocrisy:
1) Use the MoveOn.org "Betray Us" ad against Limbaugh because he first used that phrase in reference to Sen. Chuck Hagel back on 1/25/07:
RUSH: "Right. By the way, we had a caller call, couldn't stay on the air, got a new name for Senator Hagel in Nebraska, we got General Petraeus and we got Senator Betrayus, new name for Senator Hagel..."
Right below is the full transcript of that dialogue in a Rush Limbaugh article titled "Drive-By Hysterics Over Cheney Interview" from January 25, 2007. Below that is Limbaugh's reaction to this issue in an article titled "David Shuster's Rush Obsession" from September 25, 2007.
Keith Olbermann correctly brought this up as a legitimate issue and I have seen hardly any follow up to it since then:
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=3746e915-044d-49dd-b14a-491580f38878&p=Source_Countdown&t=c1149&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/&fg= (01:59)
Worst Person in the World
![]()
Sept. 24: Rush Limbaugh
Sept. 24: Comedian Rush Limbaugh called Moveon.org’s "Betray-Us" Ad "contemptible" and "indecent," even though he was the first to introduce the pun on Gen. Petraeus's ad to national broadcasting.
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?f=00&g=3746e915-044d-49dd-b14a-491580f38878&p=Source_Countdown&t=c1149&rf=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3036677/&fg= (01:59)
Rush Limbaugh NEVER allows any attacks on him by Democrats, by Non-Neocon Republicans, and by the media to ever go unanswered:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12727#comment-244744
Rush Limbaugh's response to the "Phony Soldiers" comments:
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on October 1, 2007 - 8:08am.
Keith Olbermann demonstrated the right way how to fight back against Limbaugh's attacks which is how he defines his political enemies and this is also what is very badly lacking right now in my opinion. Keith Olbermann cannot be doing all of the work by himself of going after Limbaugh and the extreme right wing media!
2) Rush Limbaugh is a hypocrite for defending "a decorated, four-star general" (General Petraeus) in the last article below titled "Drive-Bys Slander General Petraeus" from September 13, 2007 while he mocks another "decorated, four-star general" (Gen. Wes Clark) by lying about him and by constantly referring to him as being "Ashley Wilkes:"
RUSH: "Not one of those is repeated. That's Chris Matthews on Hardball last night referring to a decorated, four-star general in full dress as a "dog and pony show." Look it, folks, there's an alliance -- you know it; I know it - between Democrats and the media, and it is to fulfill and project and advance a specific agenda..."
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12727#comment-244230
Limbaugh has attacked Gen. Clark by calling him "Ashley Wilkes" and by lying about him many times in the past!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on September 28, 2007 - 11:47am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11989
REFUTATION: Rush Limbaugh attacked Gen. Clark and lied about him on Wed., May 2!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on May 3, 2007 - 12:52am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11989#comment-210599
Limbaugh's last "Ashley Wilkes" attack on Gen. Clark before this
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on May 16, 2007 - 1:05pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9886
Swiftboat attacks on Gen. Clark / We will have to be ready to defend him soon!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 29, 2006 - 2:20am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/5599
TRANSCRIPTS & ANALYSIS: Rush Limbaugh mocks Gen. Wes Clark & Eli Segal's funeral
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 19, 2006 - 3:58am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/4249
Ashley Wilkes: Our Troops Rough Up Women / Rush Limbaugh publicly attacked Gen. Wes Clark on Wednesday, Feb. 1
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 2, 2006 - 1:51am.
This is hypocrisy to the core on the part of Rush Limbaugh in my opinion!
3) Bush, The RNC, and Limbaugh all demonized and went after the MoveOn.org "Betray Us" ad as representing the entire Democratic Party:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/13442
Why I agree with Gen. Clark calling the MoveOn.org ad "a big mistake tactically"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on September 25, 2007 - 9:36am.
They also did the exact same thing with Rosie O'Donnell:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11952
RNC:"No Joke! Dems Take O'Donnell View; Take Policy Advice From Rosie O'Donnell"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 30, 2007 - 4:52pm.
The bottom line is that MoveOn.org and Rosie O'Donnell do NOT officially represent the Democratic Party while Limbaugh has official connections to Bush and to the RNC:
http://www.gop.com/GetActive/CallTalkRadio.aspx
CALL TALK RADIO STATIONS
The Rush Limbaugh Show Rush Limbaugh 1-800-282-2882 (Limbaugh is right at the top of their long list)
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12782
DOCUMENTATION: Rush Limbaugh claims to & controls who the GOP nominee will be!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 25, 2007 - 11:58pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12971
Bush met with 10 Neocon talk radio hosts and in private with Rush Limbaugh!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 9, 2007 - 3:28am.
Democrats, Non-Neocon Republicans. and the media need to connect all of these things to Limbaugh and then ask Republicans if they will distance themselves from these comments just like how they are asking Democrats to do with the MoveOn.org "Betray Us" ad:
A) Rush Limbaugh has definitely made a lot of very stupid, insulting, and ridiculous comments which Democrats can credibly use to run against Neocon GOP candidates who he is supporting in my opinion:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11762
Keith Olbermann asks good questions about Imus leading to the Fairness Doctrine!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 13, 2007 - 4:35pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9373
How Democrats (especially Jim Webb) can use Rush Limbaugh to their advantage!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 1, 2006 - 9:12am.
2) Neocon Republican candidates who Rush Limbaugh is supporting should be asked if they agree with him that "unity is not possible:"
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_081607/content/01125109.guest.html
Elite, Effete Media Snobs Up in Arms over Rush-Rove Interview
August 16, 2007
"But unity is not possible... But unity is a strange thing. In fact, some of the greatest times in our history are when we have been divided about things. That's what you get debate. That's when you get people shouting and committing with passion what they really believe. Unity requires somebody to shut up. Unity is going to require somebody to cave on what they believe in. Unity is just a code word for: "We need to end the partisan bickering," and when a liberal says, "We need to end the partisan bickering," it means, "Conservatives need to shut up, and if they won't shut up, we'll make 'em shut up," i.e., the Fairness Doctrine."
3) Neocon Republicans need to be asked if they disagree with Limbaugh making fun of John Kerry's military service like how he does in this picture and audio:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html

Lt. Kerry's Purple Hearts Club Band (2:24)
4) Neocon Republicans need to be asked if they agree with Limbaugh that Democrats "Hate the USA" as he says in this audio:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/today.guest.html
Instant Classic: We Hate the USA (2:38)
He also said the same thing in this article:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_012507/content/institute.guest.html
Why Liberals Hate America
January 25, 2007
5) Neocon Republicans should be asked if they agree with Limbaugh's comments about those who disagree with him on the war when he said "screw you!... so just go away!" and if they believe that Joe Wilson is "a pimple on a pig's butt:"
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_071607/content/01125100.guest.html
America's Real Anchorman
July 16, 2007
"'We have to get out of Iraq, Mr. Limbaugh, because I feel uncomfortable. I don't like what's happening. I don't like the roadside bombs.' Well, screw you! You know, the country won't survive with people like you in charge of things, so just go away!"
"Joe Wilson is a pimple on a pig's butt."
The fact of the matter as far as I am concerned is that Rush Limbaugh is NOT "right wing" or "Conservative" in any mainstream sense of the words but rather he and Neocon ideologues like him are what I call "Extreme right wing" and "Neoconservative:"
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12716
ANALYSIS: Extreme right wing vs. right wing/Neoconservative vs. Conservative!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 19, 2007 - 9:07am.
Rush Limbaugh has very little love for moderate and Non-Neocon Republicans who are not as ideological as he is which I have credibly documented:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9424
ANALYSIS: Keeping moderate Republicans at home if they won't vote for a Democrat
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 3, 2006 - 9:26am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11240
ANALYSIS: Division in the GOP over who is "conservative" based on foreign policy
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 28, 2007 - 5:46pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11920
ANALYSIS: Exactly how Extreme and Arrogant that the Neocon GOP Activist Base is!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 27, 2007 - 4:02pm.
This is why I think that moderate and Non-Neocon Republicans should join with Democrats in opposing Rush Limbaugh right now while he is so vulnerable to legitimate attacks!
The bottom line in my opinion is that if Bush and the Neocon GOP activist base can use MoveOn.org and Rosie O'Donnell to try and demonize all Democrats as being identified with them (which they are not), then Democrats and Non-Neocon Republicans can legitimately identify Rush Limbaugh with all Neocon Republicans because he does have official connections to them!
Mitch Dworkin
http://www.securingamerica.com/
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10756
StopIranWar.com: "War is not the answer"
Submitted by Wes Clark on February 21, 2007 - 11:40am.
http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!
--------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_012507/content/truth_detector.guest.html
Drive-By Hysterics Over Cheney Interview
January 25, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Vice President Cheney was on the Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer, who had to sneak in under the guise of a group of critics, a question about the vice president's daughter. Blitzer said, “Your daughter, she's going to have a baby. A statement from someone representing Focus on the Family: ‘Mary Cheney's pregnancy raises the question of what's best for [churrin.] Just because it's possible to conceive a child outside of the relationship of a married mother and father doesn't mean it's best for the child.’ Do you want to respond to that?”
CHENEY: No, I don't.
BLITZER: She's a obviously a good daughter –
CHENEY: I'm delighted I'm about to have a sixth grandchildren, Wolf, and obviously I think the world of both my daughters, and all of my grandchildren -- and I think, frankly, you're out of line with that question.
REPORTER: I think all of us appreciate your daughter --
CHENEY: I think you're out of line.
RUSH: Would you like to hear a media montage reacting to this? Who do we have here? We've got Ann Curry of NBC, Soledad O'Brien of CNN, Jim VandeHei of the Washington Post, Amy Robach from MSNBC, and Democrat strategerist Mark Walsh talking about this.
CURRY: The vice president bristled during an interview.
O’BRIEN: Combative interview with CNN's Wolf Blitzer, things got pretty testy.
VANDEHEI: He's very in your face.
ROBACH: The vice president got visibly angry.
WALSH: Dick Cheney is a pompous, egocentric maniac.
RUSH: Right. Well, let's go back to September 24th, 2006.
CLINTON (Monatge): I'm being asked this on the Fox network. ABC just had a right-wing conservative running their little Pathway to 9/11, falsely claiming it was based on the 9/11 Commission report. So you did Fox's bidding on this show, you did your nice little conservative hit job on me. You set this meeting up because you're going to get a lot of criticism from your viewers because Rupert Murdoch spoiled my work on climate change, and you came here under false pretenses, and you don't care. You falsely accuse me of giving aid and comfort to bin Laden because of what happened in Somalia. You intended, though, to move your bones by doing this first, which is perfectly fine. I always get these clever little political deals where they ask me one set of questions and the other guys another set.
RUSH: Okay, so here's Clinton, you all remember this, losing his cool, Chris Wallace, Fox News Sunday. Following, that was on September 24th, 2006, the Associated Press ran the story on September 27th, three days later. “Is It Cool to Lose Your Cool?” “That's one of the questions of the week as we evaluate and reevaluate Bill Clinton's finger pointing, knee poking interview with Chris Matthews on Fox. The first debate, of course, was whether Clinton had actually lost it, had a full-bore tantrum, one conservative columnist called it, or knew exactly what he was doing.” The piece goes on to analyze, is it okay to lose your cool on TV now when you're insulted? Is it okay to do it?
Just like when the lies got too many to count and remember the nineties, we got stories in the AP on how little white lies are actually healthy, they're good for us, they spare people's feelings. So here you got Clinton who was in your face and pointing his finger at Chris Wallace and doing a pretty good intimidation job -- well, he tried to. Cheney, calm, cool, collected and so forth, and the Drive-Bys are going nuts over how he lost his temper, he's a pompous, egocentric maniac; he got visibly angry. The contrast could not be more stark. We pick up now with the Blitzer-Cheney interview. Blitzer said, “Some of your good Republican friends in the Senate and in the House are now seriously questioning your credibility because of the blunders of the failures.”
CHENEY: Wolf, I simply don't accept the premise of your question. Remember with me what happened in Afghanistan. The United States was actively involved in Afghanistan in the eighties, supporting the effort against the Soviets. The Mujahideen prevailed, everybody walked away. And an Afghanistan within relatively short order the Taliban came to power, they created a safe haven for Al-Qaeda, training camps were established where some 20,000 terrorists during the late nineties, and out of that -- out of Afghanistan because we walked away and ignored it, we had the attack on the USS Cole, the attack on the embassies in east Africa and 9/11, where the people trained and planned in Afghanistan for that attack and killed 3,000 Americans. That is what happens when we walk away from a situation like that in the Middle East.
RUSH: Does that sound like Cheney is standing up in righteous indignation and pointing his finger at Blitzer and demanding that he shut up and accusing them doing a hit piece, does it sound like that at all? No, it doesn't. Next question from Wolf Blitzer. “What if the Senate passes a resolution saying this is not a good idea? Will that stop you?”
CHENEY: It won't stop us, and it would be I think detrimental from the standpoint of the troops, as general Petraeus said yesterday. He was asked by Joe Lieberman, among others, in his testimony about this notion that somehow the Senate could vote overwhelming for him, send him on his new assignment and then pass a resolution at the same time and say but we don't agree with the mission you've been given.
RUSH: Right. By the way, we had a caller call, couldn't stay on the air, got a new name for Senator Hagel in Nebraska, we got General Petraeus and we got Senator Betrayus, new name for Senator Hagel. Here’s another question from Blitzer, “Here's the problem that you have. The administration, credibility in Congress with the American public, because of the mistakes, because of the previous statements, the last throes, the comment you made a year and a half ago, the insurgency was in its last throes. How do you build up that credibility because so many of these Democrats and a lot of Republicans now are saying that they don't believe you anymore.”
CHENEY: Well, Wolf, if the history books were written by people who have so eager to write off this effort to declare it a failure, including many of our friends in the media, the situation obviously would have been over a long time ago. Bottom line is that we've had enormous successes and we will continue to have enormous successes. It is hard, it is difficult. It's one of the toughest things any president has to. It's easy to stick your finger in the air and figure out which way the winds are blowing and then try to get in front of the herd. This president doesn't work that way.
RUSH: And then they have this exchange about Hillary.
BLITZER: Do you think Hillary Clinton would make a good president?
CHENEY: No, I don't.
BLITZER: Why?
CHENEY: Because she's a Democrat. I don't agree with her philosophically and from a policy standpoint.
BLITZER: Do you think she will be president, though?
CHENEY: I don't.
RUSH: Sound angry? Sound like an ego maniacal pompous buffoon as he was called by Democrat strategist there? And yet with Bill Clinton losing it, we got stories on, “Maybe this is cool, maybe it's time for this kind of thing to stop this bullying tactic that Fox News is so famous for.” Anyway, you can't get more direct than that.
"Do you think Hillary Clinton would make a good president?"
"No, I don't."
"Why?"
"Because she's a Democrat."
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
(The Hotline: Cheney To Blitzer: Mary Cheney Questions "Out Of Line")
(Rush Limbaugh: Losing Your Temper Is Good for You!)
(AP: Some Say Clinton's Outburst Is Refreshing)
In 1998, Clinton Made Lying Cool...
(Plain Dealer: They Want Clinton to be a Saint -02.04.98)
(Boston Herald: To Tell the Truth - Clintons' Troubles Get Couples Talking -03.19.98)
(Rocky Mountain News: When -- If Ever -- Is Lying OK? -08.02.98)
(CNN & Time Magazine NewsStand: The Truth About Lying -09.06.98)
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_092507/content/01125109.guest.html
David Shuster's Rush Obsession
September 25, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Your host was brought up again on television last night. You know, these people at MSNBC are just warts on the back end of a hog. They're really trying, but it's pathetic. Here, I'll give you an example. They're all upset here that because the MoveOn.org people got called on the "Betray Us" ad, and they're beside themselves over this, and they're upset that, by the way, a Rasmussen poll out yesterday found 23% of Americans approved of the MoveOn.org ad in the New York Times; 58% disapproved of it. It failed. It bombed miserably. MoveOn.org has now offered or has paid the difference so that they were charged the full rate. The New York Times has come out and after two weeks and admitted that it was a political in-kind donation. Their excuses for this are just pathetic. They were just advancing their own agenda. Everybody knew it, and the ad didn't work. It bombed miserably, and, of course, the left had high hopes for this ad. They had high hopes they were going to destroy Petraeus, destroy Bush -- and the exact opposite happened. So now they're out there trying to say, well, you know, it wasn't MoveOn.org that first came up with the phrase "Betray Us."

SHUSTER: Where was the outrage when Rush Limbaugh said this about Republican Senator Chuck Hagel over one of the senators' stances on Iraq. Limbaugh said, "By the way, we had a caller call, couldn't stay on the air, got a new name for Senator Hagel in Nebraska. We got General Petraeus, and we got Senator Betray Us, new name for Senator Hagel."
RUSH: And now they're trying to say that I invented the name, and MoveOn.org was just copying me. Well, of course, I get everything started in this country -- ask Donovan McNabb -- but they're trying to say, "Hey! Hey! To hell with MoveOn.org! Limbaugh started it." They had a congressperson on last night, Marsha Blackburn, a Republican from Tennessee, and they ambushed her over the death of a soldier in Iraq, who they claim was from her district, that she didn't know about. It turns out he was not. I haven't had a chance to read this whole thing. I don't think the dead soldier was from her district. They accused her of not knowing the name and circumstances of an 18-year-old soldier that died from her district. She didn't know who it was and Shuster just really piled up. It was mean and cruel. It was everything liberals claim they're not. I don't know what's happened to David Shuster. He used to be okay when he was at Fox, but he's gotten over there, drinking the Kool-Aid at Mess-NBC. I guess trying to make a difference. They're trying real hard over there. Okay, so now, I -- your host, the Doctor of Democracy -- am responsible for the whole name "Betray Us" being in the public dialogue. So let's move on. That was David Shuster, by the way, in that bite that you just heard. Let's move on now. This is the same guy, Shuster, hosting the Chatsworth Osborne, Jr., show on PMSNBC, that would be Tucker Carlson, and Shuster says to Marsha Blackburn, Republican, Tennessee, "You want to take this opportunity to condemn what Rush Limbaugh said about Chuck Hagel?"
BLACKBURN: What I want to do is talk about the New York Times, and probably Rush Limbaugh could have gotten by without saying that.
SHUSTER: Could have gotten by? It was wrong, wasn't it?
BLACKBURN: He was referencing what a caller said, and --
SHUSTER: Right, but it was wrong for a caller or from Rush Limbaugh to call Chuck Hagel Senator Betray Us, right?
BLACKBURN: But Rush Limbaugh did not go in and buy an ad and place it with the New York Times and get a special preferred rate.
SHUSTER: So there's a difference between buying an ad in the New York Times and Rush Limbaugh hearing something that he likes to hear from one of his viewers and repeating it on the air? What's the distinction? Why is there a distinction?
BLACKBURN: Rush Limbaugh should not have done that, but Rush Limbaugh did not go out and buy an ad and circumvent the New York Times.
RUSH: Anyway, don't hold it against her. She's a good congresswoman. She just got sandbagged. She thought she was being brought on to discuss other things, and they ambushed her on a bunch of other things. She has no business defending me. She doesn't have to defend me. She could have said that easily. I don't apologize for anything anyway. I'm not going to take it back. I was talking about Senator Hagel in the "betray us" sense, not betraying the country, not betraying the mission. The whole MoveOn.org ad, the Betray Us thing, was that he's lying to us -- and the whole Democrat Party, in the House and the Senate, when they interrogated him, told him up front: We're not going to believe a thing you say. We're not going to believe one word that you say. He's a decorated four-star general. He's sitting there in full-dress uniform. He has come to give a report that they demanded! Congress demanded the report. He's giving it, and they're calling him a liar before he says a word. They are undermining his mission. They're undermining the troops under his command. Chuck Hagel is a senator. Chuck Hagel is fair game.
I was talking about Chuck Hagel in terms of his loyalty to the Republican Party, not anything to do with whether or not he's selling out the country and investing in defeat for the country. I was talking about him vis-à-vis his position in the Republican Party. It was a political comment. If he wants to respond politically, he can. The general can't. The general's mouth has to be shut. He can't get into politics. The Democrats knew this. They can call him a liar all they want, and you can't do anything about it -- other than say, "Every word I'm speaking here I wrote myself and nobody has cleared it." But, you know, you can't get into the political game while in command and in uniform. So, anyway, it's funny. (laughing) These guys are just beside themselves making an issue out of nothing. I don't have enough fingers nor hands, to count -- over the 19-plus years -- the number of times little row boats like David Shuster have attempted to sink me, a battleship, with a BB. Over 19 years, they have given me everything they have. They have blamed me for the Oklahoma City bombing. You know all know the drill.
They have tried everything to discredit me with you and with the American people. They've tried to destroy my reputation. The president of the United States made a racist joke at the White House Correspondents Dinner at my expense, and it hasn't worked. None of it has worked. And these guys, instead of launching these silly little BBs that they think are going to hit home, better start asking themselves how come their efforts don't work. Because there is an answer to it, and it's an answer that could really help them in trying to get their little fledgling network some serious audience. But they're not going to learn it. They're liberals, and they applaud themselves at the end of such techniques. "Yeah, we really got 'em that time! Yeah!" Again, never examining the results of what they do, just the intentions. Here, by the way, just as a reminder, is David Shuster obsessed with my attire the day I interviewed Karl Rove on this program. They played video from the Dittocam and audio of some of the interview, and this is what David Shuster had to say.
SHUSTER: There's Rush Limbaugh smoking a nice cigar, wearing a golf shirt. There was another video where you could see his nice watch. Who's the snob?
RUSH: Who's the snob? (Laughing.) I had called these people a bunch of effete snobs, and Shuster was throwing it back at me. So there you have it: your host, once again, the focal point of a major controversy in this country. By the way, "A new Gallup Poll suggests that last week's intense schedule of congressional testimony and media appearances by ...Gen. David Petraeus, enhanced his image among Americans. Not only did Petraeus' name identification increase significantly in a matter of just a week, but his image also became more favorable than it was just before the week's activities. This occurred in a contentious environment that included the publication of a full-page ad in the New York Times" calling him General Betray Us. "According to the Sept. 14-16, 2007 poll, 61% of Americans have a favorable opinion of Petraeus, while 22% have an unfavorable opinion and 18%," are too stupid to know who he is so they didn't want to rate him. So we combine this with the Rasmussen: Only 23% approve of the MoveOn.org ad; 58% disapprove, and, in Gallup, 61% like Petraeus. I would say that the Democrats bombed big time, with both of these stunts, and, as usual, are now trying to take the heat off themselves by blaming your host.
END TRANSCRIPT
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_091307/content/01125114.guest.html
Drive-Bys Slander General Petraeus
September 13, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Mary in Birdsboro, Pennsylvania. Hello.
CALLER: Hello, Rush.
RUSH: Yeah.
CALLER: Thanks for taking my call.
RUSH: You bet.
CALLER: You're brilliant, and you're my hero.
RUSH: Well, thank you so much.
CALLER: My comment is on the report by General Petraeus to the Senate, which I watched on CNN. After it was over, I was switching channels to get some feedback, and I happened to catch Anderson Cooper on CNN --
RUSH: Yeah?

CALLER: -- taking General Petraeus's report point by point and challenging each one with a video clip and report from a reporter in that area. I. Was. Furious. First of all, for them to challenge a four-star general is appalling to me, and, for what reasons, if not for political ones?
RUSH: Yeah, I didn't see this, but I know it's infuriating. This is what they do. Everybody in a Republican administration is a liar. You have to understand: that was the narrative this week, as far as the Democrats and the Drive-By Media are concerned, Mary. Petraeus was a liar, and Bush made him lie. Bush was making him a puppet, and so their whole modus operandi was not to listen to what he had to say for any reason other than to try to find some video, for some of their "correspondents" to provide out-of-context reports to indicate that the Democrats on the committees who were saying that Petraeus is lying, are right. But it didn't work. The polling numbers in the Wall Street Journal, NBC poll, the number of people supporting the surge continues to climb. The president's approval number is flat at 30% in this poll. But that didn't work. Look, there's a reason why CNN is sitting there sucking air at the bottom of the list of cable news channels. Well, they go back and forth with PMSNBC. I understand your frustration. It wasn't just at CNN. We have a montage here of Chris Matthews on Hardball last night. His assessment of the Petraeus hearings....
MATTHEWS: Petraeus and Crocker, this whole dog and pony show...
MATTHEWS: I'm watching this dog and pony show....
MATTHEWS: What do you make of the pony? You're speaking well of the dog. What about the pony?
MATTHEWS: It really is a dog and pony show.
MATTHEWS: The hypocrisy and the dog and pony show...
MATTHEWS: The Petraeus dog and pony show...
RUSH: Not one of those is repeated. That's Chris Matthews on Hardball last night referring to a decorated, four-star general in full dress as a "dog and pony show." Look it, folks, there's an alliance -- you know it; I know it - between Democrats and the media, and it is to fulfill and project and advance a specific agenda.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Bob in Grovetown, Georgia, who is now on his cell phone. Bob, welcome back to the EIB Network.
CALLER: You got it? Can you hear me now?
RUSH: Yeah, I hear you much better now. You're a Swift Boat Veteran for Truth?
CALLER: Yeah. I'll tell you how it happened. I joined later. I wasn't a member, a regular member when he wrote the book, when John O'Neill wrote the book. I only got involved when my kids told me I should get involved. After all these Democrats were saying about how the guy is lying and all didn't happen, they weren't lying.
RUSH: Right.
CALLER: That's what got me out of the Democratic Party. I was a Democrat. And then what also got me to join the swift boat guys, because they all know me --
RUSH: Wait. You left the Democrat Party when they started attacking John O'Neill about his book?
CALLER: Yeah, because they lied about it. See, I was on the 43 boat, on Kerry's operation, most of his operations.
RUSH: What boat was he on?
CALLER: Ninety-four boat.
RUSH: How far away from him would that have put you in the formation?
CALLER: When one of his -- got the guy in the water, he was right in front of me.
RUSH: So you saw it. Did you meet Kerry?

CALLER: I knew the guy. I didn't know his name, but I knew the boat and all. He did a lot of stupid things, I know that.
RUSH: Well, apparently so. He's never refuted anything. They keep complaining about all the complaints, or all the charges, but they never refuted any of them. Anyway, I don't want to relive that. You're calling for some other reason about that. I know you just identified yourself as a swift boat veteran.
CALLER: Yeah.
RUSH: What was the reason you called?
CALLER: Petraeus, about the general. I didn't like the idea of what they were doing to the guy. I mean, they pull this stuff all the time. I get a little tired of it.
RUSH: I'll bet especially when you heard Kerry commenting on it.
CALLER: Yeah, that even made it worse. He's no one to comment. Comment on anything.
RUSH: Well, I'm glad we stuck with you. You know, most shows, bad phone line, would have said, "Hey, it's not your fault," even though it was, and we just did, "the phone call is not working," but we endeavored to get back in touch with you, Bob, and congratulations on using a cell phone. They're really amazing. It sounds much better. Bob, if you don't mind my asking. I shouldn't do this.
CALLER: Yes.
RUSH: Where did you get your portable wireless phone there? Not the cell phone.
CALLER: Verizon.
RUSH: No, not the cell phone, the one that we couldn't hear.
CALLER: Oh. At Wal-Mart, I think.
RUSH: Wal-Mart.
CALLER: Yeah. Either Wal-Mart or Sam's Club, same thing.
RUSH: Wal-Mart or Sam's Club. Yeah, that's six of one and half dozen of the other. Well, that's not the best phone for you. If you're going to call us back here on the EIB Network.
CALLER: No.
RUSH: If you call back, use your cell phone.
CALLER: I think that's a good idea.
RUSH: Okay, all right, Bob, thanks so much, I appreciate your call, I really do, and your service. Every time we hear from somebody who served in the military we get lumps in our throats here, especially with the way you all have been maligned, and mistreated, and the thing with the general this week, and so forth. We all share your anger, and I'm glad you called.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
WSJ: The Petraeus Hearings Prove Democrats Need to Change the Subject
http://opinionjournal.com/columnists/dhenninger/?id=110010596
NB: Flip-Flop: Matthews Now Says Discussing National Security Not Petraeus's Job
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2007/09/13/flip-flop-matthews-now-says-discussing-national-seurity-not-petrae
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

Rush Limbaugh will not go down without a fight BUT this is a fight that is very long overdue in my opinion!
It is about time that Democrats stop taking Limbaugh's crap and bullying tactics and finally do something to fight back against him in order to help to stop this idiot from defining his political enemies however he chooses to before millions of people!
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100207/content/01125110.guest.html
Senator Harry Reid: Phony Patriot
October 2, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Here's Harry Reid on the floor of the Senate yesterday, an expert on patriotism, by the way, calling me unpatriotic.
REID: Rush Limbaugh went way over the line, way over the line. While I respect his right to say anything he likes, his unpatriotic comments I cannot ignore. During his show last Wednesday, Limbaugh was engaged in one of his typical rants. This one was unremarkable, indistinguishable from his usually drivel, [sic] which has been steadily losing listeners for years, until he crossed that line by calling on men and women in uniform who oppose the war in Iraq, and I quote, "phony soldiers." [sic] This comment was so beyond the pale of decency, and we can't leave it alone.
RUSH: Except it wasn't made; it wasn't in the middle of a rant; it was two words thrown away in a conversation with a phone caller. I think tit-for-tat's in order here. If Harry Reid is going to call me unpatriotic, then, Senator Reid, you may qualify as a phony patriot. Trying to all of a sudden position yourself now as a supporter of the troops? Can we go back and listen to some previous Harry Reid sound bites? He wants everybody to believe he's such a supporter, has such love and adoration for the troops. Here is Harry Reid in April of 2007 about the surge and the war in Iraq.
REID: This war is lost and that the surge is not accomplishing anything.
RUSH: Yeah, that's really inspiring, Senator Reid, that's really patriotic, that's really motivational, that ought to get the morale of the troops up. That night he repeated the same smear from the Senate floor.
REID: As long as we follow the president's path in Iraq, the war is lost.
RUSH: December 16th, 2006, Harry Reid celebrating when he thought Democrats had killed the Patriot Act.
REID: Think of what happened 20 minutes ago in the United States Senate. We killed the Patriot Act. (Applause.)
RUSH: Here is Harry Reid September 7th of this year talking about General Petraeus.
REID: He made a number of statements over the years that have not proven to be factual. It is now not his report; it's President Bush's report.
RUSH: So attack General Petraeus, attack the troops, tell 'em they can't win, the war is already lost, and now today and yesterday, try to make himself out to be a super patriot. It's not flying, Senator.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: And let's not forget these other two things about Senator Harry Reid. He told schoolchildren in Nevada that George Bush, the commander-in-chief, was a loser. He essentially called Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas illiterate. He was asked what he thought about Thomas, (paraphrasing) "He's not very good; his opinions don't make any sense; they're not written very well," Harry Reid said. This is a party which cannot survive on the basis of its ideas, the Democrat Party. Liberalism cannot triumph openly in the arena of ideas. It can only triumph by destroying, via character assassination and other things, its opponents. They don't dare come join us in the arena of ideas for open debate on issues. And if they do, it will soon descend into personal assaults and attacks, as evidenced by Senator Harkin on the floor of the Senate saying things about me that he couldn't say about any other senator, nor could I say to a senator were I appearing before some committee testifying about something or other, which, by the way, I would love to see.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
The Hill: Democrats Go After Limbaugh
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/democrats-go-after-limbaugh-2007-10-01.html
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
---------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100207/content/01125113.guest.html
Democrat Senators Disagree with Reid
October 2, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Cybercast News Service interviewed Senator Ben Nelson, a Democrat from Nebraska, about the phony soldier thing, and this is what Ben Nelson said:

NELSON: What we've got into right now is a situation where MoveOn.org was hammered by the other side, so it's not surprising that now you've got a sort of the return of that in the case of Limbaugh. Quite honestly, I don't get involved in those unless it's about me, and I consider talk radio entertainment as well as news, and so I just don't pay much attention to it.
RUSH: It's not about him. He doesn't care. Here is Daniel Akaka from Hawaii saying we don't need legislation aimed at Rush Limbaugh.
AKAKA: Well, I feel that any citizen has a vote -- a right to voice their opinion (chuckles), you know, on anything they want, anything they want to do, and I think Limbaugh, although I don't agree with him on many things, has a right to say what he says, and I don't think we need to do legislation to get at him.
RUSH: That's Senator Daniel Akaka. I always enjoyed pronouncing his name. He's always first on the roll call. "Senator Akaka!" they say. By the way, Senator Akaka, I love going to your state. It's a beautiful state.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
Cybercast News Service: Levin Read 'Part' of Limbaugh's 'Phony Soldiers' Transcript
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200710/POL20071002b.html
Cybercast News Service: Democrats Get Personal in Their Campaign Against Limbaugh
http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200710/POL20071002d.html
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

keeps the "freak show" going. Reid just needs to say, if asked about Rush, "I'm rubber and your glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you." Or he could just tell Rush, "bite me."
Here is the link to see how the Neocon "NewsBusters" media rapid response website is trying to defend Rush Limbaugh right now:
http://newsbusters.org/people/radio/rush-limbaugh
Rush Limbaugh
Rush Limbaugh definitely needs to be condemned by Congress in my opinion and "NewsBusters" is trying very hard to protect him from that:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2007/09/30/house-democrats-offer-resolution-condemning-rush-limbaugh
House Democrats to Offer Resolution Condemning Rush Limbaugh

By Noel Sheppard | September 30, 2007 - 17:14 ET 
The smear campaign against conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh will take a dramatic turn Monday if Greg Sargent of TPM Election Central is correct.
According to a blog posting by Sargent Friday evening, "Rep. Mark Udall (D-CO) will be introducing a resolution in the House of Representatives on Monday condemning Rush Limbaugh for his ‘phony soldiers' remark."
Unfortunately, no major media outlets are reporting this. However, Limbaugh has posted an alert at his website concerning the matter: "House Democrats Prepare to Introduce Resolution Castigating Rush Limbaugh on House Floor Monday."
The TPM piece continued (emphasis added):
Advertisement
Sources tell us that there's a lot of interest in this resolution among rank and file Dem House members, and that it may come up for a vote soon. There's no guarantee by any means that this will end up happening, though it's likely that there will be some pressure on the leadership make it happen. Udall, whose office confirmed to me that he'd introduce the reso on Monday, has powerful incentive to drum up attention for it as a Senate candidate in Colorado.
Sargent also posted a "dear colleague" letter supposedly from Udall's office that was leaked to TPM:
September 28, 2007
JOIN AS AN ORIGINAL COSPONSOR OF A RESOLUTION
HONORING OUR ARMED FORCES AND
CONDEMNING RUSH LIMBAUGH'S ATTACK
ON "PHONY SOLDIERS"
Dear Colleague:
On September 26, 2007 the broadcaster Rush Limbaugh told a nationwide radio audience that members of the Armed Forces who have expressed disagreement with current policies of the United States regarding military activities in Iraq are "phony soldiers."
On Monday I will introduce a resolution honoring all Americans serving in the Armed Forces and condemning this unwarranted attack on the integrity and professionalism of those in the Armed Forces who choose to exercise their constitutional right to express their opinions regarding U.S. military action in Iraq.
For more information or to cosponsor the resolution, please contact XXXXXXX in my office at xxxxx.
Sincerely,Mark Udall
Stay tuned.
Post facto opinion:
Conservatives should hope this resolution is offered by the Democrats, for it would give us a tremendous opportunity to expose the Clinton/Soros/Media Matters/Center for American Progress apparatus. This is especially opportunistic for the press will be all over this debate on the House floor like white on rice given the man in the middle.
Just imagine the theatrical potential of Republican after Republican citing the specifics of how this smear campaign occurred, while entering into the Congressional record the actual tapes of the broadcast in question, as well as the verbatim transcript.
Then, GOP members could offer, again for the record, the various news reports by the major media outlets demonstrating exactly how their information came from Media Matters, and that the press representatives involved clearly ignored all journalistic principles by just accepting this organization's word regarding what Limbaugh said.
Once that evidence was presented, House Republicans could enter into the record all of the information concerning Media Matters, including its benefactors, its connections to various political leaders, and its tax exempt status.
Next, said Republicans could point out that Congress just last year passed the Stolen Valor Act to address a number of abuses of so-called "phony soldiers."
Maybe even more delicious, the person who introduced this legislation in 2005 is a member of Udall's Colorado delegation, Democrat Rep. John T. Salazar.
Wouldn't that be a marvelous debate to be in attendance for?
As such, please Rep. Udall, do all right-thinking people in America a favor, and offer this resolution tomorrow. Even though your Party will end up looking quite foolish, you'd never the less be doing your country a tremendous service unlike the phony soldier Rush was really talking about.
—Noel Sheppard is an economist, business owner, and Associate Editor of NewsBusters.
Noel Sheppard's blog
Login or register to post comments
Printer friendly version
Topics:
2008 Congressional
2008 Presidential
Campaigns & Elections
Democrats
Rush Limbaugh
like how Bush is trying to hide behind Gen. Petraeus in an effort to try and divert public attention away from the real issues:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100207/content/01125116.guest.html
Two E-Mails from Rush 24/7 Adopted Soldiers
October 2, 2007
Dear Rush,

Mega-dittos from one of the soldiers adopted for your Rush 24/7. I'm writing this from the MWR in Tallil AFB, Iraq. After reading your Friday "phony soldiers" monologue, I had Democrats pegged as stuck on stupid and it's still hard to believe they are THAT stupid to accuse you of besmirching us, given their track records. And come to think of it, they besmirch us yet again at the same time they accuse you because to go by whatever they pass off as "reasoning", to believe that you besmirched us would be lumping all REAL soldiers and veterans with Jesse MacBeth and all other scumbags like him.
What was the point of passing the recent "Stolen Valor Act"? Well, anyway, here's a copy of the email I sent to my House Rep, John Carter R-TX; as well as my Senators, Kay Bailey Hutchison R-TX and John Cornyn R-TX. It reads:
Dear Senator Cornyn,
I am a soldier in the Texas Army National Guard currently deployed and stationed in Iraq. I am with the 3/144th Infantry and we are at Tallil AFB. I'm also a fan of the radio comedian, Rush Limbaugh. I have been since I first watched his TV show in the early 90's and listened to his radio show all through college. Currently, I am a free subscriber, under his Adopt-a-Soldier Program, to his Rush 24/7 service and I always read his webpage when I access the internet at the MWR here. So I'm calling your attention to this page here:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_092807/content/01125106.guest.html
As you read it, you will see that Rush is being accused, falsely, of trying to besmirch the troops with a commentary he made recently about "phony soldiers." I read that particular commentary when it was posted and it was quite clear to me that his main focus of that commentary was a man (and I use the term loosely, I might add) named Jesse MacBeth, a star of the "anti-war"/pro-al Qaeda movement who became such a celebrity after he claimed to some news outlet that he was a former Corporal in the US Army Rangers, recipient of the Purple Heart, and a witness to atrocities committed by US troops in Iraq -- all of which were not only proven false, but MacBeth himself has been convicted this past week of submitting a false VA Claim and falsifying his DD-214. As it turned out, he was in the Army...for all of 44 days. He didn't graduate basic training, let alone Ranger School, so he was never in Iraq and never got the Purple Heart. He was one of many frauds and hoaxes propped by the Democratic Party and groups like Media Matters, Code Pink, and MoveOn.org in an attempt to push their agenda.
As you read further, you will find some of the most ridiculous and hypocritical commentary ever uttered by members of Congress in our history coming from DNC Chair Howard Dean, Webb, Schakowsky, and especially John Kerry among others, all with a clear history of besmirching -- and in the case of Murtha, actually Nifonging -- the troops themselves. That is some of the most ridiculous BS I've ever heard from politicians and would actually be funny if I wasn't over here. These freaks have no room to talk, and even now by accusing Rush Limbaugh of besmirching us, they are still besmirching us by trying to bring us down to the level of Jesse MacBeth and his ilk. Now that's real insulting, and I would want my congressman to call those a[-----]es (excuse the language but I don't know what else to call them that can actually be nice) on it. What was the point of the recently-passed Stolen Valor Act? They owe us an apology for this, not Rush. Rush Limbaugh has been one of the most supportive voices we have left in the media, with quite a few servicemen who may very well owe their freedom and reputations to him for his publicly defending them while they're being Nifonged by the media and certain members of Congress. I wouldn't listen to him nor read his website daily if he wasn't. So I'm asking of you sir not only to defend Rush and his First Amendment Rights, but more to defend our honor and reputations from those of your colleagues in the House and the Senate who say they support us on one hand and then undermine, besmirch, and Nifong all of us, from the President and Gen. Petraeus to the newest private. Don't let their sickening hypocrisy stand. Call them out on the floor -- and do it publicly, please.
I thank you for your time, SSG David [----]
D Company, 3/144th Infantry
LSA Adder, Tallil, APO AE 09331
Well, that's my letter in a nutshell. Use it if you wish, because that kind of hypocrisy from the likes of Kerry and his ilk shouldn't stand. I also sent a copy to Hannity. Thanks for the years of fun watching your TV show and listening to you on the radio.
Keep up the great work.
Dave
_________________________________________________
Dear Rush,
I can think of countless times that I felt the desire to write and tell you how I felt about a subject. I think I finally found something that I could not stay quiet on any longer. This phony soldier story has disgusted me like no other. I am currently deployed to Iraq for my third time. Your Adopt-a-Soldier Program has enabled me to listen everyday by downloading your program and I have always taken great pride in your support of the military. My parents turned me on to listening to you a decade ago and I listen every minute I can. I have also taken great pride in also being a fellow Missourian, from Lake of the Ozarks here myself. I am writing this while I am listening to a downloaded copy of Friday's program. This is one soldier that cannot convey enough the disgust I have for these liberals. To totally take your comment out of context like this and demean you in this way is disgusting, especially from people that disgust me. One of your sound-bites was from a woman that quoted poll numbers from soldiers that say we should pull out, and numbers that say we should pull out now.
I'm not sure where she got her numbers, because she didn't ask anyone in my company. My company would be quite the opposite way. To be honest, there isn't a one of us that wouldn't rather be home, but we support the war, support our mission, and support why we are here, one and all. I have been in the 101st Airborne for the majority of the last 11 years. I served under then Major General Petraeus during Operation Iraqi Freedom I, when we first crossed the border. I have met him and consider him to be a great man. What these liberals did to him angers me. I know I am rambling Rush, and for that I apologize. I am extremely angry about how Iraq is portrayed. We are winning this like no one back home would ever understand. I am extremely angry about what is being said about you over this phony soldier story. I am extremely angry about how none of these liberals are called on their lies and attacks against George Bush and Iraq. I guess I just want to express my tremendous support of you Rush and how much you are appreciated by some of the soldiers out here.
Keep up the good fight,
Paul [-----]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100207/content/01125114.guest.html
Military Mom Asks for Prayers
October 2, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: St. Joseph, Missouri, this is Sarah. Glad you waited. You're next on the big program. Nice to have you here.
CALLER: Thank you, Rush. How are you?
RUSH: Good. Never better.
CALLER: I have a son in Afghanistan, a son-in-law in Iraq, and these phony soldiers -- and by that I mean these guys that were not men enough to cut basic or to get through basic -- they make me sick. I'm so angry I'm shaking. And Harry Reid, to get up there and make us think he cares one whit about our guys, our family members, our loved ones, is just so wrong. And censorship comes from the government, right?
RUSH: Right.
CALLER: And Harry Reid being the leader of the Senate, isn't he coming close to censoring you?
RUSH: Trying to, via intimidation. In ways I really don't want to mention, but yeah, you're very perceptive.

CALLER: Yeah, because, my son and son-in-law are going through things that these, I'm not even going to call them men because they don't deserve to be called men. They have no idea. They're doing it because they love this country, they love us, my son and son-in-law would be the men that would -- they would give their lives for you regardless of whether they were on the battlefield or not. And for Harry Reid to denigrate them like this and to denigrate you because you have done so much for our soldiers -- I'm sorry. I'm getting emotional now.
RUSH: So am I. We're in it together.
CALLER: And, you know, I'm just so angry. He has no right to do this. And, you know, the things that him and Dick Durbin, the things that they have said about our guys, and I'm sorry. I'm aggravated.
RUSH: I know what you mean. Durbin called the soldiers that run the prisons Nazi Gulags, Soviet Gulags, Nazi assassins, and Pol Pot's murderers. He had to do a quasi-apology for that because there was an outraged reaction to it. You know, Sarah --
CALLER: Yes?
RUSH: -- when you say that your sons would die for me on or off the battlefield, you render me speechless. Those of us in this country who have a great and deep appreciation for what people like your son and your son-in-law do, know full well they volunteer --
CALLER: That's right.
RUSH: -- to lose their lives on the battlefield for the country. That's why we are so offended when their service is impugned or their character is impugned or when they're demoralized or when leaders of their government attempt to sabotage their mission. I think that the country has a debt of gratitude to you and your family members who served that it can never repay. I know I can't.
CALLER: You don't owe me anything because --
RUSH: Not that we owe you anything. It's just a simple form of gratitude and wanting to show it, and sometimes it's difficult, beyond words, charitable donations, this kind of thing, to do so. So the support for what they do, particularly in light of the criticism they get, is something we embrace eagerly. It's a great honor to have such members of our population and country as your son and son-in-law.
CALLER: I just ask that people pray for them. That's all I ask.
RUSH: Well, I guarantee you that will happen. What are their names?
CALLER: My son's name is Vance, and my son-in-law's name is Kevin.
RUSH: Vance and Kevin?
CALLER: Yes. And I love them very much.
RUSH: How old are they?
CALLER: Kevin is almost 25, and Vance is 20.
RUSH: And they've been gone how long?
CALLER: Kevin has been gone since the middle of January. I might add about three weeks after his son was born. My son has been in Afghanistan since April, and I don't even know where he's at. He's an airborne trooper. He's airborne. I'm not exactly sure where he's at.
RUSH: How often do you hear from either of them?
CALLER: Infrequently. I send them packages and letters often. Every time I do I tell them how proud I am of them. My son was disheartened after the November election because he felt like the people -- he didn't care about the politicians, he didn't expect anymore from them, but he felt like the people were turning their back on him. And he wants to know why people pretend that they're not in Afghanistan.
RUSH: That's a good point. The critics say, "We ought to be in Afghanistan. We've diverted to Iraq, we ought to be in Afghanistan." That is an excellent point. We are in Afghanistan, and we are in combat missions in Afghanistan, and we are engaged in successful combat missions, routing out warlords and the Taliban there. That is an excellent point.
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: When I was there on the troop visit, it was pretty quiet. In the eastern parts, there were some skirmishes. I heard the gunfire when I was on the base there. But it was pretty quiet. The questions I got from the troops, "How come nobody is talking about us in the media? How come it's all about Iraq?" "Because you guys are succeeding here. There's no trouble to report here, so you guys are being ignored right now."
CALLER: It may not be as quiet there now.
RUSH: No, it's not. It's not. The Taliban is trying to move back in via Pakistan with Bin Laden and his buddies.
CALLER: Right. And he's on blackout quite frequently, which means, you know, no contact. But we live our lives one day at a time, and we have to. Because if I let the fear and worry overtake me, I would be in a ball in the corner talking to an imaginary friend.
RUSH: Well, that's -- I know. And this is what we all know. It's perhaps an unfortunate thing to say, but the strategy, the political strategy, behind the Democrat Party's anti-war movement is, when it comes to elections, there aren't that many members of this population who are military, or military family, maybe two to three million. And so their attitude is, "Well, we can lose them. We'll pick it up from some other group and still win the election." Remember, this is the bunch that tried to not count military absentee ballots in Florida in 2000. It's gotta be tough. I mean your son and son-in-law volunteer, it's always been something valorous and admirable to be a member of the US military. Now all of a sudden for the first time in American history -- well, it got bad in Vietnam for a while, but never to the extent that I've seen it here. Now all of a sudden there's a whole political movement out there designed to secure defeat --
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: -- wave the white flag of surrender for the whole country and in the process impugn the character and integrity of people like your son and son-in-law who volunteered to do this.
CALLER: And I will never vote Democrat again, ever. I don't care who the person is, they will never get my vote.
RUSH: Well, if it's Joe Lieberman someday, you can vote for him.
CALLER: No. Because he's part of the --
RUSH: They tried to drum him out of the Senate.
CALLER: Yes, I know, that's what they do, and I've had it with them. They are less than zero to me.
RUSH: Sarah, I have to go, but I've really enjoyed talking to you. Thank you so much, and God bless you and your family and your son and son-in-law from all of us, okay?
CALLER: Okay. Thank you, Rush.
RUSH: You bet.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: By the way, folks, that last call from Sarah is a great illustration of what I was talking about in an opening monologue in this program, and that is how the Democrat Party, led by Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, MoveOn.org, Media Matters for America, why it's so upsetting, the continued use by Hillary's groups and the liberals in Congress of the troops for political gain, self-aggrandizement is just more of the abuse of our armed forces. You heard this mother describe what it has been like listening to Democrats while her son and son-in-law are in Afghanistan. It's just abuse. We owe them respect, and a lot of Democrats can't even do that. Just stunning.
END TRANSCRIPT
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
This was very refreshing to see. Rush Limbaugh keeps a very close eye on any Republicans who do not play ball with him:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100207/content/01125104.guest.html
Stack of Stuff Quick Hits Page
October 2, 2007
Story #5: Republican Walter Jones Joins Dems Against Rush
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298858,00.html
RUSH: By the way, there has been a Republican in the House of Representatives sign on the Democrat resolution condemning me. The Republican's name is Walter Jones, and he's from North Carolina. He told Fox News late yesterday that I "went too far," and that he will sign on to Udall's resolution Tuesday morning. He's one of the two Republican House members who have consistently supported anti-war legislation. So he's fallen for the hoax, the smear, and so forth. But Walter Jones has mostly been voting with the anti-war left in the Democrat Party. He's been taking a lot of heat for it in North Carolina, so he throws in with the liars and the hacks because he's looking for cover. He wants to pretend he's standing up for the troops in attacking me, because he's been throwing in against them all this time. The fastest way to make himself look like he's standing for the troops, when he doesn't, is to throw in with this smear. He ought to be ashamed of himself.
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
priority right now in my opinion:
Subj: Take Rush Limbaugh Off Armed Forces Radio
Date: 10/2/2007 1:44:02 PM Central Daylight Time
From: info@securingamerica.com
Reply-to: notice-reply-63w3kbrh8imbe8@ga4.org
Sent from the Internet (Details)
Dear Mitch,

http://ga4.org/campaign/dumprush/63w3kbrh8imbe8?
We're far from giving up. Last week, Rush Limbaugh labeled any American soldier who supports an end to the war in Iraq as "phony."1 We challenged Limbaugh through an email campaign to invite VoteVets.org's Jon Soltz to his show and repeat these same insults to an Iraq war veteran's face. Over 10,000 of you responded and emailed Rush -- but to our disappointment, he has refused to respond to our request.
It's time to put real pressure on Rush Limbaugh. His show is broadcast on Armed Forces Radio, and this time we are going to go straight to the lifeblood of Rush's show -- Congress. Congress has the power to remove Rush Limbaugh from Armed Forces Radio, and it won't be as easy for elected officials to ignore our call.
http://ga4.org/campaign/dumprush/63w3kbrh8imbe8?
Tax dollars are used to fund Armed Forces Radio, and that money is not intended for radio show hosts to spout insults at our soldiers. These "phony soldiers" have simply exercised their right to free speech, as Rush Limbaugh does on a daily basis. Simply because a majority of our troops who return from Iraq disagree with Rush on Bush's failed war policy does not give him the right to dishonor their service.
Unlike Rush Limbaugh, members of Congress cannot casually brush off the concerns of citizens. Since Rush won't listen to us, we're going directly to Congress, who can prevent him from disrespecting and censoring the voices of our soldiers.
http://ga4.org/campaign/dumprush/63w3kbrh8imbe8?
How have Republicans in Congress chosen to respond so far? Congressional Republicans have actually drafted a resolution supporting Rush Limbaugh, "commending [his] relentless efforts to build and maintain troop morale through worldwide radio broadcasts and personal visits to conflict regions."
That's outrageous. Rush Limbaugh's "phony soldiers" comment should not be commended -- it should be condemned. And it's time to tell Congress to act swiftly to hold Rush Limbaugh accountable.
http://ga4.org/campaign/dumprush/63w3kbrh8imbe8?
Our armed forces have served us honorably in Iraq, and the least we can do is respectfully listen to what they have to say about their experiences and perspectives on the war. To question the sincerity of our "phony" troops is disgraceful and must end.
Thank you for speaking out.
Sincerely,

Wes Clark
P.S. After you've emailed Congress, watch VoteVets.org's new ad calling on Rush Limbaugh to stop telling lies about our troops.
Source:
1. "Limbaugh: Service members who support U.S. withdrawal are 'phony soldiers'"
http://mediamatters.org/items/200709270010?f=h_top
http://ga4.org/campaign/dumprush/63w3kbrh8imbe8?
Paid for by WesPAC -- Securing America's Future. Contributions and gifts made to WesPAC are not tax-deductible for federal income tax purposes.
Tell your friends and family about WesPAC -- Securing America's Future!
Tell-a-friend!
Please do what you can to help support Jon Soltz and Votevets.org because they are really trying very hard to make a real difference in policy right now:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/13390
We can help make a real difference on Iraq by promoting Jon Soltz & VoteVets.org
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on September 19, 2007 - 6:32am.
View Our New Television Ad on Rush Limbaugh
Maybe Rush Limbaugh hasn't heard, but there's a new sheriff in town - America's troops and veterans, who are not going to sit idle while he and his ilk demean the service of those who oppose the President's failed policy in Iraq.
Today, we're unveiling a new television and radio ad, taking Rush head on, for his contention that we're "phony soldiers."
https://salsa.wiredforchange.com/o/1138/t/376/shop/custom.jsp?donate_page_KEY=1755
The ad features Brian McGough, an Iraq war veteran who received the Purple Heart for a traumatic brain injury as a result of shrapnel he took to the head, in Iraq. In the ad, Brian makes it clear: "Rush, the shrapnel I took to my head was real. My traumatic brain injury was real. And, my belief that we are on the wrong course in Iraq is real. Until you have the guts to call me a "phony soldier" to my face, stop telling lies about my service."
Maybe Rush was able to get away with such smears in the past, but those days are over. No one - especially someone who never had the courage to wear the uniform - is going to pass judgment on us and go unchallenged. He, and others, can expect that VoteVets.org will be right there to represent and defend the voice of America's troops and veterans.
MSNBC - Major General (Ret.) John Batiste on Rush Limbaugh
Major General (Ret.) John Batiste, a 31-year Army veteran, former commander in Iraq, and critic of the President's failed policy in Iraq, responds to Rush Limbaugh's charge that those who oppose the President on Iraq are "phony soldiers"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfjW5-KywT4
IRAQ VETERANS RESPOND TO RUSH LIMBAUGH
Rush, who is the real phony, here?
which definitely makes him especially vulnerable to legitimate attacks right now in my opinion:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_102307/content/01125110.guest.html
Fortney "Pete" Stark Backtracks
October 23, 2007
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Fortney "Pete" Stark of California, from the East Bay. This is on the House floor during the veto override debate for the S-CHIP program.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lTUB5_l0Mg
Rep. Pete Stark's Unbelievable Comments
STARK: They sure don't care about finding $200 billion to fight the illegal war in Iraq. Where you gonna get that money? You gonna tell us lies like you're telling us today? Is that how you're going to fund the war? You don't have money to fund the war or children, but you're going to spend it to blow up innocent people if we could get enough kids to grow old enough for you to send to Iraq to get their heads blown off for the president's amusement.
RUSH: And this was roundly applauded on the fringe-lunatic blogs last week and many Drive-By cable commentators, excited when Fortney "Pete" Stark refused to -- well, that was close. You just heard an example of an extremely, highly trained broadcast specialist, because when I said Fffffff-ortney, I didn't mean to... (laughing) Boy, was that was quick, folks. Whoa! Fortney "Pete" Stark was applauded roundly and held up as an icon for refusing to apologize. However, today he did.
STARK: I want to apologize to my -- first of all, all my colleagues, many of whom I've offended, uhhh, to the president, his family, to, uhhh, the troops that may have found in my remarks, as were suggested in, uh, the motion that we just voted on, uh, and I do apologize.
RUSH: He did apologize. He apologized to his colleagues. He apologized to the president. Now, look what happened? In all these dust-ups you've got apologizing -- and he should have. They were on the verge of a censure motion in the House of Representatives against him for what he said, so he apologizes. Have I apologized, ladies and gentlemen? No. Have I backtracked from anything I have ever said? Have I backtracked from the Michael J. Fox controversy? Have I backtracked from the Donovan McNabb controversy? Have I backtracked? Hell, backtracked? I moved forward and stuffed it back on their throats here on the smear letter from Dingy Harry. They backtracked on the General Petraeus ad. They agreed to condemn, the Democrats did, on both the Senate and the House floors. For everybody who thinks they are out there ruling the roost and running the show, folks, they are embarrassing themselves each and every day. It's starting to catch up with them.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• VIDEO: Rep. Pete Stark Apologizes for Bush Insult as Censure Vote Falls Short
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/7103.html
• HotAir: Video: Rep. Pete Stark's Nutroots-flavored Rant Update Veto Override Vote Fails
http://hotair.com/archives/2007/10/18/video-rep-pete-starks-nutroots-flavored-rant/
http://www.drudgereport.com/flash6.htm
Rep. Pete Stark's Unbelievable Comments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lTUB5_l0Mg
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
