Dan Abrams Videos on Media Bias: Clinton vs. the Media and Clinton vs. the press
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 20, 2008 - 3:52pm.
Media
Hello Everyone:
On Thursday, Feb. 14 and on Monday, Feb. 18, Dan Abrams had two excellent panel discussions where he exposed the blatant anti-Hillary media bias that is going on right now!
Here is the Live with Dan Abrams video link from Tuesday, Feb. 14 titled "Clinton vs. the Media" which I highly recommend watching:
Feb. 14: Clinton vs. the Media
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23175735#23175735 (11:44)
Here is the Live with Dan Abrams transcript link of this video where I summarized some of the important key points that Dan Abrams made which I completely agree with:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23184021/
'Live with Dan Abrams' for Feb. 14
Read the transcript to the Thursday show
Guests: Roy Sekoff, Joshua Green, A.B. Stoddard, Carrie Frillman, Pat Brown, Mike Digiannantonio
DAN ABRAMS, HOST: "But first: It is happening again. Many in the inside D.C. media literally counting Hillary Clinton‘s campaign out tonight. “Time” magazine is asking: Is it too late for Hillary? “The New York Post” saying, Clinton‘s, quote, “Giuliani game plan will kill Hill”, unquote. Doomsday reports are everywhere even though Hillary Clinton got good news today. Officials in New Mexico finally counted all the votes from their Super Tuesday caucus and declared Clinton the winner by a narrow margin...
Because as I‘ve said for weeks, the D.C. media does not like Hillary Clinton or the Clinton story...
I mean, the bottom line is, people like you and many inside the D.C. media, wherever people live, have become obsessed with Barack Obama to a point where they‘re incapable of objectively assessing the facts...
The bottom line is that many in the inside D.C. media have effectively written Hillary Clinton off..."
Here is the Live with Dan Abrams video link from Monday, Feb. 18 titled "Clinton vs. the press" which I also highly recommend watching:
Feb. 18: Clinton vs. the press
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23228025#23228025 (08:16)
Here is the Live with Dan Abrams transcript link of this video where I summarized some of the important key points that Dan Abrams made which I completely agree with:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23236164/
'Live with Dan Abrams' for Feb. 18
Read the transcript to the Monday show
Guests: Roy Sekoff, Laura Schwartz, Michelle Cottle
DAN ABRAMS, HOST: "But first: Finally, the press catching on to what we‘ve been saying for weeks, the inside D.C. media don‘t particularly like Hillary or the Clinton story. The latest post in “Newsweek” is now reporting on how tough the media are on the Clintons. But still, no real change in the coverage of this very close race. As this has been the case for weeks, the inside D.C. media continue to focus on the story of how bad things are for Clinton, including the “New York Daily News” writing - “doom and dread surrounds the Hillary campaign”, the “Las Vegas Review Journal” - “The Clinton cultists are surely in doubt and pain”, and from Bloomberg - “The days ahead look darker than they did on that flight from Des Moines to Manchester.” A media usually obsessed with polls now is now ignoring them when the news is even remotely good for Clinton...
But Laura, this isn‘t a sporting event. And I know, we in the media love to cover it like a sporting event and we love to say who‘s making the comeback and who‘s made the great play for the latest goal and the latest shot...
But shouldn‘t there be a different standard for covering sports than covering who‘s going to lead the free world..."
Dan Abrams welcomes comments and feedback so please feel free to write to him and let him know that you appreciate his exposing the unfair, unprofessional, and ridiculous media bias that is going on against Hillary Clinton right now:
"We read your e-mails:
. Tell us what we‘re doing wrong. Be sure to include your name and where you‘re writing from."
I also appreciate Howard Kurtz for being willing to seriously talk about the issue of anti-Hillary media bias on his program "CNN RELIABLE SOURCES."
I was especially outraged when Lynn Sweet admitted point blank last Sunday that "the Barack Obama story and his rise has mesmerized a lot of the press, and that's what they've been focusing on. And the issues have taken a back seat" and when she was asked "Is it time for that to end?" by Howard Kurtz, she replied with "I think it's -- it is ending right now:"
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0802/17/rs.01.html
CNN RELIABLE SOURCES
A Look at Coverage of Presidential Campaign
Aired February 17, 2008 - 10:00 ET
LYNN SWEET, WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF, "CHICAGO SUN-TIMES": "Well, look, the Barack Obama story and his rise has mesmerized a lot of the press, and that's what they've been focusing on. And the issues have taken a back seat. I'm not saying it hasn't. But...
HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: Is it time for that to end?
SWEET: I think it's -- it is ending right now, because I think the race is at a point where it's clear that the next few weeks will make a difference. And so there is a shift in coverage. Part of it is Obama has changed what he is doing. He's talking more about...
KURTZ: A little more detail from Senator Obama. We will see if you are right.
Lynn Sweet, Chip Reid, Steve Roberts, thanks very much for joining us..."
This ridiculous situation NEVER even should have happened to begin with and it is absolutely outrageous in my opinion that Lynn Sweet thinks "it is ending right now" as opposed to being sure and certain that "it is ending right now." I do not see it ending right now!
The bottom line in my opinion is that Hillary Clinton is NOT just running against a candidate named Barack Obama. She is actually running against Obama's personal charisma which is being fueled and cheered on by much of the mainstream media right now. This is the same biased, unprofessional, and irresponsible media who are rooting for Obama and who are giving Obama a free pass on his lack of substance regarding the issues, on his past, and on his background!
You would think that after 7 years of Bush's incompetency and the media complaining about it so much that they would more carefully scrutinize a serious candidate for President of The United States BEFORE the primary process is over.
My opinion is that these unprofessional pundits in the mainstream media who are openly biased against Hillary and who are giving Obama a free ride right now will have absolutely nothing to complain about IF Obama is the nominee, if he loses to McCain in the general election because he was not scrutinized enough in the primary process (which is what I think will happen if he is the nominee), and if we "stay the course" in Iraq because he lost the election!
They will also have absolutely nothing to complain about if Obama is the nominee, if he should win the election, and if he proves to be incompetent just like how Bush has been because he was not scrutinized enough in the primary process!
Please forward this information on so that more Democratic primary voters (especially in Texas and Ohio) will be aware of this blatant anti-Hillary media bias and will think twice before believing any of it when they see it!
Mitch Dworkin
http://www.securingamerica.com/
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10756
StopIranWar.com: "War is not the answer"
Submitted by Wes Clark on February 21, 2007 - 11:40am.
http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!
It is absolutely ridiculous that "It's a good guess that the current media darlings, Obama and John McCain, will experience the fickleness of the press before too long" and that "the press is almost certain to turn on both men" which are in this article!
The press needs to be objective RIGHT NOW with all of the candidates as far as I am concerned if they want to be viewed as being professional and credible!
Bill Clinton is absolutely right in my opinion when he is quoted as saying in this article "that the media has given Obama a free ride:"
http://www.newsweek.com/id/112842
POLITICS
A Perennial Press Opera
Be serious! Give us access! The roots of the Clinton-media tension.
Joe Raedle / Getty Images
Poison Dynamic: The Clintons have long had a rocky relationship with the media
By Evan Thomas | NEWSWEEK
Feb 25, 2008 Issue
If Hillary Clinton loses the Democratic nomination to Barack Obama, it is a good bet that she, or her minions, will cast a measure of blame on the press. Bill Clinton has already started making excuses, complaining that the media has given Obama a free ride. Though Hillary handed out chocolate Valentines to members of her traveling press corps, any embers of romance between the former First Lady and the Fourth Estate have long since died. It is also true, as Clinton spokesman Jay Carson tells NEWSWEEK, that the press is "obsessed" with Obama.
Nonetheless, the bad blood between the Clintonistas and the media has less to do with any personal failings of the Clintons themselves—or the foibles of individual reporters and editors—than it does with a poisonous, and predictable, dynamic between the press and presidents that goes back at least a half century. It's a good guess that the current media darlings, Obama and John McCain, will experience the fickleness of the press before too long.
The last president who liked and enjoyed reporters (some of them, anyway) was John F. Kennedy. Chief executives ever since have felt surrounded and beleaguered within months, if not days, of taking up residence in the White House. If they have seemed paranoid at times, it may be because they had real tormenters in the basement of the West Wing, ready to pounce on their hypocrisies. How presidents handle the ordeal of press coverage can be revealing of character. Some pretend to shrug it off better than others. The Clintons have been theatrical in their resentments and aggressive about pushing back. But in the realm of press relations, the most important difference between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama or John McCain is that she has lived for eight years in the White House and they have not.
The estrangement between presidents and the press is particularly painful because the relationship often begins as a love affair. The press swooned over the young Bill Clinton. Many reporters and pundits, tired of 12 years of Reagan-Bush, saw Clinton, only 45 when he began his run in 1991, as a fellow baby boomer who was going to rejuvenate and make more realistic and relevant the liberalism of the 1960s. They learned to put up with "Saturday Night Bill" when, on the eve of the New Hampshire primary, some tapes surfaced of Clinton sweet-talking a woman—not his wife—named Gennifer Flowers. But by the summer of 1992, the romance with the press was back in full bloom. The week of the Democratic convention, NEWSWEEK ran a cover showing a vibrant Bill and his running mate, Al Gore, under the line YOUNG GUNS. (At the Republican convention in August, NEWSWEEK put President George H.W. Bush on the cover with his dog Millie. DOG DAYS, read the headline.) Clinton's presidential honeymoon was over almost before it began. The White House stumbled in ways that now seem minor and forgettable—by, for instance, nominating as attorney general a woman, Zoë Baird, who had hired illegal aliens as nannies and chauffeurs for her kids. The press clucked and thundered. THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING PRESIDENT was Time's cover line in June 1993. NEWSWEEK's cover showed a picture of Clinton looking haggard, and asked WHAT'S WRONG?
THE Clintons were not naive about the media. The First Lady suggested moving the press room out of the West Wing and into the Old Executive Office Building down the block. When this idea didn't fly, Clinton's then press secretary, George Stephanopoulos, closed the door between the press room and his warren of offices: reporters yowled as if he had just erected the Berlin wall. Reporters can be soothed with food and wine, but only briefly. In June, the Clintons held six small dinners in the White House for various pundits and reporters. I went to one of them and weakly joked to President Clinton, "Well, we're co-opted now." He responded, unsmiling, "I'll believe it when I see it."
Whitewater, a tangled financial scandal, broke in the winter of 1994, and the Clintons descended into the bunker for good. Hillary was feeling burned by a New York Times Magazine cover story in which she had opened up about her spiritualism and been mockingly dubbed "Saint Hillary." When press adviser David Gergen suggested that the White House make available its Whitewater files to The Washington Post—to show there was nothing to hide—the First Lady nixed the idea.
Former presidential adviser Dick Morris (now a ferocious critic of the couple) tells NEWSWEEK the Clintons talked about why they were getting such bad press, and Hillary speculated that certain journalists were jealous of the Clintons' success. "They are all our age," said Hillary, according to Morris. President Clinton zeroed in on Howell Raines, an Alabama native and New York Times editorial page editor who was roasting the president daily. "He had to leave the South to make good and I never had to," Morris says Clinton said. Morris also says that when Gen. Colin Powell began flirting with a presidential run in the summer of 1995, Clinton warned that the press would not ask tough questions of a black man. "Bill would be furious that the media was giving him a free pass," says Morris. "Consider the source," says Carson.
Once scorned or reviled former presidents have a way of becoming elder statesmen. Clinton, out of office, morphed into a globe-trotting do-gooder, expansive and relaxed, even with reporters. Hillary Clinton came into her own as a U.S. senator, not as charismatic as her husband, but still solid and respected, even by reporters. But as a presidential candidate, Hillary was back to the old psychodrama, running as a once and future queen in a Restoration drama. Her basic pitch—ready on day one—is the same one used by George H.W. Bush when he ran for president in 1988. Hillary has been unlucky to have a rock star as an opponent, the kind of dazzling orator who is bound to make her seem plodding by comparison. Obama appeals to the young millennial-generation reporters who fill the seats on press planes, just as Bill Clinton struck a chord with baby boomers 16 years ago. Her campaign has arguably alienated reporters by stonewalling them at times, but the relationship between the press and the Clintons is complicated—more in the nature of a bad marriage than a cold war.
Republicans express their disdain for reporters by ignoring them. The Bush 43 White House appointed press secretaries who were intentionally kept uninformed about the inner doings of the Oval Office. The Clintons have more-intimate ties to the media establishment. Stephanopoulos was a true Clinton insider before he took over briefing the press every day. He yelled at reporters, but also gossiped with them and became a newsman himself (now ABC's chief Washington correspondent). Hillary's close confidant Sidney Blumenthal is a former journalist, and Clinton's admaker, Mandy Grunwald, is married to a veteran journalist and former NEWSWEEK correspondent, Matt Cooper. Familiarity seems to have bred contempt in Grunwald: she can be disdainful of the press. (She may be reflecting her boss's view that the press is fundamentally not serious about reporting the substance of policy.) Clinton campaign officials have not hesitated to go over the heads of reporters and complain to their editors; the reporters regard this, not unreasonably, as an intimidation tactic.
In the long run-up to the Iowa caucuses, the Clinton campaign herded reporters, sometimes rudely, away from the candidate. Bill Clinton, meanwhile, vented against the press for favoring Obama. When he began to not so subtly play the race card by comparing Obama with Jesse Jackson, the press backlash was indignant and gleeful. President Clinton's baiting backfired in South Carolina, and it seemed to some pundits that the Clinton machine was not so fearsome after all.
By then, Hillary Clinton had begun schmoozing with reporters again, going back into the press section of the plane and showing her jollier side. (The belly laugh is genuine.) But it may be too late. While it is not true that the press has "gone easy" on Obama—his slender record has been and will be scrubbed—the press helped fuel his momentum with mostly positive coverage.
A Clinton aide, speaking anonymously to hide his bitterness, predicted that Obama would get his comeuppance if he wins the nomination. "The one person the press corps likes more than Obama is John McCain," the aide says. Maybe so, but it doesn't really matter, because the press is almost certain to turn on both men. Digging through the personal record, searching for human flaws, is what reporters do when they cover presidential campaigns, and the critical skepticism only deepens when the winner occupies the Oval Office.
These are the results as of the time of this comment. Please feel free to vote in this poll by clicking on this link:
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/lou.dobbs.tonight/
Quick Vote
Do you believe the mainstream media has an institutional bias in favor of Senator Barack Obama and/or against Senator Hillary Clinton?
Yes 68% 11191
No 32% 5268
Total Votes: 16459
This is not a scientific poll
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020808/content/01125106.guest.html
The Clintons Lied to Us About the Need for a Limbaugh Fundraiser
February 8, 2008
RUSH: "The dirty little secret here is that Chris Matthews has been on the anti-Hillary Clinton bandwagon. He's been on a tear against her for weeks now, if not months. It is clear that he's chosen Obama..."
http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/blog/g/f387c78d-6b31-493a-907c-040e1439b6d1
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
"The Obama Version Of Swiftboating"
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:23
"The NBC move into full-fledged Obama support is an editorial choice, and fine by me. The network's center-right audience will decide whether to watch anyway, just as left wingers often listen to my show knowing full well my transparent political leanings..."

and that Barack Obama has received a free ride from many pundits in the media as I have very credibly and thoroughly documented:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14665
MEDIA STUDY: Media Boost Obama, Bash “Billary” and "NBC Is Toughest on Hillary"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 9, 2008 - 1:01am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14759
YouTube: Chris Matthews said Clinton Press Shop Composed of "Kneecappers"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 18, 2008 - 9:39am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14717
VIDEO: Chris Matthews said "I Felt This Thrill Going Up My Leg" As Obama Spoke!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 14, 2008 - 10:23am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14623
VIDEO: Dan Abrams on Super Tuesday media coverage: Media rooting against Hillary
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 5, 2008 - 6:29pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14606
Chris Cillizza admitted: "the Obama campaign has gotten very favorable coverage"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 4, 2008 - 10:08am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14569
VIDEOS: Dan Abrams on the media: Media smearing Hillary? & Muzzling Bill Clinton
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 1, 2008 - 6:16am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14472
VIDEO: "Dan Abrams argues the media invented a race war to bait" Obama & Hillary
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 21, 2008 - 10:33am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14454
VIDEO & ANALYSIS: What about the seeming apology of Chris Matthews to Hillary?
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 19, 2008 - 5:50am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14425
VIDEOS: Dan Abrams of MSNBC did a 3 part series exposing anti-Hillary media bias
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 15, 2008 - 9:14am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14414
Lee Cowan of NBC News said about Obama: "it's almost hard to remain objective"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 14, 2008 - 9:32am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14336
Howard Kurtz on Obama's "easy ride" & will the press "provide tougher scrutiny?"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 7, 2008 - 2:44am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14319
Carl Bernstein said about Barack Obama "he had a kind of free ride up until now"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 5, 2008 - 9:40am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14266
Dana Milbank on Hillary: "The press will savage her no matter what, pretty much"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on December 30, 2007 - 10:48pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14242
Joe Sestak did a great job of defending Hillary to a very biased Chris Matthews!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on December 28, 2007 - 5:40am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/13814
Why I think Chris Matthews crossed the line showing his own bias against Hillary
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 5, 2007 - 3:30am.
Chris Matthews and many other pundits in the mainstream media are being very clearly unprofessional when it comes to the goal of being truly objective journalists and these links show that the current state of the media is definitely a broken system right now in my opinion!
It is nice to see that at least a few of these media pundits are being honest about the role that they are playing in this election as I have documented:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/13942
Media Pundit Admits: "We talk about polls... We're creating the inevitability"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 19, 2007 - 11:52pm.