TRANSCRIPT: Obama is called "a guy that America is infatuated with & phenomenon"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 25, 2008 - 4:13am.
Media
Hello Everyone:
CNN Reliable Sources with Howard Kurtz is one of my favorite programs to watch because Kurtz and his panel are very good at cutting through a lot of the spin and rhetoric that are going on in the media to get at the bottom line of what is really happening right now!
Here is the CNN Reliable Sources transcript from Sunday, February 24 where Howard Kurtz and his panel made these interesting and what I consider to be very alarming points about Barack Obama's media coverage that I definitely think all people need to be aware of:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0802/24/rs.01.html
CNN RELIABLE SOURCES
'New York Times' McCain Bombshell Sparks Charges of Political Smear
Aired February 24, 2008 - 10:00 ET
1) Howard Kurtz asked the right question when he asked "Doesn't the press have a responsibility to cut through the rhetoric" and his panel guest Blanquita Cullum honestly answered about Obama "What you have, a race right now with a guy that America is infatuated with. So there's basically bigger -- there's a bigger infatuation than they really care about the issues that he stands for or they don't:"
HOWARD KURTZ, HOST: Let me play Barack Obama's response, and I'll ask you a question, Blanquita, on the other side.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
SEN. BARACK OBAMA (D-IL), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Unlike some of the attacks that have been leveled about me that have debunked by news organizations, these are accurate.
(END VIDEO CLIP) KURTZ: "Doesn't the press have a responsibility to cut through the rhetoric and say, yes, these were largely attacks or they were not accurate, and here's how?
BLANQUITA CULLUM, RADIO TALK SHOW HOST: It would be OK if you had a different race. What you have, a race right now with a guy that America is infatuated with. So there's basically bigger -- there's a bigger infatuation than they really care about the issues that he stands for or they don't.
KURTZ: So that let's us off the hook?
CULLUM: No, it doesn't let you off the hook, but what I'm saying is that the people are not reading that. So, even if the press is covering it, it's kind of getting lost in the mix..."
People in my opinion should be very alarmed when in so much of the media Obama infatuation seems to be trumping the issues!
2) Blanquita Cullum says about Obama twice "You're dealing with a phenomenon" and then goes on to say about him "You're dealing with a guy who has got the wave now moving in his direction, and all the people are going to try to ride that wave:"
CULLUM: "You're dealing with a phenomenon. You're dealing with a phenomenon.
You're dealing with a guy who has got the wave now moving in his direction, and all the people are going to try to ride that wave. You know, there's an old adage in Washington -- if it's going to happen, be for it. Hillary is not on that wave. And so the difference between the 48 hours thing and old-time politics, and everything, we're not dealing with the same thing. We're dealing with a different MO here that's working in this election..."
3) Blanquita Cullum says about Obama "People are afraid to really ask the hardball questions to the guy" to which Clarence Page replies "I bet Republicans will bring that up:"
CULLUM: "People are afraid to really ask the hardball questions to the guy.
CLARENCE PAGE, "THE CHICAGO TRIBUNE": I bet Republicans will bring that up.
CULLUM: Oh yes..."
This is a big reason why it is so dangerous that Obama is getting a free ride from most of the mainstream media right now because IF he is the nominee, then things can probably come up in the general election that we do not know about right now which could prove fatal to him if something big comes up that we do not know about during the primary process!
This is exactly why right now "Hillary's high negatives are an illusion compared to Obama or any other Democrat" because Obama has not been vetted, he has been been given a free ride by most of the media, and he has not endured very much of the GOP attack machine yet like how Hillary has which will definitely raise his negative numbers and will lower his poll numbers against McCain IF he is the nominee as I have credibly documented:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/13992
Hillary's high negatives are an illusion compared to Obama or any other Democrat
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 28, 2007 - 4:49pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14599
TRANSCRIPT: Sen. Robert Menendez got it right about Obama's lack of electability
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 4, 2008 - 6:36am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14789#comment-284068
There is NO question in my opinion of anti-Hillary media bias... and that Barack Obama has received a free ride from many pundits in the media as I have very credibly and thoroughly documented:
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 20, 2008 - 3:56pm.
4) Howard Kurtz discusses how "the press is soft on Obama" to which Clarence Page replies "And it's like there is this kind of a narrative where I think a lot of the media coverage doesn't want to be on the wrong side of history after this is over:"
KURTZ: "But, you know, look, we've talked on this program about whether the press is soft on Obama.
PAGE: I did a column on it this past weekend, and I said, you know, the Clinton campaign has got a point, that she's been on the downside as far as the media tilt. Because every campaign -- every big story has a narrative. And the narrative here has been one of the heroic young challenger against the mighty incumbent-like woman who's running for president.
But it's not just any woman, she's a Clinton. And it's like there is this kind of a narrative where I think a lot of the media coverage doesn't want to be on the wrong side of history after this is over..."
This is absolutely outrageous in my opinion. People in the media on this Obama bandwagon who are being soft on him ought to be ashamed of themselves and they are NOT credible or professional journalists as far as I am concerned!
5) Howard Kurtz then brings up how that Obama got 46 minutes for his speech from the cable networks while Hillary got only 7 minutes and her speech was upstaged by Obama:
KURTZ: "You know what's another example of this? Just this past Tuesday night, Obama wins Wisconsin. And Hillary Clinton gives her speech. And she's seven minutes into the speech, and Obama comes out and upstages her, and all the cable networks then go to Obama.
She ends up with seven minutes. He got 46 minutes of primetime.
Why? Because he's fun to watch. But it just seemed to me to be unbalanced, and it's not the first time it has happened..."
I have said it before and I will say it again. The bottom line in my opinion is that Hillary Clinton is NOT just running against a candidate named Barack Obama. She is actually running against Obama's personal charisma which is a movement that is being fueled and cheered on by much of the mainstream media right now. This is the same biased, unprofessional, and irresponsible media who are rooting for Obama and who are giving him a free pass on his lack of substance regarding the issues, on his past, and on his background!
You would think that after 7 years of Bush's incompetency and the media complaining about it so much that they would more carefully scrutinize a serious candidate for President of The United States BEFORE the primary process is over!
My opinion is that these unprofessional pundits in the mainstream media who are openly biased against Hillary and who are giving Obama a free ride right now will have absolutely nothing to complain about IF Obama is the nominee, if he loses to McCain in the general election because he was not scrutinized enough in the primary process (which is what I think will happen if he is the nominee), and if we "stay the course" in Iraq because he lost the election!
They will also have absolutely nothing to complain about if Obama is the nominee, if he should win the election, and if he proves to be incompetent just like how Bush has been because he was not scrutinized enough during the primary process!
Please forward this information on so that more Democratic primary voters (especially in Texas and Ohio) will be aware of this blatant anti-Hillary/pro-Obama media bias and will think twice before believing any of it when they see it. I will definitely keep on exposing this unprofessional media bias nonsense as I continue to see it!
Mitch Dworkin
http://www.securingamerica.com/
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10756
StopIranWar.com: "War is not the answer"
Submitted by Wes Clark on February 21, 2007 - 11:40am.
http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_022108/content/01125113.guest.html
Obamamania Grips the Nation, as Mrs. Clinton's Prospects Dry Up
February 21, 2008
Read the Background Material...
• Baltimore Sun: Even Blowing his Nose, Obama Gets Applause
http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2008/02/even_blowing_his_nose_obama_ge.html

« Barack Obama picks up union support | Main | Was Obama 'delusion' preceded by JFK delusion? »
Even blowing his nose, Obama gets applause
by John McCormick
DALLAS – It's probably safe to say that you have arrived as a politician when your audience applauds when you blow your nose.
Yes, just a day before a debate in Texas, Sen. Barack Obama has a head cold.
And about a half-hour into a speech here, the Illinois Democrat announced that he had to take a quick break. "Gotta blow my nose here for a second," Obama said.
Out came a Kleenex (or perhaps it was a hankie), and he wiped his nose.
The near-capacity audience at the Reunion Arena, which his campaign said totaled 17,000, broke out in a slightly awkward applause.
Despite the cold, Obama's voice seems as strong as ever. He has a light schedule today and some time to rest up before his debate Thursday evening with Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York.
Posted by John McCormick on February 20, 2008 2:29 PM | Permalink
Hank Sheinkopf made a very interesting point in my opinion. I really wish that this race was based on the issues and that Obama was NOT getting a free ride from most of the mainstream media right now!
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0802/16/ldtw.01.html
LOU DOBBS THIS WEEK
Russia and China Stand Against U.S.; More on the Mortgage Crisis; Campaign Updates; Alien Sanctuary State
Aired February 16, 2008 - 19:00 ET
KITTY PILGRIM, HOST: "On the democratic side, Senator Clinton picked up a win but it was not enough to regain the lead from Senator Obama. So, joining me now, CNN contributor Errol Louis, who is a columnist for the "New York Daily News," Hank Sheinkopf, democratic strategist, also a CNN contributor and from Washington, Diana West, columnist from the "Washington Times."
Thank you all for being here. You know, it's been a real interesting week in the campaigning. And what's particularly intriguing is the language. Now, Senator Clinton has a new sort of slogan. She says she is about programs, Obama is about promises. What do you think of this, Hank?
HANK SHEINKOPF, CNN, CONTRIBUTOR: Not a lot. The issue is not Obama. The issue is Hillary Clinton. They are thinking in traditional terms that is why the Clinton campaign has got some problems. This is not a traditional race. There is no phenomena before this name Barack Obama nor will it be afterwards. It's really got to be about her. It's got to be a personal relationship between her and the electorate and that is where disconnect is. Attacking Senator Obama is not going to help much..."
Feb. 18: Hardball Big Number: Five (Fainting at Obama rallies)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23226103#23226103 (02:11)
--------------------
• VIDEO: Fired Up and Falling Down: String of Crowd Fainting Incidents Hits Obama Rallies
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/48404.html
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021808/content/01125111.guest.html
Too Much Hope Makes You Faint?
February 18, 2008
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: We have here a montage. We spoke earlier in the broadcast of all the fainting that is going on at Obama rallies, fainting and people falling down. And it does make you wonder if the fainting is planted, if they are faking it. We have a string here of -- it's a montage of Obama reacting to people fainting over and over again in his audience.
OBAMA: She is an outstanding Congresswoman, Congresswoman Diane Lawson -- we need -- if we have a medic, somebody just fell, they probably felt a little bit faint. Are you okay? We need some water, somebody still on the ground? Can somebody get them some water. Is she okay? Do we have somebody who fainted? Hold on, we got somebody who is sick. Can we get somebody? We got medical attention coming. Make some space for her and let her lie down. It looks like we have somebody who may have fainted. Can people make -- make some space? Hold on a second. Young lady? You okay? Why don't you sit down, though. Somebody guide her out and let her sit down, because she's just feeling a little faint. She's fine. You probably didn't eat lunch. That's the problem. She'll be okay. Why don't you help -- help -- somebody help her just sit -- somebody help her sit down. Can we get a chair on the side where somebody can sit down? Make a path.
(playing of A Vote for Obama spoof)
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/48404.html
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• Wall Street Journal: We Shall Be Overcome
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110011130
• VIDEO: Fired Up and Falling Down: String of Crowd Fainting Incidents Hits Obama Rallies
http://www.breitbart.tv/html/48404.html
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
What's the big deal - when I was a teenager I saw people faint in line when I was in a restaurant waiting to be seated. Wouldn't the people near the front of the room at the Obama events have been standing on their feet the longest and be more susceptible to fainting? Plus, they have to go through the Secret Service screening process which is time consuming too, isn't it? Honestly, I think there is way too much attention being paid to this topic.
Proud to be an American.
You have hit the nail EXACTLY on the head. Rational explanations don't always do it here though.
Anyone interested in at least one recorded instance of some fainting at a Hillary function, click here. It is the second video. Followed by a girl collapsing at a President Bill event in video three. Enjoy.
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/hillary-and-bill-copy-obamas-fainting-fans

I stood in line for 4 hours in 90 degree heat waiting for jfk & jre on the night after they accepted the Dem nomination in 2004. I was in the very first row and I don't recall a single person fainting. Of course, what was there to faint about???
Hi Nelsons:
The bottom line to this as far as I can see are several questions such as are these faintings genuine or staged? Are they over his personal charisma (which will NOT fix any problems we are facing right now), are they just over the temperature, or are they over the issues that really matter?
These are definitely valid questions that have to be asked in my opinion, especially when the other side is bringing them up as I documented above with Rush Limbaugh!
I have also not seen these kind of faintings reported at the campaign rallies of other candidates this year so I would like to know the answer to these questions.
My OPINION is that they are the result of Obama's high powered speeches that are emotionally affecting people, almost like what you see in Pentecostal type churches!
While it is nice that people feel good after listening to an Obama speech, I do NOT see any specific substance in these speeches that will actually solve the huge problems which the next President will inherit from Bush on 1/20/09!
Mitch

back in the sixties there were ambulances lined up around the block during Beatles concerts because there were so many young women fainting. Frankly, I could see my knees buckling far more easily at the sight of John, Paul, George & Ringo than I could Senator Obama. But hey......that's just me. :)
is, unfortunately, elected President, I can foresee a Health Care Crisis; women clear across the land will be dropping like flies as he gives his inaugural speech. Emergency rooms will be jammed, as will the switchboards and cell phone towers. Finally, but too late, the ObamaNation will be asking themselves,"What hath we wrought?"
1984 happened, but the media didn't tell us.
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_022008/content/01125107.guest.html
The Cult of Barack Obama
February 20, 2008
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Joanne in Birmingham, Alabama, we'll start with you. Great to have you here.
CALLER: Dittos, Maha Rushie.
RUSH: Thank you.
CALLER: Well, as a person who's been observing Barry Obama for the last I'd say probably three years, I'm here to say that this entire messianic aura that he's got going on right now is not going to last. And I totally agree with you about that. He has become absolutely nauseating to me, just his body language, the way he peers upon the crowd with that condescending sort of aura coming out of him. It's just sickening to me at this point.
RUSH: Is it Obama that's sickening to you, or is it the reaction that average American Democrats are having to him that really sickens you or frightens you?
CALLER: It's him. It's him. See, I saw him speak back when he was running for the Senate against Alan Keyes, and -- wasn't he running against Alan Keyes at one point, back in --
RUSH: Yeah, right, exactly.
CALLER: It was the first time --
RUSH: Alan Keyes didn't even live in Illinois.
CALLER: Right. Right. Of course he shot himself in the foot, as usual, but the way he spoke back then, I said, "This guy is trouble for the Republicans."
RUSH: Well, I got some interesting information about this. David Axelrod, who is running Obama's campaign, ran Deval Patrick's campaign and Edwards, and this guy may be the source, with the 26-year-old speechwriter they got and Ted Sorenson doing the advising. What all this goes to, folks, what all this goes to is the authenticity. Is this really Obama or is this the product of his advisors writing his speeches and so forth? Somebody's going to go there. The Clintons will go there, McCain will go there. Just how authentic is this? Is this really some inspirational movement here? Is this Dr. Norman Vincent Peale or is this a presidential campaign? Is this a cult or is it a political movement? People are going to have to start asking these questions about Obama. You know, last night, I just felt like taking a bit of a hiatus from some of this stuff. So when the results came in and it was apparently obvious what's going to happen, I turned on some entertainment TV. And all the e-mails started coming in, "Rush, Rush, Rush, you've got to turn on the Obama speech, you've got to watch this. I don't like Obama, but he is great. He's such a great speaker. Rush, Rush, Rush, you've got to --" I look at that stuff on the e-mail and my eyes turn into snake slits. Why do I have to watch it?
Ladies and gentlemen, this is what I told one of the people who sent me a note last night. "Look, if you want to marvel, if you want to sit there and swoon and go in awe, go right ahead, but those of us who are the best at what we do are not phased by others who also do it." I'll be glad to watch somebody that's great at what they do if I don't do it, like somebody playing football or baseball. I'm not going to sit around when I know what the guy is going to say, when I know the whole approach. I got better things to do. I'm taking some time off of it. I'll read the transcript of the speech later. We've put together a montage. We've got two different things in this speech that I do wish to highlight for you. We've put together a montage here of the nothingness, but then he got specific on economics last night, and this is frightening stuff. So here's the montage. This is at the Toyota Center in Houston, where Obama gave -- what would you call this? An acceptance speech, victory speech, State of the Union speech? It was all kinds of speeches rolled into one.
OBAMA: We need to move in a new direction. We're here because we still believe that change is possible. And so the question I have for you tonight, Houston, is, are you really ready for change? The size of our challenges has outstripped the capacity of a broken and divided politics to solve. Change in America does not happen from the top down. It happens from the bottom up. All across the country people are standing up and saying, it is time to turn the page, it is time to write a new chapter in American history. We want to move forward into a better tomorrow. The American people (crowd chanting "yes we can") -- yes, we can. We'll invest in you, you invest in America, together we will march this country forward. We need something different, and we need new leadership to move into a new century. Nothing worthwhile in this country has ever happened except somebody somewhere was willing to hope. That's what hope is, imagining, and then fighting for, and then working for, struggling for what did not seem possible before. All these things are possible if you are ready for change.
RUSH: What things? This is amazing! All of those things -- change, the future. (laughing) Now, I saw, there were 20,000 people there, and they were mesmerized. I mean it's a cult. (interruption) That's what I'm telling you, Snerdley, revival, whatever you want to call it, it's cult, it is a personality cult. These people that are showing up at these things are investing all this hope in Obama, not in themselves. Hope, like I keep telling you, hope is an excuse for doing nothing. (interruption) I know you gotta whole different opinion of this. I'm telling you, this will not sustain itself, just like the Perot phenomenon didn't sustain itself. It's not because it's not valid, or any of that, it's because people's emotional reservoirs just aren't that deep. Plus, the whole context of the campaign is going to change.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: It's not over yet, Snerdley. You can't say she's finished with this until Texas and Ohio, and even then, with these delegate rules, you know, I'm just reacting today. We're doing a bunch of hypotheticals within the context that it's over, but it really isn't, but in terms of what McCain has to do against an Obama nominee in the general election, that's the sense in which I'm exploring this stuff today. Snerdley is going nuts here, folks. It just hit him last night that this Obama thing is for real. It's been real ever since it started. You know, getting a handle on it, putting your arms around what it is, is another thing. But it's not a political movement. It's a rock tour. It's a rock concert tour. And if you don't show up at the concert when it happens in your town, you're not hip. It's a cult. It's a religious movement, whatever it is, it has gone beyond politics. These speeches say nothing; they say nothing. These people, I'm telling you, that are gravitating to Obama, at least these people showing up in person, these are people desperately seeking meaning in their lives because they don't have any.

We all want to matter. We all want to have meaning in our lives. We all want to be relevant to something, and a lot of these people don't feel that about themselves. They feel empty, and they're trying to fill the emptiness, fill the void. And Obama does. Obama gives them hope that they're going to be something, but that's even not it. Obama gives them hope that he is going to make their life substantive and have meaning by virtue of his presence, his messianic -- by virtue of his existence alone. They're not going to have to do anything. Basically you could say that Obama is saying this to these cultists out there in this crowd, "I will do my best to take wealth from those who generate it in our country and give it to you, who are hoping for change." That's one of the essences of what Obama is saying. Here's a couple more bites here. He finally got a little specific on economics.
OBAMA: I believe in the free market. I know Texans believe in entrepreneurship. We are an independent and a self-reliant people. We don't believe in government doing what we can do for ourselves. But when we've got CEOs making more in ten minutes than ordinary workers are making in a year, and it's the CEOs who are getting a tax break and workers are left with nothing, then something is wrong.
RUSH: Right. So throw all this free market stuff that he just said he supports out the window, because something's wrong. It ain't working. The free market isn't wrong. Hillary says she's going to rein in all these corporations. He's doing the same thing. He's just not using her language. Here's the second bite.
OBAMA: I want to take away those tax breaks to companies that are shipping jobs overseas. We're going to give them to companies that invest right here in America. And we're going to rollback the Bush tax cuts that went to all the wealthy people, and we're going to give tax cuts to ordinary families, people who are making less than $75,000, we will offset your payroll tax, senior citizens who make less than $50,000, we want to say to them, "You don't have to pay an income tax, you're already having a tough time making ends meet," and I will raise the minimum wage not every ten years, but to keep pace with inflation because, if you work in America, you should not be poor, and that's a goal that we should set for ourselves when I'm president of the United States of America.
RUSH: That's what I mean. This speech last night, folks, very specific. He is an old-time liberal. He is an old-time socialist. Very little of that stuff, by the way, that he says he's going to do will ever happen. It doesn't matter. He's not going to be able to pull that off. Those kinds of things, that drastically, are not going to happen. But he wants them to, and he will try to make them happen. Obama never worked in the private sector, and it shows. You go out, folks, you try be a young person, you try to get a job under President Obama. He wants to jack up the minimum wage and index it to inflation. You want to blast young people right out of the job market, do the Obama plan. Good-bye high school and college jobs for kids, good-bye entry-level jobs. So will Barack step up and give our tax money to those he puts out of work? Yeah. Because it's never going to be his fault. It will be the evil Republicans in Congress who have no compassion. I, for one, I do not want a naïve fool with zilch experience managing the United States economy. And Hillary talks this way, too. That's not their job. Dictators manage economies. Presidents do not. He wants to manage upper-end wages, CEO wages. He wants socialized medicine, to expand unions, empower teachers unions. All of this stuff is Marxism when you boil it all down. These are all old ideas, regressive ideas that have failed, as Obama is a young, naïve man who holds tight to failed old ideas.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I wonder if Obama wants to manage how much money that people get from their trusts, you know, like the Kennedys. Let's cap that while we're at it. We're going to cap CEO pay, let's cap what you can get out of your own trust.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: All right, here's my question: Will the American people succumb to one of the most demagogic politicians of our modern times? That would be Barack Obama. We consider ourselves educated, sophisticated, we consider ourselves stewards of one of the oldest democracies in the world. Is this all it takes to undermine it, a bunch of pap, a bunch of meaningless, nothing platitudes? Is this all it takes to turn our military, economy, our courts over to a recent community activist, Barack Obama? Is this all it takes? You have to understand here, ladies and gentlemen, that the Democrats have been vying, focusing, desiring this kind of reaction from the American people for 50 years. As much of nothing as they will accept, the Democrats will offer. As much misery, tumult, and chaos as they can promote, the Democrats will promote to create this sense of panic, discontent, unsettledness, misery in as many Americans as possible. They have done this with their willing accomplices in the Drive-By Media. Every day a barrage of pessimism, fatalism, doom, destruction, hopelessness, all of these things, in the greatest country in the history of man and woman. Is this all it's going to take, a rookie, to come along and undermine the greatness of this country? It's a question every one of us needs to ask ourselves.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• American Thinker: Reviewing Obama's Blueprint for Change
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/02/reviewing_obamas_blueprint_for.html
• Politico: Obama Win Sets Stage for Showdown
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8596.html
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
Is that I cannot stand Limbaugh, but I find myself agreeing with him more often than not lately because he is ranting against those of his own ilk who want Hillary Clinton to drop out of the race. Of course he bluntly states that he wants her to stay in so that the Dems will split for as long as possible, but to me, that is a better argument than putting up MY Jr. Senator from Illinois who has done nothing for me or for my state in terms of anything substantial at all.
And, on Hannity's radio show yesterday (yep, I've escaped from Air America due to all of the Obamamania there), a caller discussed how Repubs can all be Dems for a day in Texas and vote for Obama...of course, then switch back in the general election. Hope O is happy with his new-found consistuents--they'll be with him all the way to November...NOT!
( who, in my opinion, are substantially less than super ) are supposed to be there to counter scenarios such as the switching parties for a day scam. However, it appears many of them, too, are falling victim to the american idolization of the dem party. What a shame that our "democracy" is turning out to be such a sham.
In essence, it's becoming "mob rule."
1984 happened, but the media didn't tell us.
I'm sure, will of course do as O wants them to do and vote like their constituents want them to vote...the way MA voters indicated they should vote...for Hillary, of course! NOT!
Why would they stop the scam "Dem for a Day?" It isn't in their own interest!
in the Texas primary yesterday!
Hannity agreed with his caller and then he said something along the line of "we need to get rid of Hillary first and then we will deal with Obama later using his lack of substance."
I also "cannot stand Limbaugh, but I find myself agreeing with him more often than not lately because he is ranting against those of his own ilk who want Hillary Clinton to drop out of the race."
Very good observations Marti!
often find myself in the same boat as those here who have previously stated that they feel like they are in topsy-turvey Wonderland. Did I partake of the wrong "drink me" beverage???
Honestly, I turned off all right-wing radio for years and years after Bill Clinton's first election--it is only within the last couple of MONTHS that I've started "opposition research" again.
I don't know of any way to stop the "Dems for a Day" process and why oh why is the primary process this way in the first place? This is NOT the democracy idea at all!
http://www.thechrismatthewsshow.com/html/transcript/index.php?selected=1&id=101
THE CHRIS MATTHEWS SHOW
Weekend of March 2, 2008
CHRIS MATTHEWS, "host: Katty, TELL ME SOMETHING I DON'T KNOW.
Ms. KATTY KAY (BBC Washington Correspondent): Chris, the Obama campaign, to try and counteract the criticism of these big revival-type meetings, has a deliberate strategy now in Texas.
They're going to have much smaller meetings, 500 to 1,000 people. They're trying to stop any backlash that this is just all about a cult of personality.
MATTHEWS: Right.
Mr. COKELY: They're going to start...
MATTHEWS: I can't believe their crowds are too big..."
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/09/twip.01.html
THIS WEEK IN POLITICS
The Week's Political Events in Review
Aired March 9, 2008 - 13:00 ET
TOM FOREMAN, HOST: "THIS WEEK IN POLITICS will be right back
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
FOREMAN: How you feel about the election?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I love Obama.
FOREMAN: Really?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes.
FOREMAN: Why?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Number one, women over 40 don't like him, so, it makes me feel young.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)..."
-----------------------------------------------
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/02/twip.01.html
THIS WEEK IN POLITICS
The Week's Campaign Happenings
Aired March 2, 2008 - 13:00 ET
TOM FOREMAN, HOST: "Stick around. We've got a lot more coming up on this week in politics.
(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)
FOREMAN: Do you have any idea who you would vote for now?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Who's running?
FOREMAN: Well, there's John McCain. He's a Republican. And Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Obama.
FOREMAN: Obama, why is that?
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I don't know. I just like what he's doing, what he said. I've caught some of it.
(END VIDEO CLIP)
(COMMERCIAL BREAK)..."


http://www.drudgereport.com/
ABC: The Cult Of Obama?...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/02/and-obama-wept.html
Political Punch
Power, pop, and probings from ABC News Senior National Correspondent Jake Tapper
Jake Tapper is ABC News' Senior National Correspondent based in the network's Washington bureau. He writes about politics and popular culture and covers a range of national stories.
And Obama Wept
February 07, 2008 9:43 AM
Inspiration is nice. But some folks seem to be getting out of hand.
It's as if Tom Daschle descended from on high saying, "Be not afraid; for behold I bring you good tidings of great joy which shall be to all the people: for there is born to you this day in the city of Chicago a Savior, who is Barack the Democrat."
Obama supporter Kathleen Geier writes that she's "getting increasingly weirded out by some of Obama's supporters. On listservs I'm on, some people who should know better – hard-bitten, not-so-young cynics, even – are gushing about Barack…
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/02/05/barack_obama_is_not_jesus/#more
Describing various encounters with Obama supporters, she writes, "Excuse me, but this sounds more like a cult than a political campaign. The language used here is the language of evangelical Christianity – the Obama volunteers speak of 'coming to Obama' in the same way born-again Christians talk about 'coming to Jesus.'...So I say, we should all get a grip, stop all this unseemly mooning over Barack, see him and the political landscape he is a part of in a cooler, clearer, and more realistic light, and get to work."
Joe Klein, writing at Time, notes "something just a wee bit creepy about the mass messianism" he sees in Obama's Super Tuesday speech.
http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1710721,00.html
"We are the ones we've been waiting for," Obama said. "This time can be different because this campaign for the presidency of the United States of America is different. It's different not because of me. It's different because of you."
Says Klein: "That is not just maddeningly vague but also disingenuous: the campaign is entirely about Obama and his ability to inspire. Rather than focusing on any specific issue or cause — other than an amorphous desire for change — the message is becoming dangerously self-referential. The Obama campaign all too often is about how wonderful the Obama campaign is. “
The always interesting James Wolcott writes that "(p)erhaps it's my atheism at work but I found myself increasingly wary of and resistant to the salvational fervor of the Obama campaign, the idealistic zeal divorced from any particular policy or cause and chariot-driven by pure euphoria. I can picture President Hillary in the White House dealing with a recalcitrant Republican faction; I can't picture President Obama in the same role because his summons to history and call to hope seems to transcend legislative maneuvers and horse-trading; his charisma is on a more ethereal plane, and I don't look to politics for transcendence and self-certification."
http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/blogs/wolcott/2008/02/so-spurn-me-i-v.html
Then there's MSNBC's Chris Matthews who tells Felix Gillette in the New York Observer, “I’ve been following politics since I was about 5. I’ve never seen anything like this. This is bigger than Kennedy. [Obama] comes along, and he seems to have the answers. This is the New Testament."
http://www.observer.com/2008/primary-scream?page=0%2C0
And behold, Obama met them and greeted them. And they came up and took hold of His feet and worshiped Him.
The Holy Season of Lent is upon us. Can Obama worshippers try to give up their Helter-Skelter cult-ish qualities for a few weeks?
At least until Easter, or the Pennsylvania primary, whichever comes first...
- jpt
UPDATE: Let me be clear: I'm not saying there shouldn't be enthusiasm in politics. I'm merely touching on the fact that some Obama supporters' exhuberance seems to be getting a little out of hand. Obama himself joked about this at a Hollywood fundraiser, as noted in Men's Vogue:
http://www.mensvogue.com/business/politics/feature/articles/2007/04/status_report_obama?printable=true¤tPage=all
“When Morgan Freeman comes over to greet Obama, the senator begins bowing down both hands in worship. ‘This guy was president before I was,’ says Obama, referring to Freeman's turn in Deep Impact and, clearly, getting a little ahead of his own bio. Next, a nod to Bruce Almighty: ‘This guy was God before I was.’”
February 7, 2008 | Permalink | User Comments (753)
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/433071/25892032
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference And Obama Wept: