Obama talks big, but it's Hillary who fights to empower the American people.


| | | |

Nick Kelly's picture

Click here to watch Hillary's great speech today in Michigan!

I believe the families of Michigan are just as important as the families of any other state...Senator Obama speaks passionately on the campaign trail about empowering the American people. Today I'm here to encourage him to match those words with actions.

Hillary Clinton, Detroit, March 19, 2008

Ever since the Obama campaign curried the favor of certain Democratic Party officials by voluntarily withdrawing his name from the Michigan ballot, Obama's supporters have attempted to insure that the preferences of Michigan Democrats will not be considered at the Democratic Convention in Denver.

A committee of four Michigan Democratic leaders, all neutral in the presidential nomination fight, proposed the re-vote last week, and draft legislation was circulated at the state Capitol Monday. But Democratic legislative leaders -- largely Obama supporters -- have raised objections. The Obama campaign, though it has not flatly opposed a new primary, has cited a number of potential legal obstacles. Lawmakers in Lansing have said they will not move forward with a new primary unless both campaigns agree.

UPDATE: NO MERIT! Mark Brewer, Chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, says that none of the legal objections presented by the Obama camp have any merit!

Clinton said. “I have accepted the plan for a new vote in Michigan ... I call on Senator Obama to do the same. This is a crucial test. Does he mean what he says or not?”

The legislation to create a new primary appears to have the support of the DNC, the Michigan Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign. The DNC’s Rules and Bylaws Committee, which approved the penalties levied against the state Democrats over the Jan. 15 primary, said in a memorandum Wednesday that the draft legislation would fit within the framework of the national party’s rules and that the Rules Committee would meet to consider a new Delegate Selection Plan, if and when the state party submits one.

Mark Brewer, chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, said in a written statement he supported the legislation. “None of the legal objections to the legislation have any merit, and in my opinion, this legislation satisfies all DNC and legal requirements,” he said.

But Michigan Republicans, who control the state Senate and have enough votes in the Democratic-controlled state House to block the two-thirds supermajority needed to implement a new primary, say they will not support the measure unless all parties in the Democrats’ dispute sign off on the plan.

Obama himself is not standing by his own words

The Clinton campaign is accusing Obama of being the lone roadblock to a re-vote. "On February 8, 2008, Barack Obama stood in the aisle of his airplane and told reporters that he would be 'fine' with a new primary in Michigan if it could be done in a way that gave him and Senator Clinton time to make their respective cases and the DNC signed off. Since then, such a plan has garnered broad support from top Michigan lawmakers and the DNC has given its blessing," the Clinton camp said in a memo. "So Barack Obama is on board, right? Guess again. It turns out that his comments about being fine with a re-vote if the above conditions were met were just words."

The recognition that the Obama camp is the obstacle to a solution to this problem is now spreading rapidly. Here's a report filed from North Carolina, coincidentally one of the states that has yet to hold a primary.

Sen. Barack Obama's campaign has raised questions about a possible June 3 revote in Michigan, although the Democratic National Committee seems fine with the idea.

"We have recently been asked whether the legislation as proposed by Michigan would fit within the framework of the National Party's Delegate Selection Rules," DNC officials said in a statement. "Our review of this legislation indicates that it would, in fact, fit within the framework of the Rules."

But Obama lawyer Robert F. Bauer raised several potential problems in a campaign memo released this morning, noting that the primary would be "unprecedented in conception and proposed structure," as no other states has ever "re-run an election in circumstances like these."

According to the Detroit Free Press, Michigan Republicans will not allow a revote unless Senator Obama's supporters agree to one. As the Obama camp has yet to agree to a revote, one may surmise that their twisted idea of empowering the American people is to enable Republicans to help Obama dis-empower Michigan Democrats.

Legislation to set a second Democratic presidential primary for June 3 won’t be acted upon until and unless it wins the endorsement of the Barack Obama campaign, state Senate leaders said Tuesday morning.

Senate Majority Leader Mike Bishop, R-Rochester, said Republicans won’t add the do-over primary to the agenda until “the Democrats get on the same page.”

The do-over primary is backed by Hillary Clinton and some of Michigan’s most influential Democrats. But Bishop said Republicans have considerable misgivings about the prospect of authorizing a second election to begin with, and won’t consider it unless the Democrats are unified.

Reuters has now filed this report. Hillary commented on the necessity of counting the votes from both Michigan and Florida.

"I am here for one simple reason: to make sure Michigan's votes are counted and your voices are heard in this election," the New York senator said.

Clinton, a former first lady, urged rival Barack Obama, a senator from Illinois, to give his backing to a proposal that would allow the state to hold a new Democratic contest to pick the party's nominee for president in the November election.

"Senator Obama speaks passionately on the campaign trail about empowering the American people. Today I am urging him to match those words with actions," she said.

"We need to either count the votes that have already been cast in Michigan and Florida or have new full and fair elections so that we can have your voices and your votes counted," she said to applause.

Submitted by briarhopper on March 19, 2008 - 1:03pm.

doesn't give a hoot, in my opinion, about fairness or honesty. He's presented himself to black America as one person and to white America as another. There are so many questions and complaints about authenticity in his caucus wins that attempts to get to the truth will probably engage scores of people for decades. He's got fuzzy-headed, bleeding-heart liberals gushing over him and pushing some imagined affirmative-action right for him to be President. Meddling Republicans, striving to saddle the Democratic Party with a weak candidate, have evidently given him money and engaged in crossover voting for him. It's like an episode of The Twilight Zone!

mad4clark's picture
Submitted by mad4clark on March 19, 2008 - 1:14pm.

Posted this on the GD but it belongs here

No excuse left for Barack Obama and his ardent supporters. Once so outraged by so called attempted "disenfranchisement" by Hillary Clinton, prove that their concern for the voters was false, as they either cheer or stand silent to Barack Obama's attempts to stop the revote in Michigan. The DNC has given the the thumbs up to the MI revote plan:

http://www.talkleft.com/story/2008/3/19/13023/4122

And from Hillary's speech in Detroit today...

Democrats are turning out in record numbers. In January 600,000 Michigan voters turned out on a cold day and you made it abundantly clear that you wanted your voices to be heard and votes to be counted...

These nearly 2.5 million voters [in MI & FL] are in danger of being shut out of our democratic process. I think it's wrong and frankly, I think it's un-American.

I will protect and cherish the right to vote. I will always defend your right to vote no matter whom you choose to vote for.

http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/3/19/112651/607

"It's not all about words and math. It comes down to who can win."


Submitted by Barry_NJ on March 19, 2008 - 2:26pm.

The DNC has said that a Michigan revote would be within the DNC rules, I'm not sure that's a much of a "thumbs up." Keep in mind the same DNC says that its fine to bar two state delegations from the convention. 

The objections I've seen do raise potential legal issues, which isn't surprising since I believe this would be the first time a revote has taken place. All sides would be better served if they stopped trying to make political points and seriously tried to work out the legal wrinkles.

Barry
Are you safer today than you were seven years ago?©

mad4clark's picture
Submitted by mad4clark on March 19, 2008 - 3:10pm.

Via Alegre

Michigan, Iowa and the Games the Politicos Play
by: Lynda Waddington
Oct 11, 2007 at 15:09 PM

snip

Five individuals connected to five different campaigns have confirmed -- but only under condition of anonymity -- that the situation that developed in connection with the Michigan ballot is not at all as it appears on the surface. The campaign for Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, arguably fearing a poor showing in Michigan, reached out to the others with a desire of leaving New York Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton as the only candidate on the ballot. The hope was that such a move would provide one more political obstacle for the Clinton campaign to overcome in Iowa.

Despite speaking in confidence, sources were quick to point out that the discussions were not the final deciding factor when candidates' names were removed from the ballot.

"Yes, such discussion did take place," said one national staffer, "but that doesn't mean we were influenced by it. The decision to pull from the Michigan ballot -- or other renegade states' ballots, for that matter -- was made the day we signed the pledge with the four early states."

A contact within a second campaign agreed.

"The belief that this would somehow hurt front-running Clinton in Iowa was icing on an already sweet cake," he said. "The real meal, however, is the good will the move generates not only in Iowa, but in all the states who are playing by the DNC rules and that don't appreciate all of this jumping and chaos."

Candidates who remain on the Michigan ballot are Clinton, Connecticut Sen. Chris Dodd, former Alaska Sen. Mike Gravel and (not by his own choosing) Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich. A person close to the Dodd campaign said the push to make Clinton look bad in Iowa and the feeling of being played "like a political pawn" were items discussed by the campaign. But, standing on principle isn't always a comfortable position......

http://iowaindependent.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1264

"It's not all about words and math. It comes down to who can win."


jen's picture
Submitted by jen on March 19, 2008 - 4:37pm.

A commenter at Talk Left suggested that Obama protest the re-vote by removing his name from the ballot. ROFLOL!!


Once in a while you get shown the light, In the strangest of places if you look at it right.


Submitted by Tega on March 20, 2008 - 12:55am.

Hillary's campaign should have a political ad that shows Obama saying it would be fine for MI to have a new primary. Then show how his advisers are putting up obstacles and how his supporters are fighting it.

For FL - Hillary should have an ad that tells the FL voters how political supporters of Obama have put up obstacles on the FL vote. Every voter from FL and MI should know what elected officials in their states are preventing the vote from counting (primaries). Show a photo of each elected official with their name underneath their voter.

If they are going to silence the voice of those voters - they should be punished for it by losing elections in the future. They are squashing Democracy. They call themselves, "Democrats," but are preventing Democracy - HYPOCRITES!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.