The biased media wants Hillary to drop out; 3 moral reasons for her to stay in!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 28, 2008 - 8:47am.
Rapid Response
Hello Everyone:
Several pundits in the anti-Hillary and pro-Obama biased mainstream media want Hillary to drop out of the primary race right now and they are heavily implying that on their programs!
Right below is the NewsBusters article titled "Hardball: 'Kamikaze' Hillary Ready to Wreck the Party" which documents the hit job that Chris Matthews did on Hillary last night. Here is the Hardball video link to document this biased and unprofessional hit job that Chris Matthews did on Hillary to imply that she drop out of the race:
March 27: Will Dems fight to the finish? (Tucker Carlson and Linda Douglass interview)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23833970#23833970 (08:33)
Chris Matthews was not alone yesterday doing these kind of hit jobs on Hillary to imply that she drop out of the race. Keith Olbermann and Jack Cafferty were just as bad as Chris Matthews was in my opinion:
March 27: Inside Clinton’s exit strategy (Jonathan Alter interview on Countdown)
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23836006#23836006 (05:43)
Pelosi’s response to Clinton fundraisers
March 27: Nancy Pelosi responded to a letter from Sen. Hillary Clinton’s supporters. Pelosi made recent statements that seem to back Obama’s contention that superdelegates should follow the votes of pledge delegates. Washington Post’s Dana Milbank discusses.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23836109#23836109 (05:04)
http://caffertyfile.blogs.cnn.com/2008/03/27/should-superdelegates-back-candidate-with-most-pledged-delegates/
March 27, 2008
Should superdelegates back candidate with most pledged delegates?
Posted: 05:54 PM ET
As far as I am concerned, Chris Matthews, Keith Olbermann, Jack Cafferty, and other biased media pundits just like them can all go jump in a like as far as I am concerned and that is putting how I feel as mildly as I possibly can!
I have credibly documented that Barack Obama is where he is at right now in this primary NOT based on his foreign policy or economic experience to be President or on the real issues that this campaign is about BUT rather he is where he is at right now because of the race issue as Geraldine Ferraro has factually stated, because his highly charismatic oratory skills that are able to emotionally hook people to follow him even if they do not know what he stands for, and because he has been given a free ride by most of the mainstream media so far:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/15039
ANALYSIS: Geraldine Ferraro; The reasons why Obama is where he is at right now!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 17, 2008 - 4:05am.
Hillary Clinton in my opinion clearly has these three moral reasons to stay in the primary race all the way up to the convention if necessary:
1) This poll along with the polls that I quoted in the link right above confirms that Geraldine Ferraro is factually correct about Obama being where he is at right now because of the race issue:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/11/se.02.html
CNN LIVE EVENT/SPECIAL
CNN Projects Obama as Winner of the Mississippi Primary; Is Eliot Spitzer About to Resign?; Democratic Race Continues to Tighten Leading up to Pennsylvania
Aired March 11, 2008 - 21:00 ET
WOLF BLITZER, CNN ANCHOR: "Barack Obama is going to be joining us in a moment or so -- but, Soledad, you're getting through these exit polls numbers and getting some more details on what -- what were the voters thinking today when they actually showed up in Mississippi?
SOLEDAD O'BRIEN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: And, really, why did he win? It will be good to kind of slide this in before we actually talk to him. At the end of the day, Wolf, I think the answer is it was about race in the State of Mississippi.
So let's take a look at our first graphic here. And you can see among black voters, their support for Barack Obama 91 percent in Mississippi tonight. Historically, you look back a little bit, the Alabama vote, that was at 84 percent. Back on Super Tuesday that number was at 82 percent. So, clearly, he tied up the black vote in a very big way..."
2) These links positively confirm that with the help of his highly charismatic oratory skills, many of Obama's "enraptured" supporters are emotionally following him more as a movement and as a "phenomenon" as opposed to his actual position on the issues:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14826
TRANSCRIPT: Obama is called "a guy that America is infatuated with & phenomenon"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 25, 2008 - 4:13am.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22558140/
'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for Jan. 7
Read the transcript to the Monday show
Guests: Steve McMahon
STEVE MCMAHON, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: "Barack Obama is not just a candidate anymore, he‘s a movement. He‘s an idea. He‘s an aspiration. When she goes in and she tries to kill a dream that people have, it‘s more dangerous, frankly, for her than it is for him..."
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14352
Many "enraptured" Obama supporters do NOT know his "position on the issues..."
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 8, 2008 - 6:37am.
3) It is a credibly documented fact that Barack Obama has been getting a free ride from most of the mainstream media and that the media has been much tougher on Hillary than they have been on Obama:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14665
MEDIA STUDY: Media Boost Obama, Bash “Billary” and "NBC Is Toughest on Hillary"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 9, 2008 - 1:01am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14850
TRANSCRIPT: Howard Kurtz on the free pass that Obama is getting from the media!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 27, 2008 - 7:22am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14910#comment-287435
There is NO question in my opinion of anti-Hillary media bias...
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 3, 2008 - 4:54am.
These three points in my opinion credibly document that Barack Obama has NOT done anything of significance based on his own merits to deserve to be where he is right now!
I cannot see anything that Obama has done in his past which truly qualifies him to be President while Hillary has a real record of foreign policy accomplishments to run on:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14952
TRANSCRIPT: CNN did a fact check on Hillary's foreign policy experience!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 7, 2008 - 12:44pm.
I was very glad to see Mark Halperin confirm last night that Hillary definitely plans to stay in the race:
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/27/acd.01.html
ANDERSON COOPER 360 DEGREES
Presidential Candidates Focus on Economy; Barack Obama Too Liberal to Unite Parties?; New Fears of Iraqi Civil War
Aired March 27, 2008 - 22:00 ET
MARK HALPERIN, SENIOR POLITICAL ANALYST, "TIME": "Look, Senator Clinton is not giving up. As Candy ticked off, there's a long way to go. A lot can happen. And there's a sort of implicit assumption among some of the Democratic leaders, certainly amongst the Obama campaign, certainly some of our colleagues, that Clinton is just kind of playing out the string, waiting to look for the right opportunity to get out of this race.
That is not the way she sees it, not at all. I did an interview her with her earlier this week for this week's "TIME" magazine. And she made it clear, as the headline of our story says that I did with Jay Carney, our Washington bureau chief, she is in it to win it. She thinks that there's a path to win this nomination, and she still thinks she would be not just a better president than Obama, but a better candidate to go up against McCain. She's not getting out.
So, there's a long way to go. And, as Candy said, these polls now are measuring things right in the heat of the battle. I think the party will come together, assuming -- assuming -- that the loser decides to be gracious to the winner..."
Finally, it is the biased media's so-called "rule" that the candidate with the most pledged delegates should win the nomination. However that is NOT what the rule is officially. The official rule is that superdelegates can vote however they want to and they are supposed to vote for the most qualified and electable candidate in order to prevent a 1972 from happening all over again. That is what I think will probably happen IF an unvetted candidate like Obama is the nominee!
Also, Hillary could probably get the most amount of popular votes if Obama would allow new primaries in Florida and in Michigan which her supporters are willing to fully finance themselves. However instead of doing that, Obama is stalling on the process in what looks like an effort to try and run out the primary clock!
Please forward this information on so that more people will know the moral reasons why Hillary should stay in the primary race despite all of the pressure that the biased media are putting on her to drop out right now!
Mitch Dworkin
http://www.securingamerica.com/
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10756
StopIranWar.com: "War is not the answer"
Submitted by Wes Clark on February 21, 2007 - 11:40am.
http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!
--------------------
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/03/27/hardball-kamikaze-hillary-ready-wreck-party
Hardball: 'Kamikaze' Hillary Ready to Wreck the Party

By Mark Finkelstein | March 27, 2008 - 18:38 ET
"After me, the deluge" (après moi, le déluge) -- popularly attributed to Louis XV
Look for Chris Matthews to start calling her "Louie." The Hardball host was as roiled as Robespierre today at Hillary Clinton's threat to take the Dem party down in a convention credentials fight over the seating of the Florida and Michigan delegates.
In the course of an interview with Greta Van Susteren of Fox News yesterday, Clinton made clear her intention to take things to a floor fight if necessary, and went so far as to preemptively undermine Barack Obama's legitimacy as a candidate if he doesn't go along with her proposal to seat the Florida and Michigan delegates. That set Matthews off, though it was panelist Tucker Carlson who supplied the most colorful language, describing Hillary as a "kamikaze" who is "ready to wreck the party."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,342151,00.html
View video here.
CLINTON: I don't think that the nominee of the party will be considered legitimate if we don't figure out how to count those votes for Michigan and Florida.
. . .
VAN SUSTEREN: And if [Obama] says, no, I won't do it, that leaves Michigan and Florida out. And does that leave you out?
CLINTON: No. Not at all, because we're going to make sure those votes get counted, one way or another.
VAN SUSTEREN: How?
CLINTON: Well, you know, you can always go to the convention. That's what credential fights are for. You know, let's have the Democratic Party go on record against seating the Michigan and Florida delegations three months before the general election? I don't think that will happen. I think they will be seated. So that is where we are headed if we don't get this worked out.
Matthews discussed the situation with MSNBC's Tucker Carlson and Linda Douglas of the National Journal. Excerpts:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS: Hillary Clinton: is she willing to fight this all the way to the finish because she really believes she has a shot, or is this scorched earth; she's gonna make sure Barack Obama doesn't have a shot in November? How rough is she playing this?
LINDA DOUGLASS: Well, what she said, clearly, about going to the credentials committee is playing about as rough as you can play.
. . .
MATTHEWS: So the New York Daily News announces the day [after]: Barack Obama who goes into the convention ahead in elected delegates loses because something called the credentials committee has met behind closed doors and has come to the floor with the announcement: "guess what, we're giving it to the other candidate." I can imagine the newspapers of this country with the headlines.
TUCKER CARLSON: She is in full kamikaze mode. Did you see that Fox bite? She means it!
MATTHEWS: Kamikaze meaning she's willing to destroy herself or everybody?
CARLSON: She is willing to go all the way whatever it takes. We've suspected this from the beginning: she's just proved it.
. . .
CARLSON: But what do you do with someone like that, Hillary Clinton, seriously? It's like your dad's advice when your little: don't ever fight someone who will go all the way. You know, someone who will pull out a gun, someone who just doesn't care, for whom there is no logical end point. She's basically saying "I'll wreck the party, and I will" and she stares right into the camera like that. What do you do with someone like that?! How do you stop that person?!
MATTHEWS: I know that phrase but I can't repeat it. I know exactly the phrase.
I don't. Thanks in advance to the reader who can pass along the PG version.
MATTHEWS: I'm watching the polls every day, and I'm going to keep watching them. I get a sense that as we say in our business, television, we've jumped the shark. Which is at some point people say: "I think I see who the leading candidate is, I think I see who the probable winner is, I think this is over," but we'll see if we've reached that point. I'm watching the polls every day, I think we're getting close to that.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.
Mark Finkelstein's blog
Login to post comments
Printer friendly version
Topics:
2008 Presidential
Campaigns & Elections
Barack Obama
Chris Matthews
Hillary Clinton
Linda Douglass
Tucker Carlson
Hardball
MSNBC
Video
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0803/27/sitroom.02.html
THE SITUATION ROOM
Have Social Security and Medicare Been Forgotten About? FBI Investigates Terror Involving Americans in Iraq
Aired March 27, 2008 - 17:00 ET
WOLF BLITZER, CNN ANCHOR: "Let's talk about this and more with two guests. Our Democratic strategist and CNN political contributor James Carville. He is here in Washington. He's backing Hillary Clinton. And in Los Angeles, Congressman Xavier Becerra. He is an Obama supporter.
Gentlemen, thanks very much for coming in.
I'll start with the congressman. Is this system broken, and can it be fixed?
REP. XAVIER BECERRA, (D) C.A.: We always want to make sure that every vote counts. I think we have a process in place, at least through a delegate process, give us the votes and let them be worth something.
I think most of us believe we should let the process work through. In the end whoever has the most delegates should become the next nominee for president for the Democratic Party.
BLITZER: What do you think, James?
JAMES CARVILLE, CLINTON SUPPORTER: I think first of all you can't say that. Because the Obama campaign did everything they could to stop people from voting in Florida and Michigan. We wanted to have a revote. I was willing to raise the money to pay for it. That's nine percent of the Democrats in the country, and I'm sure the congressman doesn't want to disenfranchise nine percent, however I do think we will have a process.
I think it's flawed but I think in the end we'll end up with a nominee and we will all be behind that nominee. But what we need to do is let the system play out as is. When it finishes we'll see where it is. But the Obama people still have to explain why that want to disenfranchise nine percent of the Democrats. That doesn't seem like a very smart move on my part.
BLITZER: Congressman?
BECERRA: Wolf, I think the -- not only Senator Obama, but all of the Obama campaign supporters say we want to make sure that all of Florida's and Michigan's delegates get seated. But we have rules. And we want them seated under the rules. We have no problem with that. We don't think the next president should be the first one to start to break the rules as he or she becomes president.
CARVILLE: Let me point out that Senator Clinton did not break the rules. What we call for is a revote. We said all right, those were against the rules. Let's have a revote. It was the lawyers and lobbyists in the Obama campaign in the legislature in Michigan that stopped this. In spite of the fact that myself, Governor Rendell, Governor Corzine, other people have said we have raised the money to pay for it. That's just a simple fact. And I understand --
BLITZER: Congressman, Karl Rove, the president's former top political adviser who is no longer in the government. He says he has a gutsy idea for Barack Obama and what he should go. He should let the delegates be seated from Michigan and Florida. Let them be seated as the election turned out, which would give Hillary Clinton maybe a net gain of 50 some pledged delegates.
He says this, "It makes him look like a leader, referring to Barack Obama. It resolves the situation. It helps him in the fall in these two states. And it probably gets a lot of the superdelegates to step forward and say that was a courageous move and I'm going to support him as a result of him doing that."
It would give her -- it would be risky, as Karl Rove says. What do you think about that idea?
BECERRA: It's tough for me to comment on Rove's strategy proposals. I've never been much of a Rove supporter. But I would tell you this. I think Senator Obama has said it many times. He's willing to sit down with Senator Clinton and all of the senator's supporters to try to come up with a process that lets us live by the rules we started with to make sure that all of the delegates get counted and have a voice at our convention. That's the most important thing.
So Florida and Michigan, all those Democratic voters that came out and voted should have a voice. We think there's a process that can be had if the two camps can sit down and make it happen in a way that follows the rules.
CARVILLE: We could have made it happen. All we had to do was have a primary in June. It would have been very exciting. Florida has been devastated by the subprime mortgage crisis. Michigan is so devastated by the policies of this administration. It would have been a wonderful thing to have democracy at work and allowed this to cam. And the fact is that the agents and lobbyists of the Obama campaign stopped it.
BECERRA: James. Stop it. You know that's not the way it happened.
CARVILLE: Of course it happened that way.
BECERRA: You know it's not the way it happened. We teach our kids to follow the rules. We want them to grow up respecting the rules. We want a president for the first time in eight years who respects the rules. There was a process.
There were rules. We could follow those rules and if those were broken we could a figure out a way to get all of the Florida and Michigan delegates counted. This isn't a thing where we need to be in the playground fighting. Let those votes count.
CARVILLE: We're not fighting, congressman. I'm just merely pointing out, sir, with all respect, that agents and lobbyists of the Obama campaign in Lansing did everything that they could to stop ...
BECERRA: Name the agents and lobbyists. Name names.
CARVILLE: People in the campaign were trying to do everything they could --
BLITZER: All right, guys. Hold on a second.
CARVILLE: I was trying to make a point. He doesn't want me to make a point because my point is valid.
BLITZER: James, is Nancy Pelosi, the House speaker, a neutral observer in the debate?
CARVILLE: I'm crazy about Speaker Pelosi. I think when this process gets through I think if we're going to have a nominee and we'll all get behind that nominee. But I think the best thing we can do is let the process go through.
The really best thing we could have done is allow the people of Michigan and Florida to have a say in this, but the Obama campaign stopped that. I understand they made a political calculation, but I don't think it was a very wise one.
BLITZER: All right. We've gone over this ground. I don't know if you have anything else to say, congressman. If not --
BECERRA: I do. I do.
Just saying it, James saying it doesn't make it so. There was a process. We could get these delegates seated. But you can't if you're going to have someone accusing agents and lobbyists without naming names. Talking about who is doing something. Let's get to this so that Florida and Michigan can have its delegates counted. There's a way to get there.
BLITZER: Let's see if there is. All right. We have got to leave it right there.
Xavier Becerra from California, James Carville, our CNN strategist. A Democrat. Thanks very much. Both of them Democrats, actually. Appreciate it, guys..."
Who in the world ever put Ed Shultz in charge of making up the primary rules?
Joe Scarborough did ask Shultz some good devils-advocate questions in this video:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23829449#23829449 (04:43)
![]()
Nightly News
Time for Clinton to step aside?
March 27: Talk show host Ed Shultz joins the Morning Joe team to explain why he believes the Clinton campaign should throw in the towel.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23829449#23829449 (04:43)
Saturday, March 29, 2008
CLINTON WINS INDIANA CROWD'S APPROVAL...
http://www.thestarpress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080329/NEWS01/80328028
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/C/CLINTON?SITE=WDUN&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
Mar 29, 6:53 AM EDT
Clinton Rules Out Leaving Race Early
By BETH FOUHY
Associated Press Writer

AP Photo/Charles Dharapak
Watch Related Video
Superdelegate Leahy Urges Clinton to Quit Race
http://video.ap.org/v/Legacy.aspx?partner=en-ap&g=c61db3d2-a2cc-4522-b304-de778734344b&t=m318&p=ENAPus_ENAPus&f=WDUN& (01:05)
Watch Related Video
http://video.ap.org/v/Legacy.aspx?partner=en-ap&g=cc5c0eac-032d-4f97-807e-17e2e7a0303e&t=m318&p=ENAPus_ENAPus&f=WDUN& (01:04)
HAMMOND, Ind. (AP) -- "If Hillary Rodham Clinton is feeling heat from pundits and party elders to quit the race and back Barack Obama, you'd never know it from her crowds, energy level and upbeat demeanor on the campaign trail.
"There are millions of reasons to continue this race: people in Pennsylvania, Indiana and North Carolina, and all of the contests yet to come," Clinton told reporters Friday. "This is a very close race and clearly I believe strongly that everyone should have their voices heard and their votes counted."
The former first lady weathered a two-pronged blow Friday, with influential Pennsylvania Sen. Bob Casey Jr. endorsing Obama and another Senate colleague, Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy, urging her to step aside. But to hear Clinton tell it, it was just another day in an epic primary battle whose result is still not known.
"I believe a spirited contest is good for the Democratic Party and will strengthen the eventual nominee," she said. "We will have a united party behind whomever that nominee is. ... I look forward to campaigning over the next several months."
Traveling across Indiana, the former first lady was greeted by large, enthusiastic audiences who roared their approval at her proposals to help fix the state's economic challenges.
At events here and in North Carolina on Thursday, Clinton raised the issue of whether she should quit the race, only to have it firmly batted down by her supporters.
"There are some people who are saying, you know, we really ought to end this primary, we just ought to shut it down," she said in Mishawaka, Ind., drawing cries of "No, no!" inside a packed gymnasium..."
Here is the March 28 Hardball video link to watch this entire dialogue:
March 28: Game changer in Pennsylvania
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23849604#23849604 (07:44)
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2008/03/28/todd-bursts-matthews-balloon-caseys-spiritual-endorsement-obama
Todd Bursts Matthews' Balloon on Casey's 'Spiritual' Endorsement of Obama

By Mark Finkelstein | March 28, 2008 - 22:14 ET

He calls it Hardball, but again tonight Chris Matthews showed he's a softy when it comes to Barack Obama. Chris was crestfallen when NBC News political director Chuck Todd laid out the case, chapter and verse, that political payback, even revenge, explained Sen. Bob Casey's endorsement of Obama as much or more than the "spiritual" reasons Chris so wanted to believe in.
CHRIS MATTHEWS: Chuck, I didn’t expect this guy. He’s a very cautious U.S. senator in his first year, his first term, and what did he do? Almost a spiritual announcement he made today: I’ve got to be for Barack.
View video here.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/23849604#23849604
Todd tossed Matthews a bone, but the pragmatic political director quickly reverted to form, drawing upon his encyclopedic knowledge of modern political history to demonstrate that not-so-exalted emotions lay behind the endorsement.
CHUCK TODD: He did and in fact Obama emphasized that he actually didn’t work Casey over. If you knew the intricacies of Pennsylvania politics, you knew that Obama would have a shot at it. Wherever Rendell [a Clinton supporter] is, you would assume the Caseys are on the other side.
MATTHEWS: Why? Explain that?
TODD: Well, they had their, they ran against each other for governor in 2002, a very nasty primary fight, one that I think the Caseys as a family haven’t gotten over. Ed Rendell ran against Casey’s father in a race for governor 20 years earlier in a campaign that Casey, Sr. won, so it was a little bit of Rendell payback. But then we forget also the late Bob Casey, the Clintons kept him off of the ’92 convention [because of Casey’s pro-life position], then he protested and didn’t go to the ’96 convention. So there’s certainly enough reason for Casey not to be for Clinton. [Obama] needed something. He hadn’t gotten one major endorsement.
The deflated Chris complained.
MATTHEWS: You are so political. Well anyway, Gene [Robinson of WaPo], the more spiritual aspect of this – and you [Todd] go into the political analysis.
Chuck reminded Matthews of what the show is ostensibly about.
TODD: Aw, geez. Where are we? Are we on Hardball? Or are we on –MATTHEWS: Like we heard this before like Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri said my kids talked me into it. You know, we heard this from Caroline Kennedy her kids talked her into it [shades of Chris’ old boss Jimmy Carter whose daughter Amy told him nuclear weapons were the most important issue]. Could this be another generational, somewhat of a spiritual arising here, encouraging a guy to do something that's not necessarily in the area of political revenge, as you describe it?
Even the genial Gene Robinson couldn’t help teasing Matthews for going soft.
EUGENE ROBINSON: It could be. And we've seen the phenomenon of young people who have a different experience of race and less baggage about race and who are really energized by Obama's message. But what I want to talk about is Chris Matthews getting spiritual about Pennsylvania politics!
At the end of the video clip I’ve included for your delectation a bit more of Casey’s endorsement remarks. Have a listen and see if it doesn’t sound like one of Rush Limbaugh’s parody Obama commercials. Gauzy fluff about "change," “hope,” “new politics” and “healing” that is certified, guaranteed, 100% substance-free.
—Mark Finkelstein is a NewsBusters contributing editor and host of Right Angle. Contact him at mark@gunhill.net.
Mark Finkelstein's blog
Login to post comments
Printer friendly version
Topics:
2008 Presidential
Campaigns & Elections
Barack Obama
Bob Casey
Chris Matthews
Chuck Todd
Eugene Robinson
Hardball
MSNBC
Video

I get lost in all the links and transcripts. Good writing says that you put your point right up front, then fill in the detail. I would like to see your "three moral reasons" in the first paragraph or two, then elaborate.
Stan Davis
Lakewood, CO
Wes Clark -- Make America All It Can Be!
Hi Stan:
This post has two main points which are "The biased media wants Hillary to drop out" and "3 moral reasons for her to stay in!"
I covered the first point at the beginning which was to prove my point that "The biased media wants Hillary to drop out" which is why I did not state my "3 moral reasons for her to stay in" at the beginning!
Here are my three moral reasons for Hillary to stay in the race as I exactly stated them in this post:
1) "This poll along with the polls that I quoted in the link right above confirms that Geraldine Ferraro is factually correct about Obama being where he is at right now because of the race issue:"
2) "These links positively confirm that with the help of his highly charismatic oratory skills, many of Obama's "enraptured" supporters are emotionally following him more as a movement and as a "phenomenon" as opposed to his actual position on the issues:"
3) "It is a credibly documented fact that Barack Obama has been getting a free ride from most of the mainstream media and that the media has been much tougher on Hillary than they have been on Obama:"
Credible documentation follows each point.
Obama in my opinion is NOT where he is right now mainly because of a real debate on the issues that matter BUT rather mostly because of the 3 reasons I stated. Because these are clearly the wrong reasons for a candidate to be nominated and because Hillary has a clear record of accomplishments at the Presidential level to bring to the table in this election while Obama does not, that is why I definitely think Hillary is morally obligated to stay in the race all the way to the end!
Mitch

Thanks, Mitch. Nicely done.
The problem is that the vast majority of voters vote with their hearts, not their heads. They vote for the candidate with whom they're the most comfortable. Oh, sure, there issues-based voters, but they're in the minority. Hillary would have it all sewn up long ago if the majority voted that way.
Obama doesn't ask us to think. He asks us to feel good. He goes out of his way to avoid being specific, lest it cloud his message of hope and change. And he's very good at it, as judged by his success so far.
Many heart voters even bend their positions on the issues unconsciously to avoid cognitive dissonance so that they can vote coherently for the candidate they like the most.
Stan Davis
Lakewood, CO
Wes Clark -- Make America All It Can Be!
I completely agree with everything that you have said!
I would not be so upset and I would not have such strong feelings about this if as a hypothetical example Hillary had lost the nomination to someone who I think is truly qualified to be President such as Joe Biden in a primary race that was based on a real debate on the serious issues which the next President will have to be able to deal with.
If that was the case, then I would have absolutely no problem at all supporting Biden in the general election if he was the nominee. Unfortunately that is NOT the case with Obama which I think that I have credibly documented in this post as well as in other posts I have written.


look back and wonder what possessed them! Didn't Chuck Hagel say W was in Alice's Wonderland? Well, I wish he had added the Obamaniacs to his assessment! I try hard to keep in mind that their senseless rantings most certainly mean that they are frantic that the superdelegates are going to give Hillary the nod. And, in true through-the-looking-glass fashion, they try to blame Hillary for the Democratic earth they themselves are scorching!