Obama Will Call For investigation Into Use Of Test Drugs On Vets
Submitted by WesDem on June 17, 2008 - 1:20pm.
Barack Obama | Democratic politics | Health Care | Veterans & Military

"It is outrageous and unacceptable that our government would irresponsibly endanger veterans who have already sacrificed so much for our country. Our veterans - particularly those suffering from mental health injuries - should have the very best health care and support in the world, they should never be needlessly exposed to drugs without proper notification of the dangers involved or effective monitoring of the side effects. I will immediately be asking for a full and thorough investigation of how our government could yet again let down our veterans and their families who have given so much to their country, and who have paid so much for the failures of civilian leadership in Washington. It is time to demand accountability and to ensure that this kind of breach of trust never takes place again."
'Disposable Heroes': Veterans Used To Test Suicide-Linked Drugs
An ABC News and Washington Times Investigation Reveals Vets Are Being Recruited for Government Tests on Drugs with Violent Side Effects
By BRIAN ROSS and VIC WALTERJune 17, 2008 —
Mentally distressed veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan are being recruited for government tests on pharmaceutical drugs linked to suicide and other violent side effects, an investigation by ABC News and The Washington Times has found.
The report will air on Good Morning America and will also appear in The Washington Times on Tuesday. (click here to read the Washington Times coverage of "Disposable Heroes")
In one of the human experiments, involving the anti-smoking drug Chantix, Veterans Administration doctors waited more than three months before warning veterans about the possible serious side effects, including suicide and neuropsychiatric behavior.
"Lab rat, guinea pig, disposable hero," said former US Army sniper James Elliott in describing how he felt he was betrayed by the Veterans Administration.
Elliott, 38, of suburban Washington, D.C., was recruited, at $30 a month, for the Chantix anti-smoking study three years after being diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. He served a 15-month tour of duty in Iraq from 2003-2004.
Months after he began taking the drug, Elliott suffered a mental breakdown, experiencing a relapse of Iraq combat nightmares he blames on Chantix.
"They never told me that I was going to be suicidal, that I would cease sleeping. They never told me anything except this will help me quit smoking," Elliott told ABC News and The Washington Times.
-snip
It wasn't until three weeks later that the Veterans Administration advised the veterans in the Chantix study that the drug may cause serious side effects, including "anxiety, nervousness, tension, depression, thoughts of suicide, and attempted and completed suicide."
I'm curious. Wes Clark has officially endorsed Obama. Apparently he trusts him on behalf of veterans' concerns over the opposing veteran-candidate, John McCain.
Obama Demanding Investigation over VA Email
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/5/16/182612/404/501/517154Wes
Clark Endorses Barack Obama
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/6/191723/2477/548/531345http:
VoteVets don't seem to be having a problem with Obama:
VoteVets.org Board of Advisors
http://www.votevets.org/about?id=0005
Obama has a good congressional record on veterans issues
Barack Obama's Record
Record of Advocacy: As a member of the U.S. Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, Obama passed legislation to improve care and slash red tape for our wounded warriors recovering at places like Walter Reed. He passed laws to help homeless veterans and offered an innovative solution to prevent at-risk veterans from falling into homelessness. Obama led a bipartisan effort in the Senate to try to halt the military's unfair practice of discharging service members for having a service-connected psychological injury. He fought for fair treatment of Illinois veterans' claims and forced the VA to conduct an unprecedented outreach campaign to disabled veterans with lower than-average benefits. Obama passed legislation to stop a VA review of closed PTSD cases that could have led to a reduction in veterans' benefits. He passed an amendment to ensure that all service members returning from Iraq are properly screened for traumatic brain injuries. He introduced legislation to direct the VA and Pentagon to fix disjointed records systems and improve outreach to members of the National Guard and Reserves.
...and with Wes Clark as a surrogate I have little doubt that the true concerns of veterans you refer to will be further addressed. I totally agree that his camp should not be ignoring your attempts to contact...
Odd. One of my concerns is why John McCain is still receiving $58,000 annually in Veterans Disability payments. If there's a justification for that, it begs the question as to whether or not he's fit enough to be president. If there is no justification, why is he taking it when so many vets need it desperately?
http://www.americablog.com/2008/06/why-is-mccain-getting-58000-year-in.html

Veteran issues sound good, but unless Obama supports all veteran issues, harping on this one unfortunate story will not get the attention of veterans to support the Obama campaign.
Having written the Obama campaign it is clear to see they do not engage in any discussion for issues unless they "raise" the attention of the American electorate.
Have tried to get Obama to help disabled veterans who are under 50% disabled who each month must pay for their own disability, by having the disability deducted from their own pay. Bills to correct this issue are HR 303, HR 333, and S 439. Over 400,000 disabled veterans are in this category of paying for their own disability.
So do not believe that Obama is the candidate of choice for veterans. He clearly stands to loose many votes in the veteran category, since repeated attempts by veterans and their many service organizations have netted no response on the issues of veterans who pay for their own disability. Obama should be just as incensed about veterans paying for their own disability as he appears to be over veterans who are used in a test program for drug treatment.
Pet issues do not win elections. A true program of interest in "all" veteran issues will win elections.
Yesterdays news for veterans was that Obama would call for a 25% increase in payments to veterans for disabilities as recomended by the Veterans Disability Benefit Commission. But how would that relate to the over 400,000 disabled veterans still paying for their own disability. Would that mean that these veterans would face a 25% increase in the amount being deducted from their pay?
Obama, and his staff, had better do some research into true veteran issues, instead of concentrating on issues that sound good and have a political bite to them. Veterans are much smarter than that.