6/30/08: General Wesley Clark on "The Verdict with Dan Abrams"


You Tube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MkReBAQOYh4

June 30, 2008

Transcription by Melange




Dan Abrams: Breaking tonight, General Wesley Clark is with us live for his first interview since he ignited a major controversy yesterday by questioning the relevance of John McCain's military service as a POW in Vietnam. The question: how significant is it in this campaign? The McCain camp jumped on the comments by Clark, who's now an Obama supporter, linking them to Obama's campaign saying quote, "Obama's words don't really match up with the way he is running the campaign." Joining me now is General Wesley Clark. General Clark, thanks very much uh, for joining us. We appreciate it. Now, you set off quite a firestorm here with both McCain and Obama coming out and rejecting your comments. First let me play the comments at issue from CBS yesterday.


<Video Clip>
GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: I certainly honor his service as a prisoner of war. He was a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands and millions of others in Armed Forces as a prisoner of war. He has been a voice on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and he has traveled all over the world. But he hasn't held executive responsibility. That large squadron in Air…in the Navy that he commanded, it wasn't a wartime squadron. He hasn't been there and ordered the bombs to fall. He hasn't seen what it's like when diplomats come in and say, 'I don't know whether we're going to be able to get this point through or not. Do you want to take the risk? What about your reputation? How do we handle it publicly'

Bob Schieffer: Well
GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: He hasn't made those calls, Bob.

Bob Schieffer: Well, well, General, maybe…

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: So…

Bob Schieffer: Could I just interrupt you. If…
GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Sure.
Bob Schieffer: I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either, nor has he ridden in a fighter plane and gotten shot down. I mean-

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well, I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be President.
<end Video Clip>


Dan Abrams: Now that's the one that ended up being the real zinger, General. And as a result, a lot of response here. Admiral Lleyton Smith has said, ‘General Clark is way off base on this one.' Lieutenant commander Carl Smith says quote "it reflects extremely bad judgment." Senator Warner saying he was shocked. Former Reagan National Security Advisor Robert Macfarland saying it might be part of a larger gambit. Bob Dole says, ‘he should have stayed in bed on Sunday.' What's your response?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well first of all Dan, thanks for having me on. I don't want to do anything to take away from this very important week where Barack Obama, the man I support to be President, has talked about patriotism and service. But I do appreciate the chance to be on. Now, I wasn't representing the Obama campaign in anything I said yesterday about John McCain. Those are comments I've said for some weeks now – they've been repeated many times, I think once previously on your show, perhaps. But I have said them on many occasions and I think it's an important point that we understand that this is an issue about the qualifications to be president. National Security is going to be a very important uh, element of this campaign and people are going to be asking ‘who can best protect America.' But I want to assure you, I would never, never diss someone's service. When people choose to serve in uniform, I honor it.

And Dan, I came home from Vietnam on a stretcher; I was shot; I took a burst of AK, I got 4 rounds; I was in 3 different hospitals and finally got home, and eventually recovered and went on to serve. Uh, so I think I know a little bit about what it's like to honor men and women who serve in uniform; and I do and I would never dismiss somebody. So I think, you know, there's a lot of tempest here, but I think we need to get on with the major issues of the campaign. I think we need to listen to Barack Obama as he defines patriotism and talks about the big issues facing this country.

Dan Abrams: You…You mentioned that you'd said it before. We've actually gone back to see if you've said it on our show before. I think that the part that has really gotten people, which I don't think you have said before was the part about ‘riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down' effectively is not a qualification for president. That's the line that has been the most controversial. Are you sorry you said it?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: It's a great line. I didn't make it up – it was given to me by the interviewer and I don't think it's a great line in terms of conveying…you know, it's too bad; I wish that people hadn't misinterpreted that and lost sight of the important point. But I think, you know, we need to get on to the important point here about what are the qualifications to be president? Serving in the armed forces is a great thing. It's a great gift to the country and it shows commitment and, particularly if you're in combat, it can show courage. And John McCain showed all of that. On the other hand, it depends on what your position was in the armed forces and what you did there as to how relevant that service is to the strategic decision-making that is the essence of protecting the United States as President and that was the point I was making.

Dan Abrams: Does it show anything, though, about John McCain's character, that he had the opportunity to leave and he didn't, that he gave himself for his country and refused to go home when he had an opportunity?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well, I honor John McCain's character, and as I've said on the show, he's been one of my heroes for a long time. I like John McCain. He's been over to my house and everything. This is about qualifications to be President. That's what this is about. And, by the way, it's also a little bit about the nature of American politics today that a comment like this could be taken out of context the way it was and create such a hullabaloo. I think we ought to get back to the campaign.

Dan Abrams: Well, there's no…

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: But I want to make clear where I stand on honoring men and women – and I don't care what their politics are – honoring men and women who served our country and I do.

Dan Abrams: Let me read you from Bill Burton, the Obama campaign spokesperson. "As he's said many times before, Senator Obama honors and respects Senator McCain's service, and of course he rejects yesterday's statement by General Clark."

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well I agree with Senator Obama. I honor and respect John McCain's service as well and I think language of this type is uh, and this kind of a discussion shouldn't be part of a campaign.

Dan Abrams: So do you reject the statements of General Clark?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: I reject the idea that you'd take something like this and swiftboat it all out of proportion which is exactly what happened. In fact Dan, just as a sidelight, you might know that…that one of the people that organized the conference call for McCain with the reporters is one of the people who was very active in the swiftboating campaign against John Kerry. So what you've got here is a political gambit. It's a tactic by the McCain campaign.

Dan Abrams: But it's the Ob…

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: And it obscures the real issues of this election, which is: which candidate is better qualified – which candidate has the judgment to be President of the United States?

Dan Abrams: I…look, I think that's a fair point. In terms of the big issues in this campaign, this is not going to be one of them but when you have the campaign spokesperson for the Obama camp coming out and rejecting your statements, that says something, doesn't it?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well I think it says I…first of all, I wasn't representing any part of the Obama campaign in that discussion of John McCain. I want to make that perfectly clear. That's something I've been saying for weeks. Before Obama clinched the nomination, I was still saying that…or I was beginning to say that then. I've said this about John McCain's qualifications for a long time.

I've been in war, I've commanded war at the strategic level as well as having commanded at the tactical level. I've paid the personal price in bloodshed; I know what it's like to order men and women into combat and to pray for innocent people that they won't be hurt. And so what I'm suggesting is that there's a difference in the two levels of war and the levels of responsibility and you can honor a person's service but still ask, ‘okay, what's the real weight of that service in terms of qualifications or judgment that's required in the office of the Commander in Chief.'

Dan Abrams: Well let me ask you that. Is there anything about John McCain's service that you think is relevant in his effort to become President of the United States?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Absolutely. I think anybody who serves in uniform, who serves their country – especially in wartime, who has gone through the kind of privations and hardships of John McCain should be honored for his character and courage. And I certainly do.

Dan Abrams: But you say "honored for their character and courage," but I'm asking you specifically about…do you think that it's relevant in his effort to become President. Yes or no? Do you think that is a qualification that gives John McCain an edge on that particular issue?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: I think people look for character and courage in their presidents. But I don't think you have to have been at war to show character and courage. I think you can find character and courage in other candidates. I think you can find them in Barack Obama's life, for example. So I think that, you know, the voters have to make their own minds up on what constitutes the essential elements of character and courage.

But here we're talking about how experience leads to judgment and I think on that issue, that's what I think has to be clarified because where it leads to national security experience, and we're talking about keeping America safe, the American people are going to have to make a judgment: which candidate has the judgment - the best judgment, to keep America safe in a troubled world?

Dan Abrams: So I've got to ask you though, this follow-up question – do you stand by your comment that you "don't think that riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification for president." Do you stand by that?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: I stand by the comment that when you talk about someone's wartime experience, you have to put that in the context of the level of their service, what that service consisted of and how it matches up to the requirements of the job of the presidency of the United States.

Dan Abrams: So does that mean…again, that you "don't think that riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification for president?"

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: I think it's an incredible testimony to John McCain's courage that he endured the privations and hardship he did and I think that the American people have always been impressed by that – as I have been impressed by that. But I'm supporting Barack Obama. I think he has judgment. I think he has character and I do think that he has courage. I think he'll be a great Commander in Chief despite the fact that he didn't serve. I think he is a patriot in the truest sense of the word.

Dan Abrams: I want to play you a piece of sound from John McCain uh, talking about this issue and then I want to ask you to respond.


<video clip>

John McCain: I know that many…that General Clark is not an isolated incident. I have no way of knowing how much involvement Senator Obama has in that issue…

<end video clip>


Dan Abrams: Now you said that the Obama camp did not send you out to make this comment. Did you have any conversations with the Obama camp before you made this statement?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Absolutely not. As I've said, that statement has been made for a long time about John McCain's wartime experience and its relevance to the office of the presidency. I've been saying that for months now so there's no news in that whatsoever. Um, and it had no connection with the Obama campaign

Dan Abrams: Have…

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: and uh, you know…I certainly agree that we shouldn't be dissing someone's military service and I haven't done that.

Dan Abrams: Have you called the Obama campaign since this became quite a story to either apologize or clarify your statement?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well I've certainly talked to the Obama campaign.

Dan Abrams: I mean since then to say, ‘look, here's what I meant' or ‘I'm sorry that I said it' or what did you say to them?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well, I talked to the Obama campaign, but I'm here tonight to talk to you and the other people who are watching your show, Dan. And I want to make it very clear that I respect people that have served in uniform – especially those who served in wartime and were wounded in action. I was one of those people and I also served later so I think I understand the difference between courage and commitment as an officer or sergeant or soldier at war – or a pilot – and someone who's making strategic decisions such as the President of the United States will have to make. And I hope the American people will see past the firestorm of the swiftboating that's being attempted in this story, and look at the issue. Which candidate has the judgment to be the better President of the United States?

Dan Abrams: Are you surprised at how big a deal this has become?



GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well no, I'm not surprised by politics today. I've been in it for a while, but I think it's an important…this is an important time to recognize that people's qualifications are important. And what I'd like to do Dan, is make sure the American people understand that I, as a retired officer, have tremendous respect for everyone who served and I think that we ought to get on and let the candidates have their say on these issues.

Dan Abrams: Well look, General Clark, I'm going to ask you to stand by because some people think that what you said was true and there should be no backtracking at all. Um, others would say, as you heard all the comments that were made that this is a statement that never should have been made, but there is…there are definitely two sides to this issue. So if you don't mind, if you could just stand by for a minute, I want you to join our panel in a minute uh, and also coming up John McCain gets some help combating the attacks on his military record from one of the vets responsible for swiftboating John Kerry. Yes, the same swiftboater McCain once criticized.

<snip>

Dan Abrams: We're back with more with General Wesley Clark and those controversial statements in a moment.

<snip>

Dan Abrams: We're back. Before we get to our panel, uh welcome back General Wesley Clark. I was going to ask you one question before we thank you for sticking around. General Clark of course, usually an MSNBC analyst, tonight a newsmaker uh, here on the program. General Clark final question – uh, I've asked it to you a couple of times, I'm not sure I know what the answer is. Are you sorry you made the comments you did?

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well Dan, I'm not backing away from anything I said. I think there's a very important issue here that this is an election that's going to be about change in America but one of the critical aspects will be, who can best protect America? And so the voters will look at the qualifications of the candidates and I hope they'll look past the fact that one candidate has an outstanding record of service as a pilot and as a prisoner of war and look instead at the judgment of the two candidates. So if all of this brouhaha helps focus the issue past the fact that one served in the military and one didn't and into the relevant qualities of judgment of the two respective candidates, then…then I'll be satisfied that it accomplished something. If it was just a brouhaha in the press and swiftboating uh, and an effort to steal the headlines back for John McCain, then uh, shame on all of us for getting wrapped up in it.

Dan Abrams: General Clark as always, thanks very much for coming on. Good to have you on. Appreciate it.

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Thank you.

westcott's picture
Submitted by westcott on July 1, 2008 - 12:30am.

"It's a great line! I didn't make it up. It was given to me by the interviewer."

:D


Reg NYC's picture
Submitted by Reg NYC on July 1, 2008 - 12:56am.

My husband cracked up every time he said "diss".


Submitted by psfldem on July 1, 2008 - 1:13am.

Thank you for posting this. I got in too late, missed it.
So happy to see it here and not have to search!
*yawn*
I only read it, tomorrow I will view.
Thanks again.

Submitted by Renate on July 1, 2008 - 1:25am.

What a HUGE amount of work you did! I wish there were a big enough virtual hug to show you how much we all appreciate it!

{{{{{{{Melange}}}}}}

Submitted by Ron Esquerra on July 1, 2008 - 2:06am.

As usual General Clark showed his character by standing firm to his beliefs and earlier statements while making sure to do all he could to make sure there wwas no confusion about those statements or their intent. Great job of mentioning the swiftboat link too.

Let's hope that Obama turns around on this and gets back behind Wes. If not then he will be saying to everyone that he lacks the character and courage that Wes is talking about.

Ron Esquerra
Alger County Democratic Party
Upper Peninsula Veterans Coordinator-
www.michigan4clark.com

Arky Sue's picture
Submitted by Arky Sue on July 1, 2008 - 2:19am.

He chooses his words carefully. There is much in what he did not say that speaks volumes.


Submitted by Mary on July 1, 2008 - 3:20am.

I wish they would have 'listened' to Gen Clark, and not responded in the way that they did "for the sake of a political campaign."

SEN OBAMA:

"No one should ever devalue that service, especially for the sake of a political campaign, and that goes for supporters on both sides," Obama said, in a tacit repudiation of Clark.

SEN OBAMA:

"We must always express our profound gratitude for the service of our men and women in uniform. Period," Obama said.

OBAMA 'CAMP':

Although Clark was booked on "Face the Nation" independently from the Obama campaign, Clark did contact Obama's camp for talking points. Obama's aides say they gave him some talking points but that questioning McCain's military service was not among them.

It's unfortunate that Sen Obama and his campaign didn't 'listen' to Gen Clark.

1) Clark did not 'devalue Sen McCain's service'
2) Clark did 'express profound gratitude for the service of Sen McCain and the men and women in uniform'
3) Clark did not 'question McCain's military service'

(snip)

While most commentators took issue with Clark's words, some, like Karl Frisch, of Media Matters, applauded them.

"The media-driven notion that Gen. Clark somehow attacked Sen. McCain's military service is patently false. In fact, the opposite is true -- he praised it," Frisch said. "This controversy was created and fueled by a media unwilling to live up to the basic journalistic standard of accuracy and thoroughness."

http://www.abcnews.go.com/WN/Vote2008/story?id=5280860&page=1

Stan4Clark's picture
Submitted by Stan4Clark on July 1, 2008 - 3:36am.

Can ABC get Frisch on "Good Morning America" with the General in the morning? And bless ABC for reporting it.

Stan Davis
Lakewood, CO
Wes Clark -- Make America All It Can Be!


Submitted by GingerP on July 1, 2008 - 7:47am.

I think that statement says a great deal, but I would go even further. The media would rather play destructive word games than take the time and effort deal with actual issues, which may not be "sexy" and stir up controversy but would actually take the country forward. When is the last time anybody actually heard a discussion of policy proposals by the media? The TV commentators always say, "The American people don't want to hear about policy issues." Says who? A bunch of lazy news commentators who would rather create something out of nothing instead of addressing the mess this country is in.

As a case in point, after General Clark's excellent talk on "Good Morning America," the next piece showed a clip in which a patient was writhing on the floor dying in a hospital and a member of the hospital staff was standing around ignoring it. Why doesn't that Mika on "Morning Joe," who was still criticizing Wes Clark this morning, take a good look at the difference in health care policy between the two candidates? No, that would be too much work and not enough fun.

Anyway, I echo an earlier comment made above about Gen. Clark on "The Verdict." He stood by his comment but further clarified it so that even the most obtuse commentator could not miss his point. He did that again on "Good Morning America."

Thanks for reporting the comment from Karl Frisch. I will have to pay more attention to him and the ABC news website.

I would still urge people to voice their disappointment of Wes Clark's treatment by the Obama campaign (including Gibbs, Burton, and Obama himself) to the DNC and the Obama campaign. What they did was unconscionable. If they exclude Wes Clark from their VP short list, they have shot themselves in the foot and deprived our nation of a great leader who would literally make all the difference in the world.

Susan ClevelandOH's picture
Submitted by Susan ClevelandOH on July 1, 2008 - 7:51am.

Controversy=ratings=more people watching the ads.

That's all. There is no journalism in the MSM anymore, and nobody cares about truth and accuracy. It's all about selling. And pay close attention to who the sponsors are.


Submitted by GingerP on July 1, 2008 - 8:03am.

I just keep hoping to find some way around this state of affairs in the media if enough people demand a better quality of journalism. The main problem is that the media outlets are owned by big corporations with other major interests, so it is in their long term best interests to ignore the demand for quality journalism by the segment of the population who actually cares.

Submitted by Renate on July 1, 2008 - 4:25am.

He watched Wes on Dan Abrams' show and came away with a much more positive impression about this whole saga than I did. I was just furious with Obama for not running with Wes' comments instead of repudiating them, and thought it looked like Wes had been thrown under the bus... but he didn't see it that way at all and, more importantly, he thought that Wes made his case very clearly.

I wish I'd been taking notes while he was talking--he made some wonderful points. And I need to emphasize that this is somebody who feels positive about Wes but isn't nearly the day-to-day supporter I am, so I feel hopeful that he was speaking for a lot of people who lean left, and therefore lean pro-Wes, but aren't bound by any particular loyalty to the man. He's basically Mr. Well-Informed Democratic Voter.

I think my favorite of all the things he said was that people would never consider the military expertise of Random Fighter Pilot as being anything approaching that of Four-Star General, unless Random Fighter Pilot happened to be running for President--the idea would be absolutely ludicrous. He went and looked up the number of four-star generals in all of U.S. history--one hundred and ninety-six, all of whom had to be at the absolute top of their game (as he said, reading the list is like reading a history book), commanding hundreds of thousands of troops if not more... and we're supposed to even compare a four-star general's military know-how with that of a lieutenant commander (who graduated from Annapolis 894th out of 899, even as the son of an admiral)?

I mean, think about it (as I know you all have done--I'm "speaking" now to an average voter). If McCain hadn't been a POW--an experience which nobody of either party would ever, ever dismiss in any way whatsoever--would this discussion even be happening? Absolutely not.

As my husband said, it's practically insulting to those who have achieved Wes' rank, or anything close to it, to have to even compare his experience and knowledge with McCain's. (To be fair, nobody's literally comparing Wes' military know-how with McCain's--but there are people attacking Wes who are acting as though he doesn't have the right to state that McCain doesn't have the experience to lead. Only 196 people in the Army's entire history have had the rank to back his statement up, so--although he was Army and McCain was Navy--I think he pretty much does have exactly that right, thank you.)

My husband made his points much more clearly than I'm able to remember here--like I said, I really should have been taking notes. He said some other stuff that was really cheerful-making, but I've forgotten it now in light of finding out that there've only been 196 four-star generals in all of U.S. history, which begs the question of who exactly is anybody but the other 195 to tell Wes he's wrong?--but anyway, I did just want to share that in the eyes of an average Democrat, this has all been a plus for Wes and definitely a big minus for McCain.

Submitted by Mary on July 1, 2008 - 4:54am.

would have reminded Abrams that he DID NOT run on his military credentials, though, in his case, he should have. The voters could not have asked for a better candidate who could take over as Commander-in-Chief on day one. Of course, I'm partial...

   

Justine's picture
Submitted by Justine on July 1, 2008 - 5:15am.

I just wanted to give General Clark the biggest high five after this interview - and then tell that stupid panel that was on after him to pull their heads out of their asses and spinning on their heals long enough to hear what true character and courage is all about!!!!

And thank you Renate for the words your husband said! He's absolutely right!


Submitted by Married2Martisa on July 1, 2008 - 8:34am.

I knew Obama was going to throw Clark under the bus. The thing I found strange all along was how the DNC stripped Hillary of her four delegates in MI and handed the uncommited delegates do Obama. If you pull a thread on this, you see that John and Monica Conyers had encouraged people in MI to vote uncommited, which is fine, but normally uncommited votes are decided at the Convention. It struck me as strange that those were given to Obama pre-convention. Now if you follow Conyers and see what type of bill is on his desk, it should be interesting and very expensive for the pocketbook if Obama is elected. This article unsolves the mystery of the uncommited MI and highlights who had what interest in supressing Hillary's candidacy in the first place. If you want to read this, maybe you can make some sense out of it. Maybe I am just theorizing. Perhaps there is no connection between Conyers, the DNC's gift of Hillary delegates to Obama, and the bill on Conyers' desk. This is the link anyway.
http://www.philly.com/dailynews/opinion/20080627_Obama__change___reparations_will_make_U_S__better.html

MA3's picture
Submitted by MA3 on July 1, 2008 - 3:07pm.

because he knows he didn't say anything wrong and is not afraid to say the truth.

Thanks Kat and Melange!


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.