How red state Democratic candidates can defeat GOP Bush rubber-stamp incumbents!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 7, 2008 - 4:10am.
Rapid Response
Hello Everyone:
I definitely think that Democratic challengers running for the House and Senate in red states can use Bush to their advantage if they are running against a GOP incumbent who has been a Bush rubber-stamp!
I will be using Texas Republican Senator John Cornyn who has been an overall Bush rubber-stamp as an example to illustrate this strategy as far as this post is concerned.
There is absolutely no question that Bush should a liability to any Republican incumbent and especially to those who ran close to him when he was more popular and then rubber-stamped him while in office:
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/05/01/poll-bush-most-unpopular-in-modern-history/
May 1, 2008
Poll: Bush most unpopular in modern history
WASHINGTON (CNN) — "A new poll suggests that George W. Bush is the most unpopular president in modern American history..."
Here are my eight points which I suggest that Democratic challengers running for the House and Senate in red states do to effectively use a very unpopular Bush to their advantage against GOP incumbents who have been Bush rubber-stamps:
1) Link GOP incumbents to Bush when they were running for office on Bush's popularity at the time. That means digging up their old campaign ads and previous news articles connecting them to Bush!
Here is how to do that with Texas GOP Senator John Cornyn from back in 2002 when Bush was more popular and when Cornyn proudly ran on his popularity:
10/16/02
Barbara Bush backs Cornyn's Senate bid
By Anita Chang (Associated Press)
FORT WORTH - "Barbara Bush on Tuesday became the latest Bush family member to help state Attorney General John Cornyn in his bid for a U.S. Senate seat.
"We need a senator who's close to the president, can work with the president, and the president needs John Cornyn," she told supporters during a fund-raising luncheon at the Fort Worth Club.
The event follows a Cornyn fund-raiser last week in Houston headlined by President Bush's nephew, George P. Bush. He is the son of Jeb Bush, the governor of Florida.
Other Bush family members who have campaigned for Cornyn include President Bush, former President Bush and first lady Laura Bush. Vice President Dick Cheney and Bush senior adviser Karen Hughes have also come to Texas to throw their support behind Cornyn...
"When President Bush goes on Cornyn's television ads and says we need John Cornyn in the U.S. Senate, there isn't a good way for Kirk to counter that," said Rice University political science professor Earl Black...
A large portion of Barbara Bush's brief speech included details of her recent family vacation in Maine.
She brought a mother's perspective to the Senate race, noting that another Republican in Washington would greatly help her son's agenda.
"We've got to have John there, any mother will tell you, to help her boy," Bush said..."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec02/texas_10-4.html
BATTLE FOR THE SENATE
October 4, 2002
Betty Ann Bowser reports on the hotly contested Senate race in Texas.
BETTY ANN BOWSER: "Kirk's opponent is 50-year-old two-term Attorney General John Cornyn. In every sense of the word, he is President Bush's man.
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: I am here because there's no doubt in my mind that John Cornyn needs to be the next Senator from Texas. ( Cheers and applause ) he's the best man with whom I can work. He's a man who can help us get some things done to make America a safer and stronger and better place for all of us.
BETTY ANN BOWSER: The President has already made two campaign appearances for Cornyn, a commercial, and the White House has not ruled out more stops before election day.
PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH: We've got to have a man like John Cornyn representing our state in Washington, and there are a lot of reasons why.
REPORTER: The President's influence was evident at a Cornyn campaign event in Dallas for Republican women...
COMMERCIAL SPOKESMAN: President Bush is working hard for John Cornyn...
JOHN CORNYN: I am proud of the people who supported me in this race and I'm delighted to invite them back home to Texas. These are people we're proud of, the President and Dick Cheney, others. Politics is a team sport. Are you going to be with the President and on his team..."
2) Emphasize that these kind of GOP incumbents like John Cornyn who have been a Bush rubber-stamps did NOT do their jobs of representing ALL of their constituents BUT rather they were really representing Bush and his ideological Republican leadership in Congress!
Emphasize also that while rubber-stamping Bush, they did NOT do their jobs of asking the tough questions and acting as a check and balance on the White House which is what the role of Congress is supposed to be!
I would then mention that there are some responsible Republicans who did ask the tough questions, compliment them for doing that, and then contrast them with the GOP incumbent who they are running against!
Here are some examples of these more responsible Republicans who did ask the tough questions about Bush when it counted:
A) Sen. Chuck Hagel asked the tough questions about Bush and Iraq:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/15131
Chuck Hagel on Bush about Iraq: "Alice in Wonderland, arrogance, & incompetence"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 28, 2008 - 5:51am.
B) Sen. Dick Lugar asked the tough questions about Bush and Iraq:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12498
Lugar abandons Bush on Iraq / Michael Ware explains why the surge is NOT working
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 27, 2007 - 3:04pm.
C) Rep. Ray Lahood asked the tough questions about Bush and Iraq:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12060
TRANSCRIPT: GOP Rep. Ray Lahood on his closed door meeting with Bush about Iraq!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on May 10, 2007 - 12:59pm.
If I was Rick Noriega who is running against John Cornyn, I would emphasize that while these responsible Republicans were doing their jobs of asking the tough questions, John Cornyn was NOT doing his job and he was also NOT representing the people of Texas by his rubber-stamping of Bush!
3) I would emphasize the many Republicans who have turned on Bush because of his arrogance, his extreme ideology, and his incompetence:
A) Republican Nebraska Senator Chuck Hagel:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14027
Hagel: Bush admin is 'incompetent;' Would consider joining a Democratic ticket!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on December 3, 2007 - 10:59pm.
B) Former Bush Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12683
Former Bush Surgeon General Richard H. Carmona: "Politics often trumped science"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 16, 2007 - 2:33am.
C) Matthew Dowd who was the chief strategist for the 2004 Bush campaign:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11664
ANALYSIS: Matthew Dowd turning on Bush and why that happened!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 3, 2007 - 3:06am.
D) David Kuo who served as deputy director of the White House Office of Faith-Based Initiative:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9143
VIDEO & DOCUMENTATION: Bush "used evangelicals just to get their votes"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on October 20, 2006 - 4:03am.
E) Former Bush White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10649.html
Exclusive: McClellan whacks Bush, White House
By MIKE ALLEN | 5/27/08 6:18 PM EST
"Former White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan writes in a surprisingly scathing memoir to be published next week that President Bush “veered terribly off course,” was not “open and forthright on Iraq,” and took a “permanent campaign approach” to governing at the expense of candor and competence..."
If I was Rick Noriega, I would emphasize that while all of these responsible Republicans with a conscience were turning on Bush for all of the right reasons, John Cornyn was rubber-stamping Bush!
4) I would also emphasize the many Republicans who have gone public in their criticism of Bush because of his arrogance, his extreme "my way or the highway" ideology, and his incompetence:
A) Iowa Republican Senator Sen. Chuck Grassley:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14027#comment-258368
Iowa GOP Sen. Grassley on Bush Admin: 'my way or the highway.'
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on December 4, 2007 - 12:22am.
B) Former Florida Republican Congressman Joe Scarborough:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12716#comment-224917
Joe Scarborough: "I am more conservative than George Bush has ever been"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 19, 2007 - 11:41am.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16942296/
Demise of GOP just took turn for the worse
Scarborough: Bush willing to take his party over a cliff to prove his point
C) Former Rhode Island Republican Senator Lincoln Chafee while he was still in office:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/5707
Sen. Chafee: 'Arrogance' Hurts Bush, Rumsfeld
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 24, 2006 - 1:41pm.
D) Former Republican Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/14151
ANALYSIS: Why it will be very hard for Mike Huckabee to win the GOP nomination!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on December 17, 2007 - 2:44am.
America's Priorities in the War on Terror
Islamists, Iraq, Iran, and Pakistan
Michael D. Huckabee
From Foreign Affairs, January/February 2008
Summary: "The Bush administration's arrogant bunker mentality has been counterproductive at home and abroad. American foreign policy needs to change its tone and attitude, open up, and reach out. In particular, it should focus on eliminating Islamist terrorists, stabilizing Iraq, containing Iran, and toughening its stance with Pakistan..."
E) Former Bush White House insider David Frum who is still a Republican in good standing publicly admitting that Bush "put loyalty ahead of competence:"
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/15659
Insider David Frum admitted about Bush that "he put loyalty ahead of competence"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 2, 2008 - 3:44am.
If I was Rick Noriega, then I would emphasize that while all of these honest Republicans were legitimately criticizing Bush for all of the right reasons, John Cornyn was rubber-stamping Bush!
5) Bringing up Bush and Cheney's abuse of executive power is very important to bring up in my opinion:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12525
ANALYSIS: Democrats must make Bush's use of "executive power" a key 2008 issue!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 30, 2007 - 10:49am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12483
Cheney's Arrogance on Presidential Power; The 2008 GOP Candidates MUST be Asked!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 25, 2007 - 3:20pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11566
ANALYSIS: Why the fight between Bush & Congress is needed on executive power!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 23, 2007 - 4:33pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7285
ANALYSIS & DOCUMENTATION: The Supreme Court, Bush's abuse of power, & "Politics"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 30, 2006 - 5:32am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9447
ABC NEWS & VIDEO: Cheney: 'Full Speed Ahead' on Iraq & No Change in Iraq Policy
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 4, 2006 - 9:56am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/2184
ANALYSIS: The Miers Nomination, Neocon control over Bush, & Bush's "blank check
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on October 31, 2005 - 4:01am.
If I was Rick Noriega, I would emphasize how that John Cornyn was rubber-stamping this blatant abuse of power all along, how that he was NOT asking the tough questions about this, and how that he was giving Bush a "blank check" every step of the way which is a lack of accountability and is also a main reason why the Republicans lost so badly in the 2006 election:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/8205
ANALYSIS: The 2006 Elections are "An Accountability Moment!"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 29, 2006 - 7:56am.
6) An important point that can be brought up which will help to put these other points in their proper context is to credibly document how that Bush comes from the much more extreme and ideological Neoconservative wing of the Republican Party that other mainstream Republicans are NOT a part of:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/12716
ANALYSIS: Extreme right wing vs. right wing/Neoconservative vs. Conservative!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 19, 2007 - 9:07am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11240
ANALYSIS: Division in the GOP over who is "conservative" based on foreign policy
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 28, 2007 - 5:46pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/11920
ANALYSIS: Exactly how Extreme and Arrogant that the Neocon GOP Activist Base is!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 27, 2007 - 4:02pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9424
ANALYSIS: Keeping moderate Republicans at home if they won't vote for a Democrat
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 3, 2006 - 9:26am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/5396
ANALYSIS: Pat Buchanan's hypocrisy "what the alternative is if you throw us out"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 6, 2006 - 3:04am.
http://newsbusters.org/node/7166
Buchanan-Matthews 2008? Chris Pleads With Pat to Take Back GOP From Neo-Cons
By Mark Finkelstein (Bio | Archive) August 25, 2006 - 00:56 ET
If I was Rick Noriega, I would emphasize how that John Cornyn was rubber-stamping Bush's extreme ideology all along which is clearly NOT in step with middle America and with swing voters in any red state!
I would also emphasize how that John Cornyn has been endorsed by the Neocon Vets for Freedom PAC which strongly subscribes to this extereme ideology:
http://www.vetsforfreedom.org/pac/candidates/cornyn.aspx
JOHN CORNYN FOR SENATE
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/15866#comment-312197
The Neocon GOP Activist Vets for Freedom Supports John Cornyn
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on June 24, 2008 - 9:38pm.
Unlike John Cornyn, there are some Republicans with principles who will leave and will publicly rebuke this kind of extreme ideology when they know that it is wrong:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/4793
Transcript & Analysis: Neocon Architect Francis Fukuyama turns against Neoconservatism with documentation!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on March 1, 2006 - 4:09am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/9424#comment-148354
AL HAIG: "neocons that hijacked my party, the Republican Party"
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on November 3, 2006 - 9:28am.
7) If I was Rick Noriega, I would emphasize how that all of these points are the main reasons why Bush is so unpopular right now and they are also the main reason why so many people were looking to the 2008 election so early:
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/16165
ANALYSIS: Dislike of Bush is the main reason why Obama was so popular overseas!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 28, 2008 - 2:14am.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10819
ANALYSIS: Bush's ineffectiveness and why so many people are looking at 2008 now!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 1, 2007 - 5:22pm.
8) It is not enough just to say what an incumbent like John Cornyn is doing wrong even though that is a very huge factor. Rick Noriega and other red state and district Democratic candidates have to connect with disillusioned Republican and swing voters telling them what they are going to do differently!
They need to specifically emphasize how that they will be a truly Independent voice for ALL of the people in their state or district and not just for the constituents of their own political party. They also need to talk about how that they will work with either a President Obama or a President McCain, how that they will ask any President the tough questions, support the President when he is right, and oppose the President when he is wrong!
The more of these points that Rick Noriega and other red state and red district Democratic candidates can bring up, the more media attention that they can probably get.
More media attention should help to affect the polls in the Democratic candidate's favor and should also help to force the GOP Bush rubber-stamp incumbent to have to debate. No sane Republican even in a red state or district would want to have to debate how they rubber-stamped Bush's policies. If they refuse to debate, then the Democratic candidate can do town hall meetings putting up an empty podium with their opponent's name on it for the media to see and report about!
I definitely think that George W. Bush will go down in history as being among the very worst of Presidents as well as having ruined the modern day Republican Party. That in my opinion should be the kiss of political death to any Republican incumbent member of Congress or the Senate even in a red state who previously campaigned with Bush when he was more popular and who irresponsibly rubber-stamped his agenda while in office!
I hope that this information is helpful and especially to WesPAC endorsed candidates:
http://securingamerica.com/taxonomy/term/147
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/15924
Things We Can All Agree On: Helping WesPAC Endorsed Candidates Get Elected!
Submitted by kaflinn on June 29, 2008 - 4:49pm.
If you are not involved in a campaign right now and if you are looking for something helpful to do, then I strongly recommend helping Rick Noriega or any of the other candidates who Gen. Clark is supporting!
Mitch Dworkin
http://www.securingamerica.com/
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/16039
RESOURCES: Speeches, Articles, and Career Highlights to help define Gen. Clark!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 7, 2008 - 2:51pm.
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10756
StopIranWar.com: "War is not the answer"
Submitted by Wes Clark on February 21, 2007 - 11:40am.
http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/25853581#25853581 (07:30)
![]()
McClellan on Bush, Iraq and election
July 25: A new NBC-Wall Street Journal poll says 74 percent of Americans think the nation's on the wrong track. Scott McClellan, former White House press secretary and author of "What Happened," offers insights and analysis on the state of the nation.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/25853581#25853581 (07:30)
Transcript link of this Hardball video:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25885493/
'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for Friday, July 25
Read the transcript to the Friday show
Guests: Jim Popkin, Margaret Brennan, Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd, Michelle Bernard, Deroy Murdock, Rory Kennedy, Ron Brownstein, Scott McClellan
CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: "Welcome back to HARDBALL. Scott McClellan was the White House press secretary for President Bush. He‘s the author of the best seller, the booming best seller, “What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington‘s Culture of Deception.”
You know, there‘s a big difference between the Bush you worked for, President Bush, and his father. President Bush seemed to like the world. He had allies all around the world. He was friends with people in Russia, all over the world, even, you know, friends with Mitterand of France, certainly friends with Thatcher, with Helmut Kohl.
Why did President Bush, the one you worked for, the current president of the United States—why is he so anti-foreign? Why does he seem to dislike anybody who‘s European or from another country?
SCOTT MCCLELLAN, FORMER WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY: Well, I think part of that changed after we went into Iraq and the view that it was a go-it-alone approach, and when things turned south there. But he‘s had pretty good relations with most world leaders. But our reputation and credibility is what has been tarnished because of some of the actions and policies of this administration.
And that‘s what, you know, Barack Obama was touching on in his speech yesterday. He was touching on some of that and how we need to restore some of that credibility and reputation around the world. But it is a little bit of a different attitude from his father. I think part of it is this—that he has to distinguish himself. It‘s a competitiveness in the Bush family. He has to be his own person, to some extent. And he decided to govern a little bit differently from his father in those ways.
MATTHEWS: Is it a Texas thing? He goes down there. He wears cowboy boots. He has a ranch of some kind down there. He doesn‘t want to say he‘s from Connecticut or from that fancy prep school he went to, or Yale or Harvard Business. He acts like he‘s a Texan—you know, I have to use the right word here—soddy (ph) buster. Is this all part of it? I don‘t like—I never went—he was a kid in school, he had all the money in the world, all of the power in the world to make connections. Never took a trip to Europe. I would have loved to take a trip to Europe in college. I mean, this kid didn‘t seem to like—he never visited China, did he? I mean, what‘s his story, when his dad was...
(CROSSTALK)
MCCLELLAN: ... Crawford, as you know.
MATTHEWS: But when his dad was ambassador. I‘m getting to something, and you‘re not helping me here. What‘s his problem with the world? Is it he thinks it‘s elite to go somewhere else besides America? What‘s it—because the next presidential election‘s going to be about who wants to rejoin the world or not rejoin the world, basically.
MCCLELLAN: Right. I think Senator Obama actually touched on that in his speech, that it‘s not a view that Europe has of America that—that we‘re what‘s all wrong with the world and it‘s not—it shouldn‘t be a view that some Americans have of Europe, that we should be deriding Europeans and their role in the world, that we‘ve got to work together on this. And I think you‘ve seen the president change a little bit in the last several months and come around on some of those policies, whether it‘s Iran or North Korea or...
MATTHEWS: Aren‘t you embarrassed...
MCCLELLAN: ... Iraq or some of the others, but...
MATTHEWS: ... to be part of that administration, that we made fun of French fries? We called them “freedom fries”? Weren‘t you embarrassed to...
MCCLELLAN: Well, those things...
(CROSSTALK)
MATTHEWS: ... I mean, a know-nothing-ism about the world?
MCCLELLAN: Right.
MATTHEWS: You know it‘s like these congressmen who run around saying, I don‘t even own a passport.
MCCLELLAN: Yes, those things...
MATTHEWS: Who are these people?
MCCLELLAN: Those things certainly don‘t help in the long run, in terms of building your reputation around the world.
And it‘s not that—just that we have to reach out just for the sake of reaching out and building our reputation. It‘s that it‘s in our interests, because these challenges that we are facing, in this day and age, are global challenges that we all—that face of all us and that..."
These vulnerable GOP Senate candidates cannot run away fast enough from Bush, from the mess that he has caused, and from his out of the mainstream Republican brand of arrogance and incompetence:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/25853593#25853593 (02:33)
![]()
GOP senators to skip the convention?
July 25: The National Journal picked twelve "targeted" Republican Senate candidates in tough races this year. Out of those 12, how many haven't made plans to attend the GOP convention? Find out as Chris Matthews reveals the Hardball big number.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/25853593#25853593 (02:33)
Transcript link of this Hardball video:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25885493/
'Hardball with Chris Matthews' for Friday, July 25
Read the transcript to the Friday show
Guests: Jim Popkin, Margaret Brennan, Andrea Mitchell, Chuck Todd, Michelle Bernard, Deroy Murdock, Rory Kennedy, Ron Brownstein, Scott McClellan
CHRIS MATTHEWS, HOST: "Time now for tonight‘s “Big Number.”
Not only is it a tough year to be a Republican; it‘s a tough year to be seen with Republicans, even if it‘s at the GOP‘s national jamboree in Saint Paul this September.
So, according to “The National Journal,” of the 12 vulnerable Republicans in U.S. Senate races this year, how many have not made plans to attend the convention? Nine. That‘s right. Three-quarters of the most vulnerable Republican U.S. Senate candidates are either skipping party celebrations are undecideds—undecided right now about going, nine Senate no-shows. They don‘t want to be seen with the Republican brand..."
questions about Iraq that Texas GOP Sen. John Cornyn, being a Bush rubber-stamp, has NOT asked!
John Cornyn not asking the tough questions and his voting record show exactly why he and other Bush rubber-stamp incumbents just like him need to be replaced by good Democratic candidates like Rick Noriega who will ask the tough questions and who will hold the President accountable for what he does:
http://www.ricknoriega.com/news/press_releases?id=0090
Rick Noriega Demands Iraqis Stand Up, Pay Their Own Way
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact:
Martine Apodaca: (713) 447-3269
Holly Shulman: (713) 857-9637
August 7, 2008
Austin - Representative Rick Noriega demanded today that U.S. taxpayers be reimbursed for the costs of Iraqi reconstruction after a new GAO report indicated that soaring oil revenues from Iraq have left the country with a nearly $80 billion budget surplus. While Iraq is racking up budget surpluses from the skyrocketing cost of oil, the American people are continuing to pay for reconstruction efforts as well as unprecedented prices for gas and food.
Statement of Rep. Rick Noriega:
''When the war began, we were promised that Iraqi oil revenue would pay for most of the reconstruction costs of the country. Five years later, the American people are still footing the bill.
The New York Times reported yesterday that the Iraqis are sitting on billions while American taxpayers bear the burden of rebuilding their country. This is unacceptable, and what you get when your representatives in Washington vote against any kind of oversight or accountability. It is outrageous that U.S. taxpayers are still paying the bills while Iraqi government coffers swell because of $4 gas.
Even worse, a huge amount of Iraqi surplus money is sitting in a bank in New York collecting interest. It's about $10 billion dollars, and is expected to grow even more. But here's the kick in the gut. The deposit of Iraqi money at the Federal Reserve Bank is so large that U.S. taxpayers have paid $435.6 million in interest since last year!
Some of these problems could have been avoided if Washington had demanded real accountability over Iraq. But Cornyn and the Bush administration have consistently opposed efforts to provide real oversight over Iraqi operations. It is a slap in the face to our men and women in Iraq who are dying every day to ensure that the Iraqis can stand on their own feet, take responsibility, and rebuild their own country. Now we learn that they've had the money, but we've still been paying the bills. While Texans pay record prices for gas and the war drags on, Cornyn repeatedly voted against any kind of oversight of Iraqi reconstruction efforts and consistently voted against efforts to create a Congressional Commission to investigate waste, fraud, and abuse.''
This report should make every Texan angry. Our men and women have done their jobs, and they are fighting every day to help the Iraqis stand up and take responsibility for their own country. I am outraged that after all the lives that have been lost and the billions that we've spent that we're still paying the bills with blood, in taxes and at the pump. This is a disgrace, and today I'm demanding that Iraqi government stand up, pay its own way, and reimburse American taxpayers.
On Investigating Massive Waste Fraud and Abuse:
Cornyn Voted Against Investigating Waste, Fraud, and Abuse in Iraq AT LEAST FIVE TIMES. Cornyn serially voted against amendments that would have established an oversight committee to investigate waste, fraud and abuse in the awarding contracts in Iraq and Afghanistan, and for the reconstruction after hurricanes Katrina and Rita. [S.2400 Vote #120 6/16/04; HR 3058, Vote #259, 10/19/05; HR 2862, Vote #228, 9/14/05; S 1042, Vote #316, 11/10/05; S 2766, Vote #176, 6/20/06]
Cornyn Voted Against Requiring the President To Submit A Budget For Military Operations In Iraq and Afghanistan for the Following Year. Cornyn voted for the Stevens motion to table the Dorgan amendment which requires the President to submit a budget amendment for FY 2004, which sets forth the cost of U.S. military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. The motion passed 53-41. [HR 2658, Vote #278, 7/16/03]
Cornyn Voted To Allow Tax Dollars To Be Spent Advertising The War In Iraq. In 2006, Cornyn voted to table an amendment that would bar the use of funds by the Defense Department for public relations programs to promote positive news coverage in Iraq. The motion to table passed 51-44. [HR 5631, Vote #236, 9/7/06]
On Oversight of Iraqi Government Progress:
Cornyn voted to exempt the Iraqi government from accountability. Cornyn voted to require thePresident to withhold funding for military operations in Iraq if the Iraqi government fails to meet certain benchmarks. The president could waive the requirement if he submits in writing to Congress a justification for the waiver. [HR 1495, Vote #168, 5/16/07]
Cornyn voted against requiring the Iraq Government to meet benchmarks. The benchmarks would have served as a progress report from the Iraqi government. Cornyn voted against a conference report on the bill that provided $124.2 billion in fiscal 2007 emergency funding, it also set a goal for redeployment of troops in Iraq by the end of March 2008. If the president can not verify that the Iraq government is meeting benchmarks then the troops would redeploy by the end of 2007. The legislation also provides $95.9 billion for military operations, $6.9 for hurricane recovery and $3.5 billion for crop programs. [HR 1591, Vote #147, 4/26/07]
On Real Congressional Oversight of The War Effort:
Cornyn Rubber Stamped The Administration's Request And Voted Against Iraq War Reports. Senator Cornyn voted to table an amendment that would require the Defense Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of State, to provide Congress with an assessment of whether civil war has broken out in Iraq and a strategy to protect U.S. troops. Cornyn voted yea. [S.Amdt. 4885 to H.R. 5631, Vote # 233, 9/6/06, passed 54-44]
Cornyn Voted Against Requiring Detailed Costs Of Military Action In Iraq. In 2003, Cornyn voted against requiring the Defense secretary to submit a report to the House International Relations Committee and the Senate Foreign Relations Committee every 30 days detailing the costs of military action in Iraq, including any contributions from foreign countries. Motion to table passed 50-45 [HR 2658, Vote #281, 7/16/03]
Cornyn Voted Against Requiring The President To Submit A Report On The US Strategy Related To Post-Conflict Iraq. In 2003, Cornyn voted for the Stevens motion to table the Kennedy-Leahy-Durbin amendment which requires the President to submit an unclassified report, with a classified annex if necessary, within 30 days after enactment, on the United States strategy regarding activities related to post-conflict security, humanitarian assistance, governance, and reconstruction in Iraq that are undertaken as a result of Operation Iraqi Freedom. The motion passed 52-43. [HR 2658, Vote #283, 7/16/03]
Cornyn Voted Against Requiring Defense Department Report On Detainees. In 2003, Cornyn voted to table an amendment that would require the Defense Department to submit a report within 90 days on individuals detained as military combatants. The report would have to include the names and nationalities of all detainees and information on how the government plans to handle each detainee's case. The motion to table passed 52-42. [HR 2658, Vote #279, 7/16/03]
On Investigating The Most Massive Intelligence Failure In U.S. History:
Cornyn Voted Against Creating Iraqi Intelligence Commission. Senator Cornyn voted to table the Corzine Amendment, which would have created a 12-member independent commission to investigate the development and use of intelligence leading up to the war in Iraq. Cornyn voted yea. [S. Amdt. 1275 to H.R. 2658, Vote # 284, 7/16/03, passed 51-45]
Cornyn Voted Against Requiring The President To Submit A Report Regarding Pre-War Intelligence. In 2003, Cornyn voted to table an amendment that would withhold $50 million in intelligence funding from the bill until the president submits a report on the role executive branch policymakers had on the development and use of intelligence relating to the war in Iraq. The report would have to be submitted to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, the House International Relations Committee and the Appropriations, Armed Services and Intelligence committees of both chambers. The motion to table passed 62-34. [H 2658, Vote #287, 7/17/03]
###

Mr Inhofe is now blaming the Democrats for the high gas prices. And he is now wanting Oklahomans to send their gas receipts to him so he can send them to our Democratic Congress . Because he says it is their fault for taking a vacation and not doing anything to solve this crisis before doing so.
But mostly everyone knows it is the Republicans fault. Especially Mr Inhofe who has been known to be in the pocket of Big Oil and Energy. Andrew Rice has a petition up on his site that he wants to send to Mr Inhofe that states how much he has taken in campaign contributions over the years. Only the little matter of over 1 million dollars.
You can sign the petition at Andrews site here:
http://www.andrewforoklahoma.com/newsroom_details.asp?id=1142
Andrew Rice is good. Real good. And I hope that he takes this Bush crony down.
http://www.thechrismatthewsshow.com/html/transcript/index.php?selected=1&id=123
Weekend of August 3, 2008
THE CHRIS MATTHEWS SHOW
Ms. ELISABETH BUMILLER (The New York Times): "Well, look, and George Bush got those massive tax cuts through the first year of--in office
CHRIS MATTHEWS, host: Even though he won with a less than popular vote?
Ms. BUMILLER: And he--yeah--they--George Bush was not--he was not--remember, they were going to govern as if they'd won a landslide victory. That was Dick Cheney's idea from day one..."

For the first five years of that administration, they had a very willing and compliant Congress. The Republican classes of 1994 and 1996 were still in Congress and ran amock with the help of Cheney, Rove, et al.
Stan Davis
Lakewood, CO
Wes Clark -- Make America All It Can Be!
This is what Incumbent Republican Bush rubber-stamp members of Congress and the Senate were not asking the tough questions about or holding Bush accountable for which means that they were NOT doing their jobs:
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,417064,00.html
In New Book, Woodward Says Bush 'Failed to Lead,' Even as Surge Succeeded
Thursday, September 04, 2008
By Bill Sammon
WASHINGTON — Bob Woodward, who wrote two books praising President Bush and then a third harshly criticizing him, is out with a fourth tome that renders a mixed verdict on Bush, lauding the president’s surge of troops into Iraq, but saying "too often he failed to lead."
At 487 pages, "The War Within" is the fourth installment in Woodward’s series of books on the president. Its release is embargoed until Monday, although an advance copy was obtained exclusively by FOX News.
The new book is less critical than Woodward’s last tome, "State of Denial," which savaged Bush for his execution of the war in Iraq. "Denial" ended with the line: "With all Bush’s upbeat talk and optimism, he had not told the American public the truth about what Iraq had become."
Woodward repeats the line in his new book, adding: "My reporting for this book showed that to be even more the case than I could have imagined."
Bush refused to grant an interview to Woodward for "Denial," but gave the author several interviews for "War Within." Such increased access did not seem to improve Woodward’s opinion of Bush.
"President Bush has rarely leveled with the public to explain what he was doing and what should be expected," wrote Woodward, an assistant managing editor at the Washington Post, in "War Within." "He did not seek sacrifice from most of the country when he had the chance. He did not even mobilize his own party. Republicans often voiced as much suspicion and distrust as Democrats. The president was rarely the voice of realism on the Iraq war."
On the other hand, Woodward acknowledged the success of Bush’s surge of additional troops into Iraq in 2007.
"Violence was down so much in a few places that some U.S. soldiers were not receiving combat action badges because there was no fighting in their area," he wrote.
Woodward notes that Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama opposed the surge, while GOP presidential candidate John McCain was “advocating more troops for years.” Woodward also quotes McCain expressing frustration with the Bush White House, clenching his fists in the West Wing and exclaiming to Woodward: “Everything is f---ing spin.”
Woodward asserts in his new book that Gen. George Casey, when he was the U.S. commander in Iraq, believed "that President Bush does not understand the war" and eventually concluded "he has lost the president’s confidence."
Calling Bush "the nation’s most divisive figure," Woodward criticized the president for failing to fulfill what some might view as impossible expectations.
"He had not rooted out terror wherever it existed," Woodward scolded. "He had not achieved world peace. He had not attained victory in his two wars."
Woodward also observed that seven years in the White House has "taken a visible toll" on Bush, who "has a noticeable paunch and sometimes slouches in his chair."
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/23/mccain-lambastes-bush-years/
EXCLUSIVE: McCain lambastes Bush years
'We just let things get completely out of hand'
Joseph Curl (Contact) and Stephen Dinan (Contact)
Thursday, October 23, 2008
NEWSMAKER INTERVIEW:
ABOARD THE STRAIGHT TALK AIR — "Sen. John McCain on Wednesday blasted President Bush for building a mountain of debt for future generations, failing to pay for expanding Medicare and abusing executive powers, leveling his strongest criticism to date of an administration whose unpopularity may be dragging the Republican Party to the brink of a massive electoral defeat.
"We just let things get completely out of hand," he said of his own party's rule in the past eight years.
In an interview with The Washington Times, Mr. McCain lashed out at a litany of Bush policies and issues that he said he would have handled differently as president, days after a poll showed that he began making up ground on Sen. Barack Obama since he emphatically sought to distance himself from Mr. Bush in the final debate..."
http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/1008/McCain_tags_Bush_GOP_Congress.html
October 23, 2008
Categories: McCain
McCain tags Bush, GOP Congress Banner headline in today's Washington Times that may help with Virginia's swing voters while angering some of the president's loyalists: "McCain lambastes the Bush years." Joseph Curl and Stephen Dinan's piece (there is audio, too): http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2008/oct/23/mccain-lambastes-bush-years/
"I think, frankly, the problem was, with a Republican Congress, that the president was told by the speaker and majority leaders and others, 'Don't veto these bills, we need this pork, we need this excess spending, we need to grow these bureaucracies.' They all sponsor certain ones. And he didn't do what Ronald Reagan used to and say, 'No'; say, 'No. We're not going to do this.'"
When contacted about Mr. McCain's criticism of Mr. Bush, White House spokesman Anthony E. Warren said the administration would have no comment.
But one of the "most senior Republican strategists in the land," in the words of Mike "Playbook" Allen, was glad to:
“Lashing out at past Republican Congresses instead of Pelosi and Reid, and echoing your opponent's attacks on you instead of attacking your opponent, and spending 150,000 hard dollars on designer clothes when congressional Republicans are struggling for money, and when your senior campaign staff are blaming each other for the loss in The New York Times [Magazine] 10 days before the election, you’re not doing much to energize your supporters. The fact is, when you’re the party standard-bearer, you have an obligation to fight to the finish. I think they can still win. But if they don’t think that, they need to look at how Bob Dole finished out his campaign in 1996 and not try to take down as many Republicans with them as they can. Instead of campaigning in Electoral College states, Dole was campaigning in places he knew he didn’t have a chance to beat Clinton, but where he could energize key House and Senate races. I think you’ll find these sentiments shared by MANY of my fellow Republican strategists.”
By Jonathan Martin 10:37 AM
comments (50) | post comment | permalink
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2008/10/23/former-bush-aide-voting-for-obama/
![]()
October 23, 2008
Former Bush aide voting for Obama
Posted: 09:45 PM ET
Watch Scott McCllellan on D.L. Hughley Break the News:
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/10/23/sot.dl.mcclellan.endorse.cnn
Fmr. Bush staffer backs Obama 0:35
Former George W. Bush press secretary Scott McClellan endorses Barack Obama on CNN's 'D.L. Hughley Breaks the News.'
• Politics - News, Opinion and Analysis from CNN.com
Source: CNN
Added On October 23, 2008![]()
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/bestoftv/2008/10/23/sot.dl.mcclellan.endorse.cnn
(CNN) — Scott McClellan, the former White House press secretary who sharply criticized President Bush in his memoir last spring, told CNN Thursday he's voting for Barack Obama.
"From the very beginning I have said I am going to support the candidate that has the best chance for changing the way Washington works and getting things done and I will be voting for Barack Obama and clapping," McClellan told new CNN Host D.L. Hughley
McClellan, a onetime Bush loyalist whose scathing critique of the president sent shock waves across Washington last spring, has long hinted he was leaning toward the Illinois senator.
"It's a message that is very similar to the one that Gov. Bush ran on in 2000," McClellan said in May about Obama's campaign.
McClellan isn't the first member of Bush's inner circle to express support for Obama. In 2007, former Bush strategist Matt Dowd also said he had become disillusioned with the president and said Obama was the only candidate that appealed to him.
The full interview will air on D.L. Hugley's new show, D.L. Hughley Breaks the News, Saturday at 10 p.m. ET. Hughley is also a guest of Larry King Live Friday at 9 p.m. ET.
Filed under: Barack Obama
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0810/23/lkl.01.html
CNN LARRY KING LIVE
Interview With Michael Moore
Aired October 23, 2008 - 21:00 ET
LARRY KING, HOST: "All right. We have a blog in that regard from Michael -- from Ronnie, rather, to you: "Michael, wouldn't you agree that the ages of the candidates is making a big difference on peoples' choices, especially young and Independent voters?"
Do you think they are voting age?
MICHAEL MOORE, FILMMAKER: No. I think young and Independent voters are voting because they're -- they can't take another eight years of this. We've been through a rough time, Larry. And this last month has been the roughest in terms of domestically here in this country.
They can't take it anymore. They don't want more of that. I know people that are going to vote for Obama who don't even really agree with half of the things that he stands for, but they just can't take another four or eight years of what they've been through.
And so I think the country is collectively shouting uncle. I can't take it anymore and so I'm going to try something else. This may not be the right thing, but, you know, it's better than what we've had. And, unfortunately, it's -- I think people realize it isn't going to get any better if John McCain and Sarah Palin are in the White House..."

really stood out to me and in my opinion it is a very big reason why Bush is such a huge political liability to Republican incumbents who have been Bush rubber-stamps:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16942296/
Demise of GOP just took turn for the worse
Scarborough: Bush willing to take his party over a cliff to prove his point
FREE VIDEO
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=6EC58003-AA7C-4F5C-9087-3C70A7500516&f=00&fg=email (15:17)
• GOP civil war
Feb. 1: Will the war in Iraq make the Republican party implode? MSNBC's Joe Scarborough asks Time's Joe Klein, MSNBC Political Analyst Pat Buchanan, and The New Republic's Michael Crowley.
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=6EC58003-AA7C-4F5C-9087-3C70A7500516&f=00&fg=email (15:17)
Scarborough Country
COMMENTARY
By Joe Scarborough
Host, ‘Scarborough Country’
MSNBC
Updated 8:17 a.m. CT, Fri., Feb. 2, 2007
Joe Scarborough
Host, ‘Scarborough Country’
• Profile
The slow demise of the national Republican Party just took a turn for the worse. Hard to believe that the GOP’s prospects could actually become more bleak after two years of unrelenting bad news, but it has.
Republican senators are now turning their rhetorical guns away from Democrats and toward one another. A few conservative Republican senators, whose votes usually cheer me up during bleak political times, are actually accusing Virginia’s senior senator, John Warner, of providing comfort to terrorists.
The White House even got involved in the name calling when Tony Snow suggested Warner’s actions could embolden the likes of Osama Bin Laden.
The message from the Bush administration seems to be this: “Thanks for carrying our water on this miserable war for four years. Now we’re going accuse you of helping terrorists.”
How pathetic.
Didn’t Dick Cheney just cite Ronald Reagan’s 11th Commandment about Republicans not attacking one another?
My how things have changed in a few days.
It’s one more reason I have grown increasingly distraught over the GOP’s direction in recent months. The president is prepared to take his administration and his party over the cliff to prove that he right about Iraq—even if most of his generals and the majority of Americans disagree.
More from Joe Scarborough
Political predictions for 2007
'Scarborough Country' homepage
The question now is how long will Republicans stand by this war that has cost over 3,000 lives? Is it worth the $1 trillion dollars that will be added to our national debt? Is it worth undercutting our ability to strike at Iran and North Korea? I would say “yes” to all three questions if there were the slightest chance victory was around the corner. But it is not. If you don’t believe me, ask any general to tell you about the Bush surge. They will roll their eyes.
Even if you agree with me that this war was worth fighting as long as we believed Saddam Hussein had WMD’s aimed at America, at some point you have to face the facts: the Bush administration was wrong about those weapons, wrong about the nuclear program, wrong about their refusal to quell rioting early, wrong about Bremer’s gutting of the Iraqi army and police force, wrong about refusing to kill or capture al Sadr in 2003, wrong to tell the generals not speak of the coming insurgency, wrong to stubbornly refuse to give generals the troops they needed to win this war, wrong to make the “Mission Accomplished” declaration, wrong for the VP to claim that the insurgency was in its death throes and wrong to push a surge plan that the president’s top generals opposed.
The list could continue for pages but I will be generous to the White House and leave it at that.
At some point, GOP senators and congressmen need to understand that this war is no longer a battle between Republican war heroes and Democratic 60s hippie freaks. The lines have now been blurred by Bush’s bungling war strategy. Now we find ourselves in a fight between war heroes and war heroes. Former secretaries of Navy and former Vietnam POWs. Conservative Republicans and protectors of the president.
That may not be so bad for George W. Bush in the short run, but it is a disaster for Republicans in 2008 and beyond.
Conservatives had better wake up before all the gains made by Ronald Reagan and the 1994 Revolution are lost. The clock is ticking.
Catch 'Scarborough Country' each weeknight at 9 p.m. ET
Video Link to this Commentary:
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?g=6EC58003-AA7C-4F5C-9087-3C70A7500516&f=00&fg=email (15:17)
Link and partial transcript of this video:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16943697/
'Scarborough Country' for Feb. 1
Read the transcript to the Thursday show
Updated 9:55 a.m. CT, Fri., Feb. 2, 2007
Guests: Joe Klein, Michael Crowley, Mort Zuckerman, Carmen Rasmusen, Courtney Hazlett, Steve Mayer
JOE SCARBOROUGH, HOST: "You know, I‘ve got to say, just listening to this debate today, Joe Klein, has just made me very angry, angry at a lot of people in my Republican Party, angry at people that I like very much. The suggestion that either you support the president 100 percent or you‘re not a conservative is offensive to me. I am more conservative than George Bush has ever been! I‘m more conservative when it comes to the military. I‘m more conservative when it comes to economics. I‘m more conservative when it comes to spending our money.
But somehow, this president has been able to make the argument, You either support me, you either support—what, $10 billion more dollars, I guess, Joe? I mean, you either support these false estimates that I make at the beginning of the war, you either support my plan to give the generals less troops than they need to win the war at the beginning and more troops than they want at the end, or else you‘re not a conservative.
I don‘t know how that message doesn‘t tear the Republican Party apart, and I wonder, Why aren‘t there more John Warners out there?
JOE KLEIN, “TIME” MAGAZINE: Can I make two points about this, Joe? First of all, the people—you know, the guy who really undermined our troops, the guys who undermined our troops, were the Bush administration...
SCARBOROUGH: And you know what? I would stay the course if there was any evidence at all that we could win this war. But when you have a general testifying on the Hill in front of John McCain that he still thinks that we‘re on the right path, that he still thinks no mistakes have been made—I‘m telling you, there are troops that live around northwest Florida that are over in Iraq, that live in Washington, that live across this country, that will not be coming home next Christmas because they will be dead because we have leaders that don‘t understand that we‘re on the wrong course in Iraq! If you‘re a true conservative, there is no way you can support staying the course in the sight of such failure. Either come up with a new plan or bring our troops home!
All right, that‘s my sermon for tonight. Joe Klein and Michael Crowley, thank you. Pat Buchanan, stick around. We‘ll be right back..."