DOOM: Fairwell to the Holocene (part 1)
Submitted by richsezclark4prez on September 6, 2008 - 1:14am.
DOOM | Climate Crisis | Current Events | Energy | Environment | Fossil Fuels | Global Warming | Greenhouse Gases | Human Rights | International | Media | News and Links | Religion | Science

SPEAKING OF DOOM...
FAIRWELL TO THE HOLOCENE
I promised you a new DOOM post awhile ago. While the US Presidential Race rages on, the issues get buried or reduced to a soundbite. Here's one issue.
I encourage you to follow the links and read and listen.
got doom?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
posted June 26, 2008 10:48 am
by David Adam at commondreams
Published on Friday, August 15, 2008 by The Guardian/UK
Suffocating Dead Zones Spread Across World’s Oceans
Critically low oxygen levels now pose as great a threat to life in the world’s oceans as overfishing and habitat loss, say experts
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
December 10, 2007
By Jacques Leslie at Mother Jones
The Last Empire: China's Pollution Problem Goes Global
Can the world survive China's headlong rush to emulate the American way of life?
~snip~
The grander astonishment is the most massive and rapid redistribution of the earth's resources in human history. In a mere two and a half decades, China has awakened from Maoist stagnancy to become the world's manufacturer. Among the planet's 193 nations, it is now first in production of coal, steel, cement, and 10 kinds of metal; it produces half the world's cameras and nearly a third of its TVs, and by 2015 may produce the most cars. It boasts factories that can accommodate 200,000 workers, and towns that make 60 percent of the world's buttons, half the world's silk neckties, and half the world's fireworks, respectively.China has also become a ravenous consumer. Its appetite for raw materials drives up international commodity prices and shipping rates while its middle class, projected to jump from fewer than 100 million people now to 700 million by 2020, is learning the gratifications of consumerism. China is by a wide margin the leading importer of a cornucopia of commodities, including iron ore, steel, copper, tin, zinc, aluminum, and nickel. It is the world's biggest consumer of coal, refrigerators, grain, cell phones, fertilizer, and television sets. It not only leads the world in coal consumption, with 2.5 billion tons in 2006, but uses more than the next three highest-ranked nations—the United States, Russia, and India—combined. China uses half the world's steel and concrete and will probably construct half the world's new buildings over the next decade. So omnivorous is the Chinese appetite for imports that when the country ran short of scrap metal in early 2004, manhole covers disappeared from cities all over the world—Chicago lost 150 in a month. And the Chinese are not just vast consumers, but conspicuous ones, as evidenced by the presence in Beijing of dealers representing every luxury-car manufacturer in the world. Sales of Porsches, Ferraris, and Maseratis have flourished, even though their owners have no opportunity to test their finely tuned cars' performance on the city's clotted roads.
The catch is that China has become not just the world's manufacturer but also its despoiler, on a scale as monumental as its economic expansion. Chinese ecosystems were already dreadfully compromised before the Communist Party took power in 1949, but Mao managed to accelerate their destruction.
~snip~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Tomgram: Mike Davis, Welcome to the Next Epoch
posted June 26, 2008
Now, in a striking report from the front lines of science, Mike Davis, TomDispatch regular and author most recently of In Praise of Barbarians: Essays Against Empire, "welcomes" the new geologic era we're officially entering, a period in which humanity may simply, and catastrophically, outrun history itself.
-Tom
Living on the Ice Shelf
Humanity's Meltdown
By Mike Davis1. Farewell to the Holocene
~snip~
To the question "Are we now living in the Anthropocene?" the 21 members of the Commission unanimously answer "yes." They adduce robust evidence that the Holocene epoch -- the interglacial span of unusually stable climate that has allowed the rapid evolution of agriculture and urban civilization -- has ended and that the Earth has entered "a stratigraphic interval without close parallel in the last several million years." In addition to the buildup of greenhouse gases, the stratigraphers cite human landscape transformation which "now exceeds natural sediment production by an order of magnitude," the ominous acidification of the oceans, and the relentless destruction of biota.
~snip~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
On NPR's Talk of the Nation SCIENCE FRIDAY
Mass Extinction Event On the Horizon? (broadcast Friday, August 15th, 2008)
Scientists studying many different parts of the planet's ecosystems are warning that Earth may be on the verge of a sixth major mass extinction event. In a series of papers published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers examining biodiversity around the globe paint a gloomy picture for the planet's species. Warning signs include recent mass die-offs of amphibians and declining fisheries.
Over the course of the Earth's history, there have been at least five major extinction events -- the End Ordovician, Late Devonian, End Permian, End Triassic, and End Cretaceous. But are we facing a sixth major extinction period -- and is there anything that can be done about it? In this segment, Ira talks with biologist Paul Ehrlich about what is driving biodiversity loss and what can be done to reverse the trend.
LISTEN to this interview! It's about ten minutes of the most riveting case for SOMEBODY doing SOMETHING to stop this madness.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Lastly, we have THIS FUTURE to look forward to, UNLESS cooler heads prevail. And maybe not even then, as we slide down the back-end curve of Peak Oil.
Making Other Arrangements
A wake-up call to a citizenry in the shadow of oil scarcity
by James Howard Kunstler
photographs by David Maisel
Published in the January/February 2007 issue of Orion magazine
~snip~
Still, the widespread wish persists that some combination of alternative fuels will rescue us from this oil and gas predicament and allow us to continue enjoying by some other means what Vice-President Cheney has called the “non-negotiable” American way of life. The truth is that no combination of alternative fuels or systems for using them will allow us to continue running America, or even a substantial fraction of it, the way we have been. We are not going to run Wal-Mart, Walt Disney World, Monsanto, and the Interstate Highway System on any combination of solar or wind energy, hydrogen, ethanol, tar sands, oil shale, methane hydrates, nuclear power, thermal depolymerization, “zero-point” energy, or anything else you can name. We will desperately use many of these things in many ways, but we are likely to be disappointed in what they can actually do for us.The key to understanding the challenge we face is admitting that we have to comprehensively make other arrangements for all the normal activities of everyday life. I will return to this theme shortly, but first it is important to try to account for the extraordinary amount of delusional thinking that currently dogs our collective ability to think about these problems.
~snip~
:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: ::
I urge all who read this to read every one of these essays in whole and send these links to your friends, family, co-workers and lists. The Bu$h administration has gutted the EPA and replaced sound science and scientists with political bravado and industry hacks. The Corporate Media is being fueled by the same companies that are trying very hard to make you believe this is a complete fabrication.
It's NOT FUNNY. And it is VERY REAL. You can spend your time wringing your hands about Obama and McCain and follow the lead of the corporate-owned media over every little gossippy tid-bit on the candidates. Or you can get to work to do what you can for yourself and to help others prepare for this slow-moving worldwide crisis. It's not a matter of "IF" but "WHEN".
got doom?
to be continued.......

One very rough measure of the value placed upon science and environmental realities at EPA is the number of PHS officers serving there. PHS has long had some of the toughest academic and experience requirements in the entire Federal government. Moreover, because of the many varied assignments one can have as a PHS officer, the PHS attracts some very highly qualified people into its ranks.
In 1970, when the EPA was formed, there were 560 PHS professionals working for the agency. Most of them were experienced environmental engineers with advanced degrees. Most of the rest were top-flight scientists. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3912/is_200012/ai_n8921941/pg_4 Thus, President Nixon's administration began the process of politicizing the environmental work of the Federal government in part by placing lawyers and other political appointees in positions of authority over those scientists and engineers.
Entirely as a result of actions taken by Republican administrations, by 1990, the number of PHS officers working for the EPA had declined to 220, and very few of them were scientists. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1922845
Granted, over those years, as well as currently, the EPA brought on scientists and engineers through other personnel systems. However, it has been my impression in general (and there have been a few exceptions) that the scientists and engineers they have brought on that way have not always been of the same advanced academic achievement or experience as have been those assigned through the PHS. This impression is supported by the relatively modest rates of pay currently being offered to those scientists and engineers at the EPA. http://jobsearch.usajobs.opm.gov/jobsearch.asp?q=&jbf574=EP*&jbf522=&salmin=&salmax=&paygrademin=&paygrademax=&FedEmp=Y&sort=rv&vw=d&ss=0&brd=3876&FedPub=Y&caller=/agency_search.asp&SUBMIT1.x=73&SUBMIT1.y=14 There are at least 5 pages of vacancies shown, so it is a challenge to wade through, but in general, EPA is offering the best salaries to attorneys and "program analysts" while offering less to most engineers and scientists. Knowing what good scientists and engineers can now make in the private sector, I suspect that EPA is not attracting the top people in those categories.
So far, I haven't found any data on how many PHS officers are presently working at EPA; but I am certain it is far too few, given the environmental crisis now looming.
Nick Kelly
Wes Clark could still secure America as a national security candidate.
(I think...)
The dead zones are really making me crazy too. And the lack of public discourse about them. Unless you watch public TV or National Geographic channel (which I do, which is why I sleep so little)
Thanks for bringing this here so we can all learn more about... how doomed we really are! :)
If we're going to put the brakes on the train, we need to know where it's going and how fast. And half the problem is the squelching and disappearing of actual data and information-- on a federal level. See Wes's promise as a presidential candidate to open all records and environmental information to the public arena:
http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2004/01/clark011604.html
It's such a radically progressive platform of transparency. Too bad nobody seems to have adopted it.
Doom Request:
I hope you'll cover the Fannie Mae Freddie Mac Friday dump story as well. It certainly dovetailed in nicely and quietly behind all that manufactured high volume noise about the Moose chick in Alaska...
We are Doomed!

Thanks for the tip! Can you provide a few links on this? I'm cooking up a few more items on DOOM and one of them will include Freddie/Fannie, as well as the Bear-Stearns bailout and the failed banks (up to 11 now I just heard). But this one will be global in scope regarding the pending DOOM of the global banking/economic system. Many signs are there already, for instance:
The Royal Bank of Scotland has advised clients to brace for a full-fledged crash in global stock and credit markets over the next three months as inflation paralyzes the major central banks.
"A very nasty period is soon to be upon us - be prepared," said Bob Janjuah, the bank's credit strategist.
(LINK to Telegraph UK June 2008)
So if you have other Global Banking DOOM stories, send them to:
richsezclark4prez AT sbcglobal DOT NET
(please don't post these items here - I'd like to stay on-topic)
THANKS for mentioning it! It's a work-in-progress right now.
Stay tuned!
www.mccainsfreeride.com

You can add a comment in place of your "broken link" notice.
(i didn't reply to you so you can still edit it)
If you have a doom story that's as good a place as any!
I'm sure I can replace this post with another pending global cataclysm.
www.mccainsfreeride.com

Look, it's not just me. You can't make this stuff up.
Dear Reader,
Civilization as we know it is coming to an end soon. This is not the wacky proclamation of a doomsday cult, apocalypse bible prophecy sect, or conspiracy theory society. Rather, it is the scientific conclusion of the best paid, most widely-respected geologists, physicists, bankers, and investors in the world. These are rational, professional, conservative individuals who are absolutely terrified by a phenomenon known as global "Peak Oil."
~snip~
In practical and considerably oversimplified terms, this means that if 2005 was the year of global Peak Oil, worldwide oil production in the year 2030 will be the same as it was in 1980. However, the world’s population in 2030 will be both much larger (approximately twice) and much more industrialized (oil-dependent) than it was in 1980. Consequently, worldwide demand for oil will outpace worldwide production of oil by a significant margin. As a result, the price will skyrocket, oil dependent economies will crumble, and resource wars will explode.
The issue is not one of "running out" so much as it is not having enough to keep our economy running. In this regard, the ramifications of Peak Oil for our civilization are similar to the ramifications of dehydration for the human body. The human body is 70 percent water. The body of a 200 pound man thus holds 140 pounds of water. Because water is so crucial to everything the human body does, the man doesn't need to lose all 140 pounds of water weight before collapsing due to dehydration. A loss of as little as 10-15 pounds of water may be enough to kill him.In a similar sense, an oil based economy such as ours doesn't need to deplete its entire reserve of oil before it begins to collapse. A shortfall between demand and supply as little as 10 to 15 percent is enough to wholly shatter an oil-dependent economy and reduce its citizenry to poverty.
The effects of even a small drop in production can be devastating. For instance, during the 1970s oil shocks, shortfalls in production as small as 5% caused the price of oil to nearly quadruple. The same thing happened in California a few years ago with natural gas: a production drop of less than 5% caused prices to skyrocket by 400%.
Go read the rest and check out all the links at
www.lifeaftertheoilcrash.net
It's not as bad as you think. It's magnitudes WORSE.
www.mccainsfreeride.com


The last two links go to the same article.
I think this is the link you meant to put up for the last article:
http://www.orionmagazine.org/index.php/articles/article/7/