GOP strategist John Feehery on why Republicans fear voting for the public option


Hello Everyone:

John Feehery is a Republican strategist who regularly appears on MSNBC and CNN to participate in panel discussions and debates with various Democrats. His Republican credentials are very solid:

http://pundits.thehill.com/john-feehery/

http://thefeeherytheory.com/

On Thursday, August 20, John Feehery was a panel guest on The Ed Show. Feehery in my opinion taught Ed Schultz a very important lesson when he correctly explained to Schultz that Republican Senators Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch fear voting for the public option when it comes to the health care issue because "they‘d have primary opponents against them, and they‘d lose:"

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32509287/ns/msnbc_tv-the_ed_show/

'The Ed Show' for Thursday, August 20
Read the transcript to the Thursday show

Guests: Maxine Waters, Joan Walsh, Bob Baer, Rep. Adam Schiff, Stephanie Miller, John Feehery, E.J. Dionne, Roy Sekoff

ED SCHULTZ, MSNBC HOST: "The president needs to know the liberals are still driving the bus here. He‘s going to ride to the midterm. He‘s got to get a public option. But I want you to respond; the president has olive branches pouring out of the windows of the White House, and you have Grassley and Orrin Hatch drawing a new line in the sand. They say no public option. What are you supposed to do with those guys?

JOHN FEEHERY, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: Ed, let me ask you a question. If Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch both supported a public option, they‘d have primary opponents against them, and they‘d lose.

SCHULTZ: I don‘t think they would.

FEEHERY: They would.

(CROSS TALK)

FEEHERY: I know the Republican primary voters better than you do.

SCHULTZ: I know people without health insurance in those states that they represent.

FEEHERY: They don‘t vote in a Republican primary..."

John Feehery is absolutely correct because many Republicans who vote in their primaries are the hard core activists in the Rush Limbaugh wing of the GOP. Ed Schultz is seeing what would happen in a general election, NOT in a Republican primary. That is why John Feehery is right and Ed Schultz is wrong!

Sen. Arlen Specter in my opinion is a perfect example of what John Feehery explained to Ed Schultz. It was right after Specter's vote for Obama's economic stimulus package that Rush Limbaugh ordered Specter out of the Republican Party and that brought Pat Toomey in as his Republican primary challenger. The polls very clearly showed that Specter could NOT win that primary. All of this is fully documented:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17542

BREAKING NEWS WITH ANALYSIS: Arlen Specter to become a Democrat

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 28, 2009 - 1:03pm.

1) Rush Limbaugh ordered Specter out of the Republican Party:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021209/content/01125110.guest.html

Drive-Bys Giddy Over the Porkulus

February 12, 2009

RUSH: "Snowe, Collins, Specter? Rick, if you would listen to this program, I predicted back in November-December the Democrats didn't need 60 votes because they've got at least two of these three on every piece of legislation. So they don't have to worry about what happens in Minnesota. They're going to have 60 votes because you're going to have a number of RINO Republicans. I said earlier today it's great to flush 'em out get 'em outta there let it be known that they are not Republicans. The Republicans lost seats in the House precisely because we're cleaning up we're getting rid of the Republicans in name only..."

2) The polls showed it was impossible for Specter to win that Republican primary race against Toomey:

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2009/04/poll-specter-far-behind-toomey.html

Poll: Specter far behind Toomey

Posted by Eugene Kiely at 11:45 AM/ET, April 24, 2009

"The numbers already don't look good for Sen. Arlen Specter.

In a Rasmussen Reports poll out this morning, the Pennsylvania Republican lags behind GOP primary challenger Pat Toomey by more than 20%. Just 30% of Republican voters in the Keystone State say they would vote for the incumbent, while 51% are throwing their support behind Toomey..."

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/pennsylvania/election_2010_pennsylvania_republican_senate_primary?loc=interstitialskip

Election 2010: Pennsylvania Republican Senate Primary
Pennsylvania Senate Primary: Toomey 51% Specter 30%

Friday, April 24, 2009

"Incumbent Senator Arlen Specter trails former Congressman Pat Toomey by 21 points in an early look at Pennsylvania’s 2010 Republican Primary. Fifty-one percent (51%) of Republican voters statewide say they’d vote for Toomey while just 30% would support Specter..."

This is exactly what John Feehery said would happen to Chuck Grassley and Orrin Hatch if they supported a public option. This is also the main reason why so many elected Republicans in Congress who want to be re-elected fear Rush Limbaugh and keep on apologizing to him if they do or say something to upset him. The DCCC has this website up naming every Republican who has apologized to Rush Limbaugh so far:

http://www.dccc.org/content/sorry

I'm Sorry, Rush

"Republicans who've dared to criticize Rush only to beg for his forgiveness..."

As long as Rush Limbaugh stays in power over so much of the GOP, it will be extremely hard for Obama to get any Republican votes on his health care legislation if those Republicans want to be re-elected. It is absolutely impossible and it is completely out of the question to seriously reason with or negotiate with Rush Limbaugh and with any Republicans in Congress or in the grassroots who agree with him:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17338

ANALYSIS: Why Bipartisanship is NOT possible with far right wing GOP ideologues!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 17, 2009 - 6:21pm.

This is what I definitely believe is the silent elephant in the room that very few people are talking about when the issue of bipartisanship comes up!

It is very unfortunate that certain "Democratic strategists" do not seem to understand this concept:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17838

Chris Kofinis is wrong saying he wants the GOP to follow its extreme right wing!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 13, 2009 - 3:10pm.

Rush Limbaugh and his extreme right wing media empire are also a major reason why Obama is losing the message war on health care right now:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17836

ANALYSIS: Why Obama is losing the health care message war to the other side

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 13, 2009 - 6:28am.

Obama just does not have the understanding or the experience to seriously fight Rush Limbaugh and the rest of his extreme right wing media empire on even terms and expect to win the message war:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/16555#comment-328296

Obama not understanding the GOP attack machine & how to fight it...

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on September 15, 2008 - 11:05am.

I have two points to conclude this post with:

1) It is NOT Obama's fault that many Republicans in Congress will not seriously work with him in a bipartisan manner. Obama in my opinion has reached out to Republicans in good faith and they have not responded either because they are ideologues like Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) or because they fear being primaried as John Feehery told Ed Schultz if they vote with Obama:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17823

Why John McCain was dead wrong to say Obama has failed the bipartisan test!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 8, 2009 - 10:19am.

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17341

ANALYSIS: Why the economic stimulus compromise was as Bipartisan as possible!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 18, 2009 - 5:21pm.

2) There are two ways how Obama and Democrats can effectively deal with Rush Limbaugh right now:

A) Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi can make every member of Congress vote on the record if they agree with the MANY stupid things that Limbaugh has said recently and over the years which will put them in a bind the next time that they are on the ballot. They will lose most of middle America if they vote in favor of Limbaugh or they will risk getting primaried if they vote against Limbaugh and upset him!

If some Republicans in Congress fear having to constantly cast these tough votes more than they fear what Limbaugh can do to them, then maybe Obama can get more Republican votes on his legislation!

B) Obama in my opinion definitely needs to try and force through some version of The Fairness Doctrine while he probably still has enough political capital left and the votes in Congress that are needed to do it. This is the one thing that Rush Limbaugh and his followers truly fear and it is how Obama may be able to help liberate Republicans in Congress from their fear of Limbaugh so he can seriously work with them on health care and on other issues:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/10583

Limbaugh & Hannity react to Democrats trying to bring back the Fairness Doctrine

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on January 18, 2007 - 2:51pm.

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17308

Call Sen. Debbie Stabenow at 202-224-4822 to help her Fairness Doctrine efforts!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on February 9, 2009 - 2:52pm.

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/16851#comment-333782

Bringing back The Fairness Doctrine would help to restore...

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on October 28, 2008 - 1:04pm.

Even if some version of The Fairness Doctrine cannot be passed at the end of the day, it will still take a lot of time, money, and effort for Rush Limbaugh and his wing of the Republican Party to try and stop it from happening. Every minute and every dollar that Limbaugh and his followers spend trying to fight The Fairness Doctrine (which they will have to put first in order for Limbaugh's radio program to survive) is a minute and a dollar that they are NOT able to use to get involved with other issues like health care!

These are two realistic strategies that Obama can use to win the message wars which I think will help him to get more Republican votes. As long as Republicans in Congress keep on fearing that they will be primaried if they vote with Obama as John Feehery mentioned, then Obama will never be able to get that many Republican votes on his major legislation and he will not be able to keep his campaign promises of bipartisanship and changing the tone in Washington which could hurt him in 2012!

Mitch Dworkin

http://mitchdworkin.com/
Check out my new political website!

http://www.securingamerica.com/

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/16039
RESOURCES: Speeches, Articles, and Career Highlights to help define Gen. Clark!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 7, 2008 - 2:51pm.

http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 22, 2009 - 4:11am.

and how they fear when he said "I influence elected officials, they think, and they fear:"

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_100807/content/01125111.guest.html

Rush Limbaugh for President?

October 8, 2007

RUSH: "I'm not running for anything, and yet they think I'm their biggest obstacle. They have as much as admitted this, because, not only do I influence you, I influence elected officials, they think, and they fear. So I have to be the focal point...

RUSH: See, the point is, I am the Mr. Big, because I am the one who gets to voters. I am the one who gets to voters in their hearts and minds and changes them, persuades them -- with the truth. They can't handle the light of truth, folks. That's why this program is a threat..."

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 22, 2009 - 4:17am.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,538940,00.html

'Special Report' Panel on Fighting Taliban in Afghanistan

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

BRET BAIER, "SPECIAL REPORT" HOST: "Senator McConnell said as much on "FOX News Sunday" this weekend.

MORT KONDRACKE, EXECUTIVE EDITOR, "ROLL CALL": Well, he mentioned everyone should be civil, but these people should have the right to speak and all the rest of it.

I think the leadership is afraid of Rush Limbaugh, apparently, because Rush Limbaugh is encouraging all this stuff..."

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 22, 2009 - 4:18am.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0908/12/lkl.01.html

CNN LARRY KING LIVE

Health Care Reform: Fact vs. Fiction

Aired August 12, 2009 - 21:00 ET

WOLF BLITZER, CNN ANCHOR: "I don't know a Republican who supports Swastikas or death threats.

PAUL BEGALA, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Where are the Republicans standing up and saying no? Stop the threat. Stop calling people out. Rush Limbaugh -- Rush Limbaugh --

(CROSS TALK)

BEGALA: He's the unchallenged, self-proclaimed leader of the Republican party.

CHERI JACOBUS, REPUBLICAN STRATEGIST: Rush is a wonderful conservative voice on the radio. He's not the leader of the Republican party.

BEGALA: He compared our president to Nazis. Glenn Beck called our president a racist.

JACOBUS: You're marginalizing the folks at these events, Paul, by saying that they're fringe, and pulling out these individual things that happened that are nasty, when there are literally thousands and thousands of people, who have never really been active in politics before, who are coming out and exercising their free speech, and want to have this discussion with their members Congress.

When you marginalize them by calling them names, that I think does backfire.

BEGALA: They have marginilized the Republicans, these fringe kooks, because the responsible Republicans don't have the courage to stand up to them, to stand up to Limbaugh, to stand up to Glenn Beck, to stand up to the guy who brought a gun to the president's rally in New Hampshire. He brought a loaded gun..."

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 22, 2009 - 4:59am.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6LJB6cUH_M

Colin Powell: Republicans Are Afraid Of Rush Limbaugh (0:52)

NewsPoliticsNews
July 29, 2009

"From CNN's Larry King: Colin Powell: Republicans Are Afraid Of Rush Limbaugh - 07/28/09"

Here is the CNN transcript of what Colin Powell said in this video:

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0907/28/lkl.01.html

CNN LARRY KING LIVE

Interview with Colin Powell

Aired July 28, 2009 - 21:00 ET

COLIN POWELL, FORMER SECRETARY OF STATE: "I can handle his (Limbaugh's) criticism. The problem I am having with the party right now is when he says things that I consider to be completely outrageous. And I respond to it. I would like to see other members of the Party do likewise. But they don't.

LARRY KING, CNN ANCHOR: Do you think they are afraid to take him on?

POWELL: Well, I know a number of instances where sitting members in Congress or elsewhere in positions of responsibility in the party made light criticism of Rush, and within 24 hours they were backing away because there is --

KING: Why?

POWELL: -- a strong base of support for Mr. Limbaugh.

KING: So what? There is a strong base of support for everybody.

POWELL: Yes, but I do not have to worry about winning elections or having people who are supporting me or not supporting me. I am free and independent and can make any statements I want, and Mr. Limbaugh is free to criticize me all he chooses to, but he cannot tell me that I cannot be in the Party..."

This is why I think that John Feehery is right that elected Republicans such as Sen. Chuck Grassley and Sen. Orrin Hatch fear primary challengers and losing the next time they are on the ballot if they vote with Obama!

Many elected Republicans fearing Limbaugh is what I definitely believe is the silent elephant in the room that very few people are talking about when the issue of bipartisanship comes up!

I hope that many more Republicans beside Colin Powell will have the courage to not be afraid of Rush Limbaugh and that they will boldly stand up to him as a strongly unified group of moderate Republicans in a serious effort to try and dethrone him from his control over so much of the GOP. I think it is absolutely ridiculous that so many elected Republicans fear Limbaugh and keep on apologizing to him!

In my opinion, elected Democrats should be very thankful that people like Keith Olbermann, Ed Schultz, and Rachel Maddow have not been around for over 20 years building up a huge media empire and that they do not have the power to back up their threats to Democrats who do not play ball their way:

http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/17825

Keith Olbermann made threats to Blue Dog Dems that he CANNOT back up!

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 8, 2009 - 10:15pm.

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 24, 2009 - 6:49am.

Obama and the Democratic leadership in Congress need to start trying to implement some version of The Fairness Doctrine RIGHT NOW so that health care will have the best possible chances of passing.  This is the one thing that Rush Limbaugh really and truly fears:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123508978035028163.html

FEBRUARY 20, 2009

Mr. President, Keep the Airwaves Free
As a former law professor, surely you understand the Bill of Rights.

By RUSH LIMBAUGH

Dear President Obama:

"I have a straightforward question, which I hope you will answer in a straightforward way: Is it your intention to censor talk radio through a variety of contrivances, such as "local content," "diversity of ownership," and "public interest" rules -- all of which are designed to appeal to populist sentiments but, as you know, are the death knell of talk radio and the AM band?

You have singled me out directly, admonishing members of Congress not to listen to my show..."

If Rush Limbaugh and his wing of the Republican Party fear The Fairness Doctrine so much, then why not try to implement some version of it right now?  This will put real fear in them and they will have to put so much of their time and resources into trying to stop it in order to try and protect Limbaugh's talk radio show that they will not have as much time to interfere with Obama on health care and on other important issues even if some version of The Fairness Doctrine does not pass at the end of the day! 

Democrats and even moderate Republicans (who the Limbaugh wing of the GOP hates about as much as Democrats) in my opinion are making a very big mistake by not trying to reinstate some version of The Fairness Doctrine right now when Rush Limbaugh and his radical activist base on the other side fear it as much as they do and when Democrats and moderate Republicans working together more than likely have the votes needed in Congress to pass some version of it:

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/08/20/if-obamacare-goes-down-flames-will-calls-fairness-doctrine-return

If ObamaCare Goes Down in Flames, Will Calls for the Fairness Doctrine Return?


By Jeff Poor (Bio | Archive)
August 20, 2009 - 12:32 ET

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?v=GdnzkU6Unz

Democratic Senators Bemoan Conserveratives in the Media  (5:05)

Submitted By: Jpoor
Uploaded: 3 days ago
Date Aired: August 19, 2009

"Diane Feinstein in 2007 and Bernie Sanders in 2009 complain about the state of the media with conservative voices."

http://www.eyeblast.tv/public/video.aspx?v=GdnzkU6Unz

As each day passes and President Barack Obama's health care proposal faces more and more opposition, some of the talking heads that appear on the cable news networks are looking for a "boogeyman" to blame for allegedly ginning up backlash. And that "boogeyman" has been conservative talk radio.

http://www.businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090819105853.aspx

However, if recent history is any indication, there could be an effort to take silence conservative talk radio.

Some of the circumstances surrounding the current debate on "reforming" health care are eerily familiar to the 2007 bipartisan effort to "reform" immigration. In fact, the last big policy issue that was defeated when an upset constituency pushed back was the bipartisan 2007 effort to reform immigration.

However, it was thwarted when people flooded the switchboards on Capitol Hill. Some pointed at the power of talk radio to command action from voters, suggesting it was time to look at the Fairness Doctrine again.

Back on June 24, 2007, in the lead up to the ultimate defeat of the Senate's efforts to reform immigration, Chris Wallace, host of  "Fox News Sunday" and Sen. Dianne Feinstein had this exchange [emphasis added]:


WALLACE: But let me ask you about yourself. Do you have a problem with talk radio, and would you consider reviving the Fairness Doctrine, which would require broadcasters to put on opposing points of view?

FEINSTEIN: Well, in my view, talk radio tends to be one-sided. It also tends to be dwelling in hyperbole. It's explosive. It pushes people to, I think, extreme views without a lot of information.

This is a very complicated bill. It's seven titles. Most people don't know what's in this bill. Therefore, to just have one or two things dramatized and taken out of context, such as the word amnesty -- we have a silent amnesty right now, but nobody goes into that. Nobody goes into the flaws of our broken system.

This bill fixes those flaws. Do I think there should be an opportunity on talk radio to present that point of view? Yes, I do, particularly about the critical issues of the day.

 

WALLACE: So would you revive the Fairness Doctrine?
FEINSTEIN: Well, I'm looking at it, as a matter of fact, Chris, because I think there ought to be an opportunity to present the other side. And unfortunately, talk radio is overwhelmingly one way.
WALLACE: But the argument would be it's the marketplace, and if liberals want to put on their own talk radio, they can put it on. At this point, they don't seem to be able to find much of a market.
FEINSTEIN: Well, apparently, there have been problems. It is growing. But I do believe in fairness. I remember when there was a Fairness Doctrine, and I think there was much more serious correct reporting to people.

More recently, another player in Washington, D.C. has come out voicing concerns about conservative talk radio's position in the current media marketplace. Left-wing Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., went on MSNBC's Aug. 14 "Rachel Maddow" show - as liberal a forum as could be - and complained that the media outlets on the right were drowning the message out.

http://businessandmedia.org/articles/2009/20090814052820.aspx

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32416389/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/

'The Rachel Maddow Show' for Thursday, August 13
Read the transcript to the Thursday show

updated 9:17 a.m. CT, Fri., Aug 14, 2009

Guests: Kent Jones, George Felos, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Paola Gourley

SEN. BERNIE SANDERS (I), VERMONT: "I'll tell you what else we need to do. We need to understand that it is very, very hard for the president or anybody else to take on, not just the Republican Party - that's the easy part - to take on all of right-wing talk radio which covers 90 percent of talk show hosts, a whole FOX Network which is nothing more than an arm of the Republican Party..."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/32411154#32411154  (09:12)

Political outrage for hire
Aug. 13: Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-VT, joins Rachel Maddow to talk about an anti-health care reform Web site that is actually run by a high profile Republican P.R. firm.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26315908/vp/32411154#32411154  (09:12)

I'll tell you what else we need to do," Sanders said. "We need to understand that it is very, very hard for the president or anybody else to take on not just the Republican Party, that's the easy part - to take on all of right-wing talk radio, which covers 90 percent of talk show hosts, a whole Fox network which is nothing more than an arm of the Republican Party and the Democrats got to think long term. Why is there not a progressive television network? Why aren't we supporting good and effective personalities on radio as well and building up a network there so that we can that kind of political consciousness-raising that the Republicans, in fact, are doing so well right now."

Some members of Congress, including Sen. Debbie Stabenow, are still publicly calling for the Fairness Doctrine. And some have done it privately, according to Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. Inhofe said that then-Sen. Hillary Clinton (now Secretary of State) and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., had made references to it. But, even though it may have public and private supporters in the U.S. Senate, the Obama administration came out early on opposed to any revival of the Fairness Doctrine, as Fox News reported in February.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/0209/Sen_Stabenow_wants_hearings_on_radio_accountability_talks_fairness_doctrine.html?showall

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,285933,00.html

"As the president stated during the campaign, he does not believe the Fairness Doctrine should be reinstated," White House spokesman Ben LaBolt told FoxNews.com Feb. 18

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/first100days/2009/02/18/white-house-opposes-fairness-doctrine/

However, Brett Joshpe, writing for the June 22 American Spectator, explained the Fairness Doctrine could still be applied to talk radio, but just under another name as stealth effort. He explained that the FCC has been discussing plans for it calls "locally-oriented programming," known as localism, to control content on conservative stations.

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/06/22/his-royal-fairness/print

"If one thing is clear several months into the Obama presidency, it is that the administration is not afraid to empower bureaucrats at the expense of individuals," Joshpe wrote. "Maybe the Fairness Doctrine has, in fact, been sent to the dustbin of history, but we cannot be so sure about stealth regulations that will have a similar effect. Now more than ever, it is imperative that we carefully ask administration officials what the meaning of ‘is' is."
 
Should a defeat of ObamaCare wind up being what Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C. called the president's "Waterloo," it wouldn't take much for a Democratic-controlled Washington, D.C. to take another look at the Fairness Doctrine or some camouflaged version of it.

Related Stories

Boston Globe Story Describes MA's State-Run Health Care As 'Trailblazing' As Its Problems Deepen; Will OBC/ABC Notice?

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2009/06/24/boston-globe-story-describes-mas-state-run-health-care-trailblazing-its-

By Tom Blumer (Bio | Archive)
June 24, 2009 - 12:13 ET

Limbaugh: Obama's Control of Banks a 'Stealth Way' to Impose Fairness Doctrine

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/06/05/limbaugh-obamas-control-banks-stealth-way-impose-fairness-doctrine

By Jeff Poor (Bio | Archive)
June 5, 2009 - 13:59 ET

FNC’s Beck: They’re Going to Silence Voices Like Mine, Bill O’Reilly, Rush

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/05/06/fnc-s-beck-they-re-going-silence-voices-mine-bill-o-reilly-rush

By Jeff Poor (Bio | Archive)
May 6, 2009 - 19:48 ET

Inhofe: Senate Democrat Amendment Threatens Christian Radio

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/03/04/inhofe-senate-democrat-amendment-threatens-christian-radio

By Jeff Poor (Bio | Archive)
March 4, 2009 - 15:51 ET

Former President Carter Tells Phoenix Radio Station He Opposes the Fairness Doctrine

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/02/17/former-president-carter-tells-phoenixs-station-he-opposes-fairness-doctri

By Jeff Poor (Bio | Archive)
February 17, 2009 - 16:22 ET

Related Topics

Censorship
Fairness Doctrine
Health Care
Immigration
Medical Insurance
Radio

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 27, 2009 - 5:24am.

and that they are afraid to take a public stand on him.  This quote is Limbaugh's article right below:

RUSH:  "I think if the truth be known (and I probably should not say this publicly) a lot -- not a majority but a lot -- of elected Republicans wish I would go away, 'cause they buy into this notion I'm polarizing and making it tough on them.  I know they hate being asked, "Well, what do you think of Rush Limbaugh?"  They're afraid to say they disagree, 'cause they think they're going to be slapped down, not by me, but by other people.  But I think any time you're outspoken, unabashedly so, and you speak without fear, most people just are not able to do that and don't want to even if they are able to.  If they think other people doing that cause them troubles, they really actually wish the person that's speaking out would go away..."

I think that Limbaugh is right about this.  Elected Democrats and Republicans who are sick and tired of Rush Limbaugh's partisan nonsense and of his hijacking of most of the Republican Party probably have the power to team up and put through some kind of serious legislation to reinstate some version of The Fairness Doctrine.  This is the one thing that Limbaugh truly fears and it really could help to make him go away:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_050509/content/01125110.guest.html

Politicians Hate to Make Waves

May 5, 2009

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Ron in Sterling, Virginia.  I'm glad you waited, sir.  It's great to have you on the EIB Network.  Hi.

CALLER:  Hello, Rush.  My question is whether you think that the reason that elected Republican leadership does such a poor job articulating conservatism, is because you have done such a great job for so long?

RUSH:  No.  Why would they...? If I'm doing such a great job, why wouldn't they follow and do a great job? Or are you saying they're basically leaving it up to me and they're not trying?

CALLER:  Yes, because they can lose the next election by being voted out, but they know that you and the conservative media that has been created in your wake will kind of carry the conservative water for them.

RUSH:  Well, I think by now if they think that, they should have been shown they're wrong or that their thinking is wrong.  If that was the case they wouldn't have lost in '06, and if that was the case they wouldn't have lost in '08 because I've been standing up for conservatism every day I've been behind the microphone.  And the ones in Congress and the Senate that have been, too, won.  Those who haven't been have lost.  But I had a lot of people say, "You know, Rush you give 'em cover.  They're afraid to take on these issues because they gotta get votes and you don't."  But I actually think, if you want know... You want to know the truth about this, Ron?

CALLER:  Yes.

RUSH:  I think if the truth be known (and I probably should not say this publicly) a lot -- not a majority but a lot -- of elected Republicans wish I would go away, 'cause they buy into this notion I'm polarizing and making it tough on them.  I know they hate being asked, "Well, what do you think of Rush Limbaugh?"  They're afraid to say they disagree, 'cause they think they're going to be slapped down, not by me, but by other people.  But I think any time you're outspoken, unabashedly so, and you speak without fear, most people just are not able to do that and don't want to even if they are able to.  If they think other people doing that cause them troubles, they really actually wish the person that's speaking out would go away.  

Now, I don't have political power to share with them.  I don't have political power to bring them.  Now, if I were maybe an elected official doing this kind of stuff and it was working, I think it would be a little bit of a different thing.  I don't know how many of them it is, but there are a number of them, and you can hear them.  There are several Republicans -- the moderates, the Senate and so forth -- have echoed some sentiments. "We really shouldn't listen to Limbaugh that much."  I think more of them think it than would ever say it, but it's not about me personally.  I don't take any of it personally.  I just think that it's... (sigh) You know, I make waves.  These guys, they don't want to make waves.  Politicians don't think they get anywhere making waves.  You know, I don't pander.  You know, and I don't try to find out what people want to hear and tell 'em that and so forth.  I appreciate, Ron, your thoughts.  

END TRANSCRIPT

*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on August 29, 2009 - 9:08pm.

that Obama "respects the Constitution:"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcijeEtf-wA

McCain Booed By Arizonans For Saying Obama Respects Constitution  (1:24)

News1News
August 25, 2009

"(R) Senator John McCain Booed By Arizonans For Saying President Obama Respects The Constitution - 08/25/09"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EcijeEtf-wA 

Here is Rush Limbaugh's very harsh reaction to John McCain assuming the best about Obama's intentions:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_082609/content/01125111.guest.html

Senator McCain Still Doesn't Get It

August 26, 2009

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Move on to Senator McCain and his town hall yesterday.  You know, President Obama is preparing to pass an extinguished torch to future generations of Americans.  Remember President Kennedy? (JFK impression) "The torch has been passed to a new generation."  Obama is going to pass a torch only the torch he passes is going to be extinguished.  The torch he's going to pass is one of fascism.  And this health care debacle.  So McCain has a town hall yesterday -- and, folks, it's worse than I thought it was going to be.  My reaction to it was negative.  It was appropriate.  Here's just a sample of it. We have one sound bite from the town hall yesterday, Sun City, Arizona.  A woman got up and said, "I would like to know how the president is getting by with all of this money.  It's against the Constitution.  Doesn't he know we still live under a Constitution?"

MCCAIN:  I'm sure that he does.  I'm sure --

AUDIENCE: (laughter)

MCCAIN: No, no, I'm serious.  I'm sure that he does and I'm sure that he respects the Constitution of the United States.

AUDIENCE: (groans)

MCCAIN: No, no, no, no.  No, I -- I -- I -- I really do.  I -- I am absolutely convinced of it.

AUDIENCE MEMBER: No!

MCCAIN: I just believe, my friends, that there is a fundamental difference in philosophy and about the role of government.  That's why we have competition for public office and competition amongst parties and competition about different ideas and visions for the future of America.  I am convinced the president is absolutely sincere in his beliefs.  

AUDIENCE: (groans)

MCCAIN: But he's -- wait a minute.  Wait a minute.  He is sincere in his beliefs.  We just -- we just happen to disagree, and he's the president of the United States and let's be respectful.

RUSH:  Now, this is problematic.  He's running for reelection.  His audience does not trust Obama.  All trust has been lost.  They are afraid! People are scared to death of this man.  They're scared to death of his policies.  The people of this country who showed up at McCain's town hall think Obama has no respect for the Constitution.  Sure he knows what it is. But he looks at it as a limiting document.  He has said so himself.  What is so hard about people in our party understanding what their opponents actually say and believe?  Obama looks at the Constitution as "a series of negative rights."  Obama says, he looks at the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, first ten amendments, and says, "It doesn't say what the government can do to you! It doesn't say what the government can do for you. All it says is what the government can't do."

Well, he is a big believer in government doing everything.  The Constitution is an obstacle to him, and McCain ought to know this. (doing McCain impression) "You know, we just -- we just -- we're reasonable people and we just disagree! We just have different political philosophies."  You know, something else that McCain did yesterday, and this is really so tired and worn out.  At this town meeting, he said, "We have to take Washington back from the special interests."  Folks, that is just vacuous psychobabble, in my humble opinion.  We need to take this country back from the liberal Marxists that have taken over!  The special interest that we need to fear is fascism!  These special interests are all over Barack Obama's administration. After telling us they wouldn't be, they're all over the place.  

The people that work for him are enriching themselves at the public trough like never before.  And that's something people thought was going to change, but it hasn't changed.  The fascists, the Marxists in this administration, they're working with the special interests.  Whatever that term means anyway.  That's just an illustration of how antiquated this line of thinking is, and McCain acts like, "Politicians, we're all hostage"! Politicians are hostage to special interests. (doing McCain impression) "That's what meaningful campaign finance reform is all about because good people come here and get corrupted! Corrupted by special interests, and so -- and so -- and so we need campaign finance reform." It's just this tired, worn-out, "Gosh we're all hostage to the special interests!"  It's more like a reciprocal, corrupt arrangement.

The Democrats and the unions are bought and paid for by big business executives, AARP. Special interests, they're blood brothers! This business that he wants to lay out the groundwork to sell us out on the health care by coming up with a bipartisan bill, when the Democrats are in the process of flaming out and talking about using reconciliation?  Let 'em do all of these things!  Don't give them any assistance. Don't go "bipartisan" with them on this at all.  McCain made every effort in that town hall meeting yesterday to make himself appear to be a reasonable man, wanting to work with a political party not his own.  But those days are gone!  That's not what the American people want right now, and certainly people that vote for Republicans do not want that myth that he ran on. He ran for office on that myth, and look what happened!  

He ran for office on the idea that the American people just want us to work together.  He's out there saying, "We gotta work together and I'm the guy to cross the aisle." No! That's why you lost the election.  Good grief, what...? And this isn't about McCain anyway.  The country is facing problems that will likely irrevocably harm everyone alive today and Americans yet to be born, and to solve this to satisfy some personal insecurities about an option that's no longer viable? Working with these guys?  Who in the hell is still talking about working with these guys?  Anybody that's reasonable is talking about stopping these guys!  We're talking about beating these guys.  We're talking about defeating these guys.  Now, all of a sudden we're going to start working with them? I can't tell you how frustrating this is. 

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Background Material...

FOXNews: McCain: Public Option 'Would Deprive People of Choice'

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,542921,00.html

*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

Here is a big part of the Neocon GOP activist base following Rush Limbaugh's lead ("hat tip to Rush Limbaugh"):

http://patriotsandliberty.com/?p=6419

ThePatriotPost
Friday Digest
August 28, 2009
Vol. 09 No. 34

From the ‘Non Compos Mentis’ File

Speaking of Arizona, at a town hall meeting in his home state, sometimes-Republican Sen. John McCain was asked by an audience member, “I would like to know how the president is getting by with all of this money. It’s against the Constitution. Doesn’t he know we still live under a Constitution?” The transcript follows (hat tip to Rush Limbaugh):

McCain: I’m sure that he does. I’m sure –

Audience: (laughter)

McCain: No, no, I’m serious. I’m sure that he does and I’m sure that he respects the Constitution of the United States.

Audience: (groans)

McCain: No, no, no, no. No, I — I — I — I really do. I — I am absolutely convinced of it.

Audience Member: No!

McCain: I just believe, my friends, that there is a fundamental difference in philosophy and about the role of government. That’s why we have competition for public office and competition amongst parties and competition about different ideas and visions for the future of America. I am convinced the president is absolutely sincere in his beliefs.

Audience: (groans)

McCain: But he’s — wait a minute. Wait a minute. He is sincere in his beliefs. We just — we just happen to disagree, and he’s the president of the United States and let’s be respectful.

In a friendlier atmosphere on ABC’s “This Week,” McCain said, “I look at this as an opportunity right now. …[W]ouldn’t it be a good idea for us Republicans and Democrats to sit down with the president? … There’s so many areas that we are in agreement on.”

In a nutshell, that’s why McCain lost in November. He just doesn’t get it.

This entry was posted on Saturday, August 29th, 2009 at 6:33 am.

These ideologues are wrong when they said "that’s why McCain lost in November. He just doesn’t get it."  Bush and Cheney displaying that kind of an extreme attitude and McCain not being able to run away from it fast enough is a major reason why he lost the 2008 election in my opinion!

I agree with John Avalon and CNN for giving John McCain some credit for having "a profile in courage" by his defying the Rush Limbaugh wing of the Republican Party:

http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0908/28/ltm.01.html

AMERICAN MORNING

Thousands of Mourners Pay Their Respect to Senator Ted Kennedy; Kidnapped Girl Found Alive After 18 Years; Life After Cash for Clunkers for Auto Industry

Aired August 28, 2009 - 06:00   ET

JOHN ROBERTS, CNN ANCHOR: "And you're doing something new this week as well. You have got a profile in courage for us.

JOHN AVLON, INDEPENDENT POLITICAL ANALYST: Yes. We want to shout out the positive as well. And this weekend with all of the unhinged town halls that are going on, John McCain took a stand for decency in a town hall when a woman asked -- isn't President Obama sort of taking apart our constitution?

Let's take a listen to what he said.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. JOHN MCCAIN (R), ARIZONA: I'm sure that he does, and I'm sure that he respects the constitution of the United States. No, no. I am convinced the president is absolutely sincere in his beliefs. But he's -- wait a minute, wait a minute. He is sincere in his beliefs. We just, we just happen to disagree, and he is the president of the United States, and let's be respectful.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

AVLON: That's a profile in courage work. He's standing up to a crowd telling them not what they want to hear, showing us, reminding us that we can disagree agreeably in this country. That's what our founding father intended. We're not getting enough of that. So profile in courage award goes to John McCain.

ROBERTS: John Avlon with the wingnuts of the week and the profile in courage.

Good shout out this morning, John. Thanks so much -- Carol.

CAROL COSTELLO, CNN ANCHOR: I like that profile in courage..."

John McCain also stood up to the Limbaugh wing's activist base of hard-core GOP ideologues last October and got booed by them for calling Obama a "Decent Man You Don't Have To Be Afraid Of:"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTMloaj6b68&feature=related

McCain Booed For Calling Obama A "Decent Man You Don't Have To Be Afraid Of" (1:58)

ThePatriotsMaxims
October 10, 2008

"McCain Booed For Calling Obama A Decent Man"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTMloaj6b68&feature=related

Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on April 7, 2010 - 5:39am.

then his doing more things like this could mean that he will get a primary challenger the next time he is on the ballot! 

This is how strong of a grip that Rush Limbaugh has over many elected Republicans which I hope can possibly be broken by Obama trying to pass a back door version of The Fairness Doctrine. This is the one and only thing that Limbaugh and his wing of the GOP really and truly fears (I discussed this in the post above):

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_040610/content/01125110.guest.html

Who Cares How "Nice" You Think Pelosi May Be, Senator Coburn?

April 6, 2010

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: This is interesting. "Tom Coburn, a staunch conservative from Oklahoma" this is a CBS News story "is doing what seems almost unthinkable in this polarized political climate: Defending his Democratic colleagues from critics at Fox News.  At a town hall meeting, Coburn suggested that a woman who said 'they can put us in prison' for not obtaining health insurance under the health care reform bill is misinformed. 'The intention is not to put anybody in jail,' he said. 'That makes for good TV news on Fox but that isn't the intention.'  He also defended House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, the architect of the House version of the health care legislation that he fiercely opposed. 'I'm 180 degrees in opposition to the speaker -- she's a nice lady,' he said. The crowd could be heard responding unfavorably to his characterization." 

Well, who cares if she's nice? 

I'm sure Obama is nice.

(interruption) I know that Obama called it "Cominskey" Park back in July.  It's like that pitch yesterday, folks. There's nobody that throws like that.  Not even a Special Olympian which Obama once made fun of. Nobody throws that way. Girls don't.  That was a parody of how girls throw.  I don't know what this guy's game is but he knows it's not "Cominskey" Park.  Al Capone was a nice guy.  Hitler had friends, for crying out loud.  Does that mean we should discard what Pelosi's policies are all about?  So Coburn says, "There's no intention of putting anybody in jail."  No, no, no. Well, let's go back to the sound bite November 9th last year in Seattle, Pelosi was asked, "Do you think it's fair to send people to jail for not buying health insurance?"

PELOSI:  For a long time now people who haven't had health care or provided it have placed the burden on others.  Everybody is paying the price for uncompensated care.  I don't need to tell you that in a hospital.  And so what this is is to say we all have to do our part, and that is the point of the bill.

REPORTER:  But Madam Speaker, I'm just trying to understand.  If you don't buy health insurance, you go to jail?

PELOSI:  Well the point --

REPORTER:  You didn't answer my question.

PELOSI:  There is -- there is -- uh, uh, I think the legislation is very fair in this respect.

RUSH:  So somebody tell Tom Coburn she was specifically asked about possible jail time, and she said "the legislation is very fair in this respect."  Now, some people might say she dodged the question, but she did answer it ultimately when it was put back to her in a direct fashion.

END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Background Material...

CBS: Tom Coburn Knocks Fox News, Says Nancy Pelosi is a "Nice Person"

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20001827-503544.html

*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.