Blogspot owner Google loves me! (or not)
Submitted by FilthyRich on August 27, 2009 - 11:17pm.
Civil Liberties | Current Events | Economy | Science
ALERT ON Brick TeeVee: Blogspot owner Google told me...
-
Your blog at: www.filthy-rich.blogspot.com has been identified as a potential spam blog. To correct this, please request a review by filling out the form at www.blogger.com ....
Dear Reader: The above blogger website is the Home of Brick TeeVee for now (under construction @ www.BrickTeeVee.com). The above ACCUSED blog has links to EVIL sites like Democracy NOW! and ANTIWAR RADIO and RING OF FIRE RADIO and MAX KEISER and GritTV and it's DIFFERENT every week! How is this SPAM? NOW Back to The Google Ultimatum.. -Ed.
-
Your blog will be deleted in 20 days if it isn't reviewed, and your readers will see a warning page during this time. (What does the "warning page" say i wonder? Check it out, -Ed.) After we receive your request, we'll review your blog and unlock it within two business days. Once we have reviewed and determined your blog is not spam, the blog will be unlocked and the message in your Blogger dashboard will no longer be displayed. If this blog doesn't belong to you, you don't have to do anything, and any other blogs you may have won't be affected.
We find spam by using an automated classifier. Automatic spam detection is inherently fuzzy, and occasionally a blog like yours is flagged incorrectly. We sincerely apologize for this error. By using this kind of system, however, we can dedicate more storage, bandwidth, and engineering resources to bloggers like you instead of to spammers. For more information, please see Blogger Help: http://help.blogger.com/bin/answer.py?answer=42577
Thank you for your understanding and for your help with our spam-fighting efforts.
So I have to "request a review" now. From Telecom Immunity backer and U.S./China government spying-supporting Google. Nice.
Mind Police? Censorship? 1984?
Wie geht's?
developing.....
wordspace anyone?
will be to Clean up the Internet.... Scrubadubdub I am thinking of calling it. Clean clean clean. No more dirty filthy hippies or their dirty filthy sites. And especially no more incriminating links that make my corporate and bankster buds look bad! Quel Horreur! Scrubadubdub will launch a massive clean up effort and kick the hippies to the cyber curb.
I think this should propel me far into the heart of the Republican Party, where I wish to run.
Thanks for the inspiration Filthy Rich for my new campaign.
MS in LA (R)
Disclaimer: Screenplays make excellent reality sometimes too
People like Filthy Rich maintaining a blog using the fruits of government-funded development of the Internet should be required to pay a surtax for the Health Care public option. Same goes for political action committees like this current site. All visitors of such sites will be monitored on a per minute basis and be invoiced monthly with the proceeds targetted for our Real Deal Health Plan and for other purposes.
Nevertheless, I guarantee that your taxes will not go up for anyone making less than $10,000,000 per year.
Defoliate in TX (D)
JEN SAID: Looks like maybe you rubbed someones the wrong way!
The judge and jury TO INDICT seems to be "by using an automated classifier" part of Google's "market competitive" Secret Search Engine Web Crawler bots. So, who programmed these bots? Was it APPROVED by the Technology VP or the Board of Directors? Maybe nudged by the anti-anti-domestic-spying lobby they run? What criteria do these bots base their " Automatic spam detection"? WHO SETS THESE CRITERIA?
By using google are you being fed what google's bots WANT you to see?
We need some ANSWERS! And changes to The Law. And indictments.
Believe HALF of what you see, NONE of what you hear UNTIL you can verify.
Filthy Rich (I)
MS in LA (R)
Defoliate (D)
All we need is some big energy / oil CEO to run as a Green and we've got us a race!
Bing is as bad as Google, but I'm using it anyways. For now. No more googlie fingers for me.
Once in a while you get shown the light, In the strangest of places if you look at it right.
All sorts of sites get malware attached, because there is something about the site that the hacker thinks will attract a lot of traffic.
Looks like maybe you rubbed someones the wrong way! Maybe those links you provide to those known LIBERAL websites sent a red flag! I bet you'd be a-okay if you linked to militia websites, or porn sites, or so-called Christian fundie websites -- but those radical lefty, liberal sites speaking truth to power -- well, everyone knows those are the real danger!