Sarah Palin, Part 1: Palin is a mindless and traveling stooge for Rush Limbaugh!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on December 8, 2009 - 3:01pm.
Rapid Response
Hello Everyone:
While many people may not realize it and while some Democratic pundits are not taking her seriously, Sarah Palin in my opinion is a VERY dangerous person because she is a mindless stooge who Rush Limbaugh is using to travel around the country to enforce his edicts and to purge the Republican Party of its moderates.
Both Limbaugh and Palin are using each other because it is Limbaugh who made Palin popular with his base of many millions of GOP activists which is helping her to sell a lot of books, make a lot of money, and be a possible contender to win the 2012 Republican nomination. However as powerful as Rush Limbaugh is, he cannot travel all over the country, endorse the ideological GOP primary candidates who he likes, and raise money for them.
This is exactly what Sarah Palin is doing for Rush Limbaugh right now as his mindless and traveling stooge!
While it was John McCain who very irresponsibly put Sarah Palin on his ticket which initially got her nationwide name recognition, she probably would have gone down in history as a failed VP candidate if Limbaugh did not take an interest in her, make her popular with his activist base of many millions of people, and promote her book. Palin of course is returning those favors by being Limbaugh's traveling stooge!
To prove my points, right below are two Rush Limbaugh articles from August 29, 2008 titled "Governor Sarah Palin: Story and Experience Dwarf Barack Obama" (where he describes Palin as being "Conservative. More experience than Obama. And a babe!") and "Sarah Palin: Babies, Guns, Jesus" where Limbaugh did not deny being "responsible for her (Palin) being there" when one of his callers said that to him:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_082908/content/01125111.guest.html
Sarah Palin: Babies, Guns, Jesus
August 29, 2008
RUSH: "Sarah Palin: babies, guns, Jesus. Hot damn!...
CALLER: I love it, man. Thank you, because you are in a great sense responsible for her (Palin) being there, because you paved the way for conservatism to become mainstream in this country, not just you but the other people that are on the radio, the websites, everything. You are partly responsible for this, and God bless you for it.
RUSH: Chuck, thank you very much. It makes me so happy you say that. Thanks very much..."
Below that are two recent Rush Limbaugh articles titled "Mark Halperin Swerves Into Truth" from November 13, 2009 where Limbaugh promoted Sarah Palin's book tour and "Rush Interviews Governor Sarah Palin" from November 17, 2009 where Limbaugh just threw out the extreme ideology that he believes and where Palin just told him everything that he wanted to hear in that so-called "interview."
Here are the YouTube links of this so-called "interview" from Sarah Palin's Facebook page where Palin had might as well just be Rush Limbaugh's pet parrot who repeats everything that he says:
http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin?sid=d199205e9805bca2a6b8d2d604198fd5&ref=s#/notes/sarah-palin/rush-limbaugh-interview/176734798434
Sarah Palin: Rush Limbaugh Interview
Rush Limbaugh Interview
Tuesday, November 17, 2009 at 9:59pm
I had a great conversation with Rush today. We spoke about the issues facing our nation, the future of the Republican party and touched on other great topics.
You can listen here:
Part One:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Noxo36ZUI3E
Rush Interviews Gov Palin pt 1 Nov 17 (9:29)
ugafish17
November 17, 2009
Part Two:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ozher96_lkQ
Rush Interviews Gov Palin pt 2 Nov 17 (9:33)
ugafish17
November 17, 2009
Updated about 2 weeks ago · Report Note
9,274 people like this.
There is no question that Sarah Palin is trying to help GOP ideologue candidates win in Republican primaries and in general election races because that is what she told Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/content/01125120.guest.html
Rush Interviews Governor Sarah Palin
November 17, 2009
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: "If the GOP articulates what you (Palin) just articulated. I've always believed the way to get them... Reagan got them by just being who he was, articulating conservatism. Conservatism is nothing different than the founding principles of the country. Therefore, the key to getting independents is Republicans who can articulate those beliefs.
GOV. PALIN: You know another key to this, too, is to not hesitate duking it out within the party. This is what I appreciate about the Republican Party. We have contested, aggressive, competitive primaries. We're not like this herd mentality like a bunch of sheep -- with the fighting instincts of sheep, as Horowitz would say -- like some in the Democrat Party; where, heaven forbid, you take a stand and you oppose somebody within your own party because it's the right thing to do. I appreciate that in the Republican Party. Some on the other side say -- you know, they're observing what goes on in the GOP and say -- "That's infighting, and they can't get along, and there's no consensus there." No. This is healthy debate, good competition that makes candidates work harder. It makes for a better product, if you will, at the end of the day. I appreciate that about our party...
RUSH: Governor Palin, thanks very much. It's been a pleasure. It's been fun. Thanks for last week as well and good luck on what I know is going to be a life-changing book and book tour..."
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,575754,00.html
Cable Exclusive: Palin Sits Down With Hannity
Thursday, November 19, 2009
SEAN HANNITY, HOST: "And you also said that you want to play a national role if people will have me. Well, it's obvious you have a pretty big fan base. People will have you. How do you envision this role in — in the future? What role would you like to play? What roles, potentially, could you play?
SARAH PALIN, "GOING ROGUE" AUTHOR: Well, I'm not necessarily seeking a title to affect the positive change that I think our country needs. I want like to help candidates to get elected to cast on votes that are needed to implement good change and get our economy back on the right track...
HANNITY: Sarah Palin. "Going Rogue," already a best-seller. It was a best-seller before it was on the book shelves..."
There are many Republican candidates who want to be endorsed by Sarah Palin which is why she is being called the Republican "Endorser-in-Chief," "a kingmaker or queenmaker in the Republican primaries," "a power player," and it is why people are saying about her "that through the 2010 midterms, she's going to be all over the place, raising money, and helping to decide the fate of GOP candidates:"
http://www.thesarahpalinblog.com/2009/11/courting-palin-endorsement.html
Friday, November 6, 2009
Courting A Palin Endorsement
"Chicago Congressman Mark Kirk saw the writing on the wall and that is why he reached out to Sarah Palin for and endorsement.
If I were Mark Kirk, I wouldn't expect to get it.
But the story shows where the Republican party is headed and the power that Sarah Palin holds. She, more than any other possible 2012 candidate, is seen as the keeper of true Ronald Reagan Conservative values. her endorsement brings money, attention and a likely victory, especially in a Republican primary.
She is being called the Republican "Endorser-in-Chief."
We told you here that Republican Candidates would now be forming a line from Alaska to the lower 48 to get her endorsement..."
Sarah Palin, Kingmaker? GOP elder says ex-gov. will never be president, but could help in 2012
BY Thomas Defrank
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU CHIEF
Wednesday, November 25th 2009, 10:09 AM
"This highly-respected old pro is saying Palin can’t be President - but can be a kingmaker or queenmaker in the Republican primaries and a political force well into the future..."
http://www.businessinsider.com/sarah-palin-gop-kingmaker-2009-11
Sarah Palin: GOP Kingmaker
Joe Weisenthal | Nov. 1, 2009, 5:08 PM
It really doesn't matter if you think Sarah Palin is an ignorant bumpkin who came dangerously close to The White House.
She's got power...
She denies it, but it underlines the point that she's a power player in this election, too.
Meanwhile, the old kingmaker Rush Limbaugh spoke highly of her on Fox News Sunday, saying she was definitely qualified to be President.
This doesn't mean she'll run or be competitive in 2012. But it does mean that through the 2010 midterms, she's going to be all over the place, raising money, and helping to decide the fate of GOP candidates. it's her party..."
Because of this, I think it is extremely important that as many Palin-endorsed Republican primary candidates as possible need to lose in order to help prevent the Rush Limbaugh wing of the GOP from purging out its moderates. If too many Palin-endorsed Republican primary candidates win and if too many GOP moderates get purged, then there will definitely be negative short-term consequences and there could be very destructive long term consequences.
The short term consequences are that if Palin-endorsed Republican candidates who are ideologues win in 2010 (which is supposed to be a Republican year), then it will be much more than just obstruction that Obama will get. In addition to obstruction, every Palin-endorsed Republican candidate who wins their general election race will also be rooting for Obama to fail just like Limbaugh, DeMint, and Bachmann!
The possible long term consequences of too many Palin-endorsed Republican candidates winning in 2010 and purging out the GOP moderates will be that the Republicans will more than likely be able to nominate an ideologue for President in 2012 in the mold of Palin, DeMint, and Bachmann and that candidate could win IF any one or more of Obama's major policies either do not work or do not work fast enough to the satisfaction of most of middle America (these are the key people who decide elections).
I do not think that anyone wants to see GOP Palin-endorsed candidates who are ideologues get elected in 2010 and I know that nobody even wants to think about the possibility of a Palin-endorsed Republican Presidential candidate winning in 2012. If that ever happens, then there will be war, more war, and even more war!
The next sound that you will hear after the 21 gun salute on 1/20/13 (the next inauguration day) will be our bombs falling on Iran, North Korea, and on any other countries who the new President does not like. Heaven help this country and the world if that ever happens. This is why I very strongly think that people need to put an extra effort in helping to make sure that Palin-endorsed GOP candidates lose in 2010!
All of this COULD happen IF too many Palin-endorsed candidates win and when many of Palin's followers will do ANYTHING that she says in order to help them win because she has a cult-like following. This is why I strongly believe that Sarah Palin is a VERY dangerous person who has to be taken VERY seriously!
My question to anyone who would try to deny that Sarah Palin is Rush Limbaugh's mindless and traveling stooge is to name just any one issue (no matter how small it is) that Palin disagrees with Limbaugh on?
No two thinking people who I am aware of will completely agree on every single issue no matter how small that it is and I have not seen even one issue that Palin has disagreed with Limbaugh on!
Mitch Dworkin
http://mitchdworkin.com/
Check out my political website!
http://www.securingamerica.com/
http://securingamerica.com/ccn/node/16039
RESOURCES: Speeches, Articles, and Career Highlights to help define Gen. Clark!
Submitted by Mitch Dworkin on July 7, 2008 - 2:51pm.
http://www.securingamerica.com/ccn/node/7191
Listen to Gen. Wes Clark fight for Dems on Sean Hannity's radio program: An excellent example for all of us to follow and what we all need to be doing to help fight back against extreme right wing Neocon smear propaganda!
--------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_082908/home.guest.html
Governor Sarah Palin: Story and Experience Dwarf Barack Obama

Conservative. More experience than Obama. And a babe!
Here is the Rush Limbaugh article that this picture and caption are referring to:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_082908/content/01125106.guest.html
Governor Sarah Palin: Story and Experience Dwarf Barack Obama
August 29, 2008
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I heard Barack Obama gave a speech last night, a rumor. He did give a speech last night? I can't find much about Obama's speech today. I've been looking at all the TV -- I can't -- sounds like just a rumor that he'd make a speech last night.
JOHNNY DONOVAN: Live from the Southern Command in sunny south Florida via New York City, it's Open Line Friday!
RUSH: Greetings to you, music lovers and thrill-seekers, Rush Limbaugh, wrapping up a week of broadcast excellence. Open Line Friday, when we go to the phones, the program content is yours. So be ready. Telephone number, 800-282-2882. The e-mail address,
.

We are waiting for Senator McCain to show up with Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, who is his vice presidential pick. We are going to join the ceremony announcing her choice when it begins. We will JIP it, join it in progress, and we'll stick with it as long as we can. It's an inspired choice. They kept this secret. They totaled befuddled the Obama campaign. The Obama campaign is now busy doing their opposition research, and the one thing that just blows me away that just makes me laugh, and I haven't been laughing much this week, is that they're talking about how this is a bad pick because she doesn't have any experience. She's got more experience than Obama does! She has more experience running things. She's got a bigger story to tell than Obama has, and she's got plenty of people who will tell that great story of hers. Obama has nobody he wants us to hear tell his story. He has to tell his story himself. I think they've been rope-a-doped here. I think McCain has made a brilliant move. Folks, look what we got here.
We do have a woman on the ticket, but she is a Republican woman! It's not Hillary, and Sarah Palin doesn't have to wear pantsuits, ladies and gentlemen, and her husband is not a crook. This woman's nickname is Barracuda, from her high school basketball days. She takes no prisoners. She's a government ethical reformer. She's been opposing Ted Stevens, who's got problems. Her husband works in the oil business. He helps to create the fuel that Obama uses to fly all over the country. The fuel that Obama says he wants to get rid of in ten years. This is tremendous, and everybody saying, "Well, how is she going to stack up against Biden?" It's not how she stacks up against Biden. It's how she stacks up against Obama. McCain has the experience-vs.-Obama thing wrapped up. "Well, what about foreign policy? She doesn't have any foreign policy." Neither does Obama! Our vice presidential choice is more qualified to be president of the United States than Barack Obama, the Democrat choice. Democrats today are not happy. The Drive-By Media is not happy. They're not crazy about the speech last night in the civil rights community. I can't tell you how much Drive-By Media criticism there is of this speech, from the AP and Reuters and so forth, and there's Tom Brokaw: Democrats, don't be fooled by this raucous crowd, these big crowds at these things don't mean anything, it's going to be forgotten. It already is forgotten, folks. We've got audio sound bites of this that we're going to get to in due course.
I gave up on it with 20, 25 minutes left. I started getting mad, started getting angry, starting shouting about things, and it's the same old thing, I'd heard it all before, and I just gave up. And, you know, watching the crowd and so forth, this is a laundry list of socialist ideas. It's the same stuff we've gotten from Democrats for my entire life. There wasn't any outreach. This is a guy, big unifier, big this, big that, he didn't reach out to people who don't agree with him. This was a campaign rally. Talk about preaching to the choir, what was that last night? There was no outreach from The Messiah to people who might disagree with him. I was watching Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, this morning, and she was talking to some little Obama advisor. And, by the way, did you see they put all the black people up there in the upper deck? There weren't any in the lower deck. He didn't talk about the Martin Luther King anniversary or any of that. Civil rights community is upset about this. But Andrea Mitchell, she got back to her hotel room at two o'clock this morning, and you can tell, her voice is extremely weak.
She got back to her hotel room two o'clock in the morning and ordered some tea, and the room service woman who brought the tea up, Andrea said, (paraphrasing) "What did you think of this speech?" "I didn't think it was nice the way he attacked Senator McCain. I didn't think that's what Obama was about. I thought he was just way too mean." So Andrea Mitchell says, "You guys in the Obama campaign, do you understand how average people might have seen that?" And this guy in the Obama campaign, "Oh, yeah, we're going to track that woman down, we'll track her down and explain how she misunderstood it and so forth. We'll find her," meaning that they're going to go out and try to find this one woman that works in a hotel because they're paranoid that this one woman got the wrong idea. The image that Obama wants to portray, The Messiah, unifier, his presence can bring all people together, he made no effort to bring anybody together last night, just a sad, straight laundry list. Drive-By Media all upset. Audio sound bite number one here, Mike. Drive-By Media all upset when they heard today about Sarah Palin. This is CNN, Ed Henry saying this about Governor Sarah Palin.

HENRY: If John McCain really was a maverick, he would have gone with someone like Joe Lieberman, they had floated that trial balloon of Joe Lieberman, an independent Democrat, maybe Tom Ridge, a moderate Republican, but as we all know, Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives warned that that would lead to the destruction of the Republican Party, would split the party at the Republican convention next week. But in the end, John McCain went with a conservative. So you're going to hear the Democrats try to say, well, this is not really being a maverick, that he, in their words, buckled to the right wing of his party.
RUSH: Ed, you don't get it. John McCain gets it. She is a maverick pick! She is a total maverick pick. We're the ones that have the babe on the ticket, Ed! We have a conservative, real woman. This woman hunts moose. This woman fishes. This woman is an athlete! This is an inspired choice. This is absolutely fabulous. And she is conservative. She's pro-life. Five kids. She had a Down syndrome baby months ago, rather than abort it. I mean, here the Democrats are all upset, the Clinton women are all upset because Obama dissed them and here's the party of advanced causes for women, the Democrat Party, doing all of these exciting things that they can to try to show that they are the place for women who want to advance, and where does it happen? It happens in the Republican Party. I knew that it would be the Republican Party that first had a woman who works at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
Now, let's see if the Drive-Bys contrast McCain's choice of a woman to Obama's choice of a blowhard insider. Alaska is about as far away from Washington as you can get. Obama didn't have the guts to choose Hillary or any other woman for that matter 'cause he didn't think it would sell politically. So now they're out attacking Sarah Palin's experience. They're attacking women. What's going to happen here is, ladies and gentlemen, the Democrat Party and their accomplices in the Drive-By Media are going to attack women when they start attacking Sarah Palin. There is no question the Obama campaign is hurting from this, and it's going to be interesting to see how easily we can predict what they will say about her.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Can you imagine how Mrs. Clinton has to feel today: dissed by her own party on the 88th anniversary of women getting the right to vote to create the American welfare state. Guess where Obama and Biden started their campaign today? Beaver, Pennsylvania. They started their campaign today in Beaver, Pennsylvania, and they put out this statement. "Today, John McCain put the former mayor of a town of 9,000 with zero foreign policy experience a heartbeat away from the presidency. Governor Palin shares McCain's commitment to overturning Roe v. Wade, the agenda of Big Oil, and continuing George Bush's failed economic policies. That's not the change we need. It's just more of the same," said Adrianne Marsh, Obama campaign spokeswoman.
They are floundering out there. We may have wrested the women's vote away from the Democrats with this choice. She is the governor of a state that has just 100,000 fewer citizens than the state of Delaware. Delaware has 700-some-odd thousand citizens and Alaska around 638,000. She is an executive. She has a story. Foreign policy? No foreign policy experience? You know, really. I said this last hour, I think, folks, this is almost a rope-a-dope, because in Barack Obama... Charles Krauthammer had a great piece yesterday. I'm just going to summarize it and put it in my own words. He had a great piece yesterday on the fact that Barack Obama cannot tell his story. He hasn't told his story, other than the story of his family.
His Michelle Obama and two kids family, but he doesn't tell anything of his achievements. There aren't any. He has nobody else speak of his achievements. There aren't any. All people do is speak of his qualifications, and his number one qualification as offered in his speech last night was that he's from the party of FDR and JFK; and that alone is supposed to be solve everybody's problem with his lack of qualifications. Sarah Palin, the governor of Alaska, is more qualified to be president than Barack Obama! Barack Obama doesn't have foreign policy experience, either. Somebody tell me what it is. He has worked in the United States Senate for 143 days. He has gone from community agitator to state senator to US senator with no foreign policy experience, and McCain will trump Biden when it comes to foreign policy experience.
McCain is going to trump Obama in all kinds of experience. McCain has a story of heroism, integrity, and honor to tell. He has countless, thousands of people to vouch for him on it. Sarah Palin has a great personal story, a tremendous American story. You heard it in her acceptance speech this morning, or this afternoon in Dayton, Ohio. We're cutting it up now. We'll have some audio sound bites of that as well. Not only does she have a great American story, a great American family, she has a lot of people to vouch for that story, a lot of people to tell us who she is; about her character, about her dignity. None of these things can be said about Obama. There are no people who vouch for Barack Obama! I haven't even heard any of his Harvard Law School buddies come out and say good things about Obama.
The only people that can vouch for Barack Obama are people he doesn't want us to know that he knows very well and he doesn't want us to hear from: William Ayers;, Jeremiah Wright; that fruitcake priest, Pfleger; and who else? Some of these other guys that got him involved with these cronies in the Chicago world of thug politics. I mean you talking about an empty suit and an empty resume? You know, I got here today, started doing show prep and I turned on the TV, and there was no reporting on this big, bang-up speech last night. I couldn't find it. It was almost as though the speech were just a rumor, and then I started reading some of the Drive-By Media rumor reports on Obama's speech, and blacks are criticizing him, the civil rights coalition is criticizing him. Tom Brokaw is warning these Democrats: "Don't get caught up in that crowd size last night. It's not going to mean anything."
We put together a summary. The speech went 44 minutes, and I don't want to play all those sound bites. I'm not going to play all those sound bites. I'm feeling happy today. I'm not gonna revisit it. We put together a highlight summary of Barack Obama's speech last night.
(playing of Obama spoof)
RUSH: He actually said in his speech last night -- the audience sort of looked a little stunned. He said, "I am my brother's keeper." He actually said it. His brother lives in a hut! On twelve dollars a year! His brother lives in a hut, a shack, a six-by-nine-foot hut outside Nairobi. He is his brother's keeper? He hasn't even sent his brother a "Hut, Sweet Hut" sign to put up inside the hut. If he sent his brother 20 bucks, he's come close to doubling his annual income. He is his "brother's keeper." About all they have to say is, "I'm troubled by her lack of experience." This is going to come back to bite them, and I'll tell you something else. The Democrats are going to send out their liberal women. They're going to send out the Madeleine Albrights. (I welcome that, by the way.) They're going to send out their Jane Fondas. They're going to send out all of their women. I'll bet you we don't hear much from Hillary, and I'll bet you we don't hear much from Bill -- except he's probably trying to get her number right now.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Ladies and gentlemen, the Drive-By Media is very unhappy with this choice. I want to replay for you audio sound bite number one from CNN this morning, Ed Henry.
HENRY: If John McCain really was a maverick, he would have gone with someone like Joe Lieberman, they had floated that trial balloon of Joe Lieberman, an independent Democrat, maybe Tom Ridge, a moderate Republican, but as we all know, Rush Limbaugh and other conservatives warned that that would lead to the destruction of the Republican Party, would split the party at the Republican convention next week. But in the end, John McCain went with a conservative. So you're going to hear the Democrats try to say, well, this is not really being a maverick, that he, in their words, buckled to the right wing of his party.
RUSH: Not a maverick? This is a purely maverick pick, Ed. Who's got the woman on the ticket, Ed? Your party or McCain's party? And Ed, you are a Democrat. You guys need to stop hiding this stuff. You're doing a better job keeping it under wraps than they are at DNCTV, but we all know. They're mad at me or mad because they think I forced McCain into a conservative pick. They wanted a pro-choicer on this ticket so that they could cream McCain.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• AP: McCain chooses Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin for V.P.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D92S1JI81&show_article=1
• National Review: Foreign Affairs Experience -John O'Sullivan
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzVmMGJlY2E5NmJlN2EwZTcwZmZjOTY2ZWIzNzk0NGY
• Washington Post: The Perfect Stranger - Charles Krauthammer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/28/AR2008082802852_pf.html
• American Thinker: The Case for Palin
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2008/08/the_case_for_palin_updated_wit.html
• National Review: Team Obama Lashes Out at Palin
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YzAxN2RjNjE4ZDZkNzc5Y2Q5YjQ5OTkxMjczMTA3ODc=
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
----------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_082908/content/01125111.guest.html
Sarah Palin: Babies, Guns, Jesus
August 29, 2008
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: This is Sarah Palin and her accomplishments. Obama cannot make a speech like this.
PALIN: In serving as the team mom and coaching some basketball on the side, I got involved in the PTA and then was elected to the city council and then elected mayor of my hometown where my agenda was to stop wasteful spending and cut property taxes and put the people first! (cheers and applause) I was then appointed ethics commissioner and chairman of the Alaska Oil and Gas Conservation Commission. And when I found corruption there, I fought it hard and I held the offenders to account. (cheers and applause) Along with fellow reformers in the great state of Alaska, as governor, I stood up to the old politics as usual -- to the special interests, to the lobbyists, the big oil companies, and the good old boy network. (cheers and applause) When oil and gas prices went up so dramatically and the state revenues followed with that increase, I sent a large share of that revenue directly back to the people of Alaska -- and we are now... (cheers and applause) We're now embarking on a $40 billion natural gas pipeline to help lead America to energy independence.
RUSH: She's doing it.
PALIN: I signed major ethics reforms and I appointed both Democrats and independents to serve in my administration, and I championed reform, toned the abuses of earmark spending by Congress. In fact, I told Congress, "Thanks, but no thanks," on that Bridge to Nowhere. If our state wanted a bridge, I said we'd build it ourselves.

RUSH: Sarah Palin: babies, guns, Jesus. Hot damn!
Back to the phones. Chuck in Oswego, New York. You're next on the Rush Limbaugh program. It's Open Line Friday, great to have you here.
CALLER: Rush, it's great to be here. Can I paraphrase Michelle Obama real quick?
RUSH: Sure.
CALLER: "For the first time in years, I am proud to be a Republican."
RUSH: (laughter) Very funny. That's cool.
CALLER: I love it, man. Thank you, because you are in a great sense responsible for her being there, because you paved the way for conservatism to become mainstream in this country, not just you but the other people that are on the radio, the websites, everything. You are partly responsible for this, and God bless you for it.
RUSH: Chuck, thank you very much. It makes me so happy you say that. Thanks very much.
CALLER: I'm so excited about this, I'll tell you. I saw a couple weeks ago, I was so worried -- you know, because my nickname for John McCain is the Warm Beer Candidate, and I was so worried -- that he was going to go with, you know, a Tom Ridge or Mitt Romney. Mitt Romney was my governor.
RUSH: Let me tell you what was going on with that. There are a lot of different factions in the McCain camp. He made this decision himself, but there are a lot of factions in that camp. He surrounds himself with people like Lindsey Grahamnesty, and Grahamnesty was the one pushing Lieberman. Grahamnesty thought that would be the bold pick, or Ridge. The McCain camp does not have any full-fledged right-wingers in it. There are people that are more conservative than they are a moderate, but really right-wingers, there aren't any there. So whatever the message was that I told McCain, if he really heard it -- if he wanted clear sailing and he wasn't worried about any reaction -- he wanted Lieberman, that's what was put out.
Now, I don't know if that's the Lindsey Graham faction putting that out, 'cause all these people were leaking these different names in an attempt to put pressure McCain to pick them, to run trial balloons on them or what have you. But the bottom line is when it came right down to it, after Biden was chosen, you just knew -- and especially if you tracked the McCain campaign the last six, seven weeks. They've done a 180 and they're focusing on the base; they're focusing more on conservatism than they have. You've seen the poll numbers rise. It just didn't make any sense, especially after the Saddleback Forum, to put somebody pro-choice on the ticket. I don't think it was ever something that was really that close to happening. I really don't. It might have been close in the minds of some of McCain's camp, and I think it's probably true that if he could have, he would have, but he's not that stupid.
He's just not that stupid. Regardless the process, regardless how it came out, it's just a great choice here. An absolutely fabulous decision was made here -- and they kept it secret. They brilliantly executed the whole ceremony today, the whole appearance, knocking coverage of Obama's messianic descent from the heavens last night in Denver. They just obliterated it. Obama is nowhere. He and Biden are opening their campaign in Beaver, Pennsylvania, on the day that McCain named Sarah Palin as his vice presidential running mate. Besides that, I don't know if you people were here in the first hour, but we decided to JIP McCain's announcement ceremony today, 'cause it was historic. Talk about historic? We got history, too, on our side!
You get worried when you start JIPing things like this, joining in progress things like this because there are commercial breaks. This is a business. And it's not just our commercial breaks, the local affiliates. In dire straits emergencies, you can blow them out but you have to make 'em good at some point, and that becomes an organizational problem and a logistics problem. So we were keeping our fingers crossed today that we could cover and JIP the McCain-Sarah Palin announcement ceremony and still hit our spot breaks -- and damned if it didn't work! McCain hit the spot break at the bottom of the first hour perfectly. He didn't start the ceremony 'til after our first spot break in the first hour, and he got the announcement done in the second segment, and then Sarah Palin hit the spot break in the second half hour. They kept to the format. They hit the format like professionals -- like the professionals I know that they are.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Mary in Las Vegas, you're next on the EIB Network. Great to have you here.

CALLER: Hi, Rush. What a perfect ending to the Democrats' convention. I am so excited about this woman. I jotted some things down as I listened to her speech. She's smart, she spoke from her heart, she's compassionate --
RUSH: Authentic.
CALLER: -- she's attractive, not in a superficial Hollywood way, she's just an attractive woman, she's experienced, she's tough, she's comfortable in front of the audience, she was very easy to listen to. I am just like, I think McCain hit it out of the park with this, and I'm just so excited about it.
RUSH: A lot of people are, and I think it's justified. I agree with you. It's a great pick. She's not shrill.
CALLER: Right.
RUSH: She's not going to remind anybody of their ex-wife, she's going to remind men, "Gee, I wish she was single."
CALLER: Exactly.
RUSH: It's good. It's good all the way around. I'm glad you called, thanks, Mary, very much.
Homer, Alaska. This is Martin. Martin, great to have on the program.
CALLER: Hey, Rush, how you doing today?
RUSH: Fine, sir, great, sir.
CALLER: I'm absolutely excited to be on the phone with you. We are all so excited about Governor Palin being picked. We are ecstatic. I got goose bumps.
RUSH: Yeah, so do the Democrats, but not the way you do. I wonder if Chris Matthews has a tingle going up his leg as he listens --
CALLER: He just might! Just might.
RUSH: -- to Sarah Palin.
CALLER: She's done so many great things here, Rush, so many great things.
RUSH: Well, I know. Which one are you speaking of?
CALLER: Well, just recently, she passed a thing where you know how we get our dividends here every year?
RUSH: Yeah. Yes, we know that.
CALLER: She added a $1,200 energy bonus on there --
RUSH: Cause of the gas prices.
CALLER: Oh, yeah, and our gas prices are way higher than anywhere down in the lower 48.
RUSH: What are you paying up there in Homer?
CALLER: $4.76 a gallon.
RUSH: Has it come down any in the last month or so?
CALLER: It came down about ten cents.
RUSH: You can find it for $3.50 in certain parts of the United States.
CALLER: Oh, yeah. And there are so many people here that heat their homes with propane, that's the big one right now because you're looking at for, you know, a hundred gallon, you're looking at $400, almost $500 dollars for a hundred gallons, and most people are using close to a thousand gallons of propane a year.
RUSH: Well, she mentioned this. She didn't mention numbers, but she mentioned this bonus program in her remarks with Senator McCain. It's great to hear from you, Martin. Thank you very much.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• Washington Post: The Perfect Stranger - Charles Krauthammer
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/08/28/AR2008082802852_pf.html
• AP: Analysis: Palin's Age, Inexperience Rival Obama's
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D92S24VO0&show_article=1
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
----------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111309/content/01125112.guest.html
Mark Halperin Swerves Into Truth
November 13, 2009
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Now, you gotta hear this sound bite. Mark Halperin from TIME Magazine (he's their editor-at-large) was on with Andrea Mitchell, NBC News, Washington, on her MSNBC show. And she said, "Mark, you recently traveled outside of Milwaukee under the radar. Sarah Palin went to Milwaukee. Nobody knew it. No cameras that most people know about. What kind of crowd? What was the excitement there for Sarah Palin in Milwaukee?"
HALPERIN: A big event at the state fair grounds, about 4,000 people who paid --
MITCHELL: Four THOUSAND people! A week ago this was?
HALPERIN: This was like a Friday night, I think, one week ago. They showed up really early. I got there three hours early, and I was not the first person in line, by any means. The line stretched over half a mile, and they love her. I've never seen anything like this in my career. The gap between... We say casually, "She has support amongst the grassroots." She truly does, and we'll see it on the book tour next week. People at the grassroots love her personally. They want her to run for president. The gap between that and what people in this city say, people we know say about her prospects couldn't be wider.
RUSH: Now, in this sound bite, Mark Halperin swerves, stumbles upon the truth. Sarah Palin represents the disconnect between Washington and the rest of the country. Now, I don't want to take anything away from Sarah Palin, but 4,000 people who paid 30 bucks. He's never seen anything like that? He's never seen anything like that? Has a never been to a Sean Hannity freedom concert? Does he not know what happens out there when conservatives get together and rally? Has he never been to a Rush to Excellence Tour stop? Has he never heard about one of those? Two thousand in Washington! It was capacity. Right where he lives. Ditto Detroit, all over the country. I don't do them very often, but, you know, Hannity, Levin, the guys are out there. Beck goes out and draws crowds all over.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061939897?ie=UTF8&tag=theofficiw0c2-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0061939897
And Sarah Palin, I'm not taking anything away from her, because he's right: This book tour starts next week and Washington is going to be stunned. The one thing he's really right about is they don't get it. They haven't the slightest clue how disconnected they are from the base of this country. They have no idea in Washington how disconnected they, in the media are from not just grassroots people, but the people who make this country work. Why do conservative books sell so well? Do they ignore that? No, they don't ignore it, because over at the Huffing and Puffington Post, they want the New York Times to set up a conservative-only list because the lib books are getting shellacked.
There are two reasons that a Democrat is in the White House today. Well, maybe three, but I'll focus on two of them. We had the wrong candidate in 2008, and we had a Democrat candidate who just pulled the biggest scam on the people -- the innocent people; the people that are not actively, daily involved in politics. He pulled the biggest scam on them ever, making them think that he was something never before seen: A messiah that was going to come and get rid of all the angst, get rid of all the arguments, get rid of all the partisanship. We're going to lower the sea levels. We're going to be loved and we're going to have jobs!
Everybody is going to be rich and there's not going to be any poverty and so forth. And of course who wouldn't want all that? And you have some guy with some supposed skill at oratory, that's actually reading a prompter who was able to make that pitch. The third reason is, the Bush administration just refused to defend itself. I mentioned that to Governor Palin in my interview with her yesterday after this show for the newsletter, because we were talking about this. In her book she has the same question that I've always had: How do you respond and when do you respond to baseless, totally fabricated, made-up criticism? You know, we had a discussion about it, and she said something. I don't remember specifically what it was.
My reaction to it was, "We weren't helped by the fact that we had all kinds of people in this country willing to go to the mattresses over this, but the administration and leader of the party just did not want to get political, because Bush felt that it was lowering the prestige of the office to respond to all these attacks and critiques," and so therefore all the lies were allowed to stand. The media and the Democrat party did a pretty good job of ginning up even more people who hate this country, who think this country is guilty. Because people at the highest levels of the Republican Party were not refuting it. Their strategy was, "The story will last a day and move on to other things." But if it takes 4,000 people at a Sarah Palin rally for these guys to understand their disconnect, so be it -- and she is going to set records with her book sales. I think she probably already has.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Mark Halperin was blown away by Sarah Palin in Milwaukee a week ago: 4,000 people paid 30 bucks each to see her. They weren't any cameras there so the Drive-Bys didn't know about it. So I thought to myself, "Okay, what is it that impresses about this? Is it the 4,000 people or is it that they paid 30 bucks?" And I started to ask myself, "Wait a minute, now. Did he not see the tea parties that happened in Washington where he lives? Did he not see those?" And I ran the question by Snerdley. "Oh, they didn't see those. They didn't see these town halls, didn't see the tea parties. They don't watch Fox. They watch MSNBC, CNN, but they don't watch Fox. The only thing they saw at the tea parties was a picture of a guy outside carrying a gun," and I guess that's true. It is a huge disconnect.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• Going Rogue: An American Life -Sarah Palin
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061939897?ie=UTF8&tag=theofficiw0c2-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0061939897
• NewsBusters: HuffPo Ponders Separate NY Times Bestsellers List for 'Conservative Blockbusters'
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/11/10/huffpo-ponders-separate-ny-times-bestsellers-list-conservative-blockbuste
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
Here is the MSNBC video link that this article is based on where Mark Halperin seemed to be amazed at Sarah Palin's popularity:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/33913642#33913642 (04:53)
![]()
Palin launches campaign?
Nov. 13: Time Magazine’s Mark Halperin discusses with Andrea Mitchell whether Sarah Palin’s book tour is actually a campaign through the battleground states for a 2012 presidential run.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21134540/vp/33913642#33913642 (04:53)
----------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/content/01125120.guest.html
Rush Interviews Governor Sarah Palin
November 17, 2009
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061939897?ie=UTF8&tag=theofficiw0c2-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0061939897
RUSH: We are going to open this hour with a rare personal interview, a rare guest. It doesn't happen much on this program, but we are happy to have with us former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, whose book, Going Rogue, hits the shelves today and it's already headed for I think a record in sales. Governor Palin, thanks for making time. It's great to talk to you again. We spoke last Thursday in an interview for the Limbaugh Letter, but it's great to have you here on the radio.
GOV. PALIN: Hey, thank you so much, and dittos from an Alaskan.
RUSH: Where are you, by the way? Where are we speaking to you from?
GOV. PALIN: In a hotel room in New York City. I'm going to do a couple of interviews after that and then head to Grand Rapids for the kickoff of the book tour.
RUSH: This is going to be exciting. Are you looking forward to that?
GOV. PALIN: I am so looking forward to this. I cannot wait to meet some of these good Americans all across this country. It's going to be a blast.
RUSH: They can't wait to meet you, judging by the reception you got during the campaign. Now, ladies and gentlemen, Governor Palin, when we spoke last Thursday I spoke to her a lot about the things in her book regarding the campaign. That stuff you'll read in the Limbaugh Letter, and I predicted to Governor Palin then that much of her book would be ignored in light of the dirt that she was supposedly dishing from the campaign. So Governor Palin what I'd like to do here is go some different directions from what we did in the newsletter interview and start with the economy. We have 10.2% unemployment. We see no end in sight. The administration and others are suggesting next year could be just as bad with unemployment going up to 11%. What would you do differently than is being done now?
GOV. PALIN: It's over 10%, and in fact it could be closer to 17 or 18 when you consider those who have kind of given up and are not applying for unemployment benefits. So it's bad, it's really bad and then of course Fed Chair Bernanke announced that there are still weak job prospects for the very short term and probably long term, and that's an uncomfortable place for our country to be. What we need to do is shift gears and really head in another direction because what we're doing right now with the Fed, it's not working. We need to cut taxes on the job creators. This is all about jobs, creating jobs. We have to ramp up industry here in America, and of course reduce the federal debt, quit piling on and growing more. But those commonsense solutions there, especially with the cutting taxes on the job creators, that's not even being discussed. In fact, increased taxes is the direction it sounds like Obama wants to go.
RUSH: You mean that you don't even hear it being discussed on the Republican side or within the administration?
GOV. PALIN: Within the administration, and as it is discussed on the Republican side, Republicans need to be bolder about it. Independents need to be bolder about that solution that has got to be considered and plugged in. This is the only solution that will be successful. We need to rehash some history that proves its success. Let's go back to what Reagan did in the early eighties and stay committed to those commonsense free market principles that worked. He faced a tougher recession than what we're facing today. He cut those taxes, ramped up industry, and we pulled out of that recession. We need to revisit that.
RUSH: Why do you think this administration is ignoring that blueprint? What is their ultimate objective here? They're sitting in the middle of abject failure of their number-one stated goal, and that's job creation. So what are they really trying to do here do you think?
GOV. PALIN: Well, you wonder, you wonder because history proves what will work and you wonder if they're realizing that and if it's just perhaps a stubbornness at this point that they are so committed to going down this road of growing government and interjecting the Feds' control in the private sector more and more, which will prove to be more failure. I don't know if it's obstinate thinking that they're engaged in right now or if they truly just do not believe what the free market, free enterprise economic solutions are that built up this country.
RUSH: Do you think this is going to be a major issue in the congressional elections in 2010, and if so, how would you advise Republicans to pursue it?
GOV. PALIN: It better be a major issue, absolutely. Of course, national security will be, too, and hopefully we'll talk a little bit about some of the decisions being made in that arena that cause so many of us concern but, yeah, the economy, that's what it's going to be because it's all about jobs, it's all about Americans who are hurting right now and what those solutions are that are so obvious, so commonsense that need to be plugged in. And those are Republican, they're commonsense conservative principles that we just need to apply.
RUSH: New York-23 is being portrayed as a race in which you and I -- because we supposedly went up there -- handpicked Doug Hoffman, he supposedly lost, even though that race, they still haven't finished counting the votes. It's two weeks! This is not Chicago. They haven't finished counting the votes. He says he wishes he could un-concede now. But they're trying to diminish conservatism, and I think in the process intimidate the Republican Party from going in that direction. What's your read on New York-23?
GOV. PALIN: I think this is exciting. It's encouraging. No matter the outcome even with his recount of some of those, well, uncounted ballots, it's exciting that the race is going to be even closer, and it's a clearer and clearer picture that what Americans are seeking, even in a district there in New York, they are seeking commonsense, conservative solutions to all the challenges that we're facing. I'm glad to see this.
RUSH: So the positive thing there is that the Republican Party was rebuffed in nominating essentially a RINO, a liberal?

GOV. PALIN: Well, I think what you saw there is -- and of course it's not just the Republican machine, it's the Democrat machine, too. You know, if you're not the anointed one within the machine, sometimes you have a much tougher row to hoe and that's what Hoffman faced. He was the underdog. I think great timing for him, though, to stand strong on his conservative credentials and essentially come out of nowhere and prove that an American without that resume, without that machine backing can truly make a difference in an election like this.
RUSH: Well, now, you used the term, "If you're not the anointed one by the party machine, you're the underdog and you have a tough row to hoe." Based on things that I read, the Republican establishment would not anoint you to be a nominee of their party should you choose to go that way. I'm not asking you the question because I know you're not going to answer and give away what your plans are in 2012.
GOV. PALIN: (chuckles)
RUSH: Do you consider yourself one of these unanointed ones within your own party?
GOV. PALIN: Well, to some in both parties, politics is more of a business. It's not so much a commitment to an agenda or a person or values or issues. It's more of a business -- and, no, I'm not a part of that. So if they're going to keep using that way of thinking in their decisions on who they anoint, who they will support or not then, no. I'll never be a part of that. But hopefully we're going to see a shift with independents, with the Republican Party and the Democrat Party, and we're going to get back to what the issues are, what really matters, and then hopefully we're going to go from there, which will be much fairer to the electorate.
RUSH: All right, independents, slash, third party. A lot of people -- mistakenly, in my view -- are looking at New York-23 as evidence that, see, a third party could actually do well. But that's not a good example because there was no primary there. As you said, the party bosses chose Dede Scozzafava on the Republican side and a Democrat. Had there been a primary, New York-23 would not have been constituted as it was. So what are your thoughts now on the viability of a third party if the Republican Party can't be brought around?
GOV. PALIN: You know, to be brutally honest, I think that it's a bit naive when you talk about the pragmatism that has to be applied in America's political system. And we are a two-party system. Ideally, sure, a third party or an independent party would be able to soar and thrive and put candidates forth and have them elected, but I don't think America is ready for that. I think that it is... Granted it's quite conventional and traditional, but in a good way that we have our two parties, and I think that that's what will remain. And I say that, though, acknowledging that I'm not an obsessive panther, I understand why people -- good people like my own husband -- refuse to register in a party. Todd's not a Republican and yet he's got more commonsense conservatism than a whole lot of Republicans that I know because he is one who sees the idiosyncrasies of the characters within the machine and it frustrates him along with a whole lot of other Americans who choose to be independent. But in answer to your question, I don't think that the third party movement will be what's necessary to usher in some commonsense conservative ideals.
RUSH: Now, you mentioned independents. We need to get independents. Independents right now are abandoning the Democrat Party. They did so in New Jersey. They did so in Virginia. And the White House pretty much proves this because the White House was out prior to the election saying, "Ah, Republican Party identification in polls is as low as it's ever been." Therefore, for Republicans to win these races there had to be independents moving in their direction. Now, I know you're not in politics now but you have political experience. I'm not in politics. I've never gone out and gotten votes. I've always been curious about the professional politicians' insistence that we go out and "get independents." Sure you want to shore up the base. But these magical, whatever it is, 20% of people that are not identified or do not self-identify themselves with either party, what's the way to get them?
GOV. PALIN: I think just naturally independents are going to gravitate towards that Republican agenda and Republican platform because the planks in our platform are the strongest to build a healthy America. We're all about cutting taxes and shrinking government and respecting the inherent rights of the individual and strengthening families and respecting life and equality. You have to shake your head and say, "Who wouldn't embrace that? Who wouldn't want to come on over?" They don't have to necessarily be registered within the Republican Party in order to hook up with us and join us with that agenda standing on those planks. In Alaska, about 70% of Alaskans are independent. So that's my base. That's where I am from and that's been my training ground, is just implementing commonsense conservative solutions. Independents appreciate that. You're going to see more and more of that attraction to the GOP by these independents as the days go on.
RUSH: If the GOP articulates what you just articulated. I've always believed the way to get them... Reagan got them by just being who he was, articulating conservatism. Conservatism is nothing different than the founding principles of the country. Therefore, the key to getting independents is Republicans who can articulate those beliefs.
GOV. PALIN: You know another key to this, too, is to not hesitate duking it out within the party. This is what I appreciate about the Republican Party. We have contested, aggressive, competitive primaries. We're not like this herd mentality like a bunch of sheep -- with the fighting instincts of sheep, as Horowitz would say -- like some in the Democrat Party; where, heaven forbid, you take a stand and you oppose somebody within your own party because it's the right thing to do. I appreciate that in the Republican Party. Some on the other side say -- you know, they're observing what goes on in the GOP and say -- "That's infighting, and they can't get along, and there's no consensus there." No. This is healthy debate, good competition that makes candidates work harder. It makes for a better product, if you will, at the end of the day. I appreciate that about our party.
RUSH: We are talking to Governor Sarah Palin. We take a brief prosperity time-out. We'll be back and continue with Governor Palin right after this.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: And we're back. Our remaining moments with former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, starting her book tour today. Let's talk about your book tour, your career in general, Governor Palin. Who are you trying to reach, and for what purpose, with the book and your book tour? What's your goal here?
GOV. PALIN: I'm not trying to reach the liberal elites in this country, and it's a good thing I'm not trying to, because I'm not succeeding there. Just everyday, hardworking Americans who want government back on their side and I want to help them have their voice be heard. And the book is all about that, and the book is about my record and my accomplishments as a mayor and as a governor that kind of lay the foundation for Americans to see where it was that I was and how I got to where I am. It was just a lot of hard work and it was a lot of very commonsense measures that I undertook politically and practically speaking, and the book is about that, and hopefully people will read it and enjoy it and learn something from it.
RUSH: What's our biggest energy challenge as a country? Do you believe at all or some or a lot in the modern-day go-green movement of solar and wind and all of these nefarious things that really don't produce anything yet?
GOV. PALIN: I think there's a lot of snake oil science involved in that and somebody's making a whole lot of money off people's fears that the world is... It's kind of tough to figure out with the shady science right now, what are we supposed to be doing right now with our climate. Are we warming or are we cooling? I don't think Americans are even told anymore if it's global warming or just climate change. And I don't attribute all the changes to man's activities. I think that this is, in a lot of respects, cyclical and the earth does cool and it warms. And our greatest challenge with energy is that we're not tapping it to the abundant domestic supplies that God created right underfoot on American soil and under our waters. It's ridiculous that we are circulating hundreds of billions of dollars a year in foreign countries, asking them to ramp up production so that we can purchase it from them -- especially from the regimes that can control us via energy, using it as a weapon against us, potentially. It's nonsense that this administration and past administrations haven't really understood yet that inherent link between energy and security. I think more and more Americans are waking up to the fact, though, and we will hopefully see changes there soon.
RUSH: Vice President Biden chided you, saying, "It's a little bit more complicated," Governor Palin, than "Drill, Baby, Drill," which is one of your chapter titles. What's complicated about drilling for oil?
GOV. PALIN: Exactly. What is complicated about tapping into abundant, safe domestic supplies that could provide stability for our country and security for our country? I know Alaska has billions of barrels of oil underfoot, and we have the natural gas that's waiting to be tapped, too; and other states do, too. It's not that complicated. It's political, and that's what is the shame in this, is that for political reasons we're not allowing to tap these domestic supplies.
RUSH: What are your thoughts on the congressional health care reform bills going through the House and the Senate?
GOV. PALIN: Well, we don't really know, do we, what's in that Senate version, the Senate consideration? It will be soon but we have no idea of costs. We don't know how many will be insured. We're waiting to hear that. We don't know if the tax funding of abortions will be in this new version that's sitting over on the Senate side. We don't know if those who choose not to purchase this government-mandated level of coverage will face jail time as punishment. There are so many questions unanswered. I don't like the idea, in general, of the federal government thinking it needs to take over health care -- which essentially this is -- and control one-sixth of our economy. Not when there are commonsense solutions to meeting health care challenges in our country, like allowing the intra- and interstate competition with insurers, tort reform, cutting down on the waste and fraud that the Obama administration insists if we just did that we'll pay for this one-point-some trillion-dollar health care reform package. So lots of commonsense solutions that need to be plugged in before ever considering federal government taking it over.
RUSH: You mentioned earlier you wanted to talk about national security, that you hoped it came up. Well, here it is: What do we face? What are our threats, and are we prepared, or not?

GOV. PALIN: Well, I think domestically a threat that we're facing right now is the dithering and hesitation in sending a message to the terrorists that we're going to claim what Ronald Reagan claimed. Our motto is going to be: "We win, you lose." The way that we do that is allow McChrystal to have the reinforcements that he's asking for in Afghanistan. That sends that message to the terrorists over there that we're going to end this thing with our victory. We need to start facing Iran with tougher and tougher sanctions that need to be considered. We need to work our allies with the Iranian issues, like Britain and France and not allow access to favorable international monetary deals. That's a great threat that I think would kind of shake up Ahmadinejad and get him to listen. We need to look at halting Iran's imports of refined petroleum products. They're quite reliant on imported gasoline, and we need to use that hammer to wake up the leadership there, too. Those are two big challenges that we have right now, domestically and in naming those two countries, Afghanistan and Iran. Two big challenges there, too.
RUSH: Thirty seconds: Immigration. Can you do it in 30 seconds before we have to go?
GOV. PALIN: I can't do it in 30 seconds but just know that... You know, let me put it simply: Illegal immigrants are called "illegal" for a reason. We need to crack down on this. We need to listen to the border states where the governors there have some solutions and we need to get serious about that.
RUSH: Governor Palin, thanks very much. It's been a pleasure. It's been fun. Thanks for last week as well and good luck on what I know is going to be a life-changing book and book tour.
GOV. PALIN: Hey, thank you. Keep up the good work.
RUSH: Thank you.
GOV. PALIN: And all the best to all your listeners.
END TRANSCRIPT
Buy The Book...
• Going Rogue: An American Life - Sarah Palin
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0061939897?ie=UTF8&tag=theofficiw0c2-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0061939897
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
Here is how Rush Limbaugh described Sarah Palin on the day of this interview:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/home.guest.html

Limbaugh's quotes about Palin:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_111709/content/01125100.guest.html
Tuesday Quotes: An Alpha Male in a World of Betas
November 17, 2009
"The Sarah Palin phenomenon is about a vacuum being filled by somebody in a political party that has nobody else speaking that way."
"The hatred for Sarah Palin… I think they actually hate her more than they hate me, and I didn't think that was possible. You think I'm wrong about that? My staff's all saying I'm wrong about that."

That especially goes for a Limbaugh/Palin endorsed Presidential candidate in 2012. If a person like that wins the 2012 Presidential election, then the next sound that you will probably hear on 1/20/13 (the next Inauguration Day) after the 21 gun salute will be our bombs being dropped on Iran, North Korea, and on any other countries who the new President does not like!
This is why I think it is VERY important that as many Limbaugh/Palin endorsed Republican candidates as possible lose in 2010 and 2012 (and that also goes for their GOP primaries against moderate Republican candidates)!
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121809/content/01125106.guest.html
Do We Have the Will to Bomb Iran?
December 18, 2009
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Now, the Iranians are denying this story, but it's in multiple sources here. "The deputy minister, Mohammed Haj Mahmoud, said Iranian troops seized oil well No. 4 Thursday night in the al-Fakkah..." gotta pronounce that carefully "...oil field, located about 200 miles southeast of Baghdad. The oil field is one of Iraq's largest." However, as I say, the Iranians are denying this. Now, ladies and gentlemen, as far as Iran is concerned, let's be blunt here. The only way to stop them is to destroy the Iranian regime, the mullahs, and that can only be accomplished through war. And by war I don't mean ground troops, I mean massive bombing raids intended to destroy every one of the key targets. The question is whether we have the will to do this anymore. Danielle Pletka, from I think AEI, had a column on this in the Washington Post earlier this week basically stating our policy is one of containment and how erroneous and dangerous that is. It's a leftover containment policy, mutually assured destruction that we had with the Soviets.

But these people are irrational, and they are irrational religious fanatics, and the guy running the country, the figurehead, anyway, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, really does believe that he must make the last days occur so that the 12th imam can rise from the well. And the only way to do that is to destroy Israel and Western countries. So I don't know whether we have the will to do this or not. Bush didn't because he was engaged in Iraq and Afghanistan, and they would have impeached him if he tried. Obama's tied up in knots with his own appeasement mentality, his left-wing base. Everything Obama is touching is coming apart. Everything's unraveling. "World Stunned by Obama's Copenhagen Speech," from the UK Guardian, and they are a bunch of commies at the UK Guardian. They're just terribly upset and disappointed. They thought Obama was going to jump in here and save the day and now there are rumors that the UN is asking the delegates to stay on so they get something meaningful out of there. The UN is now denying that they've asked that.
So if we don't pound Iran into submission at some point they are going to get the bomb, they're bragging about it, they've told us, they've shunned the inspectors, and they laugh about it all. If Israel doesn't attack 'em the world will be forever a hostage to an Islamic regime that could fire midrange and eventually long-range nuclear missiles when it chooses. Now, we know that Obama will not take effective military steps to stop Iran so if Israel doesn't it will in fact become a nuclear regime. Obama will not do it because he doesn't like the concept of victory, he's uncomfortable with it, and he'd rather send letters to North Korea and to Tehran and have all kinds of meaningful dialogue. Economic sanctions in Iran will not work since the mullahs and ayatollahs are unaffected by it, they don't care what happens to their people.
The ayatollahs and the mullahs will have all the physical comforts that they want, but -- (interruption) is that him bowing again? I'm looking at a picture of Obama on Fox here. He's either bowing to the ChiCom leader or a vase of flowers. I wonder if they're from Pro Flowers. I wonder if these clowns ordered Pro Flowers from the Rush Pro Flowers website. Anyway, an internal revolution in Iran might have worked, but it's highly, highly unlikely to work now with Obama as president, given his inhumane response to the uprising of a few months ago. So it's a precarious situation. The Iranian nuclear possibility is the elephant in the room that nobody wants to deal with.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Jumping back here to Iran and its apparently inevitable nuclear program, do you remember when nuclear war, nuclear proliferation was by far the most important, most frightening problem facing our world? Do you remember back in the late eighties, early nineties, Phil Donahue still had a show and I remember Laura Dern, the Hollywood actress, broke down in tears on the Donahue show when she was 18. (imitating Dern) "Do you know what it's like, Phil, to get up every day and worry that somebody's going to launch a nuclear bomb, do you know?" Do you remember that? All the hysteria, the global peace marches for nuclear disarmament, all of that stuff. According to the media and the rest of the left, that was by far the most important, most frightening problem facing the world. And now, when we are finally facing a real threat from real lunatics, it's being completely ignored! And instead, the new bugaboo is global warming, even though the worst thing that can be said about that is the world might go up a degree or two in a century or so. Global warming is the big panic! It used to be nuclear war, nuclear proliferation. Now nobody cares.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• AFP: Iranian forces take over Iraq oil well
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091218/wl_afp/iraqiranoilborder_20091218153543
• WP: Why Iran can't be contained -- Danielle Pletka
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/12/14/AR2009121402713.html
• UK Guardian: Barack Obama's speech disappoints and fuels frustration at Copenhagen
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/18/obama-speech-copenhagen
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_121809/content/01125100.guest.html
Friday Quotes: EIB Christmas Spirit
December 18, 2009
"As far as Iran is concerned, let's be blunt here. The only way to stop them is to destroy the Iranian regime, the mullahs, and that can only be accomplished through war. And by war I don't mean ground troops. I mean massive bombing raids intended to destroy every one of the key targets. The question is whether we have the will to do this anymore."
"If we don't pound Iran into submission at some point they are going to get the bomb. They're bragging about it; they've told us; they've shunned the inspectors, and they laugh about it all."
"An internal revolution in Iran might have worked, but it's highly, highly unlikely to work now with Obama as president given his inhumane response to the uprising of a few months ago. So it's a precarious situation."
"The Iranian nuclear possibility is the elephant in the room that nobody wants to deal with."

which makes her VERY dangerous in my opinion. IF Democrats should ever lose power, then Palin's ideologues will be there to pick up the pieces basically on a default basis IF they win their races!
I think it is VERY important that Democrats, moderates, and Independents do everything that they can within their power to try and help make sure that Palin-endorsed Republican candidates lose both their GOP primary races and their general election races in 2010:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2009-12-10-palin-book-interview_N.htm?csp=
Sarah Palin plans to be key player in 2010
Updated 12/11/2009 9:50 AM | Comment
By Kathy Kiely, USA TODAY
"But even as her book sales soar, Palin remains a divisive figure in American politics. In an October Gallup Poll, 50% of those surveyed viewed the conservative Republican unfavorably, compared to 40% who had a favorable view.
In the interview, Palin praised President Obama for the speech he gave Thursday to accept the Nobel Peace Prize. She said the president's defense of war to combat evil could have been taken from the pages of her memoirs.
"Wow, that really sounded familiar," said Palin, a frequent Obama critic. "I talked, too, in my book about the fallen nature of man and why war is necessary at times."
She did criticize the president for his efforts to make a deal on climate change at the global summit now underway in Copenhagen. Though she has seen "glaciers receding" and other "impacts of climate change" in the nation's only Arctic state, the former Alaska governor said "that doesn't mean that it's man's activities — that it's drilling for oil or driving an SUV — that has caused these cyclical weather pattern changes that for eons the Earth has witnessed."
Does she plan to take on Obama in 2012?
"My thinking is still 2010 and helping candidates get elected there," Palin said. "That's what I'm concentrating on."
If she isn't quite ready to run for the presidency, Palin also is doing nothing to discourage the idea. Her book tour has been a "confirming and affirming" experience, she said, adding that she's tapped the same vein of discontent in the country's body politic as the conservative "Tea Party" movement, which she called "beautiful."
"The great thing about what's going on right now across the country is there isn't the apathy that perhaps we had seen even a year ago," Palin said. "All these people who are getting riled up. It's a healthy riled up, too. This is good for democracy. It's people getting sick and tired of feeling disenfranchised and disenchanted with their government, and they want their voice heard."
The political action committee Palin formed this year, SarahPAC, won't file its next public accounting until January. Palin aide Jason Recher reports "a significant uptick" in fundraising since the book tour began Nov. 18.
In next year's congressional and gubernatorial races, Palin said she'll be helping to fund candidates who share her "economically conservative principles" and "commitment to win the war against terrorists." Ideology, she said, is more important than party labels..."
which is why Palin's spokeswoman Meg Stapleton "called (Limbaugh) to say, "I didn't mention Rush in particular. They kept asking me about Rush and I kept answering generically. But they kept asking about Rush and I just wanted you to know." So I soon saw The Politico story and the reaction to it, and, lo and behold, that's exactly how The Politico reported it. If it's a contest between Politico and Sarah Palin's spokeswoman, I will believe Sarah Palin's spokeswoman. No question about it:"
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020510/content/01125107.guest.html
Media Pushes Palin vs. Rush
February 5, 2010
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Let me get something out of the way here before we move on to other issues. Last night, I'm minding my own business around five o'clock or 5:30, already working on today's show. I received a flash message from H.R., chief of staff. Sarah Palin's spokeswoman had just gotten off the phone with him, sort of in a panic. She had said that The Politico was going to run a story saying that Sarah Palin's spokeswoman had ripped into me for using the R-word and she had called to say, "I didn't mention Rush in particular. They kept asking me about Rush and I kept answering generically. But they kept asking about Rush and I just wanted you to know." So I soon saw The Politico story and the reaction to it, and, lo and behold, that's exactly how The Politico reported it. If it's a contest between Politico and Sarah Palin's spokeswoman, I will believe Sarah Palin's spokeswoman. No question about it. Because the Drive-Bys have been trying to create this ever since it happened -- and you talk about transparent? These guys are more transparent in their motives than Obama is, and he's the one that pledged it. So let's go to the audio sound bites. Steve Doocy on the Fox & Friends show this morning said this about Palin and me...

DOOCY: Sarah Palin says she is not at war with Rush Limbaugh over Rush's use of the R-word. Rush repeated the offensive word on his radio show, talking about Rahm Emanuel. But Palin does point out the word is offensive no matter who uses it.
RUSH: Now, last night on MSNBC, Richard Wolffe was the guest. I forget what this guy's famous for not knowing. He's a correspondent. He's written a couple of Obama books or one Obama book and is working on another one. Here's the question he got: "In Palin's statement she basically said calling people that is not acceptable, but she didn't actually say she thought Limbaugh had done that. Am I more or less correct here?"
WOLFFE: What would have been consistent would have been maybe a Facebook entry along the lines of what she wrote about Rahm Emanuel: "Are you capable of decency, Rush Limbaugh?" But the question here for her and for those who love her is this question of, does she have the guts to stand up for what she believes in and no matter whether it's Rush Limbaugh or anyone else. Because if you can't stand up to a talk radio host, then how are you going to confront Putin when he rears his head?
RUSH: Oh, my God! And they want to say that Obama is showing guts in standing up to people? Okay, here's the last word on this -- the last thought on Rahm Emanuel and Harry Reid. I took some liberties. For those uncomfortable with the favorite words of leading Democrats, "Negro" and "retarded," I have a question: Are you comfortable with the words or with Harry Reid and Rahm Emanuel? I am uncomfortable with the men and the manner in which they used these words. Words don't generally offend me. I try not to give people the power to offend me. But Harry Reid and Rahm Emanuel, they do offend me and they scare me and they worry me. These men have cold hearts. They are statists. They have power over all of us. They are trying desperately to exercise that power. In fact, my friends, I am so uncomfortable with these men, I purposely chose to use a rhetorical tool -- satire, s-a-t-i-r-e -- to ridicule and humiliate them. That tool is an effective blunt object in breaking through walls put up by State-Controlled Media to protect Democrats.
Satire!
For those of you in Rio Linda, here's the definition: "The use of irony, sarcasm, ridicule, or the like in exposing, denouncing, or deriding vice, folly, et cetera." I used Harry Reid's words and Rahm Emanuel's words, not mine, to expose and punish their behavior. I used satire to wash their mouths out with soap and made an uncomfortable point. Because the State-Controlled Media would have run any Republican out of office (as in George Allen and "Macaca") if they had been caught saying what Reid and Emanuel said, just as they're trying to run me off the radio for repeating what they said. Now, I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for Saturday Night Live or the late-night comedians to treat Democrats the way they treat Republicans. If some would choose different methods to expose Reid and Emanuel, fine. We share the same goals and both are useful in getting results. Do not doubt me. Aside from the State-Controlled Media, everybody involved got the point -- and so did they. Their outrage is totally fake and totally predictable.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• Politico: Palin to Post: I'm Not Ripping Rush
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32586.html
• Hot Air: Palin Spokesman on Limbaugh's "Retard" Joke: "Crude and Demeaning"
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/02/04/palin-spokesman-on-limbaughs-retard-joke-crude-and-demeaning/
• ABC: Rahm Emanuel "Retarded" Comment Puts Offensiveness in Spotlight
http://abcnews.go.com/WN/rahm-emanuel-retarded-comment-puts-offensiveness-spotlight/story?id=9738134
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.
Sarah Palin knows that Rush Limbaugh could easily take back the power that he gave to her if she ever did or said anything to upset him. Palin would probably be just another failed VP candidate if it was not for Limbaugh heavily promoting her to his audience of many millions of followers which I documented in this post above.
Palin is definitely Rush Limbaugh's stooge in my opinion when her spokeswoman Meg Stapleton, being "sort of in a panic," called Limbaugh to try and head off any potential problems with him!
Note: The "H.R., chief of staff" mentioned at the beginning of this article who Meg Stapleton called is Kit Carson. Carson really is Limbaugh's chief of staff:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Rush_Limbaugh_Show
The Rush Limbaugh Show
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Program staff
Kit Carson
“Chief of staff”. Also known as “H.R.”. Screens calls when Limbaugh broadcasts from New York City, among other things."
Palin needed that "amnesty" because so much of Limbaugh's hard core activist base hates John McCain and they were complaining about that endorsement. I do not think that Palin will get that much criticism from Limbaugh's activist base over her endorsing McCain in his primary race now (the bolding in the Limbaugh article below is my emphasis):
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_021610/content/01125111.guest.html
McCain Goes Hard After Hayworth; Sarah Palin (R) in No-Win Situation
February 16, 2010
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Ben Smith has it in The Politico today: "John McCain's communications director, Brian Rogers, takes a sledgehammer to McCain primary foe J.D. Hayworth," and this is true. Hayworth announced his candidacy for McCain's Senate seat yesterday. He had a speech or two out there to make, and the McCain people didn't like very much about what J.D. had to say. So look at this: Here they are taking "a sledgehammer" to a Republican on day one. Now, McCain never did take a sledgehammer to Obama, who is destroying the country -- and we're going to get a chance now, I guess, to see if the era of McCain is over depending on how this primary goes out there. But I just remember during the McCain-Obama campaign, it was going to be "honorable," and remember Mark McKinnon and Steve Schmidt were worrying about "civility" and "staying above the fray" and McKinnon even said he would quit if there were attacks on Obama by the McCain campaign because of the historic nature of the Obama campaign.

So what we have here, folks, is a teachable moment about RINO Republicans: They will go after conservatives more than they will ever go after any liberal, including ones who are destroying the country! "Senator John McCain has full confidence that the people of Arizona will again return him to the US Senate this year and will work hard to earn their continued support. ... Former Congressman Hayworth obviously disagrees, and it was sad to see [Hayworth] use blatant lies and fabrications to attack Senator McCain when he 'officially' entered the race for US Senate today. ... Mr. Hayworth falsely said [blah, blah]. Mr. Hayworth falsely said [blah, blah]. Mr. Hayworth falsely said [blah, blah]. Mr. Hayworth falsely said [blah, blah, blah, blah]. ... One would think that when asking Arizonans to entrust him to represent them in the US Senate, Mr. Hayworth would have the decency to at least respect them enough to tell the truth.
"Instead, Mr. Hayworth has started his campaign with a litany of lies. Sorry J.D., the people of Arizona aren't stupid. They're on to you." This is McCain's spokesman! "Mr. Hayworth has obviously resorted to lies and distortion today because he has no record of his own to stand on." Now, this is a great line coming out of the campaign McCain. Why the hell didn't they use it against Obama? Why DON'T they use it against Obama? Talk about no record of his own to stand on! He was a community agitator. He had a five-minute career. (angry McCain impression) "That's right, Limbaugh! That's right! But we were running an honorable campaign, something you wouldn't understand. See? See!" I guess not. But the honorable campaign was designed to lose. But I just wanted to point out here, folks, how RINO-type Republicans will go after conservatives. I mean, it's like nothing you've ever seen, but they wouldn't go after Democrats this way, and they wouldn't go after a president who's literally destroying the US private sector this way. I'm just pointing it out. Just saying it.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: Victor in Boca Raton, Florida, I'm glad you waited, sir. You're on the EIB Network. Hi.
CALLER: Great. Hello, Mr. Limbaugh. Mega dittos to you from your fans at the Free Republic.
RUSH: Thank you, sir, very much.
CALLER: Sir, I would like to hear your opinion on Sarah Palin's endorsement and campaigning for John McCain. Thank you, sir.
RUSH: Well, I've been waiting for this question to come up, and I see there's a story out there today that Joe the Plumber says that he cannot and will not support Sarah Palin because of her endorsement of McCain. It is problematic, but you know what's going on here. She's a Republican. She's not a tea partier, she's not a third party person. She's a Republican. McCain picked her. No matter what has been written about how she wasn't supported by some people, I think -- and I'm not coping out here -- I just think I understand the reality of the circumstance. Maybe she coulda stood mute and not said anything but it would have really, really caused some problems in the other direction for her if she had not endorsed McCain. She's in a no-win in this situation as far as I can tell. I'll have more when we come back.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: I haven't forgotten about Sarah Palin and McCain, I'm not avoiding this. Folks, I'll say again, Sarah Palin is not a tea partier, she spoke there, but she is a Republican, and I've interviewed her a couple times for my newsletter and the radio show, but I haven't gotten into any of this kind of thing. We talked about her bio and her book. So my guess is as good as yours. But I think if she's going to have a political career, it's going to have a big capital R next to her name, not a capital TP or some other party, not third party. She's going to go Republican. And there are just rules. Politics is repulsive to a lot of people for a lot of different reasons, but the one thing that she knows -- I mean, you've seen the story about how she went into Daytona and totally took over the place. Danica Patrick who?
Sarah Palin went in there and was mobbed at the Daytona 500 on Sunday. She was in there to speak I think to the Daytona Chamber of Commerce on Monday, and she went into the drivers meeting before the race on Sunday and got standing O's from everybody on every crew. She could not get out of there, signing autographs, and there's one person that made that happen, and that's John McCain. Despite whatever happened during the campaign to belittle her and closed budget and all that stuff, one thing she knows is that nobody would know any more about her than they knew before McCain picked her were it not for the fact that he picked her. You remember how upset everybody got at George W. Bush back when Specter was still a Republican, was running in the primary against Pat Toomey, and Specter was a Republican disaster, but Bush is out there endorsing him and raising money and I think he did a couple campaign appearances, and people: "What the hell is this? Why didn't he get behind Toomey? Where are the conservatives?" It is a problem in a lot of people's views. This is just how parties work.
This is why, folks, the tea party movement must stay oriented on reclaiming the Republican Party and not going third party, but reclaiming it, and then establishing a new set of principles here that rewards conservatism first, foremost, and down the line. It's going to be a slow evolutionary process because the RINOs are entrenched in this party, and a lot of them are very wealthy, personally and corporately. And they're not going to give up the power that they've got easily. It's going to be an ongoing battle. We've talked about this battle for two years. As conservatives you and I know that we're persona non grata in the RINO Republican Party and in the liberal Republican Party, the New York elitist, Washington corridor Republican Party. We know those are the people saying the era of Reagan is over. They're the ones that didn't like Reagan in the first place. He was embarrassing, they didn't like abortion. It boils down to the social issues with these people.
There's this new group of Republicans called the Mount Vernon group, and they're coming out with position papers on stuff. The Republican Party is fighting the tea party people now for control of the party, there's a big battle going on. And I think personally four or five of these very prominent members of this Mount Vernon group said, "I'm not joining if the social issues are going to be part of our mission statement, I don't want any part of it," meaning they don't want this party having a thing to say about any social issue, not just abortion, but anything else that's cultural. They want it to remain fiscal and political only, not cultural. So the battle is going to be raging. And I hate to put words in Sarah Palin's mouth because I'm just guessing and I'm neither defending nor criticizing, I'm just observing and I think I understand why she's doing this. I don't think in her mind she has a choice. She wouldn't be who she is, she wouldn't have all of this opportunity in front of her had McCain not chosen her. So this is the obligatory payback and I think after this it's over.

This is the right thing being done that is required, given circumstances, and then don't talk about it anymore, don't go into any appearances, don't do that, just do the endorsement and move on. And we'll see if I'm right. Usually am. But I haven't spoken to her about this, so I apologize if I've got this all wrong, I'm not trying to put words in her mouth, I was asked what I think about it and that's what I think about it. And, frankly, one more thing, it doesn't matter. Her endorsement of McCain doesn't dampen anything I think about her. It has nothing to do with it. This is issues, issues, issues to me and look for consistency on that side. But, you know, I'm not kingmaker, I even feel a little strange here saying, "I'm going to be watching." I'm just a guy on the radio telling you what I think about it every day, and that's what I'm doing here. Snerdley, would you get the smirk off your face? You wouldn't even let me try to be humble!
BREAK TRANSCIRPT
RUSH: You also have to think of something else here, folks. Imagine if Sarah Palin had not endorsed McCain. Can you imagine the media field day with the following: "Oh, wait a minute! Governor Palin, he's good enough to be president -- he's good enough for you to be his vice presidential running mate -- but he's not good enough to be Senator from Arizona?" Can you imagine what they'd do? By the way, did anybody who seriously read her book know that she would do this? She doesn't have one bad thing personally to say about McCain in her book. With all of the record straight that she did vis-a-vis the McCain campaign and some of the staff, every comment she made about McCain in her book was positive. But I shudder to think what woulda happened if she'd endorsed somebody besides McCain and the media gets on this.
"Oh, yeah! He's good enough to be president, but not good enough to be Senator from Arizona." You know, loyalty is loyalty, and sometimes people want ideologue purity over loyalty and not realizing that loyalty is actually part of a party. By the way, Joe the Plumber has backed off, too. At BigGovernment.com, Joe the Plumber says he shouldn't have said what he said about Palin, that he likes her and thinks that she'd make a good president. Hillary Clinton has said that if Palin's elected president she's going to be visiting Canada a lot more, which is where Clinton's girlfriend is. So there could be a double meaning there. But that's not a bad notion, Hillary in Canada a lot.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• Politico: McCain on Hayworth: 'Litany of Lies' - Ben Smith
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0210/McCain_on_Hayworth_Litany_of_lies.html
• American Thinker: McCain and Hayworth: Tale of the Tape
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/02/mccain_and_hayworth_tale_of_th.html
• BigGovernment: Setting the Record Straightby - Joe 'The Plumber' Wurzelbacher
http://biggovernment.com/jwurzelbacher/2010/02/16/joe-the-plumber-setting-the-record-straight/
• National Review: Palin endures - Jay Nordlinger
http://article.nationalreview.com/425104/palin-endures-c/jay-nordlinger
• American Thinker: Gentlemen, Start Your Engines -- Quickly!
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/02/16/gentlemen-start-your-engines-q
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.


when even well known Republican commentators like Peggy Noonan and Charles Krauthammer criticized Palin for saying that. Only a mindless stooge (which is what I definitely think that Sarah Palin is) could say something as wrong and as stupid as this in my opinion:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_081309/content/01125108.guest.html
Palin is Dead Right on Death Panels
August 13, 2009
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: These are death panels, by the way. In Levin's book, Liberty and Tyranny, let me quote: "Barbara Wagner was diagnosed with a recurrence of lung cancer. Her doctors recommended a specific drug to help prolong and improve the quality of her life.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1416562850?ie=UTF8&tag=theoffiwebs0d-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1416562850
http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin?v=app_2347471856&viewas=6190&ref=search#/note.php?note_id=116471698434
http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin?v=app_2347471856&viewas=6190&ref=search#/note.php?note_id=116471698434
"However, Barbara is a resident of Oregon and therefore, part of the state-run Oregon Health Plan. The state refused Barbara Wagner's request for the drug since it doesn't cover drugs that are meant to prolong the life of individuals with advanced cancer. After all, when the Oregon Health Plan was established in 1994 it 'was expressly intended to ration health care'" to save money. "But Oregon also has legalized assisted suicide, and in an unsigned letter from the state, Barbara was informed that the health plan would pay to cover the costs of a doctor to help her kill herself," but not give her the drug to prolong her life. She was not ready to have herself killed. "However, it seemed she had reached a dead end until a pharmaceutical company that invented the drug learned about her case and stepped in to provide Barbara with the drug free of charge."
We already have Obamacare in several states. These death panels that -- and, "Sarah Palin Doubles Down on 'Death Panels,'" according to The Politico. She's now defended her claim that the Democratic health care proposal would create 'death panels' in a statement Wednesday night slamming" Obama. If you go to her Facebook page and you look at the notes and you look at the things she wrote about death panels, it would seem to me that all of the inside-the-Beltway elites -- from Peggy Noonan to Mort Kondracke to Charles Krauthammer to whoever the hell else -- said (mocking voice), "She needs to educate herself on the issues! She needs to become more sophisticated. She needs to do some homework!
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0809/26078.html
Sarah Palin doubles down on 'death panels'
By ANDY BARR | 8/13/09 7:05 AM EST
It seems to me if you go to her Facebook, she's done some homework on this health care bill. She's become an expert on Section 1233. Politico writes about she's "doubling down." She's not backing down. She is doubling down, and this has got the White House in a defensive tizzy. But I would suggest that anybody who doubts her intellectual heft or her ability to learn and study, go to her Facebook page and look at the notes that she's taken. It's right there, the study that she has done and engaged in, in order to learn about section 1233. Now, this story in Oregon involving Barbara Wagner, again it's in Mark Levin's book Liberty and Tyranny, illustrates that they are death panels. And it's a great way to phrase this end-of-life counseling and so forth. There's no question that these expenses, these end-of-life expenses are among the most costly, and they will be used to cut costs. But the thing that nobody's talking about is you don't have to be old for them to kick in.
All you have to do is have a disease that the government says, "Eh, it's just not worth paying for this." You could have advanced cancer, you could be 35 years old and they could say, "Sorry," and that's where this is headed. When you boil all of this down, when you really synthesize everything Obama wants to do down, it comes down to this: He wants to put your medical records on Google; wants to have everybody be able to see them. He wants to take over control from Congress of deciding what Medicare and Medicaid will spend, on who, and on what. He wants the White House, he wants the executive branch, to be making determinations of who lives and who dies -- which will lead to the regulation of every lifestyle or life in this country. When you boil down all the legalese and all of these 1,017 pages, you boil it down, Obama wants to run it. And the reason that he's not being specific about his plan is purely politically strategic, right out of the brain of David Axelrod -- and I'll explain that to you and get to these funny audio sound bites when we come back.
BREAK TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: All right, Lisa Murkowski, Alaska senator, at a town hall meeting in Anchorage said this about the health care debate.
MURKOWSKI: It does us no good to incite fear in people by saying that these end-of-life provisions, these death panels. I'm so... Quite honestly, I'm so offended at that terminology because it absolutely isn't. There is no reason to gin up fear in the American public by saying things that are not included in the bill.
RUSH: Now, here again, this is why you members of Congress are in deep trouble. End-of-life provisions are in the bill, and it's simply a matter of logic. We don't treat the healthy! The healthy have very little money spent on them for their health care 'cause they're not sick. Only the sick are expensive and if we gotta "save money in health care," where you going to cut? You can't cut money you're not spending on the healthy. There are end-of-life provisions! There can be no other way. And it's not just end-of-life. It's going to be even young people have certain diseases that are determined to be not worth treating because of cost or the stage of the disease, the government's going to be in the position to decide who gets treatment and who doesn't. And, Senator Murkowski, it is irresponsible of you not be informed enough to understand this. Your constituents understand it. They have read it.
END TRANSCRIPT
Read the Background Material...
• Facebook: About Those 'Death Panels' - Sarah Palin
http://www.facebook.com/sarahpalin?v=app_2347471856&viewas=6190&ref=search#/note.php?note_id=116471698434
• Sweetness & Light: What The Health Care Bill Actually Says
http://sweetness-light.com/archive/what-the-health-care-bill-actually-says
• HotAir: Obama Ought to Read Section 1233 of HR 3200
http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2009/08/13/obama-ought-to-read-section-1233-of-hr-3200/
• Classical Ideals: The Health Care Bill: What HR 3200, 'America's Affordable Health Choices Act of 2009' Says- John David Lewis
http://www.classicalideals.com/HR3200.htm
• AP: Murkowski: No Need To Lie About Health Care Bill
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gPQKN26HCWfPH2a1i0LorK8CG-sgD9A1FMGO1
*Note: Links to content outside RushLimbaugh.com usually become inactive over time.