BIG PHARMA SCAM: Medicare Prescription Part D


| | |


Welcome to 55 and Better

The "55 and Better" series focuses on the issues that effect everyone sooner or later. With that in mind, it is important that we join together in tackling the problems and looking for the solutions as we plan for the future. All of us have inherited a system including Medicare and Social Security from those who have fought the "good fight," now it remains up to us to continue the promise so that the years after 55 will be even better.

BIG PHARMA SCAM: Medicare Prescription Part D

(Survival inside a doughnut-hole )

It's rather difficult to discuss Medicare Prescription Part D since seemingly there are no government or agency officials willing or able to provide a clear explanation as to exactly how the scam is supposed to benefit seniors.

"Cutting drug costs for seniors" is not an explanation is it? It’s a campaign slogan.

How does it work? Is there an official explanation? Why not?

This fact in and of itself qualifies Medicare Part D as a 'scam' in our estimation.

So "scam" it will be for purposes of discussion here. We don't happen to have much tolerance for this 'entitlement' - not lacking a clear explanation for supporting the billions now added to the deficit to pay for it. A deficit for which our grandsons and daughters, and their progeny will pay and pay and pay unto the next millennium. We've been scammed again by this administration, cross-generationally we have, and we don't feel up to being particularly polite about it.

This administration has brought a whole new meaning to the word 'entitlement'. "This is our 'due'...", to coin a phrase from Dick Cheney.

How did BIG PHARMA get past congress?

Was the outrageous BIG PHARMA bill actually passed on the floor of the House? Not as per House 'rules'. Not as we witnessed it, (and we did, thanks to C-Span.) BIG PHARMA was actually defeated on the first vote in the wee small hours, and it would have stayed defeated if not for the work Tom Delay. Delay and his extortionist-henchmen set to work turning that 20 minute 'nay' vote around. It took them three hours in which they resorted to full-blown blackmail! So much for the Ethics Committee, the Rules Committee and/or any semblance of congressional oversight...( or even simple common decency for that matter.) It's simply ludicrous to trust that they "police" themselves in the Peoples' House...but that's a whole different story...for another day...or another series.


Beware the "donut-hole"

Let's talk about the doughnut-hole for a minute. Murky, it is. It's our understanding that the donut hole clause was fabricated after the bill was "passed". The reason being that the cost for the original legislation was misrepresented to Congress by Bush's Medicare lap-dog, McClellan, to the tune of a couple of billion dollars. The donut hole 'deductible', into which any one of us could fall, makes up the price differential between the actual cost for the scam and the cost upon which the scam was "passed". That is to say: after the fact. Was it deliberate you might ask? I'm sure of it, aren't you? So much for knocking the props out from under old-folks-on-walkers, the so-called "beneficiaries" of this pricey 'entitlement' program. According to The Washington Post, this is how it works:

Under a standard plan this first year, Medicare handles 75 percent of drug costs after a deductible until the bill reaches $2,250. It does not kick in again until those costs total $5,100. After that, prescriptions are almost completely paid for. The very poor can get special subsidies.

Oh well, the very poor will get some help. It is only when you see how many will fall through that hole, that the whole story gets told. Citing the same Washington Post article:

Before the program's start, the Congressional Budget Office and the Kaiser Family Foundation both projected that about 7 million recipients would be affected this year.

Then last month, a report for the national Health Leadership Council, a coalition of health care executives, pegged the number at 3.4 million. This month the Campaign for America's Future report put the estimate back at 7 million.

Seven million people, many living on fixed incomes, and all of them needing that medication to stay alive in the wealthiest nation on earth, down the hole. What's with that? Here are a few of their stories:

Retired teacher Elise Cain walked into her Silver Spring pharmacy last week for a pill she takes for diabetes, one of her dozen daily medicines. The 77-year-old woman had paid $20 in June. Her charge now is $175.24.

"I nearly passed out," Cain said.

****

Columbia resident Mary Ann Anderson, 81, was caught by surprise even though she had carefully reviewed the plans. She knew she had to choose wisely given the long list of medications she is taking after having double bypass surgery in December.

"It was a huge success," she said of the operation. "But not having the drugs could kill me."

This month, Anderson went to the store to pick up three refills. With her coverage, the bill had been about $125 a month. Suddenly, it had more than doubled.

"You hit the limit," the pharmacist told her.

"What do you mean?" she asked, bewildered.

She quickly learned. She also learned that the $14,952 she nets from Social Security annually made her ineligible for many assistance programs, including those offered by pharmaceutical companies.

****

WASHINGTON - Mildred Lindley is stuck in a hole, the doughnut hole — "right in the middle of it," she says — that comes with Medicare's new prescription drug benefit.

Just four months into the program, Lindley has hit the point in her coverage where she has to pick up, at least for a few months, the full cost of the medication she takes to keep her bone marrow cancer in remission. As a result, her two-month supply of Thalomid shot up from $40 to a whopping $1,300.

"If I can't get it, I guess I'm here until the Lord takes me out. That's all I can do, because there's no way I can afford it," said Lindley, an 80-year-old from Jonesboro, Ark.
"I'm in the hole all right."

The Republicans now have a looming election-year "doughnut hole" problem. On September 22, people who have been enrolled in the program since January are projected to reach the brink. What will happen then?

If Plan D is bad for the recipients, a drain on America's budget, and not even a successful Republican election gimmick, who wins?


The Success of Big Pharma

According to the Alliance for Retired Americans


The Justice Department is accusing Abbott Laboratories of vast price inflation as part of a fraudulent billing scheme that cost Medicare and Medicaid more than $175 million from 1991 to 2001. Abbott jacked up the price of the intravenous antibiotic vancomycin as much as 18 times what it charged health care providers, knowing that the Medicare and Medicaid programs would reimburse the providers based on the manufacturer's price, according to a whistleblower lawsuit unsealed Thursday and reported by the Associated Press. Abbott, based in Chicago, participated in the scheme because hospitals, pharmacies and other providers could pocket the difference and would be more likely to prescribe the company's products in the future, the Justice Department stated. Other Abbott solutions used in administering IV drugs and to replace fluids in the body also were alleged to be part of the arrangement. "If Medicare had been able to negotiate prices with Abbott Laboratories directly, the government would have saved $175 million on the fraud alone," said Ruben Burks, Secretary-Treasurer of the Alliance.

Help just might be on the way

Democrats on Capitol Hill have called for change. One proposal would have Medicare, not the drug plans, negotiate directly with the pharmaceutical companies; supporters say the savings could help eliminate the gap. Another measure, introduced by Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.) and three colleagues, would waive the premium for any month when a senior lacks coverage.

More Help

Hopefully a Democratic '06 congress will be able to change Plan D to eliminate the gaping hole in coverage, but until then, there are somethings we can do. It goes without saying that we write those letters, and make the calls. We're all getting smarter about that. However, education is the key to success. Staying informed and keeping others informed is how we'll make this expensive doughnut and dangerous hole go away.

Just as the sands pass through the hour glass, our first series blog reaches its end. Please join us with your comments, and especially with your political actions.

LJM's picture
Submitted by LJM on August 11, 2006 - 12:43pm.

The donut hole is something insurance companies have been using with PPOs as well for healthcare. For example, the first $500 is paid and then depending on the coverage a person has, the next $1000 or $2,500 is for the person to pay. In my case I pay my monthly premiums and then face the donut hole, which I got stuck in last year with my sinus surgery. For many people, they are paying huge premiums and can't afford to use their insurance and fall into the donut hole. However, in my case, what I have is better than the medicare plan, because of all the medication I have to take. My insurance has a drug plan that doesn't have a donut hole and with medicare, I'd fall into it for sure. What I'd spend for the drugs during the donut hole is about the same as what I pay in premiums for a year for my insurance, so I'm better off sticking with the group I've got and refusing medicare for my disability. It's strange, but I feel badly for the people who don't have the option I have and are forced to rely on medicare or have nothing. Clearly, part D was dreamed up to benefit insurance companies, drug companies (they have huge profits this year) and push people off their medicaid drug benefit. I keep hearing some people are happy with their part D, but unless they are in an insurance scheme like an HMO with drug coverage that protects them fro the donut hole, can't imagine who else is happy.


Stan4Clark's picture
Submitted by Stan4Clark on August 11, 2006 - 2:18pm.

...what kind of thinking logic second-grade thinking led to the donut hole.

Stan Davis
Lakewood, CO
BE THE CHANGE you wish to see in the world.
If not us, WHO? If not now, WHEN?


Submitted by Sybil Liberty on August 11, 2006 - 3:04pm.

much less see thru, (panoramic view from that hole), becuz they "mis-underestimated" to the 'congress' how much BIG PHARMA would REALLY cost the next generation(s)...brilliant, huh?

The donut hole was never a part of the original legislation they hyped...not officially anyway

What would you do for a Klondike Bar?

Submitted by Donna Z on August 11, 2006 - 3:39pm.

Medicare Rights Center

Myths and Facts (pdf)

Efficiency and competition

“The competition is good for consumers; it happens to be good for our taxpayers, too,” President Bush, Canandaigua, NY (3/14/06).

The drug benefit wastes tens of billions of taxpayer dollars a year and allows the drug companies to continue to charge Americans the highest drug prices in the world. In a free market, buyers and sellers negotiate a price that suits both. Part D prohibits Medicare from using its bulk buying power to secure a better price. It’s not a free market; it’s a sellers’ market.

5~The waste and inefficiency built into the structure of the MMA will add more than $800 billion to the cost of prescription drugs over its first
decade, compared to a drug bill designed to maximize efficiency. The most simple and efficient way to cover the cost of prescription drugs would have
been to establish a simple add-on to the basic Medicare program, comparable to the prescription drug benefit provided by most private health insurers.

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.--J. V. Marley 

Submitted by Sybil Liberty on August 11, 2006 - 3:52pm.

made it imperative that Medicare negotiate drugs as the V.A. does...did I tell you I attended his townhall meeting on this?

but of course, you can imagine

heck even my hmo negotiates drug prices

What would you do for a Klondike Bar?

Submitted by Donna Z on August 11, 2006 - 6:52pm.

I've been reading Sirota's book. When I find the mention of Miller, I'll pass it along.

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.--J. V. Marley 

Submitted by Donna Z on August 11, 2006 - 7:00pm.

Today I read a Kos diary by nyceve. She has posted informative diaries about health care issues including Plan D. Today's offering was not strickly "on topic" but it certainly touches on the horrible situation in America and how Big Pharma is doing its best to keep us there.

Oncologist's Day: Drug Denial

What is especially important about this diary is the comments by those who have first-hand knowledge of the subject.

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.--J. V. Marley 

Submitted by Sybil Liberty on August 11, 2006 - 8:18pm.

"ovary cancer" patient - her oncologist recommended $50 per tablet kytril - said she should have them prior to chemo - just in case. She refused - but her husband insisted that he would not see her start her chemo treatments without them - just in case - her doctor wrote a prescription for 3 tabs to start - just in case - she could always call in for more if needed - so just in case, he filled that prescription.

my friend has 'pricey-good' health coverage, but no go on the kytril - not even with oncologist intervention - you can't get "peace of mind" upfront when you're an "ovary cancer" patient. $150 bucks out of pocket for hubby's peace of mind = a bargain.

Turns out she didn't need them - there is a goddess

...there's more to that story of course, but I can't tell it here

She's doing fine btw

What would you do for a Klondike Bar?

Submitted by Donna Z on August 11, 2006 - 8:40pm.

The tale of the woman who felt guilty because she could have pills while those around her could not. OMG Syb. And then the stories of people loosing their jobs made me wild.

It is not just about having health insurance...in a way, it's about why have it at all. No one gives a damn about people getting sick in America, they only care about the premiums, and profit vs loss statements. It's the bottom line.

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.--J. V. Marley 

Submitted by Sybil Liberty on August 11, 2006 - 9:33pm.

What would you do for a Klondike Bar?

Submitted by drsusan on August 11, 2006 - 9:35pm.

Well, I think I found a way out of the donut hole today for a couple of patients.
My folks with rheumatoid arthritis on self injectable medications hit the donut hole rather early. For example, etanercept (Enbrel) costs about $1200 per month so patients taking it hit the donut hole by two months on this drug and less if they are on any other meds. They then have to pay $3600 or so and then Medicare D picks up 80% of the rest. But for many people, that amount is prohibitive.
However Medicare B covers infusions such as Remicade, Orencia or Rituxan which are MORE expensive but paid out of a different Federal pocket. So I am hopeful I can switch my patients to MORE expensive but covered medications.
What a mess?
Where is single payor health care?

drsusan

Submitted by Donna Z on August 11, 2006 - 9:48pm.

Thanks for finding a way drsusan.

The rub comes when patients come to the donut hole, find a work around with either samples or some other means, only to find that the other means don't count toward filling the hole. One can't get to the other side with paying the fee.

The only real solution is government negotiating drug prices. Cheaper drugs would mean the hole could be eliminated all together.

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.--J. V. Marley 

Stan4Clark's picture
Submitted by Stan4Clark on August 12, 2006 - 2:46am.

The only "real solution" is eliminating the donut hole.

Stan Davis
Lakewood, CO
BE THE CHANGE you wish to see in the world.
If not us, WHO? If not now, WHEN?


Submitted by shortie on August 12, 2006 - 7:51pm.

I cross-posted this (short preview and a link) on Eric Massa's blog:

LINK

Submitted by Donna Z on August 12, 2006 - 8:05pm.

I've decided to link nyceve's diary to Eric's next blog at kos or CCN. That diary knocked me for a loop.

You have not converted a man because you have silenced him.--J. V. Marley 

Submitted by Sybil Liberty on August 18, 2006 - 3:20pm.

GlaxoSmithKline to Reimburse $70 Million in Landmark Settlement (From ARA bulletin)

Pharmaceutical company GlaxoSmithKline has agreed to pay $70 million in a nationwide class-action settlement to resolve claims that it artificially inflated drug prices. The company will reimburse both patients and third-party payers, such as health plans and union benefit funds, who were overcharged for Zofran and Kytril, medications commonly used in cancer treatments. In 2001 the Prescription Access Litigation Project, of which the Alliance for Retired Americans is partnered, filed the lawsuit contending that there is an industry-wide scheme to defraud consumers by charging inflated prices for critical medications. GlaxoSmithKline was one of 19 defendants named in the suit, known as the "Average Wholesale Price" (AWP) case. Some experts view the settlement as a move toward a more transparent system that will prevent drug companies from charging inflated prices that have no relation to the actual cost of a drug. "This agreement marks a tiny step in the right direction to ensure Americans pay a fair price for the drugs they need," said Ruben Burks, Secretary-Treasurer of the Alliance.

 

...but what about Iraq?

Submitted by Sybil Liberty on August 18, 2006 - 3:36pm.

DONUT-HOLE UPDATE 

Drug Industry's Excessive Profits Could Fill Doughnut Hole
A new report from the Center for Economic and Policy Research, "The Origins of the Doughnut Hole: Excess Profits on Prescription Drugs," by economist Dean Baker, finds that drug companies will make billions in excess profits under Part D. Through calculating the difference between the average cost of common drugs used by seniors and the cost when purchased through the Veterans Administration, the report found that for many of the drugs, the prices paid by insurers participating in Part D are more than twice as high as prices paid by the Veterans Administration. Profits for the drug industry as a whole will reach more than $50 billion in the first full year of Part D, according to the report. Pfizer stands to make $1.2 billion off Lipitor and $585 million on Zoloft. Wyeth will enjoy a profit of $1 billion on Protonix and Merck will pocket $1.6 billion from Zocor. The drug industry's $50 billion profit is more than twice the size of the Medicare doughnut hole. On Wednesday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) trumpeted a plan to make prescription drugs more affordable for seniors by allowing Medicare to negotiate for lower prices.

(also from ARA bulletin)

...but what about Iraq?

early-bird's picture
Submitted by early-bird on August 18, 2006 - 3:38pm.

Condoms: a woman should never have to ask permission from her partner to save her own life - www.GatesFoundation.org

 

( probably not true in real sense ) but seems all the creative money people - money managers tend to be sneaky and work for people with bad intentions.... and there are no career opportunities for money people and money managers with good intentions cause can't find work with/for others like them....

they are so good at holding back competition and then scamming the pool/ market share they do serve... and max their profits... not much energy finding creative ways to make money work towards abundance for balance distribution of money - wealth... power corrupts absolutely .... the only thing that even touches abuse of power is creativity and community.... then potential is unleashed......


Submitted by Sybil Liberty on August 18, 2006 - 3:40pm.

that's the only answer

...but what about Iraq?

early-bird's picture
Submitted by early-bird on August 18, 2006 - 3:51pm.

Condoms: a woman should never have to ask permission from her partner to save her own life - www.GatesFoundation.org

 

the HOUSE represents community in theory.... we'll get better at COMMUNITY... that will make a difference... what we suffer from I think mostly now is more than corruption is

integrity and lying.... sociopaths...fiancial rewarded for being sociopaths ... the reason CEO as paid so much is to make them lose their consciences...have to have countermeasure for fanaatic fundamentalists ..they can be convinced of anything they don't care if they are lied to as long as they are told what to do and everybody marches in lock step .....

corruption through the American taliban is a problemoooooo

they are taught to scam anybody who is not a church person or a non believer..... that is killing democracy.. because they are told they are entitled to all the power and money ...... they make the argument that America- democracy is not based on liberalism and secular principles.... they are pushing America is a Christian nation that went wrong because it went secular.... horse pucky.....

the problem with entitlements are the religious and elite kind not wasteful or mismanaged social programs.... in democratic governance..... follow the money...Bush is washing the evangelists is a sea of money under the thinnest guise of BS .... the entitled elite - grassrooting to the entitled believers... that is the germany formula.... the fascists in western hemisphere in recent history ... that they follow as a model.... people are confused by the labels.... and because reality makes them run for denial......

 


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.