Time to Unwrap November
Submitted by 55 and Better on December 2, 2006 - 9:13am.
55 and Better

Welcome to 55 and Better
The News is Getting Better
Time to Unwrap November
The "55 and Better" series focuses on the issues that effect everyone sooner or later. With that in mind, it is important that we join together in tackling the problems and looking for the solutions as we plan for the future. All of us have inherited a system including Medicare and Social Security from those who have fought the "good fight," now it remains up to us to continue the promise so that the years after 55 will be even better.
We at “55 and Better” opened our gifts on the morning of November 8th with great excitement: A Win! Somehow we received a win; in fact we received several wins. Digging through the goodies we now have a chance to see just what this will all mean and what the future holds. Hopefully, our issues will now get better…we like better.
Grinch or No Grinch? At least the Pirates are gone.
First the good news: Representative Hoyer assured the country that any thought of Social Security Privatization is off the table. Say goodbye to the Pirates, this is one program that is searching for calmer waters. Not everything is perfect (it never is), and both Rep. Hoyer and Rep. Rangel are putting a few things on the table:
Raising retirement age or reducing benefits can't be ruled out if the Social Security system is to be saved from going bust, Rep. Charles Rangel said yesterday.
"All of these things are on the table to find some way to make certain that Social Security is solvent," said Rangel, who is poised to take control of the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.
Rangel (D-Harlem) discussed the fate of Social Security - which some have estimated will have a cash-flow problem as soon as 2017 and run out of money by 2040 - during a Manhattan breakfast talk sponsored by Crain's New York.
Any solution will cause some pain, according to Rangel. "If you call tax increases pain - and I do - that'll be a part of the mix, too," he said. "There's no easy way to do it, but it has to be done."
But the congressman also swore Social Security and Medicare health benefits would not be scrapped entirely. "If you're talking about getting rid of entitlements, forget about it," he said.
Okay, so we know that Social Security is being taken seriously, and that the effort will be geared to saving a valuable program. That is surely better than another Bush gift sent to some fat-cats. We must remember that not everyone believes that Social Security needs a radical overhaul. Here’s a snip from the Atlantic Free Press:
As the Bush presidency faces low polling numbers for its foreign and domestic policies, he needs political allies for yet another go at building support to reform Social Security. So we see an olive branch of sorts being extended to the Democratic-majority Congress to discuss Social Security.
The problem with the administration’s plan to privatize Social Security remains what it has been. The program’s finances are sound, on rock-solid ground for the next 40 years with no change at all, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office reports.
A Lump of Coal?
The New Year promises to ring in changes in Medicare Plan D. For the folks who depend on this program, it recommended that you make your list and check it twice:
— For anyone interested in learning how to navigate through the maze of the Medicare Part D puzzle, here’s a quick solution: Go to the Medicare.gov Web site online and glance through the online publication the federal government has placed there — all 156 pages of it.
Since its inception last year, the government’s medication assistance program for seniors has taken a lot of flack for being hard to understand. The length of the governmental guide to the program is a case in point. Seniors who were registering for the program for the first time last year had six months in which to decipher the program. This year, that window of opportunity is six weeks, not six months. And those who wait until just before the window closes will be out of luck as far as assistance for their drug benefits in January.
Here’s a little something that might help:
CMMS offers these ten tips for seniors:
F Calculate your health care costs. Try to figure out how much you paid for medications, hospital bills, doctor visits and other health costs this year.
F Write it down. Make a list of your doctors and drugs as you consider your options.
F Confirm your coverage. Make sure your doctors and drugs are covered by the plans you are considering.
F Do your homework. Consider an insurance company’s financial security, customer service and reputation before signing up.
F Consider different options. New Medicare insurance plans often include health and drug insurance for little or no premium beyond Medicare.
F Be realistic. Don’t leave a Medigap or supplemental insurance plan for a $0 premium plan if you expect to be frequently hospitalized.
F Be a smart shopper. Compare plans from a variety of companies or use a service that can help make that comparison for you.
F Don’t believe everything you hear. Be cautious about signing up for a plan at a seminar that sells only one company’s plans.
F Read the fine print. Always review potential plans’ “Summary of Benefits.”
F Get expert advice. Use appropriate independent resources to help you assess how competing insurance plans may or may not meet your needs.
Josh Taylor, an assistant to U.S. Rep. Chet Edwards, D-Waco, indicated that revision and simplification of the program is high on the agenda of the new, Democratic majority congress. Edwards, Taylor said, tried unsuccessfully in the last session of Congress to address the possibility that Medicare use the same negotiating tactics used with high praise by the VA.
Return to sender: The doughnut hole gets bigger. Bush seems to have slipped something into our stockings, which would be filled with holes if he had his way.
Those grinches at Fox News think everything is working just fine and we owe Bush a “thank you.” The problem according to
You see. We just don’t get all of this competition, and any problems we have are just a mirage. Fortunately, there is a great big bundle coming soon called “The First 100 Hours.” One of the gifts that arrived on November 8th, the one that will keep on giving, is the new Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi. She has plans:
There is a lot on the agenda plate for the new Democratic-controlled Congress to tackle. Years of the Republican Congress rubber-stamping the Bush Administration and selling out to corporate special interests have produced legislation that serves big business instead of the broader electorate. But Democrats want to change that. Soon-to-be Speaker Pelosi has outlined her vision for the first 100 hours of a Democratic Congress, which includes passing the 9/11 commission recommendations and raising the minimum wage, as well as instituting ethics reform to "drain the swamp" of the Culture of Corruption that has plagued the Capitol under Republican rule.
On that agenda is also a desire to fix the disastrous Medicare bill passed by the Republicans which prevents the federal government from negotiating lower drug prices for seniors.
Looking over this year’s gifts, here’s what 55 and Better found: No privatization, an effort to fix Social Security, a promise for a new and improved Medicare Plan D, and a fighting new Madame Speaker.
We wish we could tell you that everything would arrive tomorrow, but just knowing that change is coming may be the best gift of all.

WASHINGTON, Nov. 21 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Speaker-designate Nancy Pelosi announced today that the House of Representatives will open the first session of the 110th Congress on Jan. 4, 2007 and will remain in session for several weeks in January to take up crucial legislation that will address the urgent priorities of the American people. "From economic security to national security, the American people have resoundingly called for a New Direction. It is imperative that we waste no time in addressing the pressing needs facing our nation," Pelosi said. "In the first 100 legislative hours, Democrats will get to work immediately to restore civility, integrity and fiscal responsibility to the House, while increasing prosperity, opportunity and security for all Americans." Included in House Democrats' first 100 legislative hours are: -- Draining the swamp -- break the link between lobbyists and legislation and commit to pay-as-you-go budgeting, no new deficit spending -- Making America more secure -- implement the independent 9/11 Commission recommendations -- Giving Americans a raise -- increase the minimum wage -- Making college more affordable -- cut the interest rate in half on federally subsidized student loans -- Making health care more affordable -- negotiate for lower prescription drug prices -- Ending subsidies for Big Oil -- Giving hope to families with devastating diseases -- allow stem cell research “If you put me on third base I'll take it home.” - Wes Clark

stops calling Medicare and Social Security, "entitlements." We paid into those programs with our hard earned cash. It's an insurance plan and it better not be tinkered with. The idea of raising the age for retirement is just wrong. Read the obits and you will see a large number of people dying all the time aren't over 65 years of age. Some people may be living longer, but that doesn't mean our bodies aren't still aging. Most people don't work in jobs that are like congress or the SCOTUS with lots of staff helping smart older people do their jobs that require almost no physical exertion. The reality is that something like one in four people are disabled before they hit 62 years of age and can't work.

Getting something passed by this Congress and signed by the President is going to take negotiation. You don't take anything "off the table" before a negotiation. Let them talk you out of things you don't want anyway so they feel like they got something out of you. Congressman Rangel is a very shrewd dealmaker.
This was a fun read on some dour subjects, love the gifting analogies!
And that is one of Ms Pelosi's better photos too...
I always remember my Mom opening up her Medicare D information and being reduced to tears -- wondering if she couldn't understand it (A) because it was too complex and poorly presented or (B) if in fact she was losing comprehension skills-- (which she is not)
I will say one thing I have noticed in materials presented for the senior crowd---AARP consistently writes in legible clear language in all it's documentation.
No matter what age the policy holder might be, I think it is code amongst nearly ALL insurance companies to use an incomprehensible garble of legalese and jargon in order to confuse the customer and retain their "outs" when/if the day of reckoning should arrive. Wind? Water? What do you mean?
I once tried to decipher my homeowner's policy and discovered the only protection I was sure of was that if I had any model boats - they were protected from storm damage as long as it was not via lightning. Or something like that. I of course have no model boats. But am considering getting some just so that I might have some recourse in the event of a really bad storm.
Otherwise, I'm on blind faith. And being in a faith based government... we're seeing a lot of blind faith prerequisites these days.
"Trust -- but leave the verifying to us"
excerpt from ARA Friday Alert yesterday, (too late for publication)... "K" street - Dems driving the wrong direction on a one-way street to hell.
Drug Industy Braces for Change
Troubled by the results of the 2006 elections, top executives from two-dozen drug companies met in Washington, D.C. last month to strategize, according to the New York Times. In an effort to stop Congress from letting the government negotiate lower drug prices for millions of Medicare beneficiaries, the pharmaceutical industry has been hiring new Democratic lobbyists, contacting old friends in the Bush administration and Congress, and re-establishing ties with organizations of patients who depend on brand-name drugs. Many industry insiders acknowledge that the House is likely to pass a bill intended to drive down drug prices, but they are determined to block the legislation in the Senate. If they are unable to accomplish that outcome, lobbyists are counting on a veto by President Bush. With 49 Republicans in the Senate next year, drug companies are confident that they can round up the 34 votes normally needed to uphold a veto.
Become part of a progressive grassroots movement! Join the Alliance: www.retiredamericans.org/join
watch and listen...
Hi Sybil,
- The business of America is business, therefore:
- What's good for business is good for America, therefore:
- In any conflict between business and labor or business and comsumer, the patriotic thing to do is to support the business interest and silence the laborer/consumer.
I actually read that article in a George Will column years and years ago. Repeat until nauseous or similarly brainwashed.
*sigh*
Crissie
CMS Ad Deceives Readers
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have placed an ad in Parade Magazine and other media outlets addressing the Part D open enrollment season that ends on December 31. The ad features a checklist where the second step incorrectly states, "If you are satisfied with your current cost, coverage and the customer service you receive, you don't need to do anything." Nowhere in the ad does it explain that costs and coverage have changed for many of the prescription drug plans. "CMS should explicitly mention that many plans have changed and while you may be happy with your current coverage, you need to make sure it will be there in 2007," said Edward Coyle, Executive Director of the Alliance. "The misleading nature of this ad follows the trend of CMS not revealing the entire truth about Part D to the public." Last year, while the Bush administration and CMS officials were touting the benefits of Part D, CMS failed to mention that nearly 7 million beneficiaries would fall into the donut hole. "Part D is still flawed, and deceitful ads such as the one by CMS won't cover that fact," added Mr. Coyle.
Become part of a progressive grassroots movement! Join the Alliance: www.retiredamericans.org/join
watch and listen...

Really great to see a summary of the issues congress needs to get started working on right away.
Re part D--I think Arizona, under its Democratic governor, has instituted a statewide prescription plan that has lowered drug costs and is a single, simple plan to use. (couldn't they just put a scannable strip on the Medicare cards, keyed to income level, for Rx coverage? (After negotiating drug prices, of course. Everyone eeds to remember that 70% or more of the phama research is done by NIH, paid for by your taxes. The biggest expense for pharmaceutical companies is advertising, which imo should be eliminated anyway. Saved tax $ should go to FDA for better follow-up testing of meds.) Personally, I think that Medicare should just cover all health insurance--thatway, for $100-$200 a month, everyone could be insured. Employers should love the lower premiums--and the larger pool would help Medicare offset its rising costs. jmho.
In any case, the Dems had better not cave in to big PHarma. Get some good campaign financing going, and the Dems could be fearless.
The General gets it right.
Competence--What a concept!

We may have some people living longer, but the model body we were issued is the same one. Raising retirement ages for everyone just isn't the right answer to fixing social security. The model body we were given was designed with our parts wearing out in midlife. Paul Brand, one of the most amazing surgeons I ever met told me that in my twenties. My parts were already starting to wear out from working in hospitals lifting people.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2006/12/04/GR2006120400761.html

...certainly needs fixed, starting with the govt's ability to negotiate drug prices. The problem is, big pharma is so powerful, the Dems seem to be backing away from this. can't remember where I read this but will look for it.