All three of these videos are in today's top 20 most watched on YouTube.

Senator Obama says, "We can't keep playing the same political games we always play." What do you think? Will we stop playing those games?

"It is unacceptable for Iran to have a nuclear weapon," says Senator Obama. Do you agree? In this same interview with O'Reilly, Senator Obama makes many other emphatic points. How do you think he did?

Never let it be said that neocons don't have a plan for further empire building in their back pocket at all times.

And never doubt that a Republic administration isn't standing in line to pick that pocket and put the plan into action.

And then there's a weak kneed congress that will turn their eyes the other way while the "wallet" is being lifted lest they unintentionally divert the pickpocket from his goal.

Late last year congress coughed up funding for escalation of covert operations in Iran at Bushy's request.

[I think I found all his comments] 

I'm a bit surprised at the lack of discussion on the topic here, though I suppose the traffic here has probably
plummeted in the wake of the Hillary endorsement.

Here's the Entry Gen. Clark wrote on Huffington Post on October 4, 2007 (same link on Blog Buzz):

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gen-wesley-clark/i-support-hillarys-posit_b_67170.html

So, Hillary and Wes Clark are following Joe Lieberman's 'leadership' in dealing with Iran (designating the
entire Islamic Revolution Guard, a core part of Iran's military, a terrorist organization, helping pave the

Glimmer of Hope for US Policy Towards Iraq and Iran

snip

Wednesday night I participated in the briefing of 14 members of Congress, a majority of whom would be labeled as liberal Democrats by most Republicans (but a couple of classy Republicans did attend that session). The following day I briefed 12 Republican legislators, who by Democratic standards, are considered libertarian to ultra conservative. The topic was the same–Is War with Iran Inevitable and What are our Options?

Via Taylor Marsh..

BREAKING: Clinton to Join Webb on Iran Bill

In March, James Webb introduced legislation demanding that the President seek congressional approval before striking Iran.

I've just learned that Senator Hillary Clinton will co-sponsor legislation with Webb and re-introduce it into the Senate. Exact language isn't available, but this is what Webb offered in March.

I could be wrong about this, but supposedly, one of the arguments for placing the Iranian Revolutionary Guard on the State Department's list of Terrorist Organizations is so the USA can freeze their assets. Well, that's odd, because, if I understand the following story concerning the violent suppression of Myanmar activists, the Treasury Department evidently has the power to do that already:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/28/world/asia/28myanmar.html?_r=1&th&emc=th&oref=slogin

Today's Los Angeles Times had the following story on the front page:

FOREIGN POLICY IS CENTRAL IN 2008 PRESIDENTIAL RACES
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-iraqviews29jul29,0,2858677.story?coll=la-home-center

And it describes a contemporary political landscape that makes a 2008 Wes Clark candidacy highly potent and viable- regardless of any money concerns alluded to on Charlie Rose.