Afghanistan

Wes Clark & Mike Breen for VoteVets: "The helicopters never came"


| | |



Watch the video, leave a comment or a rate the video on YouTube.

It was 2005 in Afghanistan. Marines were ambushed. Men were being hit. Army artillery officer Mike Breen, and his unit were holding off the enemy, but they were running out of ammunition. Breen kept calling for helicopters to re-supply us. But the helicopters never came.

Where were the helicopters?

This is the question the third and final ad of the "Generals" series by VoteVets.org asks.

View the final ad here | Donate Here

Following on the ads from General Batiste and General Eaton, I appear in this ad with Officer Breen to highlight the Bush administration's failed national security and foreign policy. The fact is the Iraq war hinders our ability to fight the war on terror.

Where were the helicopters?

The helicopters, the equipment, and the troops are stuck fighting George Bush's war in Iraq. As I said before the invasion, military action against Iraq would distract us from fighting those who attacked us on 9/11: Al Qaeda. George Bush and Dick Cheney constantly trumpet their capture of Saddam Hussein, but where is Osama Bin Laden?

Congress has to help get the strategy right, so we can fight the terrorists who are the real threat to America.

Donate to VoteVets.org keep the ad on the air.

The President did not listen when I went before the House Armed Services Committee in 2002, discouraging an invasion of Iraq. The President did not listen to General Batiste and General Eaton, as they called for a new strategy in Iraq. And the President is still not listening.

The series of "Generals" ads is making an impact. The voters, the national media, and the local media are putting pressure on the members of Congress who are blindly supporting the President. The days of rubberstamping Bush's failed strategy must end.

In this version of the ad, I call on Congress and Virginia's Senator John Warner to "Protect America, Not George Bush." Blindly supporting Bush's failed strategy does not protect America. The voters need to know the truth, and the more money we can raise for the ad, the more voters we can reach.

Donate to VoteVets.org keep the ad on the air.

The ads are making a difference. The response has been overwhelming, but we can't rest now.

Thank you for your support.

Sincerely,

Wes Clark

What We Must Do Now


| |


What We Must Do Now

Success is possible. But make no mistake. We are not winning.

By Wesley K. Clark | Newsweek International

Oct. 2, 2006 - In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, U.S. forces achieved a rapid, high-tech victory over Afghanistan's terrorist-supporting Taliban government. Five years later, the Taliban is back. But this is a different fight. Not only Afghanistan but NATO itself is at risk.

Fingers are pointing. Washington didn't commit enough forces.

The Europeans are too timid. The central government is weak. All that might be true. But the real problem grows out of how the United States defined its mission to begin with. That was to strike the Taliban but not get stuck in Afghanistan. We don't do "nation-building," American leaders declared, as if that were something to be proud of. Besides, the troops would soon be needed in Iraq.

The fact is that Afghanistan was a tribal country savaged by 20 years of war and further brutalized by the fundamentalist Taliban. Its infrastructure, educational system, agriculture—all was gone. With the Taliban in retreat, traditional warlords reestablished themselves. Vital political and economic assistance never arrived. Neither did a sufficiently strong international security force. Instead, a few thousand U.S. troops were inserted to pursue the remnants of the Taliban and Al Qaeda. The government of Hamid Karzai, pieced together, was never able to extend its reach much outside Kabul. The results today are a mockery of early optimism. Despite the presence of almost 40,000 NATO troops, security has worsened. Opium has again become a major business, infrastructure redevelopment lags, schools remain closed—and across great swathes of the country the Taliban is resurgent.

BOOK CLUB: Come Back To Afghanistan - by Said Hyder Akbar


| |

CarolNYC's picture

I first heard of this book’s young author on my favorite radio show, NPR’s This American Life. Seventeen year old Said Hyder Akbar had gone to join his father in Afghanistan in the summer of 2002 and he’d taken recording equipment to record a radio documentary of his trip. It was fascinating. The next summer he went back and recorded another documentary for This American Life. It was at the end of this second show that I first heard of Come Back to Afghanistan, co-written with radio producer Susan Burton, which details his visits to Afghanistan in the summers of ‘02, ‘03 and ‘04.

Wes Clark in Newsweek


| | |

mad4clark's picture

Wes talks about Afghanistan in Newsweek International. A nice long article which will eventually be posted on SA, I'm sure. Meanwhile....enjoy.

What We Must Do Now
Success is possible. But make no mistake. We are not winning.

By Wesley K. Clark
Newsweek International

Oct. 2, 2006 issue - In the immediate aftermath of 9/11, U.S. forces achieved a rapid, high-tech victory over Afghanistan's terrorist-supporting Taliban government. Five years later, the Taliban is back. But this is a different fight. Not only Afghanistan but NATO itself is at risk.

Fingers are pointing. Washington didn't commit enough forces.

Fighting Dems News Service, Sept. 13


| | | | | | | | | | | |

FIGHTING DEMS NEWS SERVICE

September 13, 2006
Vol. 1 No. 10
Published Weekly

THE NEWS HEADLINES
Cooking The Books On Iraqi Deaths
The GOP's Anti-Counterterrorism Record
How Bush Is Losing Afghanistan
Pakistan: al-Qaeda In, U.S. Out
A Democratic Victory With National Security
Quotable

THE OP/ED HEADLINES
What George Bush Didn't Say About Guantanamo
How Do We Win? Take The Battle To Them

THE ARTICLE SUMMARIES AND LINKS

Update on Passaro conviction


| |

Update:

Passaro seems to have had plenty of help in this. Four soldiers from the 82nd Airborne assisted Passaro, placing Abdul Wali in stress positions and holding him while Passaro beat him. Two more guards were aware of the proceedings. The statements they gave to the Army Criminal Investigation Command investigator who first looked into the case were not nearly as detailed and complete as their statements in the Federal court trial. The Raleigh N&O reported new details in a story today:

The 82nd Airborne soldiers' testimony helped convict Passaro of felony assault Thursday but also raised questions about why they didn't face charges as well. Not only could the four guards who assisted Passaro have been charged as accomplices, but all six of the guards who knew about the abuse could have been charged under military law with failing to report a crime, according to experts and witness testimony.

An investigator with the Army Criminal Investigation Command said he found the soldiers had done no wrong, but it appears based on the testimony during Passaro's trial that the soldiers were less forthcoming with that investigator than they were on the stand.

George Wysocki, a former Army investigator, testified that the soldiers never told him that they held Wali in the "iron chair" position during the interrogations. The iron chair -- an accepted technique among military interrogators at the time -- involves a detainee having his back against the wall and his legs bent as if sitting in a chair.

Wysocki said his inquiry could have led to court-martial charges against the soldiers. Based on what the soldiers told him at the time, Wysocki concluded: "There was no severe wrongdoing."

But at trial, Sgt. Kevin Gatten testified that he and another guard held Wali while Passaro smacked and kicked him. Gatten described the force of Passaro's blows as "just enough so that it was hard to hold him up."

In a statement to N&O reporters, Scott Silliman, executive director of Duke University's Center on Law, Ethics and National Security stated:

"You're asking a soldier to make a judgment call on a nonuniformed member operating ostensibly under different rules," he said. "You had military officers mixing with CIA and private contractors. Each one was marching to a different standard. That might have constituted sufficient confusion in the uniformed folks that they were hesitant to report it up."

Even so, Silliman said, every U.S. fighter, regardless of organizational affiliation, should use common sense.

"Beating somebody with a two-foot flashlight obviously violates any standard of law," he said. "If you think a crime is being committed, you should try to do something to stop it instead of standing by and allowing it to happen."

General Clark's speech at Rider University, part 1


| | | | | | |

Reg NYC's picture

Given on September 12, 2005. Transcribed by Reg.

Thank you very much. It's great to be with you and thank you so much for that kind introduction, Dave, and for that warm welcome. Well,I'm very happy to be here.
I came in from Amsterdam at noon on a business meeting and I drove down from New York City this evening. And, I was in Amsterdam yesterday on business and people were, - we were all reflecting on the fact that it's been four years since the terrible events of September (pause) 11th. Four years. My Dutch friends, my Israeli friends that I was there for a business meeting with were all (in audible). And they were all expressing concern for our country, especially in the aftermath of the hurricane that struck the Gulf Coast and what seems to have been a discoordinated, uncoordinated, ineffective, slow, bewildering lack of responsiveness, which still hasn't been sorted out. But it created an image abroad of an America that somehow have lost the expertise and the leadership and the power to take care of its own people and to deal with its own future.

Syndicate content